« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Mitt Romney Should Raise These Questions

Mitt Romney is in a difficult position. On September 11, 2012, radical Islamists stormed the American Embassy in Cairo, tore down and burned the American flag, and hoisted a black flag associated with Al Qaeda. In Libya, radical Islamists did the same, but also set the embassy on fire, fired rockets, and killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and at least three other State Department employees.

The President is not the Democratic President, but the American President. Any challenger in a time of crisis must keep that in mind. Any challenger also comes to the table with less foreign policy experience than a sitting President. Mitt Romney has a difficult needle to thread handling his response to these unfortunate events.

The Romney campaign would be well advised to be delicate and let surrogates handle most of the partisan shots, but there are absolutely some valid points Mitt Romney can and should raise.

First, this was the second September 11th anniversary since Osama Bin Laden was killed. Subsequent to his death several other top Al Qaeda leaders have been killed. Islamic radicals still demand revenge. It was quite foreseeable that Islamic radicals would find an excuse to attack us in some way on this September 11th. Why wasn’t the American security presence at American embassies in North Africa and the Middle East boosted prior to 9/11? Sending Marines to Libya now seems a bit too little too late.

Second, when the United States picked the side of rebels in Libya many media outlets reported the rebels also had ties to Al Qaeda. What happened in Libya was a foreseeable outcome. Who did the President think would get greater respect from Libyan rebels who, like Al Qaeda, were persecuted by Gaddafi? Would not the better response to the Libyan uprising have been to sit on the sidelines and do nothing?

Third, the Obama Administration has, for four years, sought greater accommodation of the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that at no point in its history has shown itself to be a friend of western values in general or the United States in particular. Knowing the dangers, the United States under Barack Obama was perfectly happy to work with the Muslim Brotherhood. Why was this not foreseeable by President Obama when it was an obviously foreseeable event to so many?

Fourth, why has Barack Obama skipped more than half of his intelligence briefings? The Government Accountability Institute reports the President, since taking office, has attended just 43.8% of his Presidential Daily Briefings. Liberals, to this day, accuse George W. Bush of ignoring terror warnings leading up to 9/11 when he was in office less than 8 months before the attacks. President Obama has not even attended half his daily intelligence briefings in four years. He’s opted for written reports instead of being able to discuss, probe, and question his national security advisors.

Fifth, free speech is an American freedom and one recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It isn’t something our government should be condemning. Why was the American Embassy’s initial reaction to condemn persecuted Coptic Christians for making a movie? We’ve seen this over and over. Draw a cartoon of Mohammad? Riots. Make a movie? Riots. Burn a Koran? Riots. Radical Islamics riot at the slightest provocation. It is what they do. Throwing the First Amendment under the bus does nothing but send a signal that we do not value our most cherished constitutional rights when someone might be offended. Why do that?

Sixth, why did the President condemn Mitt Romney’s own campaign before condemning the violence and bloodshed?

To quote Jeremiah Wright, the chickens are coming home to roost.

These are difficult days for the United States and for its President. But the events of September 11, 2012, though not foreseeable in the form they took, was foreseeable in that Islamic radicals have been waiting for an opportunity to strike back at the United States and the date is a logical day to foment unrest. Turmoil against the United States’ interests in North Africa and the Middle East after the Arab Spring was predicted by many foreign policy experts. Ambassador Stevens’ death was an avoidable tragedy.

Mitt Romney can and should raise these points. President Obama supported the Arab Spring. He led a coalition into Libya to help Libyan rebels. Now, in the Arab fall, we are seeing the undoing of decades of American foreign policy designed to stabilize, as best we could, an unstable region.

COMMENTS

  • kahieb

    Obama should have taken the position that, because our embassy is sovereign U.S. territory, to attack our embassy is the same as a home invasion and will be dealt with swiftly. Instead he chose to soft pedal and apologize. This is unacceptable and is an insult to everything that this country stands for. Mr. President, pack your bags because your time is over. It’s time to call in the “A” team, comprised of adults!

  • http://www.neoavatara.com/blog neoavatara

    Romney was damned if he did, damned if he didn’t. If he didn’t speak out, the media would have pounded him for that too.

    Romney said the right things, and I think Erick nailed down what the criticisms should be.

  • Kyle-MI

    What Republicans?

  • CarolT

    Did anyone notice that Obama used some of George W. Bush’s speech from September 11, 2001? He blames Bush for everything and now he’s stealing his words.

  • 10ab

    Obama is the President whether we like it or not…Now is not the time for Romney to go all Sarah Palin and look like a fool. It is time to mourn the dead and come together as a nation. Romney will get his chance to be presidential but this should not be his “look at me” moment it simply makes him look desperate.

  • nocontest

    Goodgovernance is right on. Mitt looks juvenile, desperate, and unpresidential. If only he had waited but no his timing is way off.

  • goodgovernance

    Like I said before, tnguy, timing is everything. Too many people are confusing “be careful what you say right now” with “don’t ever say anything, ever.”

    This is no time for Romney to be a bull in a china shop. It can’t always be about expressing outrage all the time, can it? If it is, maybe you need to re-examine your outlook on things. And just know that most Americans don’t share that point of view.

  • Melody Warbington

    Everything you said, proudmarinemom, and more. Romney speaking out forced Obama to say something, and he’s the one who ended up looking un-presidential. Because, of course, he is.

  • proudmarinemom

    I asked you to explain. Can’t think of anything? Okay, here: the “timeline” is irrelevant. Had all the Americans survived and been rescued, the attack on a U. S. Embassy would still constitute an act of international terrorism against this nation. The leading candidate for the Office of the President of the United States has a MORAL duty to make a statement and to do so promptly. If you have a problem with that, let’s hear it. Waiting:

  • CarolT

    Thanks Melody. Carol

  • Jack_Savage

    Actually, anger comes right along with mourning. Sorry. Not one of those worthless bastards would set foot within a quarter mile of a US embassy if I had command of the military.

  • Jack_Savage

    So exactly how should an American citizen react to a picture of a United States Ambassador being dragged through the streets?
    Barack Obama is so incredibly far out of his league, I am surprised more American citizens haven’t been killed before now. Maybe he should go to an intelligence briefing once in a while so he won’t look like the fool he actually is.

    I’ll tell you who looks desperate – any idiot who tries to defend with worthless sack in the White House. That includes you, pal.

  • Jack_Savage

    If only he had waited for what? More Ambassadors being dragged through the streets?
    While you and goodgovernance have your heads up Obama’s ass, maybe you could do him a favor and check for polyps.

  • poorwilber

    To hell with the press. They’re all howling because they’re part of Obama campaign. Romney should kick this President, at every opportunity, until he stops wiggling. Exactly Erick, BO must be pressed on his cozy relationship with the radical Muslim Brotherhood. His foriegn policy to reset Russian relations has been an epic fail, has led to Putin bullying all the former Soviet satellite states. Weakness in the US Presidency has always invited the World’s preditors to move closer.

  • Jack_Savage

    I’ve got some really good ideas for you too, shill.

  • Jack_Savage

    Blah, blah, blah.
    Maybe the mere fact that we have a leaderless country makes this situation so dangerous that it would be dishonoring to those who serve it to remain silent?

    It’s not a foreign policy crisis. That would assume we have a foreign policy.

  • proudmarinemom

    I dunno, Jack, I was kind of looking forward to some fun with this one, but now I’m bored. Liberals simply are not equipped to debate and maybe we should just pat them on their wee heads and send them out to play in the fairy gardens of their collective imagination.

  • Jack_Savage

    Leftist Democrats who say they are Republicans. Like marky-mark.

  • 10ab

    In no way did I defend the President. Your anger is blinding.

  • Jack_Savage

    Maybe you should read what you are writing. Your ignorance is blinding.

  • Jack_Savage

    Yeah. Kinda like the Dixie Chicks.

  • proudmarinemom

    And your blindness is … annoying. Backatcha.

  • garfieldjl

    No matter what the mainstream media would have smeared Mitt Romney, if he hadn’t came out, they would smear him as being indecisive. Since he came out and didn’t follow Obama’s policies he’s being called irresponsible.
    Fact of the matter is what Romney said was very accurate, and if he was “shooting without aiming,” he’s a surprisingly accurate shot.
    The President of the United States has no business apologizing over what someone posted on Facebook, and only encourages more of these attacks. The President only recanted what the Embasy stated after Romney issued a statement, it took 16 hrs for Obama’s statement after the Embasy’s initial statement; but only 1 minute after Romney’s statement.
    If you look at the press’s interview of Romney today, it was extremely coordinated, it just goes to show you how fundamentally dishonest the Press is today.
    What passes for a government in Libya has made statements that they are appalled about what has happened, the Egyptian government has been completely silent.
    People are complaining about the fact people like me are bashing Obama when a crisis like this is happening, well got news for those people, if Obama was actually behaving like a Commander & Chief instead of Apologist & Chief, we wouldn’t have to complain in the first place.

  • streiff

    Troll #FAIL

  • Jeff Cooper

    Free speech is indeed a right protected by The Constitution, but is not exclusive to Americans. Free speech is a natural right of man and no law, religious or otherwise, should force one to remain silent because another might be offended.

  • Uma Richie

    So my my Navy husband is still at work, doing whatever he does when there is a crisis, yet the President is off speaking to his adoring throngs in Vegas. Something ain’t right.

  • proudmarinemom

    And mine has just come home after a typical 13-hour marathon of balancing the books, making payroll, consoling worried clients and paying bills.

    Do we have enough evidence now to begin proceedings against this President? Without Congress’ approval, this President co-sponsored a resolution (1618) that would outlaw “blasphemy” of Islam. Without the consent of the American people, this President participated in the overthrow of leaders in Islamic countries, knowing that the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that works against the interest of the United States would rise to power. This President has shunned out greatest ally in the most volatile political region on the planet, Israel.

    Where is it written that we have to sit here and allow this?

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    55555! Good one Jack!

  • jumperpin

    What’s all the fuss? Even if the rest of Republican leaders bail, Mittens is THE expert at Etch-A-Sketch 180′s.

    Anyway – his insight, charisma, candor, erudition and populist persona are already moving the polls. Right?

  • littlehouse18

    I found it comforting that Mitt spoke up. Someone had to act like the President of the USA and stand up for American principles. I’m sick of this appeasing pathetic excuse for an American leader.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    gg, when Reagan was running against Jimmy Carter in 1980, we had almost 400 hostages being held in Tehran. Was Reagan supposed to hold his criticism until the hostages were released? If he had, those poor folks would have spent another four years in Iran. Romney’s comments were dead-on, and his timing was perfect. And you don’t speak for “most Americans.”

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Go home to DKO’s. If you’re trolling for free, you’re overpriced.

  • littlehouse18

    I think Mitt was also letting the rest of the world know that if he becomes President, America will be back in business and our allies will be able to rely on us again and our enemies fear us.

  • Bill S

    More trash to take out.

  • PowerToThePeople

    Now that is funny Rick, staff should put that saying up on the front page permanently.

  • pdxkris

    absolutely spot on. I think Romney blew this one big time. There was absolutely no need to say anything about obama or his policies on this day. He should have said “there are many valid criticisms to be made about obama policies. But today is not the day to do that. Today I stand with the American people in condemning this barbaric attack. We will put pressure on the local govts to bring the perpetrators to justice”. and then wait for a few days until violence subsides and talk about specific obama policies that are bad, instead of jumping at every violent event to criticize obama. There is plenty to criticize in obama foreign policy. But by jumping at these tragic events to criticize obama, Romney looks like he is doing crass politics at a time of tragedy, even if Romney is right.
    THis man is running one of the worst campaigns in history. It took him until the convention to show that he is more connected to and has helped more ordinary people in one day, than obama has done all his life. He let axelrod define him to be a heartless man, while Romney is the guy who has actually served the poor and the down on luck people in his private life. Obama talks about it. Romney lived it. This should have been pounded on the airwaves, before axelrod defined Romney. Even now I dont see or hear any of Romney’s character witnesses anywhere. In addition Romney comes across as somebody who desperately jumps on both national and international events to criticize obama, instead of expressing concern at the event for a day or two and then clearly articulating why that particular event was precipitated by obama policies. He keeps saying obama’s policies are making things worse, without doing a bill clinton like clear explanation of what specic things are getting worse by which policy. The economy is in the tank. The job numbers are actually worse than the offical number (Romney doesnt talk about that either). Woodward says this man never showed leadership in one of the biggest leadership testing exercises during the debt limit extension negotiations. Romney should be winning by 10 points. INstead he seems to be on track to lose by 10 pts. Maybe he will eventually win. But if he does, he has to thank Obama, not his campaign. I havent seen a more incompetent campaign ever. I know you folks here dont like to hear it. I say McCain campaign was better than this mans campaign.
    I say Murdoch is right. This man needs better campaign operatives, which he wont change now and as a result will most likely lose. And Murdoch is right about the fact that he is still playing to the choir (his base). What the hell? this is september. The base isnt going to vote Obama by any stretch of imagination. He should be attracting other voters, whether it is independents or sympathetic hispanic voters or Reagan democrats. Erick is crazy to suggest Romney should keep taking potshots at Obama on the day when they are chasing americans in the middle east. This most certainly comes across as desparation on a day like this. IT looks like there is absolutely no one in the republican party who can run campaigns anymore. I say make KarL rove the permanent campaign manager for all campaigns from now on. This is just ridiculous. Like Laura said, if republicans cant win this election in a landslide, might as well give the country to the socialists and shut down the party. There is no better opportunity to take the presidency and the senate (and hopefully not lose the house) than this year. If I dont see another campaign run by inept idiots from Boston for the rest of my life, it will be too soon. I know you folks here dont like to hear it. I dont care if you pile on to call me a troll and anything else. But between Bush and Obama this country is screwed for 16 years, while China is reaping all the benefits (not to mention the pile of cash from every last trinket they sell here) of these two incompetent idiots ruining the country for successive terms. Maybe Christy should somehow get on the ballot. I think he might win. And definitely will run a better campaign than Romney. I get the feeling he will govern better than Romney as well, given how well Romney is running his campaign.

  • willik

    The RINOs in charge of the Party don’t have much interest in attacking one of their own.
    We’ve nominated yet another ‘sacrificial lamb’ to put up against the Democrat/Socialist/Communists. (Dole, McCain, now Romney).
    Once again I have to vote for the Veep, as I did in ’08. The second position of the Republicans seems to be the only ones deserving of the top spot!

  • jiminga

    It’s unthinkable that US embassies in the MENA were guarded by mercenaries, not US Marines. This alone may have cost Ambassador Stevens and his staff their lives, and is further proof of this administration’s fecklessness.

    As for Romney’s response the MSM would have crucified him either way, whether he commented or not.

    We are far from the end of this new eruption of violence and it will have a major impact on the election. And I’ll stick to my assertion that Carter solved the Iran hostage crisis by losing to Reagan. Hopefully, history will repeat.

  • http://patriotpowerplay.blogspot.com/ mirac777

    Let me re-phrase a part of your left-wing talking points memo for you: Obama is President whether you right-wingers like it or not,,, no matter what damage he does to America, I (10ab) will be on the net parroting DNC falsehoods 24/7, because that is what I am paid to do. And if you are not paid by the DNC or Soros groups, then you are really more ignorant that your stealth attempts at telling conservatives what Romney needs to do and what he needs to say shows.

  • http://patriotpowerplay.blogspot.com/ mirac777

    Good point. This is how the left operates. They control the message and timing, and try to paint Romney into a danged if you do, and danged if you don’t box. I am proud of Romney’s initial statement. Now if we could just get him to have an empty chair sitting next to him when he breaks out the “Our POTUS misses over half his intelligence briefings” statement, and “this chair represents what the intelligence chiefs see when they hold a daily briefing to inform the POTUS of such threats as radical Islamists are planning riots at the embassies, and advising him that we should increase security immediately.”

  • purplewings

    Give Obama the glory but none of the tough questions! Use any possible means to take the gloomy spotlight off the president – especially to put it on any who challenge is ideology….that’s what the lousy tv media has done!
    I don’t understand why our news media is trying to force-feed our citizens by lies and obfuscation, but I know that they are. I also know this method worked well in pre-Nazi Germany. People had nothing to measure those wanting to be leaders,except the media, which was newspapers and radio. A woman who lived through the Nazi nightmare remembered being told repeatedly what a magnificent leader Hitler would be…..and we all know how that turned out. Those who forgot or never knew their history, will make certain it is repeated. Sadly.

  • purplewings

    Well, thank heavens that Obama is doing just that….bringing people together as a nation and mourning the dead – from his latest fundraiser in Las Vegas! OMG! That’s what we call a President????

  • purplewings

    It’s always easy to be the Monday morning quarterback. There are hundreds of people waiting for Romney to show his strength, and then hundreds more waiting to criticize when he does. I wouldn’t want to be a candidate for anything in this country – especially right now. I feel sorry for Romney who’s taking hits from Obama & his News Crews continuously, no matter what he does. I think Obama is playing the dirtiest politics there are & the people are buying into it!

  • purplewings

    I don’t recall any Republicans encouraging Obama to drag us into Libya’s wars – ever! Obama does those things on his own because he feels that he is God!

  • duanej

    I’m sure the meetings that he doesn’t make are “excused absences” for playing golf. We can’t have the presidential tee time interrupted by “intellegence briefings”. Besides, those meetings are probably just way too “thinky”.

  • tnguy

    Then America is lost. If Americans (men, especially) don’t have the stones to work up righteous indignation over a bunch of crazy muslims pillaging on our sovreign territory, then there isn’t much left worth saving anyway. I’m not “mourning” over those lost, because I do not know them. I hate it for their families, but my primary emotion is fury.How dare those animals attack OUR embassy and kill OUR ambassador.
    Your p~$$y approach to things has worked out so well for our country and our party in recent years…. That republicans have always been careful with their words is one of our biggest problems. 99% of party leadership lacks any boldness at all. The few who have courage are treated as outcasts.
    For once, Romney got something right. He’ll probably backtrack on it if he holds true to form.

  • barbara125

    May I recommend a small book by Andy Andrews, “How Do You Kill 11 Million People?” The answer is the government LIES. For the most part the main stream media has been complaisant.

  • thethinman

    Obama running off to Vegas to raise money so he can continue to be our ineptest president – Obama’s house of tarot cards are coming down around him – unions on strike in his “own” town of Chicago with his handpicked Mayor, now the Arab Muslims are killing our ambassadors – sent by Obama and Hillary. His failure to listen when everyone said he was feeding the Muslim Brotherhood – well – maybe that was his plan.

    there is NO country in the world like the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America, there are some that are close, perhaps, like Canada and Australia. But NO WHERE is there the Liberty and Freedom guaranteed by our constitution to every one of our citizens, male, female, black, white, red, yellow and even religion. We are very tolerant to all religions, we may say many things, question even God, but we don’t go around killing people for what they believe or what they say. That Americans think the rest of the world is like us only means they are ignorant of the world. Someone was yammering last night about how we had “liberated” the people of Libya – bull, out of the frying pan and into the fire of the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia law to the hilt. We did those people no favors. Obama did the same thing with Egypt, knowing that the Muslim Brotherhood was the only real organized entity that could take over from Mubarak. We are in the same process of trying to turn Syria over to the Muslim Brotherhood

    at what point to you let Shiia and Sunni kill each other and protect ourselves. Don’t tell me about Muslim extremism – they are ALL extreme – and they chanted yesterday exactly how they all feel about the USofA and western culture. they HATE us and wish us dead. What part of that doesn’t Obama understand.

    Romney should walk carefully and merely point out that this is Obama’s making, Obama is the Democrat President, it is his problem – just as it was Carter’s problem with Iran – and the similarities are remarkably similar. A pacifist, appeasing President with no hint of what to do. He is a little child still playing in the sand box with grown ups that play with guns.

  • thethinman

    Around 1218-19, Genghis Khan sent gifts to Shah Muhammad of the Khwarizm empire and proposed trade. he sent a trading caravan of 450 merchants. at the edge of Shah Muhammad’s empire they were seized and executed. Genghis sent an ambassador to demand the Shah hand over the guilty governor for punishment; Muhammad killed the envoy and sent his head to Genghis – shall we say the rest is history? The Mongols believe in the absolute inviolability of ambassadors. (as Morris Rossabi points out) To harm them was a heinous crime. (Dec 1996 National Geographic)

    It is still a heinous crime. Embassy’s and ambassadors are protected by international law. WHERE is the World Government LAW – where is our own chicken poop of a President? Islam wants war – it’s time to do more than bow and beg and pay tribute – it’s time to do more than rattle our sabres – it’s time to mount up and destroy the evil empire before it destroys all of our freedom and liberty. Death to Islam and bury the koran and it’s prophet in the middle of Saudi Arabia between Mecca and Medina and let them reflect the places of Sodom and Gomorrah.

  • thethinman

    Yes, Romney should take the Reagan approach – let Obama hang on his own petard.

  • thethinman

    With the US treasury my butt – with OUR tax dollars.

  • thethinman

    The Muslims KNOW Obama – chicken poop coward appeaser that he is. Obama is NO commander in chief – I would not be surprised if a top general took him into custody for a military court martial – CIC indeed – Obama couldn’t lead a pack of dogs to a bone.

  • thethinman

    Reply I don’t think I’d be visiting the soon to be demolished pyramids right now – unless perhaps you would like to be part of the gang that tears them down.

  • thethinman

    I’ve a better one – go to Egypt or Libya.

  • thethinman

    NOT an act of “terrorism” and act of WAR. Not everything is terrorism – such an over used term. Islam is AT WAR with the west (US, the U.S.A.) What part of that are we really ignorant of?

  • thethinman

    This is the bad dream of a Carter rerun.

  • thethinman

    YES and Pakistan is so remorseful that they hid Osama bin Laden for years right next door to a military facility.

  • thethinman

    McCain – does that speak for it

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    You know I was worried about him missing the intelligence briefings and then it hit me; the OfA spinner was right, Obama would learn as much from the cliff notes as the meetings themselves. 0=0 either way, the problem is the idiot who doesn’t attend the meetings because he doesn’t understand what is being said anyway, picked all the other idiots in the room.

  • thethinman

    warmongers – McCain remembering his glory days as a POW with his girlfriend Jane – and the ever anti-war gunboater Kerry.

  • thethinman

    Where would you expect the “Commander in Chief” to be – he cares naught about the United States – except to be it’s dictator. He cares less about the military – can’t wait for him to declare “martial law” – that should be trip for him – to the brig or to the stockade – depending on who actually finally takes some action against this malfeasance in office chicken poop of a president. Carter II

  • thethinman

    and essentially spit in the face of our oldest enemy and greatest ally – England.

  • thethinman

    what the president “intends” to do – go out and collect some more money.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    good point…

  • thethinman

    Americans are sheep, the shepherd is working with the wolves

  • jamesmpratt

    ROMNEY ABSOLUTELY DID the right thing to show a contrast — that there are adults in the wings capable of filling the empty Oval Office and chair. Notice the polls swing? The liberals are not only livid but scared. The strategy to show a man who could be President worked. I believe Erick is correct, that future President Romney appear at major points when Obama is MIA to contrast but allow surrogates to do most of the next administration’s bidding.
    I had posted on the need for him to show the US electorate some Presidential chutzpah in an our that Obama was sleeping (right after his critical 9/11 radio interview with “Pimp the Limp” in Miami.) 8 hours before Romney trumped the incompetent occupying the WHite House.
    The mainstream media conspiracy that occured at Romney’s presidential-like morning briefing not only trumped an MIA Obama but was an awesome event proving to even the most ignorant how the liberal deck is stacked – come hell, highwater, or incompetency, the liberal communications industry is in bed with itself — and the Ivy League children they help elect.
    See post 12:54 AM 9/12 counseling Romney to do this for additional insights: http://www.redstate.com/jamesmpratt/2012/09/12/romney-must-offer-daily-leadership-to-america-or-where-is-the-president/

  • cfl68

    Meh, the only point I agree with is #1. What were the security protocols for a small consulate like Benghazi. Were they too weak? Were they not followed? #2 is just typical shallow partisan jabbing. Sure its a volatile world. If you want to try to shape events, you need to be a part of them. They are still ongoing. There are many forces at play in Libya not just AQ. And how is it the right so quickly forgot that GWB made a massive full scale invasion of Iraq that unleashed horrendous violence killing/maiming tens of thousands of americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, sponsoring AQs massive recruiting campaign, and basically turning an Iranian for into an Iranian ally??? Libya isn’t even a drop in the bucket compared to this – yet you feel compelled to share your righteous indignation. Could you be more dishonest? #3 as per #2, you need to be in it to influence it. Any leverage we can get over Egypt, however small, is but another tool in dealing with a madhouse region. Spare us the indignation. #4 partisan drivel and you know it. #5 I’m not sure on this but a couple thoughts: first – free speech is protected in USA but not in world. Maybe there should be restrictions if speech is targeted outside of USA. Probably not, but maybe… Second, free speech deliberately intended to cause mayhem and harm is not protected. A quick google came up with this –
    http://www.freedomforum.org/packages/first/curricula/educationforfreedom/supportpages/l04-limitsfreedomspeech.htm
    #6 Partisan drivel – you are persistent! Its really Mitt who was premature don’t you think? Blaming the President for things he didn’t say to score political points during an attack, then getting the chronology wrong. This is all shallow partisan yapping that would have been posted on a left wing site 4 or 8 years ago.

    Mitt should have kept his mouth shut, and maybe after the dust had settled brought up the point about lax security in a hostile region at a very volatile anniversary. He may have scored points. What the hell was his rush anyway??? He blew it.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “Romney should kick this President, at every opportunity, until he stops wiggling.”

    GOOD ONE!
    Romney should be making 5 stops a day, laying down a steady barrage on Obama’s anti-constitution, job-killing, debt-growing, economy-damaging, freedom-destroying failed, bankrupt kleptocratic policies.