« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The World Is Not Enough For The Chicago Teachers Union

Electing Leftists Has Not Brought Peace To Chicago

I remember several occasions where we were all told that if we didn’t elect the leftmost candidate, there would be rage in the streets. The people would not stand for it! Royale tried the tactic out against Sarkozy with no success. James Carville trotted it out in 2008 as a reason that people should vote for Barack Obama in 2008. It was, you see, a vote for peace. You gotta’ share the wealth! (If you know what’s good for you.)

That brings us to the latest festivities in Chicago. Chicago has elected an effluvium of Leftist central planners and served as the incubator and cash source to fuel Barack Obama’s radicalism. The city elected Rahm Emanuel Mayor and lets Bill Ayers dabble in the local school system via “initiatives” such as The Chicago Annanberg Challenge. Peace and nirvana have descended in the form of a 400,000 employee strike by The Chicago Teachers Union.*

According to The Chicago Sun Times, the teachers turned down the following offer.

The package, which would cost $400 million, keeps increases for experience and credentials with some modifications. Vitale said the contract amounted to a 16 percent raise over four years for the average teacher when factoring other increases. And the raises could not be rescinded for lack of funds — …“This is not a small commitment we’re making at a time when your fiscal situation is really challenged,” Vitale said. A $1 billion deficit awaits the system at the end of this school year, officials have estimated. And the district drained its reserve funds to plug this year’s budget.

The teachers also seem upset that they will have to pay more of their healthcare costs and face more rigorous professional evaluation. Amazingly, despite the fact that Chicago Public School Teachers get paid a median salary of $76,000 per year for a job that doesn’t even require them to show up for 2 months, this offer wasn’t good enough. Chicago Civic Foundation president Laurence Msall tried interjecting reality into the situation.

“It’s math. It’s not really politics, as much as it gets caught up in politics. The financial situation of the Chicago Public Schools is dire. The situation of the State of Illinois – that provides significant funding to the Chicago Public Schools – is dire,” he said. “The property tax payers in Chicago are beleaguered. They’re seeing a drop in their property values, and to be asking them to pay increased property taxes, so we can fund increased salaries for employees is something that’s gonna be a very tough political sell.”

What amazes me most is that 90% of the rank-and-file voted to authorize the walkout. They really and truly don’t care about the children they profess to be educating. Their city is going broke. More people have been shot on the streets of Chicago this year than in The Afghan theatre of the War on Terror. One would think that the fate of the 350,000 children turned loose from school in a city that resembles a low-intensity conflict zone would matter a little more to the head of The Chicago Teachers Union than whether Rahm Emanuel was nice enough to her in person?

Politicians tell us all the time that we have to invest in education. We have to invest in proactive government. Like the Chicago Teachers Union, you’ve got to think of the children. Oh, that’s right! Nobody in Chicago seems to give a rat’s (decency edit) about the children. There’s money and perquisites on the table and the world just isn’t enough. The (expletive-deleted) children need to zip their soup-coolers and not be getting under foot. Remember; people were instructed to elect politicians like the ones now running Chicago to prevent discord from breaking out in the street. That worked about as well as the average prototype of The Fisker Karma.

*-Chicago’s Charter Schools (hint, hint, subtle, subtle) will be open this morning.

Correction: There are 400,000 children effected by the strike. 26,000 public employees walked off the job.

COMMENTS

  • DerKrieger

    16% over 4 years based on the $76,000 median = $88,160.
    Nice raise. Private sector average raise of 2.5%/yr over the same time period would yield $83,900.

  • gscandlen

    This may be the final nail in the coffin of public employee unions.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    And a Civil Servant in A GS slot has been frozen for three years w/ an executive order signed for 2 more. No raise for five years. I wonder how the CTU would have responded to that!?

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    It certainly removes any misguided belief that they operate on a basis of altruism.

  • beefeater

    How much must it suck to be a Chicago teacher sitting across the bargaining table and getting crapped on by Obama’s hand picked mayor, both of whom were elected with the union dues confiscated from your pay check?

  • bobmark

    When I saw this on Drudge I thought “A less cynical person would think the union is trying to take advantage of the election to intimidate the D’s, but what’s really happening is that the D’s are going to bring in the O to rescue the situation.” Sure enough I just heard Limbaugh say almost exactly that. Wish I’d posted this before he said it. lol

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    There are a lot of people working harder that would *kill* to make $76K this year. I will agree that Rahm “Effing” Emanual is a sleaze of the first order, but these folks arn’t exactly auditioning for their own version of Les Miserables.

  • aeaeren

    My Private sector pay went down, My health insurance went up while no pay raise for 2nd year in a row.

  • veritaseequitas

    My last raise was 1.5% and that was in 2010. This is another perfect example of why the unions need to be shot down and the public school system revamped. These teachers already make above median incomes for doing a piss poor job educating children and they want more…why? Because they are blood sucking parasites. Schools, just like health care and retirement, need to be taken out of the hands of government who have proven to be a failure at administration.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    They should be getting a COLA and nothing else. I could see public employees getting about the average of what the private sector gets, but no more. I work public sector and haven’t seen a raise in 3 years. I won’t see one for another two unless I earn a promotion to higher ranking position. These CTU people make me sick!

  • aeaeren

    One could hope they bring about a result like what happened in WI. The more the people see this nonsense the more they want to change it and boy do we need some serious changing.
    Unions served a purpose in the day but that day has long past and now they have become monster they used to fight against.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Plus, people have the option of shopping elsewhere if Kroger workers struck. Little opportunity exists for people in CHI to switch businesses in this case.

  • freemkts

    This issue should be front and center in the Presidential campaign. On the surface you might say it’s just a Chicago issue, but there’s more. What’s happening in Chicago is happening in communities all over the country and it’s the Dems and their allies in the labor unions that are to blame. Chicago and Illinois are controlled by the Dems and the teachers go on strike anyway. So much for shared sacrifice and we’re all in this together.

    As important as reducing the debt and reforming Medicare are to the future prospects of the country most voters don’t grasp the issue. What people do get, though, are issues in their own backyard. That’s why people rebel more against property taxes than income taxes. That’s why the sorry state of our schools matter more than the deficit. If Romney can convince people that situations like what’s happening in Chicago will continue to happen as long as Democrats are in charge then he may be able turn public opinion against them. It’s what worked for Chris Christie and Scott Walker and it can work for Romney too.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Bingo! This isn’t shared sacrifice. When the Dems get in power it turns into a Visigoth Holiday. Eventually, mon ami, the beer runs out….

  • aeaeren

    I was shocked at some stats I heard today, I am going from memory so just ballparking it. Avg pay for teacher in Chicago is $76K, this does not include benefits this is just pay, avg taxpayer is $45k ish. 79% of Chicago 8th graders are not reading up to level, 80% of 8th graders math is not up to level and these guys are complaining about getting 16% pay raise, but that is not their issue. They don’t want to be held accountable for the failure of actually teaching the kids, oh and they don’t want to pay more for health care.
    Now I can’t see how the avg joe can keep putting up with this crap.

  • norris

    This strike was not called to benefit teachers, it is to show non- union teachers that they must join . Both sides know the outcome before the negotiations start ,the employer has an amount that they can spend the local union decides how to divide between wages and benefits . The top union bosses make the decision to strike ,and pass the word to the local . The local instructs the members to make a strike vote for just for leverage and not to worry about more than a few days off. The national bosses of the union use the strike to convince the the non-union people that they can’t survive with out them. The only ones that benefit are the union bosses who collect more dues for their million dollar wage and perk packages.