« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Priebus on Akin: “He Could Be Tied, We’re Not Going To Send Him A Penny”

In an interview for Revealing Politics today, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus was asked, among other things, if the party’s position on Akin would eventually change if Akin refused to step out of the race:

.

The question is: “If he stays in, is your position eventually going to change? Are you going to have to support him? The Chairman replies “No, no. No. He could be tied. We’re not going to send him a penny.” That’s a pretty definitive answer. Priebus also states that stepping aside from the race and letting someone with a better chance of winning step in would be “putting [the] country first,” and implies that stepping aside is what someone would do if they “really did believe this is about liberty and freedom and the future of this country.”

“I just think that the people who want to do something special are always better than the people who want to be somebody special,” says the Chairman.

COMMENTS

  • streiff

    This could be noble if we weren’t actually trying to elect candidates to office…. well maybe the RNC isn’t.

  • emptybucket

    Guess Akin hasn’t apologized enough, or hasn’t crawled on his knees to the GOP establishment asking for forgiveness. What good does it do to even talk about this right now? Priebus should have ducked the question…he knows how to do that.

  • texasref

    I don’t know how to get to my comments or adjust my profile or footer! Please put something on the page if you can’t respond to emails. Does anyone even read these? Your new website is not enjoyable when I can’t find anything any more and it seems the only ones who can create diary entries are the select few. Did I lose my ability to post diaries? What kind of transformation is this, anyway? Could somebody please respond?

  • AceInTX

    The party is ceding this seat to the Democrats….that’s a heck of a price to pay in my book….I keep hearing how we’re supposed to be in the business of beating Democrats…but not if it means supporting someone that has did indeed make a stupid comment….but is still the party’s nominee…

    Brilliant

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    My take is at this point, let the voters in Missouri sort it out. I just don’t see the use of tearing each other apart and finger pointing.

  • annas

    Akin needs to step down. Period. Let someone with a chance run. He can try another day. What a loser!

  • ohiohistorian

    Romney calls Prez 0 “a nice guy, but incompetent”. Is that any stupider than Akin’s comment? THAT will REALLY attract the base. In fact, I think Akin’s was smarter. Think I’ll send him some money. Up yours, Reince. I’m a conservative, not a pantywaisted backside-kissin retard from Washington. God help the Republican party with sorry people like him leading it.

  • votemout2012

    Mr. Priebus thanks for clearing things for us in MO because I have a message for you. If you push Mr. Akin out of MO race I not vote for his replacement. McCaskill actually stands a chance to win now because our party has tried to nullify our primary vote. Make no mistake this is war!

  • Bill S

    Patience. It’ll be fixed and everyone will be able to post diaries. There are bugs being ironed out as we type. … and there’s a “User Guide” being written to help folks navigate the new stuff.

  • Bill S

    Unfortunately I don’t know what the fix priorities are. I do know that everything I’ve seen voiced as concerns here has been reported as bugs (plus others) to the nice folks working on the upgrade. They’ve been working on it literally around the clock. Some things, like putting back the Recent Comments block, was easy. Other things are made difficult by the very complex caching system that’s in use to make WordPress perform and scale to the Redstate level.

  • cbartlett

    Cutting your nose off to spite your face? Ummmm – yeah.

  • Melody Warbington

    Bill S, one comment/problem about the comments column. Clicking on the comment just takes you to the diary, not the actual comment. It’s already frustrating, but on those diaries that end up having 200 or 300 comments, it’s gonna hurt. Something I hope is on the to do list. Thanks, and I’ll try to remember that patience is a virtue.

  • http://colorado.mediatrackers.org/ Aaron Gardner

    Melody, if you click the time next to the comment it will take you directly to the comment.

  • Melody Warbington

    Thanks, Aaron! One down, a few more to go.

  • kipling

    So Priebus is unwilling to support Akin even if it means re-electing McCaskill and losing the Senate. It appears to me that Priebus should be able to forgive a gaffe if he “really did believe this is about liberty and freedom and the future of this country.”

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    Not if they had the muscle to push Akin out, which is what should have happened.

    Unless the Dems totally overplay this – and there’s that possibility – Akin’s idiocy has the potential to become a major issue in the campaign. Is it major? No. But the Obama Media will make it major and not enough voters pay attention so that could have a major impact in any number of races.

  • lineholder

    Which will cause people on various websites (many of them Conservative) to post something along the lines of the following…

    “That’s right. Who do these SoCons think they are? SoCons are just old fogeys who hold to outdated Judeo-Christian beliefs. They aren’t even sophisticated enough to know that politics come first. Why, they’ve even been acting as if they have the right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment of the US Constitution. We can’t have that, no sirree. You’re doing the right thing Mr. Priebus by putting your foot down, laying down the law, and showing them who’s the boss! That will teach those SoCons to stay in their place. We don’t need no stinkin’ SoCons. We’re better off without them”

    Think I’m exaggerating? Then you haven’t been reading what’s getting posted at a lot of sites these days.

    Sad, but I always had this impression that the greatest advances in American society towards the normalization of the mindset that persecution of people who hold to Judeo-Christian beliefs would come at the hands of the left. It’s just been in the past few days that I’ve started thinking maybe I’m wrong about that one.

    Either way, someone needs to get Priebus soon and give him a head’s up.

  • jsbrodhead

    GOPhers talking about “putting the country first”… LOL!
    WHERE’S THE DAMNED BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!?!

  • willik

    Another back Eastie RINO has spoken!
    Granted, Akin perferated his foreskin and the MSM has made the most of it.
    He was inarticulate on this particular issue, which is excuseable as he clarified his position, which was scantily reported on.
    Being a bit inarticulate is the bane of all CongressCritters, Republican and Democrat. For a Republican, though, it is a death sentence for true Conservatives in the minds of the heirarchy RINOs that control the purse strings. Time for a BIG house cleaning at the RNC!

  • skybounder

    I think that Priebus and the RNC have shot themselves in the foot on this one. I say beat McKaskill, dump Harry Reid and get control of the Senate. Stay focused Reince!

  • namohalko

    I heard that Democrats are giving him money.

  • edintexas

    Why would we expect the RNC to do anything other than choose the course that most benefits the Democrats and denigrates the non-Rockefeller Republican who made a mistake? Perhaps I’m having a senior moment and have forgotten all the times that the RNC supported Conservatives in the 5 decades I’ve been paying attention to politics, but I simply can’t recollect any sort of track record which makes this stupidity an aberration.

  • smagar

    There is a difference. Murkowski WON her race. Was the GOP supposed to ignore the fact that she’d hold a Senate seat for the next six years? And, Snowe was already holding a Senate seat.

    If Akin is able to win his seat, I expect the GOP will be much more accommodating. Let Akin prove he’s a good enough candidate to regain at least some of the lead he had over McCaskill, before he inserted both feet in his mouth.

    Priebus is simply saying that Akin needs to climb out of the hole he dug for himself, on his own.

    Akin is now a cause celebre. His supporters can donate online. Let him prove he can raise the money he needs to be viable.

  • smagar

    OK, willik, go online and give Akin the money he needs to wage a competitive campaign in Missouri. If Akin is popular enough, and Caskill/Obama/the national Democrats unpopular enough, wage a PR blitz. Go on the air. Move those poll numbers. PROVE to the rest of us that money spent on Akin is not money wasted.

  • smagar

    Wow, what a pity party! Will Akin supporters hold a mass rally, where Mike Huckabee can lead everyone in a chorus of “Help Help! We’re Being Repressed!” Akin supporters—why should the rest of us give money to a man who’s cratering in the polls? PROVE to us that you can turn this around. Here’s the chance for Mike Huckabee and crew to prove that they can pull a Senate seat out when it appeared lost. If McCaskill is as lame as everyone says, prove it—take her out. Marshal your own resources. Akin’s supporters across the world can donate to him. Huckabee has star power to jumpstart fundraising. If you want to Stick It To The Establishment, don’t let us stop you.

  • smagar

    Ace, it’s pretty lame to shift the blame to the RNC. If the RNC doesn’t cut ties with Akin, the Dems and the MSM will use that as a justification for asking every other GOP candidate, everywhere in the country, about Akin Akin Akin. They’ll use this as a tool to starve the GOP story of oxygen (to paraphrase Kos).

    Money spent to try and save Akin in MO (and appease his supporters) is money that can’t be spent to help Allen in VA or Mandel in OH.

    If Akin is as strong as his supporters say he is, then he should be able to turn these poll figures around. Here is a chance for the “So-Cons” to stick it to the Establishment. Have Akin pull his campaign up by its bootstraps. He should barnstorm around MO. Force McCaskill to deal with him. Let Mike Huckabee prove that he and the So-Con movement can be a force in GOP politics. MAKE Priebus pay attention. Murkowski made the GOP pay attention to her, by winning a write-in campaign.

  • tngal

    Stop being so sanctimonious RNC! On the one hand you tell us to ignore the fact Romney is an insult to all those who are against Obamacare. A year ago we held banners saying Anybody But Romney as high as we held banners saying No More Obama. Now you say we should all pull together and vote Romney because we’re all R’s and its for the good of the country. Priebus, if polls show Akin with a tie or anywhere close, you grit your teeth and send him money. He’s an R too.

  • http://www.mtgriffith.com independentmike

    I agree that Akin’s remark was foolish and insensitive, but I think the GOP’s refusal to help him is a mistake. If he’s not going to drop out, then the GOP should do all it can to help him win. He would be a big improvement over McCaskill.

  • ihateliberals

    I have mixed feelings on this. Akin is an obvious idiot but is it worth losing the Senate over an idiot after all we still have McCain and McConnell in there and they are idiots too, albeit of a different kind. Is there too much collateral damage to other races if we support him just to try to keep the senate? We have enough trouble keeping our people in office why do jerks like this insist on continuing to shoot us in the foot?

  • votemout2012

    Keep on drinking the kool aid. You believe anything the democrat party puts out there. Any rally Akin had put on in Primary have been packed. So keep believing fools talking that the only people supporting him are democrat McCaskill operatives. Akin lead his 2 opponents in funding through the entire primary. This doesn’t include the 8 million Brunner spent of his own money to destroy Akin. Akin was the last man standing. He is our primary winner and unless you think McCaskill should win re-election we had all better get behind him.

  • emptybucket

    not having a pity party, I don’t care for how Akin messed up and then how he tried to correct the mess up. Heard Rove yesterday on c-span and he was brutal in his assessment of Akin’s remarks, this after calling him a good man. There is a part of me that wishes Rove and etal. weren’t so focused on x amount of seats in the senate…I understand from a political assessment viewpoint Akin had to step aside, from a Christian, everybody deserves forgiveness and a second chance, we’d like Akin to have a chance to redeem himself. Just as I have prayed for almost 4 years for Obama to put country ahead of his own ideas, and redeem himself in my eyes. Don’t give him any money, it’s your choice! For some of us we’d like to see the GOP help him pull this off. Akin is a Conservative worth a second chance according to many.

  • Jack_Savage

    Not sending a dime, huh? Hmmm…I think I’ll adopt that position as well.
    Thanks for clearing that up for me, Reince.

  • jdbixii

    He is principled, and they shouldn’t send him a penny.

  • General_Confusion

    Should Murkowski been ignored? HELL YES! She ran against her own party, what the heck does someone have to do the “cross the line”?

    She should have been the junior independent senator from Alaska NOT the “senior” RINO senator from Alaska that reliably votes with the Democrats on key issues on powerful committees that our idiot “leadership” put her on.

    The same is true of Snowe, with her record she should have been nowhere near the levers of power in a key committee, her RINO record was long ago established yet our “leadership” put her a position to maximize damage against our key interests.

    Our “leadership” seems to see conservatives as the “enemy” as
    they sure do seem to embrace liberals more readily.

    Our “leadership” seems to see conservatives as the “enemy” as
    they sure do seem to embrace liberals more readily.

  • camurd

    Hey GOP, how stupid can you be? It is way past time that you “party” folks wake up and start support Republicans that are conservative. Yea, Rep. Akin said something stupid but at least it was stupid right. not stupid left or lib!
    How in the world do you expect him to win the Senate seat if you do help fund his efforts? Trust me that people that will be swayed by Rep. Akin’s comments weren’t going to vote for Romney anyway. A President Romney is going to need every GOP seat in Congress he can get and to throw an elected representative under the bus because he is TOO Pro-life is not just a mistake it is stupid and bad strategy.
    RNC Chairman Reince Priebus are you listening? Let the people of Missouri decided who they want to represent them and if you want to help the GOP how about you start with pushing the RINO’s out of the party? If you need a list please let us know I am sure the conservatives on this site will be more than happy to provide you a list.

  • Lucas Black

    That’s what bothers me – the amount of damage he is doing outside of the state. I support the Chairman on this – not one penny for Akin.

  • Lucas Black

    No – it’s that if the national party does send money for Akin, they then become more liable for his hateful remarks. He needs to get over his sin of Pride and drop out.

  • thethinman

    anybody wonder why “I” don’t contribute to the RNC or any “party”? I’d recommend to all those in Missouri – you stop giving money or support to the RNC – put your money on your candidate. Apparently Chairman (Mao) Priebus will be happy to have McCaskill back in the Senate rather than a conservative Republican.

    Matter of FACT – I wouldn’t give the RNC any of my money anyway – You think you elect your senator and representative to represent you and your state – only to find out that they “OWE” their allegiance to the Party.

  • thethinman

    QUIT SUPPORTING the Republican habit. it’s time to start supporting candidates that Represent you and YOUR state.

  • thethinman

    What will the establishment do when Akin WINS in Missouri and is seated in the Senate? He owes NO loyalty to the Party of political correctness. When the Republicans FAIL to gain the Senate and Obama IS re-elected – what then?

  • thethinman

    What damage is he doing? Name one thing where he is doing damage? Perhaps not the most brilliant statement he’s ever made – but what is his record and where does he stand on the real issues facing this nation? At wost the RNC should put tape over their collective mouths – they are the ones DRIVING the negativity – and at best they should stand by him and get McCaskill out of the Senate.

    this is JUST LIKE our choice with Romney/Ryan vs. Obama/Biden – there is no choice – We desperately need to oust Obama and n the Senate we need to oust the Socialist Democrats. pick your poison if you must – but it’s stupid to continue to feed this diatribe against a good man over just this.

  • thethinman

    was it really a “mistake”? or is it just a politically incorrect mistake? What are the REAL facts about what he said – can it be refuted – or all of you just up in arms because he, like many other believe that there are rapes and then there are incidents like the lacrosse team. too many females think they can play in the shark tank and not get bit – they wear skimpy clothes, drink too much, don’t pay attention to their surroundings, go to places that they should not be. NO, assault and battery rape by a stranger is one thing traumatic – but many of these “girls” wake up to find that they’ve been had – after leading some poor schmuck on – now they want t cry foul – when they essentially invited the sex.

  • thethinman

    QUIT giving money to the RNC – devote your time and money to candidates that will represent YOU and your state and not be in “debt” to the Party.

  • thethinman

    Is he cratering in MO polls or just the national pundit polls?

  • thethinman

    I’m sure you are the one drinking the kool aid – McCaskill at this point wouldn’t give him money – he’s her opponent – there is and will not be another. the time for dropping out has passed. So, Missourians get who they vote for – if they like ObamaCare and trillion dollar debt being passed on to their children and grandchildren – vote McCaskill – if you want a CHANCE to turn the country around, a chance to save your Christianity, you better vote for Akin – It’s MO’s call – the rest of you need to keep your yap shut about it – or just send McCaskill and the Socialist Democrats your money.

  • thethinman

    What was “hateful” about his remarks?

  • thethinman

    IT is a NON-issue – unless the REpublicans – and you all keep pushing it. You ALL seemed determined to blow the party up rather then knit it together. Obama is his own worst enemy – and it appears that the Republicans are taking their cue from him – destroy themselves.

  • thethinman

    This is an issue only if the RNC and other candidates allow it to be – they need to focus on their opponents and their record of supporting ObamaCare, TARP, the bailouts of GM – that’s going down again wanting more of our tax dollars for the unions.

    You folks are so easily distracted over nothing and will let the prize escape if you don’t start behaving like adults instead of small squabbling children pointing fingers at each other. We already have a problem of having to check the ballot for Romney when in fact our vote is NOT for him but against Obama.

  • thethinman

    Cowards are losers. NO one else has a chance to win because it’s too late for him to step down and put someone else in – that time elapsed last Friday at 5:pm MO time.

  • thethinman

    the sky is falling the sky is falling – run and hide chicken little.

  • thethinman

    Nope, who is making the most of it is YOU and the RNC.

  • thethinman

    Time to start a NEW Conservative Party – because it’s NOT the Republicans – they are the fleas on the dogs that are now infesting our government.

  • daddyhink

    The GOP is about to lose Missouri for a generation, not because of Todd Akin misspeaking, but because they act like Democrats. Sick of these RHINOS and Karl Rove telling Missourians what we are to do. Todd Akin will win, mark it down.

  • daddyhink

    I know Todd Akin and he is no idiot.

  • daddyhink

    AMEN!

  • daddyhink

    Do not believe this Democrat stuff. The Teavangelicals are gathering for Akin and somebody is going to pay when this is all over.

  • daddyhink

    Make no mistake, if Romney loses Missouri, it will be because he, the Republican Senatorial Central Committee and Karl Rove ordered a “hit” on Todd Akin.

  • PowerToThePeople

    What Hole? For Pete’s sake, he used a bad combination of words trying to describe a very legitimate and may I remind you, a very socially conservative, ideal.

    The way some of you long term posters are crying here, one would think Akin asked for us to legalize pedophilia. Some of you should never again claim conservatism as your own as you have not shown it here with Akin. His words were poor, but the meaning was very right. You want perfect words, you got a perfect words clown in office right now. If you want values, vote em regardless of perfection. And when the dems tell you to get mad at a statement, you should ignore it as is the case here. We have made more of a big deal about it then they have. And again, he was speaking truth, not asking for more bailouts, legalized rape, pedophilia, let all the criminals out of prison, etc. Simple stated the life of the child is sacred and some claimed rapes are lies.

    All of the anti Akin clowns need to get over yourself, concentrate on beating Obama, and help win the MO seat. Anything less is BS.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    If blamsticks are still working we have a birther.

  • daddyhink

    He’s not getting out … so get over it.

  • acat

    If it were limited to MO, @redstate-3c053666271d0d4f874e31e15fbeb082:disqus, you might have a point.

    Last time I checked the Dems’ house organ press were going after Veep nom Ryan over Akin’s quote. That’s not isolated to MO.

    Look, you’re not new to politics, you know quite well that Akin’s quote will be thrown at every GOP candidate out there. If allowed to appear as the arbiter of party policy, which he is surely not, Akin ends up costing more than just MO.

    If you believe he should stand, then give him some $$$$. I decline.

    Mew

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    Honestly, the people who get air time and take it upon themselves to speak for socons – with no high level challenges – are idiots. And all the socons get the trickle down from that.

    If you’ve got a problem with socons looking like idiots with one tooth you should think about how you get the idiots like FRC etal out of the political picture and let them go about ministry. The organizations are designed for ministry, they should stick to it and stay out of the political realm because they’re not doing “the cause” any good.

    In 2008 they gave us Huckabee, this time around they gave us Santorum. Those two happen to be the least conservative candidates Republicans have run in decades – including Romney.

    Frankly, we’d be a whole better off without them.

  • acat

    Funny, @redstate-f3b7e5d3eb074cde5b76e26bc0fb5776:disqus .. you want Steele back?

    Mew

  • acat

    @redstate-eed77a7948ecd4087ef931b0faac64cb:disqus, just how naive do you want us to believe you are?

    I’ve gotten mail from my liberal Texas buddy linking the Akin quote to veep nom Ryan .. this is not about forgiving a gaffe, this is about winning elections. Plural, kipling – electionS – not just the MO senate seat.

    We can take the Senate without Akin. It remains to be seen whether Akin can figure out how to take out one of the most loathed and weakest politicians ever after – not his gaffe, kipling – his incompetent *handling* of his gaffe.

    I know perfectly well you are not this naive, @kipling.

    Mew

  • jamesm

    Repubs will win the Senate regardless of Akin.

  • jamesm

    Real wordsmith eh? Go back to watching cartoons with your lib friends. Your beclowning yourself with your inaccurate posts on this topic.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    And let’s not forget the “Akin Platform Plank” on abortion. It’s been there for decades, hasn’t ever really been a big deal until now. The Ds will tie it in with Akin’s stupidity and it’s a ready made media win in purple climes.

  • jamesm

    First you say GOP is going to lose Missouri. Then you say that Todd Akin will win. Which is it? HUh? If you think Missouri will vote for Obama over Romney then your delusional.

  • porkandcheese

    Akin’s stupidity wasn’t conservative. In fact, it hurts the conservative cause by dodging a difficult position and instead espousing pseudoscience born from a combination of moral cowardice and misogyny. Undecided women voters will definitely hear the latter, which is why the Democrats have grabbed this issue and forced it front and center. You might not have any use for moderate women Republicans in the party, but they help close the gender gap the GOP faces. With honest, respectful and intelligent discussion, you might persuade them to see your point of view, and that’s the greatest service you can do the pro-life movement. As it stands now, they are legally entitled to their choice. Encourage women to choose life, and it’s a victory for the unborn. Akin doesn’t help there.

  • porkandcheese

    Murkowski’s own party ended up voting for her in the general, and she held onto the seat she’d held for years.

  • porkandcheese

    That’s right. Don’t like the party bosses, the establishment, the GOP even? Find another party that represents you. Ask the Libertarian Party or the Democrats to endorse a platform that opposes abortion in all instances. Start your own party. But you’re letting the perfect be the enemy of the good in the end.

  • porkandcheese

    Akin’s mistake wasn’t a grammatical one, and two full days went by between when he taped the interview, when it aired and when all hell broke loose. He saw no problem with it until everyone pointed and laughed, and then he furiously backpedaled. He just wants that senate seat, he and sees no other opportunity this late in his career.

  • porkandcheese

    The most obvious is Akin has put the MO Senate seat at risk. He threatens the Republican campaign to win a Senate majority. He introduces a highly divisive social issue into the GOP campaign which shifts the debate away from jobs and the economy, where President Barack Obama is vulnerable. He highlighted the Republican platform calls for a total ban on abortions with no exception for rape. He opened up a split in the party between mainstream conservatives and the religious right who will stand by him because he appeals to their martyr complex.

    If Akin wanted McCaskill out of the senate so badly, he would have reconsidered his campaign when the NYT announced she was his biggest donor during the primary giving him $2 million. He might have wondered why she did that. He might have looked at polls showing him behind by such a large margin as to be insurmountable and heeded the calls of the entire Republican party, many of whom he had worked with before and knew him personally.

    Instead Akin sees himself as a child born of rape that the GOP is obligated to carry to term despite the risk it poses to the mother’s life. Akin is the “no exceptions” candidate.”

  • porkandcheese

    MO has moved from solid Republican to a leaner. Akin is a drag on the national ticket, eroding Romney’s once large margin, and he will lose.

  • porkandcheese

    The real Patsy Cline died when her plane lost altitude and crashed worse than the Democrats will this year. She was a great singer and is sadly missed.

  • porkandcheese

    Akin said pregnancy from rape is impossible, so any woman who claims to have conceived in that way is a liar. There you go.

  • porkandcheese

    Please please please push Akin out. If his trolls are admitting this possibility, there is a glimmer of hope. It’s the only reason I bother with these stupid threads. By the by, Akin got 36% of the primary vote, which means 64% of the party voted against him. Many who initially supported him had no idea he held such ignorant views about biology. It’s a small minority who will pout on election day over the party appointing a replacement. That will certainly tighten the race, but the establishment would flood support to the race to send a message.

  • daddyhink

    Response from Akin Campaign:
    Perry Akin, campaign manager, released the following statement:

    “Reince Priebus’ comments are extremely dissappointing. He claims the mantle of freedom, liberty and the good of America, but this betrays his apparent personal vendetta against Todd Akin. He is putting party power and political games ahead of the good of the country.”

  • porkandcheese

    Akin has told the Republican party to go got to hell. He is not running as any kind of Republican but a Todd Akin one.

  • porkandcheese

    As his name suggests, he’s probably drunk.

  • porkandcheese

    The concern troll quoting Clare McCaskill, which tells you everything you need to know.

  • porkandcheese

    No, if Akin wants to thumb his nose at the party, he can another way to finance his campaign. Why does the GOP owe him anything?

  • porkandcheese

    There’s no fixing stupid. Not even with duct tape. Especially when it’s far right stupid. Liberal stupid always gets a pass from the media.

  • porkandcheese

    You do have a short term memory and may even be going a bit crazy if you’ve missed Charlie Crist speaking at the DNC after Rubio beat him. The RNC gave Rubio plenty of support to beat Independent Charlie Crist now Democrat.

  • porkandcheese

    Only someone deluded enough to support Akin would think WI is on the east coast. What’s 2+2? Finland?

  • General_Confusion

    So if a RINO loses a primary it’s AOK to ignore the results.
    Check, good to know. After all it’s her rightful seat, not some
    icky conservative that might be a threat to the status quo. I’m use to establishment types telling conservatives
    to sit down, shut up and mind their proper place.

    But you know what, I’m not too thrilled we have a blue state
    governor at the head of our ticket, you think it would be OK if I started a
    write in campaign? Oh, that’s right, conservative
    in the primary, republican in the general, unless of course it’s a conservative
    then there’s an new set of rules.

    I wonder what that rule would be, oh, I know: Conservative in the primary, never, ever a conservative
    in the general, that just ain’t right!

  • General_Confusion

    @redstate-b859fc50f5e0a7b0f0c5abd8bd964abf:disqus
    So if a RINO loses a primary it’s AOK to ignore the results.
    Check, good to know. After all it’s her rightful seat, not some
    icky conservative that might be a threat to the status quo.

    However, is it possible, just possible that they might of
    actually voted for the primary winner if she had not run. Are Alaskan Republican voters preprogrammed
    to vote Democrat when Murkowski is not available?

    But you know what, some are not too thrilled we have a blue
    state governor at the head of our ticket, you think it would be OK if they
    started a write in campaign? Oh, that’s
    right, conservative in the primary, republican in the general, unless of course
    it’s a conservative then there’s an new set of rules.

    I wonder what that rule would be, oh, I know: Conservative in the primary, never, ever a conservative
    in the general, that just ain’t right!

  • jwwing

    This is not an idiotic statement (see below) and there are many conservatives who agree with it. The response by the Missouri Republican Assembly says it.

    The question given to Senate-candidate Akin was about his stand relative to rape.
    He said, ‘From what I understand from doctors, that’s really rare,’ Akin said in an interview with KTVI-TV on Sunday. ‘If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. But let’s assume maybe that didn’t work or something. I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist.’

    The Missouri Republican Assembly Press Release appears below:

    “Congressman Akin used the phrase ‘legitimate rape’ in the sense of an actual, ‘forcible rape’ as opposed to a claimed rape after consensual sex. He did not mean to imply that there is anything ‘legitimate’ about some rapes compared to others or intend to be insensitive about the trauma that is experienced by women in a rape situation. We’ve all chosen a word with more than one meaning before and we censure those Republicans who refuse to call Biden to task for his statements and yet throw one of our own under the bus by joining with Democrats in this misleading attack with ulterior motives. We call on all Republicans to accept the Congressman’s heartfelt and contrite apology offered by an honorable man. After all, Claire McCaskill supports partial-birth abortion and the Democrat platform contains a pro-abortion plank.

    “Congressman Akin’s comment on the rarity of pregnancy following rape was initiated by, ‘… From what I understand from Doctors.’ Whether or not this is true (and it probably is as indicated by well documented studies) is immaterial, as the Congressman was relating that which the experts had told him. And the Congressman should be commended for standing by his convictions and being better informed than the general public or liberal media. The real issue is that if you believe that life begins at conception and you have taken an oath to defend life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, then you have to keep your focus on protecting all innocent life or risk multiplying one tragic situation into three. (Two for the mother and one for the baby.) The MRA commends Todd Akin for publicly stating that the child should not be punished for the sins of the father. That we are all endowed by our creator with Liberty and the pursuit of happiness has little meaning when deprived of life.

    “The Republican leadership needs to grow a spine and disallow the Democrats, who always support their candidates even when they are wrong, to dictate our stance. By so doing we are now agreeing with the President that forcible rape and statutory rape are identical. While Todd may have been indiscreet in his word choice, he was not wrong in his facts. Todd can win despite this misstep. All Republicans will lose if they continue throwing their candidates under the bus because of a poor word choice. This is the first out, of the first inning in a long three months with many Democrat directed issues ahead. Issues and battles ahead which will be filled with lies and deception, for such are the tactics of our opponents. If we are unable to stand strong for our values it will be the Republican leadership that allows American exceptionalism to become a footnote in history.”

  • porkandcheese

    Joe Miller was not properly vetted and lost handily to Murkowski in the general election. There is a good chance he would have lost to the Democrat, but that’s a moot point. The voters were happy with more choices, and they supported the incumbent. Murkowski never whined that the party was obligated to support her. She reminded her constituents of her record, and they voted for her. That is how the system is supposed to work.

  • acat

    Never went out, Bill S. Red State went out in the middle of it.

    Akin had his chance to show his political chops and win the issue, or to show his dedication to winning the Senate and step aside and chose .. neither.

    Your *best* hope for getting rid of this, Bill S., is for Akin to win .. and your best hope for that to happen are for Perkins, Robertson, and Huckabee to fund him.

    Mew

  • porkandcheese

    Don’t let the door hit you where the good Lord split you.

  • kipling

    I am taking Priebus at his word on the scenario. If Akin and McCaskill were tied and he needed a push to make it over the top, then the RNC would not provide that push. If it is about winning elections, then Priebus would learn to squelch the issue instead of keeping it in the news cycle.

    Of course the Democrats are going to link the issue to all Republicans. It is going to happen even if Akin exits the race. Instead of running his mouth and playing into the hands of the MSM, Priebus and the Republicans should let the issue die and stay focused on their message.

    All Akin needs to do is put together a commercial with Obama speaking on behalf of infanticide and end by asking McCaskill on where she stands on the issue. He can close by stating: “I misspoke. President Obama and McCaskill would kill living, breathing children. Who do you want to vote for?”

  • acat

    @redstate-eed77a7948ecd4087ef931b0faac64cb:disqus, that’s what he should have done in the first place… and the second place.

    Instead, he pulled a deer-in-the-headlights freeze, tried to defend his statement while referencing biblical rather than Dem political positions (not necessarily *wrong*, but not sharp in a *political* contest) and then tried to shift the whole thing to the economy.

    At *NO* point has Akin looked like he’s got the *political* skill to pull this off…. and *that*, kipling, is the problem and why I think Renice is right to not support him.

    Mew

  • acat

    Depends, @redstate-eed77a7948ecd4087ef931b0faac64cb:disqus … the Dems seem to think that running on a pro-abortion platform will work for ‘em… My thought is if they do it, it’s yet another slap at black pastors, among others. Also, catholics… if DEMCON is all about abortion, I wonder what bishop Dolan will say in his closing prayer for *them*, eh?

    Renice is looking to splinter and defeat the Dems entire, not just McCaskill, so his statements and actions must be taken in a larger context than just MO GOP.

    Mew

  • Bill S

    Yeah. It did “go out”. There were several days where it finally settled down, and it was not wise to start in again. Sorry, Ben/Caleb. Shouldn’t have been posted.

  • acat

    . . . respectfully, Bill S., that is simply not true.

    Mew

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    And just where do you think “most” voters get their information. Hint: it isn’t here. It’s ABC, CBS, etc and the Democrats own them lock, stock and barrel. Therefore, that’s exactly what will be pounded over the airwaves for the next 70 or so days at every opportunity.

    Democrats own the ink. Akin was stupid to say what he did in the first place and since then he’s just dug his hole deeper. And while you might feel abortion is a separate issue, it won’t come across that way. Just wait for the Dem Convention. Even though not many will likely watch either, they’ll float their first attacks on it.

    Akin and his idiots have teed up a perfect shot to keep people from noticing that the jobs numbers for August will be in the tank and unemployment is likely to tick up again. Consumer confidence is down again pushing record lows. And Akin’s on the front page with both feet in his damn mouth.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    kipling, if you really believe that, you’re a fool.

  • lineholder

    That isn’t accurate. What he said was the in a situation of rape, a woman’s body has a way of rejecting the sperm to prevent implantation. Technically speaking, that is correct. The woman’s body does have a sympathetic system response to the traumatic experience of rape, and it can prevent implantation.

    He did not convey or imply in any way that women who claim to be raped are lying about it. You’re using hyperbole on that point.

    Where he messed up was using the words “legitimate rape”. It was a very bad choice of words, and it gave the Dems an opening in the “war on women”.

  • AceInTX

    He’s the nominee…period…he won the primary….he’s the nominee of the party…we’re not the Democrats….this isn’t New Jersey….We don’t throw out the will of the voters like the Democrats do….

    you can slice this pig up 100 different ways but the bottom is still the RNC is giving away a winnable seat to the Democrats

    it’s as simple and unavoidable as that.

  • AceInTX

    They’re asking every Republican about Akin Akin Akin anyway Smager….so what is your point exactly?

    and it’s not lame to blame the party for losing the race if they refuse to fund the nominee….bottom line…the RNC doesn’t fund this race…and McCaskle wins….it’s the RNC that gave the seat to her…

  • AceInTX

    Maybe it’s escaped your notice Becker…but we’re not out there pushing ANYTHING….Prebus is the one out there running his mouth…as I said earlier….I’d rather see Akin gone myself….but I’m mad as hell that the RNC is making a calculated decision to hand McCaskle a seat for what? to prove a point?

    It’s the RNC and Prebus handing the Dems a winnable seat because they refuse to conest the election with their petulance and childish crap…so….Who’s blowing what up here?

  • jamesm

    @Bill S.
    I agree because of the timing. Not that it wasn’t relevant, newsworthy or some other reason. But was it “wise”. Tend to lean no. Going around in circles. But like the articles. No offense meant to writer(s)

  • AceInTX

    Not the point acat….in fact it’s entirely beside the point…

    you just said yourself…the lapdog press just asked Ryan about Akin…so…dumping Akin hasn’t helped anything has it?

    In fact…what it’s done is show…that if the Dems and the press squeal loud enough…the RNC will wet themselves and do exactly what the Dems and the press wants…

    So/…They get the best of all worlds…they get to go on and on painting every Republicans as extremist using akin even though they spooked the party into dumping the nominee…AND…they get the bonus now of keeping MO as a D seat because the Bed Wetters in the establishment gave them exactly what they wanted…

    From a Dem/Press standpoint…it’s Mission Accomplished….lets break out the champagne

  • jamesm

    Clear and concise. Well said. They asked him to drop out. He said no.

  • AceInTX

    Why can’t I find the discussion I was in earlier in this thread? I found a reply to one of my posts from acat and would like to reply to it…but can’t find the reply button on the comment….why can’t I view the entire thread?

    I still can’t believe we did this on convention week…grrr

  • lineholder

    New poll shows Akin in the lead over McCaskill 45/42
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/08/family-research-council-poll-akin-still-a-contender-133624.html

    Thank you, Missourians!!

  • acat

    Do you have the internals of the poll, lineholder?

    Tony Perkins, whose outfit commissioned it, have a clear conflict of
    interest – it is in their best interest for Akin to do well, and ..
    tada! .. a poll that shows he is.

    At this point, I’ve seen two prior polls from MO that show very different things .. and when one looks at the internals, the one that shows Akin doing well was blatantly over-representing the GOP in the sample size.

    I am not from MO, but .. I will believe this poll when I see the internals. Show me.

    Mew

  • acat

    On that, @redstate-3c053666271d0d4f874e31e15fbeb082:disqus, we agree. This implementation of Disqus is not user-friendly.

    Mew

  • lineholder

    I thought about that, too. I’m trying to find one, acat.

    As far as I’m concerned, we’re now to the point where it should be left up to the people of MO to decide this one on their own without interference from outside parties, especially those parties at a national level who could playing games because of old baggage and animosity.

    It wouldn’t bother me one bit for the people of MO to get riled up and ticked off enough to prove to some people at a national level that this is still a country where the votes of the individuals (and states rights as well) do matter.

  • http://colorado.mediatrackers.org/ Aaron Gardner

    I haven’t seen the link to the actual poll yet, Politico instead linked to the Mason Dixon poll showing Akin down, that said, Politico did include the following:

    “The Family Research Council poll was conducted by Wenzel Strategies from Aug. 27 to Aug. 28, testing 829 voters for a margin of error of plus or minus 3.38 percent. The sample was 32.7 percent Democrats, 34.1 percent Republicans and 33.2 percent independents.”

    I don’t know what the registration numbers are in MO, but a poll showing a rather even split of D/R/I doesn’t seem unlikely.

    The way I see it, Akin isn’t getting out so we should all just sit back and enjoy the show and hope for the best.

  • acat

    According to an analysis of a prior poll over at Ace of Spades (http://ace.mu.nu) MO went D+6 in 2008 and R+3 in 2010, so .. this sample size is adequate on it’s Repub-Dem balance, but way off on Independents.

    I agree on popping the popcorn and seeing what happens … who knows, he may manage to pull this off …

    Mew

  • acat

    I disagree, lineholder. I know, you’re not surprised.

    I don’t see why, when it was Perkins, Robertson, and Huckabee (only one of ‘em from MO) pushing hard for Akin, their feet should not be held over the fire now that the rubber has met the road.

    In short, Perkins, Robertson, and Huckabee wanted Akin for Senate over Brunner and Steelman .. and they got their wish. Let *them* support him.

    Who knows, if they actually do open their wallets, he could win.

    Mew

  • http://colorado.mediatrackers.org/ Aaron Gardner

    Pretty sure RedState supported Akin in the primary as well. If I had spare change, I wouldn’t feel bad about sending it to Akin at all.

  • acat

    Heh. If the Dems don’t replace Obama at the top of the ticket, beyond being clear evidence of party suicidal tendencies, I’ll lose a couple bets that require payment by my making a donation to causes I find .. unpalatable.

    I find Akin quite unpalatable…

    Mew

  • http://colorado.mediatrackers.org/ Aaron Gardner

    Wait, are you saying that you actually made a bet that Obama would be replaced?

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Replace Obama at the top of the ticket, wouldn’t Chris “I Found My Thrill” Matthews call them all racists?

  • lineholder

    Based on an article from last week, acat, backing him financially separate from the RNC was already in the works.

  • AceInTX

    So the conversation ends because Disqus and the site won’t let us go back to old comments and reply to our friends?

    Welcome to the death of Red State

  • sulmak

    You know there was a comments/complaints article put up by Erick the other day, perhaps you should have commented there. And I agree with you, by the way.

  • sulmak

    PPP has him down by only 1. In a poll that skews femal by 10 points.

    “There’s a bipartisan consensus that he should stay in- 57% of
    independents, 53% of Democrats, and 52% of Republicans think he should continue running.”

    “favorability numbers are still poor with 33% of voters rating him favorably to 56%
    with a negative opinion.”

    partisan breakdown
    Democrat ……………………………………………….. 33%
    Republican……………………………………………… 35%
    Independent/Other…………………………………… 32%

    ideological breakdown
    Very liberal ……………………………………………… 8%
    Somewhat liberal …………………………………….. 12%
    Moderate………………………………………………… 33%
    Somewhat conservative……………………………. 29%
    Very conservative ……………………………………. 19%

  • acat

    Aaron, no. I’m saying I made *multiple* bets that Obama would stink on ice badly enough that the Dems would replace him.

    Remember, cat is from Illinois and knew what Obama was early,.

    Mew

  • acat

    kowalski – I’m a little shocked that the Dems haven’t realized that he needs to go .. I prefer to overestimate my opponents, but .. not by *that* much!

    Mew

  • acat

    One wonders, lineholder, whether that played into Priebus’ statement.

    Casting Akin as a pariah-victim may help him, y’know.

    Mew

  • Common_Cents

    So with his dumb comments, Akin is WORSE or AS BAD as Claire McCaskill? really??? really??? We yet again earn the title of the STUPID party, painting ourselves in a corner on this, especially with the Senate hanging in the balance!!! I didn’t know REPS need to live perfect lives and run perfect campaigns. Chalk one up for the biased propaganda media once again SHAMING Republicans into election suicide. Go Akin!!!!! with no thanks to Priebus and the RNC.

  • Common_Cents

    It’s one thing to pressure the guy and replace behind the scenes, but for the REPS to publicly paint themselves in a corner calling for him to leave when they arent sure he will, is beyond STUPID!!!!

  • Common_Cents

    They could have EASILY said, “I disagree with his unfortunate comments. Frankly, if dumb comments define a man then why is Barack Obama President of 57 states? While you the media focus on this Obama is ZERO for 23 Million unemployed, is THIS what you the MEDIA want to focus on?”