« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Obama’s Talking Points About Tonight

Remember that story the other day about Romney and the “zingers” for the debate? It struck me as more the Obama campaign pushing a story than anything real from the Romney camp.

Below are the talking points the Obama camp is circulating this morning to get their surrogates ready for the media discussion. Note their use of the “zingers” bit among other things. Also, let’s laugh at the Obama camp saying they have a specific plan and Romney is “hiding.”

Relatedly, here is Stephanie Cutter’s spin memo.

Today’s Talking Points

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

TONIGHT’S DEBATE: The President Will Keep Sharing His Specific Vision for Moving Forward; Romney Hides the Details of His Plans Since He Knows They’re Bad for the Middle Class

Key Point: At tonight’s debate, President Obama will continue his conversation with the American people about his specific, concrete plans to restore middle-class security and move our country forward. Romney will keep hiding his specific details behind lies, distortions and “zingers” because he knows what voters do – that his policies are bad for the middle class.

President Obama and Mitt Romney have two very different approaches coming into tonight’s debate.

  • President Obama will continue his conversation with voters about restoring middle-class security, creating jobs and growing our economy for everyone.
  • Romney can finally reveal the specifics behind his plans, but he doesn’t have any, so he’ll probably just try to land some of the “zingers” he’s been memorizing.
  • Just this morning one of Romney’s top advisors said it’s hard to get into specifics in a debate. Last time we checked, that’s what debates are supposed to be about.

Must See: This new OFA memo and this new OFA web video outlining and debunking the many promises and contradictions we’ll hear from Romney tonight.

Romney doesn’t have a single idea to create new jobs and the math of his plans just doesn’t add up, so he’ll do what he does best: lie about the President’s record, distort his own and try to peddle his five-point plan – but as usual, it’s all a sham.

  • Energy: He claims he’ll make us energy independent by 2020, but even using his own math, Romney’s drilling-only plan leaves us dependent on foreign oil. Under President Obama, our dependence on foreign oil has reached a 20-year low.
  • Small Businesses: He says he’ll champion them, but he’d risk raising taxes on 30 million small business owners to pay for his $5 trillion tax plan skewed to the wealthiest. President Obama has cut taxes for small businesses 18 times.
  • Education: He says he’ll improve schools but won’t detail how. His budget cuts would slash Pell Grants and lead to teacher layoffs, but he’d cut taxes for the wealthy. The President doubled Pell Grant funding and prevented teacher layoffs.
  • Trade: He says he’ll sign trade agreements and stand up to China, but he sent our jobs there, attacked the President for enforcing trade laws against Chinese tires, and one economist said his plans could create 800,00 jobs overseas. The President signed three new trade agreements and is standing up for American workers.
  • Deficit: He says he’ll balance the budget, but his math doesn’t add up. He’d give the Pentagon $2 trillion it hasn’t asked for and cut taxes by $5 trillion, but he won’t say how he’ll pay for any of it. The President’s balanced plan reduces the deficit by more than $4 trillion, cuts spending and asks the wealthy to pay more.
  • He says he’ll create 12 million jobs in the next four years, but independent economists say we’re already on track to do that, and outside analysis says his plans would cost nearly 2 million jobs by 2014. We were losing 800,000 jobs a month when the President took office, and businesses have since created nearly 5.1 million new jobs over the past 30 straight months of private-sector growth.
  • Taxes: He’ll say tax cuts for the wealthy will fix everything, even though they got us into this mess. Independent economists say he’d have to raise middle-class taxes to pay for his tax cuts for the wealthiest. President Obama has cut taxes by $3,600 for the typical middle-class family since taking office.
  • Obamacare: He says he’ll repeal it, raising costs for seniors and letting insurance companies drop coverage for preexisting conditions. One of the architects of both Romneycare and Obamacare says that would nearly double premiums and out-of-pocket costs in the individual market compared to the President’s plan while leaving 51 million more Americans uninsured.

President Obama will discuss his specific, concrete plans to move us forward – like creating a million new manufacturing jobs, doubling our exports, cutting our oil imports in half and reducing the deficit in a balanced way that protects the middle class.

The President has been open about his specific vision for our country, but Romney keeps hiding the details of his plans because he knows what voters do, and what independent experts have said for months – that his policies are bad for the middle class.

# # #

COMMENTS

  • streiff

    “Osama bin Laden is dead. So is Chris Stevens.”

  • rustyoldgarand

    Well, you’re right that sticking to our guns ideologically regarding taxes on the wealthy is making it harder for Romney to make his case. Personally, I’d rather win the election with a compromise on the upper tax bracket than lose it without one.

  • rustyoldgarand

    That’s pretty good. Maybe you should debate BHO?

  • golffan1963

    Beware of any “snap polls” that the networks might promote in their post-debate coverage. CBS and CNN usually do them, and I cannot recall any debate—not a single one—where these polls called the Republican the winner. A great example is 2000. Those quick—and usually unscientific—polls all went in Gore’s favor, yet later it became accepted fact that he lost all three debates.

  • rustyoldgarand

    Sadly, in many ways, I think Romney is running against Bush. This isn’t the first time the dems have pulled this manuever. FDR won two elections in a row essentially running against Hoover. No, I’m not quite old enough to remember it.

  • fightnright

    hey, let’s hope ‘awkward’ exposes ‘failed leftist weasel wearing moderate mask’.

  • deano64

    Right…the President has specific plans to create a million manufacturing jobs,double exports, cut oil imports in half and reduce the deficit. I’ll be looking to hear all the specifics tonight on how he is going to do this. My only question would be if he can do this in the next 4 years why didn’t he already accomplish this in the last 4 years?

  • Gordon

    9 pm!

  • http://www.justintribble.com Justin Tribble

    Of course it’s horrible! Obama is horrible! The information is out there, but it’s not connecting with enough voters! Reconnect & reassure in the first debate, gain trust, then level Obama in the next two.

    But if you can’t capture their ear, they aren’t going to listen to you. “Obama’s bad, elect me” doesn’t win you the presidency! “We need a new president” doesn’t win it.

  • jamesm

    Thats good. Devastating

  • http://www.justintribble.com Justin Tribble

    Romney never should have proposed a tax plan that lowers tax rates for the rich — not in this climate, not in a climate where the media is forever fussing about the “1%” and Occupy Wall Street makes headlines. Don’t even go there. Just propose massive lower income and middle class tax cuts below the $150,000 income level or so, and literally have nothing to say about higher income earners, and maintain tepid, quiet support for the Bush Tax cuts.

    I’d even argue Romney should have proposed to raise taxes on the rich early on. It would have just completely taken the wind out of the sails of the Dems’ argument that Romney is “for the rich.”

    If you know what your opponent is going to target you on, why do you go and do the very thing that gives him ammunition against you?

    The American people don’t understand this on an economic or philosophical level. You can’t get into that right now. You can’t make nuanced arguments about closing “tax loopholes”. Please.

  • jakeincarolina

    Agree completely! The Senior Bush always got a bum rap, IMO. He was a great President.

  • Bill S

    It’s quite useful…

  • stosh126

    Cutter has laid out all the ‘specifics’ on what she assumes Romney will say; and debunked them. Yet, all she says about Obama is he will again state he will create 1 million manufacturing jobs, but she doesn’t state ‘specifics’. Hilarious and sad at the same time.

  • Melody Warbington

    Keep reading, and for the record, it’s a conservative site. Generally speaking and IMHO, the analysis and comments here are good because they’re fact and experience driven rather than emotion driven. Most do their research and provide solid evidence. Further, we stick to the rules of no profanity and being respectful which makes for a more polite community, although things can get heated occasionally and lines may be crossed.

  • krish

    there was an interesting article in WSJ by Fred Barnes….take a look…hope Romeny team took note of what all the people supporting him are saying….go on the offense! Playing defense has not helped so far!

  • backatcha1

    Exactly… her retorts are baseless accusations against Romney and factless cheerleading for Obama. Reverse spin and do it again…

  • rabun1016

    Not really. The Civil Rights reform act giving all disgruntled employees jury trials versus judge trials was a disaster, and the Disabilities act was not much better.

  • fightnright

    thumbs-up to clowngirl & jake re the glory days and their true origin.

    I think sometimes Repubs forget how much the Dems ~idolize~ this president as a personality, totally apart from political considerations. Libs are a starstruck crowd, and Bill & Barry, their two young kewl hip presidents are mega-celebrities to them. Recalling the Kennedy era, the Clinton and Obama years are a later-generation’s Camelot, and Dems long to extend the triumph of their Golden Age.

  • rightlane1111

    Hey…he spent OUR money to campaign…NOT HIS prior to his convention.

  • jakeincarolina

    There’s a lot more to Bush’s tenure than those two acts though, no?

  • Concerned4America

    Well the prophets and soothsayers have nothing to fear from MS Cutter. What I saw bore no resemblance to what she said was going to happen.
    – No zingers.
    – As many details as you can get in a two minute comment.

  • Concerned4America

    Obama wants specifics so he can attack them. Obama is saying the reason he lost is because he came prepared to argue what he thought Romney’s positions were. Romney “cheated” by being smarter, better prepared and better looking that Obama. LOL. Once a stoner, always a stoner.