« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama Campaign Supports Promiscuity

This is an actual ecard that can be found on the Obama-Biden website. This one has companion pieces that decry any agenda that returns us to an era of stable, two-parent (male and female, not one of the many permutations of gender and species identity that inhabit the modern Democrat party) families, middle class incomes, independence from government, affordable health care, and a low rate of both out of wedlock births and shacking up. This era is called “The 1950s” by the Democrats and it is bad because it is hostile to their natural constituency.

What struck many of us on the right as exotic about this claim is not only why any adult woman would expect her mother to pay for her birth control. Even the slacker mandate in Obamacare cuts you off from the familial teat at age 26. But the price tag.

I mean $18K is a lot of birth control to be used from age 12 or 13 through age 22 or so. If you were servicing the Pacific Fleet you wouldn’t use that many. Abstinence is also fairly inexpensive, in fact, based on my experience growing up abstinence can be very lucrative.

Christine Rousselle, who blogs as The College Conservative, offers more insight on the improbability of anyone outside the most energetic hooker actually spending $18,000 on birth control.

Because our letter-writer has been reduced to asking her mom for money, we’re going to assume that she’s not very well off and she’s a bargain hunter. On Amazon.com, one can purchase a fishbowl filled with a variety pack of 144 Durex brand condoms for $25.89. Assuming she’d use one condom per day every single day between the ages of 12 and 52, that only equals $2,624.96 for 14,600 Durex condoms. For those of you who aren’t great at math, $2,624.96 is far less than $18,000. She’d have to be using around four or five condoms a day for 40 years for that number to even approach $18,000.

Suppose our cash-strapped friend prefers to use the birth control pill instead of condoms. In 41 states, she can get the pill for $9 a month at a Target or Walmart. That totals $108 per year, and $108 multiplied by 40 is $4,320, which still winds up less than $18,000. In the nine other states, the cost per month is around $30, which reaches around $14,400 over 40 years. These figures assume that our letter-writer plans on using birth control pills over the full length of time that she is able to get pregnant.

Perhaps our letter writer would rather use a diaphragm. According to americanpregnancy.org, the maximum costs a person can expect for a diaphragm total around $65-$250 for the actual device, and around $7 to $18 for a tube of spermicide. I’m not sure how long a spermicidal tube lasts, but I’m willing to bet it’ll be good for at least a month or two. If the tubes are $7 and she gets one a month between the ages of 12 and 52, she’ll have spent $3,360, plus the cost of the device. If the tubes are $18, she’ll have spent $8,640 over 40 years, plus the cost of the device. Still, those numbers are far less than $18,000.

The crotch-focused campaign the Obama camp is running leaves me wondering, though. Is the rest of the nation really this focused on their own nether regions? Is who sticks what where how many times really the biggest issue facing the nation this year?

COMMENTS

  • californiasquish

    I have a good job with pretty good health insurance, but my wife’s pill is only partially covered, so we pay $60 a month for it. According to the google calculator, we pay $720 a year, and will be $18000 in 25 years.

    My employer switched health plans a few years ago, and there was a month my wife and I had to pay full price for birth control, and that bill was $120. Which would be $18000 in 12.5 years.

    I imagine that’s where they’re getting their number. 14 to 26 with no insurance would pay $18k for the pill. Whatever. I work so darn hard so I don’t have to lie awake at night worried about these things.

    Here’s the thing: I don’t see how this is an effective line of attack against Obama given Romneycare in Massachusetts. Any time Romney tries to hit Obama on Heath issues, Obama just replies with, “Why are you disparaging me with the same things you did in your own state?” I get that Romney can respond with “good for the state does not equal good for the nation,” but I just don’t think that resonates.

    Romney would get more traction hitting Obama on a stagnant economy and lackluster job growth. Just keep hammering on that at the debates, and that will have an effect on the polls.

  • http://twitter.com/jlevin Jesse Levin

    This is a pretty idiotic diary. I don’t know a woman who pays only $9 per month for the pill. That is unless you’re talking about just insurance co-pays, Planned Parenthood subsidy or some other clinical freebie for lower income women. If that’s the case, then you’re making Obama’s case for the ACA.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Did you know anyone that didn’t vote for McGovern?

  • renl57

    There is a huge gender gap this year. Obama is just clobbering Romney among single women (the second fastest growing voting group in America after Hispanics).

    I don’t know if the problem is birth control–but whatever message the GOP is sending female voters just isn’t selling well.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    $18,000 per year? If buy that estimate, maybe you are the one with the sub-standard understanding of the issue.

  • kentucky

    You have a point. The facts in this diary are no match for your anecdotes.

  • agooglyminotaur

    I was wondering myself why that wasn’t mentioned. I think it’s absurd to require a Catholic organization to provide birth control, even to non-Catholics. If Limbaugh had kept his mouth shut, I think the provision would have been overturned, but instead he made Fluke look like the moderate and now she’s a martyr on the left.

    One other thing I noticed in the article— the author (and the post he quotes) make a good case that team Obama seem to have picked their $18k figure out of nowhere. There’s also a good case that there are relatively cost-effective options for birth control outside of abstinence. But the author never links it back to his original point about out-of-wedlock births and single motherhood. If out-of-wedlock births and single motherhood usually happen among the poor, how is providing some form of birth control “hostile to [the Democrats'] natural constituency”? And is it possible that some government spending on birth control is cheaper than years of welfare for a single mother?

    It seems like the Democrats don’t have a plan to address teen pregnancy, and the Republicans’ plan (abstinence-only education) doesn’t work. I’d like to hear some new ideas.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Since that communist rag Mother Jones says 99% of all women engaged in sexual activity use birth control, who are these mass of women who are being denied their birth control bills?

  • agooglyminotaur

    Bling-bling condoms, courtesy of the Obama administration? I smell YouTube gold. Someone make a video!

  • streiff

    no problem. I agree with your point and I may write on it but the rule in blogging is that your reader’s aren’t, by and large, going to read a 10,000 word essay. This was just meant to be quick and fun (TWSS).

  • gretchenstreetman

    555.

  • rightlane1111

    ren…here’s the problem. Younger women have not learned personal responsibility nor have they savored personal success. They are still believing in someone “taking care” of them. Time for them to put on their big girl panties.

    Now…the female yuppie types..They are all for equality…only they don’t want to work for it. They want respect…but they don’t want to earn it.

    So…any trolls out there that see themselves “equal” to men…then do what men do. You are not the weaker sex…although that is a common rant.

    Birth control is a personal responsibility. If they cannot afford it because they do not have a job…then get one. How did I ever survive without the government’s help in the bedroom for all these years.

    You don’t see the government paying for free testosterone. So…ladies…why are we paying for your estrogen? Fair is fair…unless you are truly the weaker sex…and in that case…you are not “entitled” to the same treatment and respect as men.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    but you do want to pay for guns to Mexican Drug Cartels and for bombs for Muslim Brotherhood? See how that works? How about we not throw out Obama talking points? There is logically no connection between SS and Medicare both of which a person paid for themselves through a lifetime of taxes and contraception coverage being a right of every citizen which is silly on its face.

  • rightlane1111

    Another sidenote Gretchen…which president GAVE big PHARMA mega money. Where to birth control pills comes from…BIG PHARMA. So…with all that money they got…how come the cost of medicine is going up. Could it be graft and corruption. You might want to speak with other women that are using other methods that cost far less and are just as effective.

  • renl57

    What a lot of Republicans don’t get, is that we can’t put the genie back in the bottle.

    Today, lots of single women have active sex lives, just like single men did for thousands of years. Not just poor women, but career women and female executives too.

    So when Kathryn Jean Lopez of the National Review writes columns touting chastity, that may appeal to one part of the conservative base, but it’s not going to win over single female voters.

  • gretchenstreetman

    Well, I’m already on board for Mitt. Now, I didn’t say anything about either candidate having a plan to stop paying for SS or MC. I was simply pointing out that as much as you don’t want to pay for “someone’s sex,” maybe you should realize that there are others that don’t want to pay for your SS and MC.

    And you paid for SS? Maybe so, but it’s a minority of people that actually paid into SS more than what they take out. And why no mention of your Medicare? Interesting that you leave that out. If you do actually receive it, then I certainly hope that you don’t actually try to argue that you actually “paid for that.” My FIL tried the same thing after he had a $150K Medicare-funded heart bypass. Fail.

    At the end of the day, I was only guessing that you were a SS recipient. But wow, you are predictable. Nicely done.

    Finally, don’t lecture me about personal responsibility. I make well north of 6 figures/year and pay an enormous amount in taxes. In fact, I’m personally responsible for paying taxes to support your entitlement-receiving self. AND, I will continue to pay more and more taxes as time goes on and your generation gets older and sucks more out of the system because for the last few decades, you voted into power Republicans and Democrats that spent like drunken sailors. Then curiously, you got “fiscally responsible” around the time you started collecting entitlements. Maybe that’s your story and maybe not, but it certainly represents most in your demographic.

    At the end of the day, you typing away on a blog does nothing for the problems my generation is going to have to clean up when you are gone. But I promise you this: We Gen Xers, Yers and Millennials will blame you first when we’re paying 60-70% in taxes to support your SS and Medicare. Count on it.

  • renl57

    You’re speculating. I didn’t.

    I don’t know why the GOP’s message isn’t resonating with single women. I only know that the GOP can’t continue to write off one group after another: Blacks, Hispanics, single women, gays–and expect to keep winning elections with the 60% or so of the voters who are married white Christians.

    This ain’t the same electorate as we had in 1980. It’s less white, more black and Hispanic, less married, more single.

  • gretchenstreetman

    Indeed. Agree with everything you said. How do other conservatives not see that you indeed can’t put the genie back into the bottle? Geez.

  • renl57

    Many Quakers and Amish are pacifists. But they pay taxes knowing that some of those taxes go for war.

    Americans who are morally opposed to capital punishment still pay taxes knowing that part of that tax money may have been used to execute someone.

    Your income tax is not a cafeteria menu. Most of us have moral objections to some things the Government does. But we still have to pay our taxes. If we have moral objections, we try to elect representatives who will change Government policy.

  • gretchenstreetman

    Wow. If I didn’t know better, I would suspect you were a lazy troll, RL1111. Seriously? “Younger women haven’t learned personal responsibility”? Really? Your rhetoric sounds like Kos-kid attempting a ham-handed impersonation of an old white male Republican. Bravo to you, sir! Good Lord…

  • gretchenstreetman

    Thanks, rightlane. I will most certainly take your expert women;s health advice and “speak with other women.” You sir, are a gem. Of hilarity.

  • Matt12314

    When will conservatives realize that the party is completely split at the moment. It’s time to throw in the towel on social issues and realize that this country overwhelmingly supports same-sex couples (not including marriage), supports a women’s right to choose, and supports many democratic social issues. However, the country also heavily supports conservative fiscal policy. A unified shift towards a libertarian mindset will have republicans in office for the foreseeable future. Without the shift, democrats will continue to wreck the country with wasteful spending.

  • stantertius

    Are you seriously complaining about the frikkin New Deal? Can we please drop the illusion that the republican party hasn’t been on board with entitlements for a long time now? This fantasy that it is all the fault of the democrats is an insult to everyone’s intelligence, and glosses over the fact that the conservative movement needs to come clean about its own sins if we are going to move forward. I mean…Medicare Part D is, what, six years old now?

    Sadly, the Ryan/Romney plan (as far as we know) won’t reduce the amount that young people have to fork over paying for people 55 and older, who are set up to soak up hundreds of billions more than they paid into Medicare. I’m sure you did pay into your social security. SS is actually not badly out of balance, and can be easily reformed. But unless you die suddenly and without complications, you are almost certain to cost the medicare system more than you paid into it. That’s just how the whole thing is structured at this point.

  • grumpyKoz

    I cannot believe that U.S. women can actually be bought for the cost of a 50 cent condom.
    Please, women out there, tell me that this is NOT true.
    Because if this were true, perhaps our founding fathers were right in not allow women to have the right to vote.

  • gretchenstreetman

    Awesome. Your drug cartel/MB straw man sucks. what part of what I said was a BO talking point? You perhaps missed the point. I was not saying that SS and Medicare are the same things as contraception. I was simply pointing out that there are some things I don’t like paying for either, but I do anyway. And seriously, you are going to argue that a person actually paid for all of the Medicare that they receive? You must be joking. At the end of the day, you have validated what I suspected — the anti-contraception argument is mostly a trope of old white men. Nice.

  • Bill S

    A. You’re wrong. The country doesn’t “overwhelmingly” support any of those things. But nice try.
    B. Social issues are the ONE THING the GOP wins on consistently.
    C. Social/Christian conservatives are the most reliable constituency for the GOP.
    D. This ain’t LibertarianState. You’re welcome to vote for Gary Johnson if you like.

  • Bill S

    You know, I stay awake at night worrying about what Millennials and Gen X/Y/Z thinks about me. Well, not really.

    Check back on that when the so-called youth vote actually amounts to anything. When y’all can muster the kind of voter turnout that the 50+ crowd generates, maybe I’ll care.

  • kentucky

    The original post wasn’t about abstinence. I doubt streiff wants government-enforced abstinence. I certainly don’t.

    The post was about birth control, which has nothing to do with trying to “put the genie back in the bottle” (which is a strange choice of words). It is about whether a taxpayer should be forced to pay for the lifestyle choice of another.

    I like beer. The good, expensive kind. A lot. The genie is not going back in that bottle (ha), either. Still, I don’t expect to get a good beer stipend from the government to allow me to do things that I like. It is my choice.

  • gretchenstreetman

    Yep, you just made the point I was attempting to make above way better than I did/could have. Your “cafeteria menu” metaphor is exactly was I was getting at. Thanks, renl57!

  • stantertius

    You are kidding yourself if you think any senior at this point has actually paid for all of the medicare they are receiving or are set to receive.
    Gretchen’s point is that puritanical moralizing is hurting the GOP brand, with both women and young people. It is one thing to take a stand for the church’s right to follow its conscience, but far too often these days, the republican party allows its mouthpieces to say things that simply come across as hostile to women. The scuffle over contraception wouldn’t cost the GOP votes if we could keep people like Rush from throwing around words like “slut”, and if we could euthanize idiots like Todd Akin.
    If the republican party actually wants young conservatives to vote for it and not stay home, it needs to start moving into the 21st century.

  • streiff

    the only problem with running for office as a libertarian is that someone actually has to vote for you. As history has shown, libertarians can only win when they claim they are Republicans. The Tea Party movement, which despite libtard propaganda, voted conservative on both social and fiscal issues. What you are advocating is a recipe for disaster.

  • gretchenstreetman

    Stop with your facts, stantertius. Honestly discussing Medicare Part D gets the old folks like rightlane too wound up. I sure don’t want him to have a medical issue over this that I’ll have to pay for. :)

  • fightnright

    I’m not sure it’s so much a question of what the Republicans are selling to young and single women, rather than an issue of how much free stuff Democrats are talking about giving away.

    I think Romney-Ryan might win more women voters if they clearly demonstrated the real cost to them of one benefit like birth control within the current dismal Obama economy with its miserable growth rates, sky-high unemployment levels, and punitive taxation/regulatory costs to small businesses, against the *far* more lucrative possibilities of greater employment rates for female college grads/young single women, better market opportunities for young female entrepreneurs, and a government that will allow all women to keep more of what they earn.

  • Bill S

    And that’s all for you. Good bye and good riddance.

  • kentucky

    It actually is a cafeteria menu. And you have to eat everything on it. Why make it bigger?

  • Bill S

    That’s enough from you, too. This diary is drawing idiots like flies.

  • kentucky

    I must have somehow missed the pro-tax evasion arguments in this thread.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Goldfinger meets Dirk Diggler

  • mark

    The problem isn’t we have a generation of whores.
    The problem is mandating an entitlement for sex.

  • tcgeol

    That is ridiculous. I’m a fairly young conservative, have younger conservative siblings, and a bunch of young conservative friends. All of us understand (even if not everyone is always perfect) that personal responsibility is an enormous part of conservatism. If you (generic you, since I obviously don’t know you personally) can’t keep pants zipped/skirt down, then you really have a problem with the philosophy of conservatism, not with us who stil believe that abstinence is the right way and that maybe we shouldn’t be paying for birth control for other people.
    As far as abstinence and birth control causing a gender gap, are you really saying that women as a whole lack self control so much that they must have sexual relations at will and can’t handle their own feelings, while men (apparently) can? Wow, if I said that, you’d be pillorying me, but that is exactly what you said. Otherwise, it wouldn’t be a gender gap, because men would be right there with you (and, believe me, there are a bunch of men cheering on those sneering views on abstinence you gave – they are happy to take whatever you give).

  • tcgeol

    Medicar Part D was a HUGE mistake that most conservatives (that I know) were strongly against. Having said that, it is a pure fact that the New Deal was almost purely and completely the fault of the Democrats. The fact that we now have big-government Republicans who won’t do anything about it does not in any way make the legislation our fault or responsibility.

  • rightlane1111

    OK…Gretchen…We are all adults…supposedly on this board..so we will start with SS. I have been paying into it since I have been 16. I have not outlived it…and I could not live on it alone. However, I did manage to save (new concept) and have money put aside. Otherwise known as “personal responsibility”. If you make well north of six figures…why are you complaining about contraception, which I might point out includes OTHER METHODS than pills…which are really unhealthy for you, as a woman. NOW FOR THE BIG MEGA SURPRISE…because you apparently did not catch it from the avatar…I am a woman, married with children living outside the home (meaning they are grownups). I might want to point one little thing out to you concerning birth control, now that you know I am not some “old white guy”…which sounds very sexist to me…but I digress. If you want something that is cheap and has the same rate of protection, you might want to learn about diaphragms..and yes they still make them..and yes they work. So…is that too hard…or too much trouble? Easier softer way work better…and that goes for personal responsibility.

    I pay for my Medicare. I have collected on it once. I have to buy my prescription drugs outside the USA because I cannot use a generic….I still pay for the drug portion and they are making money on me. Good thing I am in excellent health.

    Concerning my generation. My generation were capitalists, job creators. My generation flew a man to the moon and were proud of their country. My generation was ashamed to be on Welfare and would rather work. My generation ENDURED Jimmy Carter. You don’t even know what interest rates were at 21% do you? You never had to wait on gas lines for two/three hours do you? My generation was not one that assumed too much DEBT.

    Suck the life out of you. Why don’t you look at the Sallie Mae College Program…which has burst its bubble once and tell me, who is paying for that. Our taxes. ALL those that have money…pay taxes. So, if you are so incensed about people who “suck” the life out of your generation…look to those people who are here illegally and claim SS and deplete the fund. Look to all those people who have to have their Obamaphone “’cause Romney sucks”. That’s your takers…not me. I pay income tax, I paid into SS for more years than I care to…and no I am not ahead of it. I pay for Medicare and believe it or not I pay for Obamacare and Medicaid..OTHERWISE KNOWN AS TAXES. Know how…I PAY TAXES.

    There is one candidate that has a plan for SS and Medicare AND IT IS NOT OBAMA/BIDEN. So that should make it simple. If you are into income redistribution (which is the point of all of this)..then vote Obama and look to previous dictatorships and their success rate. HINT…success = 0

  • fightnright

    thank you!

  • rustyoldgarand

    It’s not good for the credibility of the current conservative movement that nobody will really own Plan D, though. I’m glad to hear you say that you consider it a mistake. I was beginning to think this place is allergic to genuine debate.
    The New Deal was obviously pushed through by Roosevelt, but it does seem cheap to complain about that at this point. How seriously would we take it if the libs complained about the republican party being responsible for the great depression because of Hoover? I just don’t think we do ourselves any favors by dwelling on these thing.

  • rustyoldgarand

    This is apparently your first time ever posting in a blog thread. You may find that you look like less of a mouth breather if you don’t manually hit enter when you come to the end of the box. Your text will automatically wrap; it’s the miracle of the internet.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    He’d need a harbrace as well. Normally I’d say punctuation and grammar aren’t important on the internet; exchange of ideas are more important. However, 3rd grade knowledge of paragraphs is nice. @redstate-b70aa3a0fda627aae0b921c0d48147d1:disqus’s post is indicative of a disorganized mind. Of course, his structure is indicative of the nature of his ideas.

  • Rupa Derp

    FYI, rustyoldgarand: this happens when you post from a mobile phone, genius. It wasn’t from manually hitting enter. Get back to your mouth breathing now. And also begin thinking about who you will blame when Obama wins. So cute to watch!

  • Rupa Derp

    Hey, rusty–this place is allergic to genuine debate. Don’t fool yourself. It’s an echo chamber of a few dozen angry folks, the majority of whom have been “taught” American History by Glenn Beck and who think they are at the cusp of a “conservative revolution.” It’s ridiculous. Even more ridiculous are Neil’s whinings on “Tech at Night.” Check out the comment count on his entries. Hint: they hover around zero. This is (one of the many reasons) why outsiders snicker at RS.

  • Rupa Derp

    Totally with you on the beer thing. You probably already have, but if not, try Stillwater (Baltimore) and 3 Floyds (Indiana). Pricey but awesome. Thx, Gretchen Streetman

  • californiasquish

    I agree with you, tcgeol, I think personal responsibility is a big part of conservatism. Though I label myself as an independent, I’m definitely on the fiscally conservative side of the aisle, and I don’t kid myself: I’m either paying for my wife’s birth control at the counter or with my taxes, but no one is going to give them to me for free.

    My example, however, points out a political error in the socially conservative argument against these kinds of issues. When ‘The College Conservative’ portrays all, or even most, women on birth control as harlots, they run the risk of turning the millions of married, and single abstinent women on the same birth control off to a message they might otherwise be on board with.

    With 35 days to go until the election, and Romney behind with women, I think that argument loses more votes than it gains.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Clean up on aisle 3. There’s some fool here that thinks we care what he thinks.

  • jayjayson

    I ran the numbers. There is a low cost birth control out there that is $25 for 28 pills. $18,000 works out ot be 720 packs of pills per year. So this means that said Lady is taking those pills at is taking 55 pills a day. That is over 2 pills a hour. This side effects for toxic over load of the pills would stop the need for the pills. Are these people that stupid?

  • jayjayson

    gretchenstreetman
    It is not about the birth control or a woman’s right to use it. It is about other tax payers paying for it.
    I was young once. So was my Wife. She had to be on birth control for medical reasons from 14. So we were different then most young people, we worked to make sure we had health insurance.
    Oh as a side note, she once was a flaming liberal (I have been one since I was 10). Now with two kids and married, 16 years this last June, she is far more conservative then I have every been (I didn’t change my postions).
    What most people forget is we are not fighting for this election, which we have to win, we are fighting for the next election and the next. So Blame us “oldies” if you want, but remember we hold the line today so your childern with still have a line to hold tomorrow. What has been 100 years plan to distroy us wil not be turn in a day. Fight to day so we can fight tomorrow. Lay down to day and it will be our great grand kids that might be able to fight again if ever.

  • http://lvjohnston.blogspot.com/ lvjohnston

    I’m sure that it’s due to the inflammatory rhetoric in this thread, but there *is* an obvious point that the original postcard from the Obama/Biden camp seems to hint at that none here have mentioned. It’s not contraception through use of the pill, it’s the form of *birth control* used when a young lass wakes up.3.months.later. and only then decides that she has better things to do than raise a child. A phone call to Planned Parenthood for an appointment to remove ‘some tissue’ and she’s good to go… Include that in the cost calculations and the $18,000 does not seem out of line including therapy and other health issues. I don’t agree with it at all, but sad to say, this is a common form of birth control in society today.

    An aside on the issue of the b/c pill… some doctors regularly prescribe estrogen therapy as a matter of course for a variety of aliments and conditions. Both the wife and the daughter have had to get scripts filled and not for use as birth control. Before we all go putting the cart before the horse, we need to understand that just because it’s called a b/c pill, it may not be prescribed for that purpose (or I would have had a *serious* talk with both my wife and my (then 15 year) old daughter!)

  • jayjayson

    reni57
    I have to point out your logic fallicy on abstinence. It is a strawman argument. It also shows a lack of basic historic knowledge. It was not until Victorian progressive England started pushing “standards” that there was a push fo abstinence outside of religion. Also before the advent of modern medical tech, the number 1 deterent to sex was the possiblity of death thru child birth.

  • jayjayson

    You sound like my Grandmother saying that our Fed government would never so stupid as to bankrupt the country.

  • jayjayson

    Now you are preaching to the choir. Not knowing how old you are, I will say that at 10 years of age, I reallized that Medicare and SS would not be there when I reached retirement. And to add fuel to the fire, neither of these programs were intended to be permant.

  • rustyoldgarand

    Oh…a mobile phone? I’ve heard of those. Aren’t those what you get for agreeing to vote for Obama?

  • kodster5

    Well, Gretchen DID say she took birth control pills for health reasons, not necessarily for an active sex life. Both my daughters have to take birth control pills because their periods are irregular, and sometimes up to 6 months apart. The pills help regulate their hormone levels, so that they can have normal periods. Part of this is due to their thyroids being underactive (called hypothyroidism, a heritidary, genetic disorder), the other is the GMO foods being forced upon us, along with HFCS that is in just about every processed food out there. So, Gretchen, in that case, since they are for health reasons, your physician should be able to justify to ANY health insurer the justification for payment of the birth control pills, including religious-based ones.
    It is those women who have an active sexual lifestyle, and want their choices subsidized by those who don’t practice that lifestyle that should pay for their OWN choices.

  • kodster5

    Well, let’s see… I distinctly remember that there was a call for government to STAY out of our bedrooms, that we were free to do what we wanted. Now, government IS in our bedrooms, through providing birth control, and we are opening Pandora’s box by allowing it. Once we open the door to that, then the government has a right to say what we can and cannot do. Anyone think of George Orwell’s “1984″, where John Hurt’s Winston Smith has sex with Susanna Hamilton’s Julia, and the police come barreling in, helicopters flying outside the window, spying on them?

    Also, Gretchen, that’s a lame comeback. rightlane1111 pays for his OWN Medicare and SS… through separate taxes of FICA and SS… it’s the FEDERAL INCOME TAX that will be paying for YOUR birth control, not Medicare and SS.

  • kodster5

    YOU NAILED IT!

  • justperhaps45

    Personal responsibility is the issue.

    Why should I, you, anyone or everyone pay for someone else’s personal behavior, proclivity, preference, addiction, compulsion, pleasure, emotional crutches or professional appliances?

    I know a few young females whose self worth seems to be closely attached to their availability to frequent and random males. I don’t know how the sperm donors keep score but I do know that they are rarely around to support their prodigy. We taxpayers and sometimes the girl’s family, pick up most of the tab even as the behavior continues. We recently witnessed a young single mother cause 8 men to submit to paternity testing before she found the “baby daddy” for her cute little girl. Her goal was money, which I haven’t heard she has received. Something about this behavior seems damaging to all individuals involved and our primitive culture as well.

    Some of these instinct driven young people, which my wife and I know and work with, go to public health doctors monthly for STD testing and frequently are taking meds for the pleasure gifts they have received. Now that sounds really healthy doesn’t it?

    The picture we see is ugly not pretty. The minor cost is dollars.

  • Chrissews

    Well, he has a point- but he made it good and inflammatory by only mentioning females. None of the ( OK now I’m doing it, I know it isn’t all of them) 20- something’s have learned personnal responsibility, nor do they have a good work ethic. It is hard to appreciate all the benefits of a job when the economy sucks so bad you can’t find one. Or you only can find one flipping burgers. Of course they are desperate for the government to step in when mommy and daddy have rightly pushed their chicks out of the nest. These “kids” were spoiled from day one, how many worked thru high school like we did? Who bought their first car? They are scared that they will somehow have to WORK for a living at a crappy job and they are entitled to so much better than that.

    My mom is a flaming lib, Obama zombie, I am going to have to go find this card and send it to her ( with some if these comments). Think she will just pop that check in the mail? LOL!

  • severe_conservative

    It’s not that we think you care at all. We just want to say thank you for the endless hilarity that comes from reading your comments. And by “your” I mean most of the people on RS. But certainly you, WCP, are one of the best. Just think, every time you type a delusional, angry comment, there are those out here who will read it with delight and revel in your ridiculousness. Keep those comments coming, please! And thank you again for your contribution to comedy.

  • severe_conservative

    Oh Bill, you old fool. Don’t you remember how our “youth vote” pushed Obama over the line to victory in 2008? Guess what? We’re going to do it again this year. Here’s the thing that you and the other 30-40 people that actually comment on here regularly need to understand: Even if some of us don’t care for Obama, we will vote for him if only to see you RSers/Tea Party oldsters lose your minds at his re-election. You don’t even realize it, but the “Tea Party” has been the best thing for Obama and the Dems because it has shown how you guys have no idea how to govern. RS is a great site—for watching to see what fringe mouth-breathing “conservatives” manage to type out with their sweaty fingers on their ‘puter.

    You’re not a legitimate movement that can govern. You’re just a bunch of angry and scared white people. You simply have no idea how awesome it’s going to be to see you guys lose your minds on the morning of November 7 as you realize that America disagrees with you. Look for the spike in traffic on Nov 7 as we watch you lament and blame the polls and voter fraud and the Black Panthers. Then a number of you will threaten to move to Canada to escape Obama’s “socialism.” Ultimately, though, you’ll retreat in defeat and recall fondly the period of 2009-2011 when it seems you had begun a conservative revolution. You didn’t. Your party leadership doesn’t like you and snickers at you. Americans as a whole don’t like your ideas.

    Nov 7 is going to be wonderful! As I drink my celebratory mimosas with my friends on that morning, we are going to have a delightful time watching Red State light up with anger, delusion and sadness. Keep it up, kids!

  • cwfoster

    “Is who sticks what where how many times really the biggest issue facing the nation this year?” Considering the Obama, Reid, and Pelosi have been sticking it to the American people for the past SIX years (counting the two Obama served as a Senator), YES, that WOULD be the ‘biggest issue’!

  • streiff

    that’s a #WIN

  • Melody Warbington

    I agree with everything you said, rightlane1111. As a conservative, a woman and a boomer. I started working when I was in high school and have worked and paid taxes since. Same for my husband. We didn’t choose to pay SS and Medicare taxes. It’s a forced plan, and the government confiscated those from our paychecks. We’ve planned our retirement with the expectation that we won’t receive any SS. Further, we’d prefer to continue on private insurance and not to be forced to participate in Medicare.

  • jimof ct

    THERE HAD TOIBE A FEW ABORTIONS IN THAT TIME FRAME. PERHAPS BY TAKING A TRIP TO A VACATION SPOT WITH A WELL FUNDED PLANNED PARENTHOOD FACILITY

  • mytraintrax

    I would rather pay for birth control than abortion don’t you think

  • duanej

    What the author of this article doesn’t realize and take into account is how much more expensive something as base as birth control pills is going to cost under Obama-care. Remember, ACA, does NOTHING to lower medical or health care costs and only subsidizes ever increasing costs.

  • Jacobite2

    Here is the missing ‘dot’ that you have to connect. Leftists are either complete aliens to our dominant society (i.e., non-NW Europeans), or they are people who cannot fit in because they are abnormal. Sure, not that many humans are born with any particular abnormality, either physical or mental, but we now find out that when you add up all the freaks, psychos, atheists, criminals, sexual deviates, and just plain a**holes, they are close to half the electorate. Nothing more plain than that women who do not marry, and moreso women who have kids but don’t marry, are abnormal. Now, in any healthy society (animal or human) abnormal individuals don’t live happy lives. Animals either kill them outright or throw them out to die unprotected. Many human societies have been as tough (ancient Greeks) but mostly societies today simply ignore the square-peg/round-holes folks, who can survive quite well because humans dominate nature pretty thoroughly. Notice that one of the early PC campaigns was to de-stigmatize abnormality. It isn’t quite the “A-word” yet, but it doesn’t miss by much. As always, although the mechanism isn’t understood, it is always a mistake to beleive that human behavior, the same in every place and at every time in human history, is useless or counterproductive. Abnormal people cannot be trusted by normal members of society, because no one can know just how far their abnormality extends. Know this: stereotypes are almost always true in general. If you make a practice of ignoring them, ultimately you will always loose, just as the house always wins in the long run, because the odds are on their side.

  • streiff

    that is a helluva statement, don’t you think? Why don’t you explain to me why I don’t “realize and take into account” something that I’m not even talking about in the post.

  • duanej

    Your bcp would be much lower in any other state with reasonable health care regulations. My wife can get them for $5/month at Wal-Mart. If it is that important to you, move to another state or switch to condoms. If you were to move to, say, NC, for example, you would recognize a property tax decrease of 90% for a much larger house on a much larger piece of land. With the money you’d save, you could buy your own pharmacy and get free bcp the rest of your life. In either case, I should not be required to subsidize your sex life, or any other part of your life. No one owes you a living nor do they owe you or your wife bcp.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Tupper/1010664387 David Tupper

    My take is that anyone paying this kind of money for birth control, for recreational sex it should be condoms as they are the only protection against STDs, doesn’t need government help paying for it, they need a tax accountant to help them write it off as a business expense. Much of this started with Sandra Fluke, claiming she needed $3000 per year. Even premium condoms are only about $2 each, so she is claiming a need for 1500 a year or almost 5 per day, every day. Even porn stars and prostitutes take a day off now and then, so why does she need this many if she isn’t working one of those industries?

  • duanej

    I don’t think the article makes the argument that women want birth control to support their promiscuity. The title is accurate that the Obama-care policy does promote promsicuity. This is a fact, even if some, a very few women, use bcp for true medicinal needs. Any drug that is prescribed for HEALTH REASONS is covered by ANY insurance policy the same as any other drug. That was the case long before health care. If a Dr. prescribes bcp for health purposes, he codes that differently than someone a pph would for a teen interested in not getting pregnant. In the former case, insurance plans will cover that the exact same as they would a thyroind medicine or blood pressure medicine. So let’s put that tired old canard to bed.
    I don’t know what is wrong with the view that everyone, women included, should be responsible for their own decisions. That isn’t new or novel and it certainly predates the 50′s and extends forward into the future forever.
    The point of the article is to point out the lunacy of a hypothetical young woman (who we have to assume is a healthy young lady with no pre-condtions, since none were implied or stated explicitly) asking her parents to foot a $18k bill for birth control that you could only get to that amount by living in CA and over a 25 year period. Are we to assume mom and dad are going to have to pay for her bcp up until she’s in her 40′s and married? If I were the parent of the youg lady, I’d offer to have her tubes ligated and when she wanted to procreate, should could pay to have her tubes untied. That would cost much less and would be covered by insurance making my cost reasonable.
    To paint a picture that streiff is somehow wishing to return to victorian age mores is a ridiculous claim on its face and has no place here, especially being proffered by someone who purports to be conservative. If you have a medical condition that requires medicine, I am truly sorry. That in no way compells me to subsidize it under any circumstance. If you want birth control, I am under no obligation to pay for it. Pay for it yourself.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I suspect the cost of many non-necessary medical products will rise under Obamacare. That doesn’t mean that taxpayers should pay for them for others to elect to use.

  • Perdido

    renl57,
    That is the most well stated take on income taxes the IRS could dream of.
    It is diametrically at odds with the facts and the law.
    You have been grossly misled as to the liability for and the use of the taxes.
    Income taxes pay interest, period.

  • Perdido

    Income taxes don’t pay for birth control. Income taxes pay interest. Borrowed money will be paying for her birth control. Let her borrow it.

  • Perdido

    Yes they were. What was not intended was all the extended benefits and beneficiaries. It was set up to help widows and orphans. Everything else is a distortion.

  • Perdido

    Oh, please. Medicare is a form of insurance. It is paid for by the pool of insured. Believe it or not, the citizen has a choice of whether to pay those costs. (See Galveston, Tx and the Rail Road Board)

  • Perdido

    @ GretchieBaby: Mostly flies, you’re stinking the discussion up.

  • streiff

    This is wrong on both counts. 1) no part of Medicare is paid for by an insurance pool. Every part of Medicare requires extensive subsidies from general revenues. 2) The citizen has no choice. Railroad employees have their own plan. State employees are not required to participate in either SS or Medicare IF their state opts out. The employee has zero choice.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bobbi-Bennett/100000186261420 Bobbi Bennett

    most insurance policies already cover the pill for medical needs – in either case it can be purchased relatively inexpensively. (One of the reasons insurance is so expensive is that it is no longer insurance, but more of a pre-paid yearly medical plan that assumes you will need everything.) The cost of an abortion is less than $1,000, even less if you are poor and go to Planned Parenthood. Still doesn’t add up to $18,000.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bobbi-Bennett/100000186261420 Bobbi Bennett

    all well and good, but the mandate that all insurance cover birth control with no co-pay didn’t come from the legislature.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bobbi-Bennett/100000186261420 Bobbi Bennett

    Not quite. Medicare and SS are separate taxes (don’t you read your paystub?) – the people who receive those benefits paid into them. You don’t get SS payments if you didn’t pay the requisite number of quarters in SS taxes to qualify.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bobbi-Bennett/100000186261420 Bobbi Bennett

    Sorry, I’m a woman. I don’t think government should pay for birth control for all women at no co-pay. It’s silly. Subsidies for the poor, OK. I don’t like it, think charities can cover it, but OK. (even though subsidies so far haven’t meant that poor and young women are using it, or using it correctly – teen births and single women births have increased, not decreased, since federal funding became available.) But why should every woman – even those who can well afford it, get free birth control? If we spend money there, we don’t have it to spend somewhere else where it may be truly needed.

  • californiasquish

    Nowhere in my post did I suggest anyone but myself should pay for my wife’s bcp. To suggest otherwise is to show very poor reading comprehension.

    However, I agree with your ancillary point. Yes, property taxes are great in states where nobody wants to live.

  • Pingback: gsdfghsdkflhgksdfl

  • Pingback: getwhgdrthfyjfygujfuyg

  • Pingback: wnetrza sklep�w

  • Pingback: Extreme weight loss diet

  • Pingback: birkin handbag

  • Pingback: learn more

  • Pingback: Related Site

  • Pingback: great post to read

  • Pingback: onion chopper

  • Pingback: Get More Info

  • Pingback: high intensity training

  • Pingback: Hayden Vanschuyver

  • Pingback: Get the facts

  • Pingback: software toko program kasir terbaik

  • Pingback: leapfrog leappad explorer

  • Pingback: nikon d600

  • Pingback: google sniper 2 review

  • Pingback: buy viagra gold online

  • Pingback: Get More Information

  • Pingback: swissdent

  • Pingback: rank site SEO

  • Pingback: mastercard casino

  • Pingback: Make money Youtube video

  • Pingback: http://pond5promocode.weebly.com/

  • Pingback: Gail Mulligan

  • Pingback: Morris Nocon

  • Pingback: sushi catering boston ma

  • Pingback: Get More Information

  • Pingback: Danette Remy

  • Pingback: real estate in dubai

  • Pingback: More web design Info

  • Pingback: monoloop.com

  • Pingback: alternatives to steroids

  • Pingback: best supplements for muscle gain

  • Pingback: Find Out More

  • Pingback: Homepage

  • Pingback: This Site

  • Pingback: legal steroids

  • Pingback: gadgets

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: Used Classified Cars

  • Pingback: pakej umrah 2013

  • Pingback: computers-database

  • Pingback: keys to astral projection

  • Pingback: estate agents glasgow

  • Pingback: out of body experience definition

  • Pingback: gay

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: rv warranty

  • Pingback: car tire

  • Pingback: Discover More

  • Pingback: My Homepage

  • Pingback: homes for sale in Indianapolis

  • Pingback: pure green coffee bean extracts

  • Pingback: sps support cake systems

  • Pingback: why supply chain management

  • Pingback: link

  • Pingback: gutters

  • Pingback: Going Here

  • Pingback: Dell Battery

  • Pingback: Best Credit Repair

  • Pingback: Sharebuilder 200 promo code

  • Pingback: hamster porn

  • Pingback: tartamudez

  • Pingback: toronto plumbers

  • Pingback: Red Dawn

  • Pingback: get more followers on tumblr

  • Pingback: Nikon v2

  • Pingback: Make Money Youtube

  • Pingback: Tas Branded

  • Pingback: business

  • Pingback: noclegi roztocze

  • Pingback: lecteur datamatrix

  • Pingback: Remote Control

  • Pingback: Allevamento Rottweiler

  • Pingback: abc blinds

  • Pingback: Dumpsters

  • Pingback: Dumpster Deliveries

  • Pingback: have a peek at these guys

  • Pingback: buy real instagram followers

  • Pingback: free annual credit report

  • Pingback: local one night stands

  • Pingback: http://targetbabyregistry.weebly.com/

  • Pingback: Youtube Make Money

  • Pingback: gaming tips

  • Pingback: Organo Gold Scam

  • Pingback: Solavei

  • Pingback: how to make money online

  • Pingback: super cheap car insurance

  • Pingback: Laura Brunk

  • Pingback: teen porn

  • Pingback: ldlhdlcholesterollevels.org

  • Pingback: zynga poker chips hacks

  • Pingback: hair loss treatment for men

  • Pingback: lida hapi

  • Pingback: arts and crafts

  • Pingback: great post to read

  • Pingback: website logo design