« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Attention, @barackobama: Source required on “We will not let the truth get in the way.”

On Wednesday, at a speech in Charlottesville, VA, President Obama made this statement:

And they were asked about it and they said — one of their campaign people said, we won’t have the fact-checkers dictate our campaign. (Laughter.) We will not let the truth get in the way. (Laughter.)

This is a reference to comments made Tuesday by Romney pollster Neil Newhouse to Buzzfeed regarding Obama’s gutting of welfare reform; more specifically, the perhaps vehement media reactions to one ad cut by Romney attacking said gutting. Newhouse stated:

“Fact checkers come to this with their own sets of thoughts and beliefs, and we’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers,” he said. The fact-checkers — whose institutional rise has been a feature of the cycle — have “jumped the shark,” he added after the panel.

So where did the Obama administration get the second half of that statement? Good question, which the New York Times almost kind of, sort of, came close to hinting that it was maybe an issue that needed to be addressed: “Mr. Newhouse did not say, ‘We will not let the truth get in the way.’” Which is a burying-the-lede that both Mark Hemingway and I truly marvel at. One might think that the Times would be more courageous in calling the President a liar; one might also think that someone in our vaunted news media establishment would have checked by now to see whether the quote was even accurate.

Either way, President Obama needs to provide a source for that quote. Or else he needs to both retract that statement, and apologize to Neil Newhouse. Personally.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

COMMENTS

  • ohiohistorian

    What good is an apology by President 0? Do you want one where, as he apologizes to you, he gives you the finger? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DygBj4Zw6No There is no shame from this man-child; the only thing that matters is for him to win, and he will use any means possible. Ask his opponent (Jack Ryan) in the US Senatorial campaign.

  • ohiohistorian

    Your question is too nebulous to answer. There was a Georgetown speech by Obama where he insisted that the cross and Jesus be covered over. cnsnews.com/news/article/georgetown-says-it-covered-over-name-jesus-comply-white-house-request-0 Maybe that is the reference?

  • gscandlen

    I’m sure all the “fact checker” sites will give this statement a whole bunch of pinochios, eh?

  • chbroussard

    An apology from the big O and gang?? If that happens, you’d better prepare because there’ll be pigs flying all over the sky.

  • commonsenseobserver

    They’re now talking about #LyinRyan. You know they are desperate when they have to lie about their opponents’ lies. #LyinBiden. Or, #LyinOBiden

  • commonsenseobserver

    Obamacrats doubling down on healthcare takeover?
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/obama-advisers-seek-health-care-cost-control-17137224
    Could show the difference between Romneycare under Romney and under Patrick. When Republicans pass bipartisan healthcare reform and compromise with liberals, it only results in disaster as Democrats come in and make the whole system broken, before using that as an excuse to stage a government takeover. Romney should realise that as President.

  • http://hehasfailed.wordpress.com/ HopeHeFails

    Nothing has changed in 64 years… I watched CNN broadcast Truman’s speech to the party from 1948 and you could swap out the Obama liberal talking points word for word, 64 years ago. Same spew that Obama is spouting now was being spouted back then. Republicans are for the rich, want to take away healthcare and public housing, blah blah blah.