« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Day of Rage – When Mayhem Comes For The Saudis?

“If Saudi Arabia were to become unhinged, the consequences are almost impossible to imagine—politically, economically, at every level,” said Ryan Crocker, who was the U.S. ambassador to Iraq until 2009. “But I don’t see it happening.”

National Journal.com.

Saudi Arabia suffers from a despotic, myopic, reactionary government that bases its authority upon a religion that quite literally demands that its followers render all non-Islamic countries either conquered or destroyed. Once we get past these trivial details, The Saudis remain a critical US ally. We currently have no other valid choice.

Despite the fact that The Royal Kingdom of Saudi Arabia officially exists to enslave the rest of the world under Islam, they head up an international organization that provides approximately 40% of the world’s petroleum oil. This natural resource oligopoly forces the modern world to tolerate their ignorance and barbarism. It also forces us to view the worst possible outcome of tomorrow’s Day of Rage Protest with concern and impotent fear.

The protest movement organizing the events scheduled for tomorrow has a list of demands that will not be met as a direct result of the form and nature of Saudi Arabia’s current government. Arabian Business.com (in the article linked above), lays out some of the more controversial demands.

The demands included “that the ruler and members of the Shura [Consultative] Council be elected by the people” as well as calls for an independent judiciary, release of political prisoners and the right of freedom of expression and assembly. They also sought a minimum wage of SR10,000 ($2,700), greater employment opportunities, establishing a watchdog to eliminate corruption and cancellation of “unjustified taxes and fees”. Other requests included rebuilding the armed forces, reforming Saudi Arabia’s powerful and conservative Sunni Muslim clerics, and “the abolition of all illegal restrictions on women” in the kingdom.

(OB.Cit. Arabian Business.com)

To further complicate matters, the monarch and the religious leaders of Saudi Arabia have already offered their predictable statements on the proposed Day of Rage. They have implied that anyone who participates in tomorrow’s demonstrations is a religious heretic.

“Every citizen should co-operate with the authorities to maintain security and stability throughout the kingdom,” warned the appointed shura council chairman, Abdullah Al-Asheikh. Saud al-Faisal, the veteran foreign minister, weighed in: “Reform does not come via protests and [the clerics] have forbidden protests since they violate the Qur’an and the way of the prophet.”

(HT: Guardian.uk)

Thus, the protestors are asking for the Saudi Monarch and his Royal Council to consist of elected offices. They want the judiciary to become a separate branch of government. They want a professional military that is not a private security force for the monarch, clergy reform and furthermore, they demand equality for women.

Should King Abdullah actually wake tomorrow morning, stand smiling on his balcony and announce to the gathered crowds “You guys are absolutely right! Come on in, have a seat on the palace furniture and let’s discuss how to make this happen!” it would be hard to still consider Saudi Arabia either Islamic or a kingdom. Saudi Arabia’s authorities will thus have two options.

The Monarchy could choose to grandly ignore the entire event. The propagandist employed by Saudi state television could report on it briefly, call the demonstrators the Arabic equivalent of “Tea-bagger” and estimate crowd sizes by dividing all reliable counts by ten or fifteen. Anyone who actually got violent or vandalized anything of worth would be carted away to a place God wouldn’t ever want to visit.

We saw how well that approach worked here, where people wanted to reform, rather than destroy the American form Democracy prior to Election 2010. Almost every biasshole, of the so-called journalistic profession, denigrated and constantly belittled the people who demonstrated against US government policy as members of The Tea Party. This backfired, and made these establishmentarians look like the very reactionaries they were.

The other option the Saudis have is to absolutely terrorize anyone stupid enough to actually suggest that King Abdullah abdicate and set up a modern democracy. Those paper-machete Statues of Liberty that got wheeled around Tiananmen Square, they don’t look very lifelike after they get run over by a T-72. The Saudis use cast-off US M-60A3s, but the general message is the same. Nobody has been stupid enough to seriously demonstrate against Chi-Com ever since.

Thus, I expect tomorrow to be a violent wreck on The Arabian Peninsula. The Saudi secret religious police will be vicious and retaliatory against anyone who, by their definition, offends The Prophet. All of which is fodder for the foreign and domestic enemies of The Saudi Monarchy. Any acts of malicious stupidity by King Abdullah’s various coercive forces could lead to the death of Saudi Arabia’s current unstable social order.

The first Day of Rage in Saudi Arabia could be the match that lights the fuse on a massive economic bomb. America’s current portfolio of fail energy policy will leave us totally unprotected against the devastating fallout. GasBuddy.com may need to find a bigger Y-Axis to plot the average US retail price for a gallon of gasoline once that happens. On the postive side, it may be the kick in the rear that America’s Governing Leisure-Class needs to finally realize that we have to become responsible enough to produce our own energy, rather than relying on the followers of a religious faith that routinely prays “Death to America!”

COMMENTS

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    after all, we can’t do new drilling here…

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    he would have to do so in a major way. We would be “forced into war by our own short-sighted diplomacy” as Sen. Daschele once put it.

  • blooch

    “More than 460 people had endorsed the page by Wednesday morning, but it was impossible to verify how many of them were inside Saudi Arabia or whether any protest would materialise.”

    Probably a bunch of sandbaggers like Bill Ayers fomenting again.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    Saudi police open fire at protest
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/10/AR2011031003269.html

  • Marcus_Traianus

    I suppose Obama is now going to be discussing a no-fly zone in Saudi Arabia?

    That will of course be followed by France recognizing an illegitimate gaggle of “Saudi” rebels, most of whom they know nothing about, as the new legitimate government of Saudi Arabia?

    I’ll bet somewhere in that process there is also a complete list of sanctions Obama will be proposing…or was it Hillary? I completely forgot who is in charge of our government.

  • blooch

    without a little gunfire, would it? Or is it a “Revolution of Yearning”? I hope that’s just a bad translation of something. What does that mean? About as much as “Audacity of Hope”.

    Maybe Ayers has moved up from ghostwriting books to ghostwriting revolutons.

  • altexas

    King Abdullah must walk a razors edge on many levels. He is a brilliant man and of good heart. Nice words I know but what I have learned. I traveled freely in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Bahrain wearing a USAF uniform during Gulf War One. It was my job.
    One of the responsibilities of the House of Saud is to allow any and all persons who claim to be Muslim, entry to their country. Every Muslim is to visit Mecca once during their life. Since two of the holy cities of Islam are in Saudi Arabia, the King has no choice. This creates an enormous security and logistic problem. If for no other reason, security is insured by the strict enforcemnet of sharia.
    King Abdullah welcomed our armed forces to operate from his country to liberate his peacful little neighbor Kuwait. We were treated well. The Saudis even opened special savings accounts for US military personnel that matched 100 percent of anything they iinvested during their assignment in that country.
    I am a Roman Catholic and know well the butchery on which Mohammud founded his control of the people. I am not defending Islam, I am just pointing out, what I believe. Most of the House of Saud are of good heart but they have a role to fill. For Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, stability is in everyones best interest.

  • rightwingmom52

    Up to almost 500,000 “attending.” I posted the redstate diary “Gas 101″ on the page yesterday.

  • dog_nut

    nice to get the other side of the story. I was also in Gulf War One. The only liberty we got was in Bahrain. Couldn’t wait to get back on the ship for the first time ever…..

  • altexas

    Each week I flew a group from Kuwait to Al Kohbar SA and then drove them to Bahrain. Beer was available at public bars . We usually hit the ‘White Gate’ bar first but it was much cheaper on station. Loved the pool too. I could wear a speedo in those days. “)

    And THANKS for your service.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    http://www.businessinsider.com/saudi-arabia-day-of-rage-march-11-2011-3

    The Day of Rage was a mere afternoon of irrascibility.

  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

    Now that’s how you prevent an opposition movement.