« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Who needs a muted, irrelevant President?

Why Obama's lack of vision actually matters in November

As conservatives, we know why we don’t want President Barack Obama in the White House. He is leading this country in the wrong direction. But his completely empty convention speech, when combined two moments described in Bob Woodward’s new book, gave us another prong of attack that is potentially much more devastating. He simply is irrelevant now. Nancy Pelosi put him on mute and Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid kicked Obama out of a meeting he called in the White House.

So here’s the argument. President Obama may be bad. But he’s worse than bad. He’s irrelevant. It is time to elect someone with a vision and a capacity to actually solve — or at least contribute to solutions — to today’s problems. Obama’s convention speech, allergic to any specifics, and nothing more than a recitation of progressive goals and values rather than specific policies to get people there, shows that he will continue to be the irrelevant man in the room if re-elected. Who needs a man who brings nothing to the table other than speechifying, no matter how inspiring it may be to some?

So let’s look at these stories one by one. First, Nancy Pelosi put Barack Obama on mute.

“Warming to his subject, he continued with an uplifting speech,” Woodward writes. “Pelosi reached over and pressed the mute button. They could hear Obama, but now he couldn’t hear them. The president continued speaking, his disembodied voice filling the room, and the two leaders got back to the hard numbers.

Now, Pelosi has denied it. But Woodward has said that he has recordings of first person accounts of that meeting.

The message is clear: thanks for your thoughts, now the adults have to go do the work.

Second, on today’s Washington Post front page, Bob Woodward described Obama being kicked out of a room in the White House for his irrelevance to the debate over the debt ceiling as both Boehner and Reid asked to be left alone to address the problem.

Obama objected, saying that he couldn’t be left out of the process. “I’ve got to sign this bill,” he reminded the leaders as they sat in the Cabinet Room off the Oval Office.

“Mr. President,” Boehner challenged, “as I read the Constitution, the Congress writes the laws. You get to decide if you want to sign them.”

Reid, the most powerful Democrat on Capitol Hill, spoke up. The congressional leaders want to speak privately, he said. Give us some time.

This was it. Congress was taking over. The leaders were asking the president to leave the meeting he had called in the White House.

Once again: thanks for your thoughts, now the adults have to go do the real work. Woodward nailed what happened in a follow up question:

How did it feel, I asked the president in an interview on July 11, 2012, to be voted off the island in his own house?

It is hard to comprehend how weak this President is.

The only thing that this president has really provided leadership on is ObamaCare. We, and most of America, don’t like it. If this were an election on his record, that would be enough to fire him. But his re-election pitch is nothing more than that. He has no additional vision. And all of his nice words give us nothing more than that. And not even his own party respects him enough to include him in decisions.

What possible rationale is there to re-elect an irrelevant man to the White House?

COMMENTS

  • annas

    Why oh why then is Obama surging in the polls? To hear all pundits today-both conservative and liberal- we have already lost!! Never mind Friday’s jobs report!

  • http://hehasfailed.wordpress.com/ HopeHeFails

    The only thing that this president has really provided leadership on is ObamaCare.
    I saw no evidence of that. Pelosi and Reid took the wishlist off the shelf and began to run with it. Obama was busy planting other Marxist seeds in the areas of Energy and the EPA, and Union reimbursements.

  • myronfalwell

    Obama did give speech after speech in attempt to drum up support for Obamacare. But all those speeches did was increase opposition to the bill.

  • Ausonius

    Trust no poll except Rasmussen. And even then, who knows for sure? People lie to pollsters, to each other, to themselves.

  • davesinsanantonio

    The pollsters, most of them, are lefties, and they are still in the “form opinion” mode. Most pollsters are merely shills for the Left and leftist causes, not honest reporters. They will not switch to “report opinion” mode until late in October. They only report real numbers, some of which are still skewed, until the end so that they can claim next time how “accurate” they were in their predictions. Not only do the pollees lie to the pollsters, but the pollsters also lie to us and each other.

  • willik

    Do not EVER think of this man(?) as irrelevant!
    Congress hasn’t had the temerity to question his ‘Executive Orders’ (EOs)or to formally exercise Congressional oversight responsibilities concerning them.
    I think EOs, are supposed to be reviewed once a year at the beginning of the January session after the Christmas/New Year ‘break’ and accepted through making them lawful; or sumarily reject them and the orders nullified and become unlawful if continued. So far, I’ve seen nothing being done by CongressCritters to challenge or curb Obama’s enthusiasm for ruling by fiat (Executive Orders).
    This article is nothing but ‘eyewash’ for the unthinking/uneducated plebes in the audience.

  • willik

    Forgive me but I shouldn’t have written ‘uneducated.’ I should have written ILL-educated. There are a lot of ‘educated’ (just look at their diplomas) but mostly with lies concerning history, political science and politics, all three of which are intertwined.

  • Rick_Caird

    I really agree with you. As long as Obama can issue EO’s and his administration can issue regulation and he can send the drones in, he is not irrelevant.

  • msabul

    “Obamacare”, as with so much else that slithers out of the guy, is a self-contradiction. The problem is no longer the man; he’s the thief in broad daylight. What scares the bongoes out of me are his blind defenders. Though some have regained conciousness, there are legions still in Zombie Spring.

  • mrfixit10

    You are mostly correct. His handlers are doing exactly what is expected of them. Load up his teleprompter and control the discussion. Have you noticed that none of the senior “Advisors” will answer a question with a yes or no?. The President is a radical progressive with one agenda-”Fundamentally Change America” His words not mine.

  • wantonpleasure

    Obama is a psychopath, a cold pitiless reptile, who is a master at political froth/bullshit that the American Idol generation finds profound. He has been unbelievably effective in moving America toward being a third rate marxist hellhole just to do the bidding of his fathers, Obama Sr. and Frank Marshall Davis. He is the most dangerous and destructive man on the planet whether Romney and Boehner want to realize that or not. To use the “irrelevant” argument is to go way way off the track.

  • RedstateBillS

    Watch the language.