« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Blaming Romney, not terrorists, Obama fuels Middle East bloodshed

Like many Americans I spend time on September 11 contemplating the terror attacks. This year my contemplation didn’t end on the 11th. I have spent the entire week watching as riotous Muslim mobs, first in Egypt, then Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and Sudan attack U.S. embassies espousing hate for American values and belief.

It got much worse. The hateful Muslim mobs multiplied throughout the Muslim world, even in countries not considered Muslim, such as Britain and Australia. And al Qaeda went on the offensive.

Under the cover of the rioting Muslim mobs in Benghazi, terrorist viciously attacked the U.S. consulate killing four Americans including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. That was the first time an American Ambassador had been murdered in the line of duty since the Carter administration.

Al Qaeda didn’t stop there. They attacked the American-lead multinational peacekeeping force in the Sinai. They also attacked a U.S. Marine base in Southern Afghanistan in an effort to kill Britain’s Prince Harry. So there was much to contemplate on this extended anniversary of 9/11.

The lessons to be learned from the terrorists’ 9/11/12 offensive are despite Obama’s protestations to the contrary the War Against Terror is not over, and Governor Romney was right to criticize Obama for sending mixed signals about the violence of the hateful Muslim mobs.

Obama is so wrong here. His naivete has always been there for us to see. On November 21, 2007, presidential candidate Obama said, “The day I’m inaugurated Muslim hostility will ease.” He actually thought he could just say nice things, and because he had lived in an Islamic country during his youth and his half-sister is Muslim, the Muslim hate for America would dissipate. Well perhaps the Muslim hate for America didn’t diminish while President Bush was prosecuting the War Against Terror. But we never saw an uprising or offensive like this during his war, because those that hate us respect strength.

Obama sees things differently. His administration says “the war on terror is over,” and Obama won’t even use the term “war on terror.”

So yes, Governor Romney was entirely correct to criticize Obama’s incoherent response to the Cairo debacle, and to question Obama’s now discredited policies of appeasement and apology that have left us so dangerously vulnerable in the Middle East and still hated in the Muslim world.

The most important lesson of the week is that we now know that the Obama Administration has put us right back where we were 11 years ago before 9/11.

That is why yesterday we saw Obama’s Press secretary flat out said that the hateful Muslim uprising — formerly known as the Arab Spring, and the murder of an American ambassador was exclusively the result of a silly amateur video - despite the evidence to the contrary.

This statement and appearance was a turning point. Why?

Not because it flies in the face of the evidence.  But because it shows EXACTLY why we’re in the position we’re in under Obama. Team Obama just doesn’t understand that terrorists hate America, not a “video” that was used as a diversion to kill Americans. This video of makes this point:

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    The guys who attacked our embassies are not terrorists. They are religious fanatics. Plain and simple.

    They need to be separated from their government — Libya or Egypt.

    This is a State Department function.

  • sssmith7896

    On Thursday Romney had the chance to differentiate himself and his policy and failed to do so, and he has not had the brass to state a firm position on what he would do. So I guess I vote against rather than vote for.

  • CarolT

    The Obama administration has been a failure from day one. He wants to appease them, we have to show strength and resolve. I want the fanatics afraid of the US and ti is not going to happen with Obama, Clinton, et all.
    Romney has probably been quiet since Wednesday, he may have been on television but I missed it. I had a gum graft done Thursday and I’m in quite a bit of pain from it and have not paid much attention to television.
    Romney must be bold to win, he’s got to show how strong the US will be again with him leading. I thought he was very presidential Wednesday, he acted more like a president than Obama did that day.

  • renl57

    This is what Romney said:

    “I think the whole film is a terrible idea. I think him making it,
    promoting it showing it is disrespectful to people of other faiths. I
    don’t think that should happen. I think people should have the common
    courtesy and judgment– the good judgment– not to be– not to offend other
    peoples’ faiths. It’s a very bad thing, I think, this guy’s doing.”
    ~Mitt Romney.

    Tell it to Mel Brooks, Mitt:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TAtRCJIqnk

    If no one ever said anything controversial or shocking, you wouldn’t need a First Amendment.

  • 10ab

    Viet I appreciate your post… is disheartening when I read posts calling for war based on blind anger without a shred of knowledge about these regions. I believe there are over 2.3 billion Muslims…as you stated, those responsible for the bloodshed this week are religious fanatics and a small percentage of the population.

  • coemgenus

    Our president is first and foremost a communiuty organizer/demonstrator. His sympathies will always be with the rabble.

  • jamesm

    Agreed. They are following Islam. They want to kill infidels not just “terrorize” people. With Islam, it is not some organization like the Weather Underground. They do not want us to change policy. They want to kill or convert. I guess we would have the option of dhimmitude. Islamists is a better word.

  • http://hehasfailed.wordpress.com/ HopeHeFails

    Romney has already stated the biggest foreign policy change ever:
    “Energy independence by 2020.”

    Couldn’t be more clear and distinct than if he had said, “Let them eat sand”.

  • mikeymike143

    islam is a cancer on the world. and its followers are the mortal enemies of the united states

  • justavgguy

    CarolT – I also thought Romney was very presidential. In fact I am pretty confident that is why the media is so frenzied. In the hour when we needed a President to lead, Romney did exactly what Obama should have been doing. At the same time, Romney didn’t pretend he was the president, contrary to the comments from ssmith7896, HopeHeFails, and renl57 below. Romney acted like a leader should. At the same time, he is not the President (yet), so it is not his place to declare policy (yet). I am confident that when he is President, we will see him restore pride and strength to our country.

  • CarolT

    Reagan did the same things in 1980 by speaking about Carter’s failed policies. Is everyone here too young to remember? I was 20 then and didn’t pay much attention to things but I do know Ronald Reagan made comments about Carter during times of crisis, and we have had plenty this week.

  • rodguy911

    Story after story whether you read USA Today, Breitbart or the Blaze they all confirm what Petraeus told congress that this entire fiasco was planned by radical Imams to go off during 911 and after muzzie prayers on Friday. Always a good send off time for radical idiots. The video is just a timely excuse used by the radical whacked out muzzies to raise hell at their favorite infidels us.Of course it doesn’t help that we knew about it did nothing and armed our soldiers with blanks instead of live ammo as well as the bad guys knowing where the safe house was.The entire affair was a fiasco and was handled poorly by the regime.And knowing the regime plans to give them hundreds of millions to destroy Israel with makes it even worse.

  • fightnright

    Re-visiting video of Occupy Wall Street, the Oakland CA riots, watching mobs of students violently eject right-wing speakers at universities, viewing union/socialist thugs stepping up their game in the Chicago teacher demonstrations, hearing chanting SEIU members trampling on the lawns of business owners’ private homes, etc., makes me believe that Obama would like to create gangs of liberal/leftist rabble here in the U.S., rivaling those we’re seeing in the Middle East in size and viciousness, with the MSM and union leadership replacing the Muslim clerics as the rabble-rousers.

  • jamesm

    Muslims are now demanding that pope apologize.
    http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/14/news/foreign/muslim-union-demands-pope-apology-accuses-him-of-sedition/
    Obama has unleashed this crap. Next they will want the pope to bow like Obama

  • PowerToThePeople

    I am sorry, but until the so called reasonable or peace loving Muslims take to the street here and abroad to protest the cowardly killers amongst them, they are just as responsible for the actions of their fellow believers. And until the governments in these countries where these radical operate freely take serious and constant action against these criminals, they too are compliant.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Trolling again?

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    so Romney should have said…”I absolutely think it was a wonderful film. Man, I just love it when Americans denigrate the religious beliefs of others” or “well, I really got no opinion”. Wonder what Stephanopolous and Chuck Todd would have done with those responses…no I don’t because well I know exactly what they would have done. Since you selectively chose to edit, Romney’s response – lets go with the whole enchilada shall we,

    “The idea of using something that some people consider sacred and then parading that out in a negative way is simply inappropriate and wrong. And I wish people wouldn’t do it, Of course, we have a First Amendment. And under the First Amendment, people are allowed to do what they feel they want to do. They have the right to do that, but it’s not right to do things that are of the nature of what was done by, apparently this film.” - so essentially Romney says that because you can doesn’t mean you should. Entirely reasonable, thought out and intelligent especially from a man who can watch any episode of Lawerence O’Donnell and see his faith denigrated at least 6 times in the hour. Oh and at no point did Romney say “Middle Eastern people are rioting because of this silly film”.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Some observations:
    1. President Obama said Romney shot without aiming. If so, then Romney has remarkable accuracy. It turns out appeasing and apologizing to radical Islam is ineffective just as Romney stated.
    2. Chuck Toady said Romney’s timing was off. Perhaps, if Obama acted more on Romney’s timing and quit wasting time taking instruction from Muslim Brotherhood head, Morsi or asking for Sudanese permission to protect American citizens then radical Islam wouldn’t have been emboldened by a dishrag of a President and the damage would have been contained to Egypt and Libya as bad as that was. Joe Biden was right (proving even a broke clock is right twice a day) – “This guy is going to be tested”. Egypt was that test and the elements of Radical Islam were told, the American President is either unwilling or unable to act. I am sure Tom Donllon is make a kill list to leak to David Sanger of the NY Times so that Obama can recapture his lost huevos.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Carter said about Reagan: “He shoots without aiming” – no lie and sound familiar?

  • radioone

    “Obama fuels Middle East bloodshed” If you don’t believe that go see the “2016″ movie.

  • renl57

    That’s not what I would have said.

    I would have said: “I haven’t seen the video, and I never cared to see it. For we Americans to do ANYTHING about the video that we would not have done if the violence hadn’t erupted, is giving in to the Islamists. The best way for us to deal with the Islamist violence is to go about our lives here as if the violence wasn’t ongoing. That’s how you treat a bunch of immature children throwing a temper tantrum. Ignore them. We Americans should take no actions under duress, not ever.”

  • streiff

    concur. It is an offense against the First Amendment for the US government to take a position on it. That serves to “abridge” that right.

  • celador2

    These Arab Spring goverments are new and untested. They are media hyped and backed by Obama in the name of what or who we do not know. They are the result of mob action on TV by demos full of English language signs.
    Security is a failing of all the Arab Spring governments. They cannot protect their own people much less foreigners or commercial activity. The new security may be tied to known terrorists or someone with a grudge in a no man’s land of militias and arms.
    Obama is quick with a sound bite or photo op but lasting governing alludes him just as it does his own Arab Springers in ME.

  • CarolT

    Yes, Rush pointed it out. Rush also pointed out that Obama’s DNC acceptance speech was very much like Carter’s and played parts of each. It’s bad when Carter has to correct O that Egypt is an ally.

  • annas

    Will someone PLEASE tell me why Obama is getting such great press after this weeks abomination of a foreign policy? Even Brit Hume was bashing Romney today!

  • ateam

    You know, it is interesting how Christians have had to tolerate countless instances throughout the last 20 years of people claiming all kinds of things about Jesus. Mature Christians blow it off because, well, scripture said those things would happen and truth will always win. You don’t see Christians rioting, looting, and acting like mindless vandels. And now we have to be politically correct and say that we shouldn’t ever say anything against someone’s religion because they consider it sacred? That would put 3/4 of the popular comedians out of work and add to our unemployment problem. Does that mean we shouldn’t ever have called the “Reverend” Moon a kook? For religion to ever be deemed true, it must be allowed to be criticized, even mocked in conversation, print and media. This isn’t about defending religion. It’s about consolidating and holding onto power. And in that part of the world, when you hold the power, you control the natural resources and the money.