« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

On Eye Contact and God-Kings

On Wednesday night, Mitt Romney was respectful of Barack Obama when Barack Obama challenged him. Mitt Romney looked Barack Obama in the eye when Barack Obama challenged Romney. He kept a smiling demeanor to his challenge in the room.

Wednesday night, Mitt Romney was the challenge in the room for Barack Obama and Barack Obama would not look at him. Barack Obama kept his head down, eyes fixed on his podium. This is a metaphor for the entirety of Barack Obama’s Presidency.

Mr. Obama does not make eye contact with the challenges he faces. He looks down or away.

He came into the White House to dire fiscal times. No one denies it. But Barack Obama declared a recovery in June of 2009. Instead of looking the challenge in the eyes and staring it down, Barack Obama declared it no longer a problem and pivoted to healthcare. Even as the fiscal storm raged, Barack Obama said it turned out to be worse than he and his advisors expected, but he wouldn’t make eye contact with the problem. He set about destroying our healthcare system instead in the name of reform.

In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon exploded off shore. It took the President almost two months to look the challenge in the eyes, address the nation, and tell us what he was going to do. In the meantime, his administration overreacted doing untold harm to the Gulf Coast economy. Still, the President refused to meet the challenge of our economic situation, pivoting from health care to Solyndra.

Now, we have another challenge. The Middle East is in chaos and our Ambassador is dead. The Presidential campaign went from “Osama is dead and Al Qaeda is on the run” to “Al Qaeda is alive and our Ambassador assassinated.” But the President refused to face this challenge too. Instead, he blamed a YouTube video. We now know the President and his administration knew of the security risk. We now know the President and his administration were pretty sure, within twenty-four hours of September 11th, that we had yet again been attacked by terrorists on September 11th.

But the President refused to look us or the problem in the eyes. As his Press Secretary, Secretary of State, and Defense chiefs were beginning to acknowledge it was a terrorist attack, Barack Obama still refused to make eye contact with the problem. He refused to even acknowledge it existed, hiding still behind a YouTube video.

I have reservations about Mitt Romney. I’m a conservative. Of course I do. They are well known. But make no mistake about it — Mitt Romney will make eye contact with the challenges of the day instead of looking away at a podium, a desk, or a distraction. I may not always agree with him, but at least I know I can trust him to make eye contact with the challenges of our day and set about solving them, not looking for easy distractions and fleeting glories.

Barack Obama won’t make eye contact with the challenges of the day and he won’t accept responsibility for having to deal with them. Nothing is his fault. Nothing is his blame. Only credit flows to Barack Obama. Now more people are out of the job market than any time since the Carter recession, our Ambassador to Libya is dead, and the black flag of Al Qaeda rises from our own flag poles at our own Embassies in the Middle East.

For five years the left has told us Barack Obama came off Mount Olympus to be our God-King. Now they say the elevation in Denver, lower than that of Olympus, was too high for him. The god-king of the Cult of Personality bleeds. Pay no attention to any of it. Make no eye contact with reality — not to him being merely a flawed man in over his head, not to our dead Ambassador, not to the unemployed, not to Al Qaeda’s black flag.

No, the god-King commands we pay attention to Big Bird and birth control — issues that, unlike Christopher Stevens and millions of unemployed, truly matter when staring down at the podium instead of making eye contact with the future.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.facebook.com/RottDawg Andy Miller

    Brilliantly writen Erick!

  • lineholder

    Well done, Erick. Well done indeed!! Thank you.

    There are policy position points where I’m not entirely in agreement with Romney either, but there are a couple of things that I’ve learned about his character that have brought an unexpected confidence in the man.

    He does genuinely care about people. He isn’t afraid to take on a challenge. He’s even proven that he can be tenacious in facing things head on when he has to be. And he LOVES this nation of ours.

    I’ve gone from reluctantly supporting Romney as the lesser of two evils to genuinely believing that he is very much so capable of providing the kind of leadership that our nation needs now.

    This is our nation, our country, our home…and our people. Our people are hurting right now. We need someone who will face the tough challenges head on!!

    You’ve done a good thing here, Erick. Thank you again.

  • cardcarryingmom

    beautifully written and moving piece. However, I believe Obama knows exactly what he’s doing and he is not in over his head. He WANTS to destroy America and, in particular, to harm certain segments (one specific color, gender and generation) of America. He is the ultimate hate monger and hatred and anger feeds and loves other hatred and anger… We need to continue to look this hate mongerer deep into his eyes and thank god Mitt Romney has the courage to do it…

  • catbird

    Brilliant

  • commonsenseobserver

    Romney should hire Erick :P

  • catbird

    the Jason Blair presidency – burning down his master’s house

  • glen thompson

    You can’t help yourself can you Eric? Gotta get that dig in on Romney even when writing about Obama. Perhaps it passed you by, I’ll re-inform you: Romney is our presidential nominee and it is our job, for the sake of the country, to support him come rain or shine. With friends like you, who in the hell needs enemies. Stay the hell off CNN if you are not going to represent our interests.

  • glen thompson

    I see you now wisely see Romney for what he is and offer your 100% support. Now if we can only convince Erick Erickson to do same. I am sick and tired of hearing him going off about Romney’s shortfalls. Angry because his guy did not win and still wallowing in sour grapes. Putting his childish behavior ahead of the present needs of our country. Feeling it is more important to be loved by his buddies at CNN than putting a Republican in the White House. What a loser!

  • glen thompson

    Why, so Erick can continue his one-man destruction campaign more directly? Go back to the beginning and read some crap Erick has put out there against Romney. Read it carefully. It might surprise you.

  • commonsenseobserver

    ???

  • Gabby in Florida

    I was kinna wondering why you go on CNN all the time and brow beat the team your suppose to be representing I lost interest in your blog because of that..

  • jbritterjr

    Superb column, Mr. Erickson. This could be a powerful theme for an ad, even a series of ads. Mitt has the track record and the maturity of a leader. Obama, his handlers, and his enablers (read mainstream media) have put forth a false messianic image of him that is far removed from his morally and intestinally weak core.

  • streiff

    we lost interest in you, too

  • streiff

    we’ve never been a pro-Romney site. I banned the most noxious Rombots during the primaries. But Romney is our nominee and while he’s still learning to converse in pidgin-Conservative, he’s one helluva lot better than Obama and we are doing more to help elect him than the GOP establishment.

  • tngal

    One line is choking you? One stinking line! What is the problem? He’s going to vote for the man, and that should be enough. And, by the way, no one is expected to support anyone “come rain or shine”. Vote for your candidate, exhault praises if you like something they do – but if they err in judgement call them on it. If they have shown, in your opinion, bad judgement in the past be mindful and even a bit wary as they may do the same in the future. Make no mistake, for a lot of people here voting for him is a means to an end.

  • duanej

    We are not the party of sheep. We think our own thoughts and believe our own beliefs. I will vote for Mitt Romney in November, but I will never pledge eternal devotion to him or even just “support him come rain or shine”. If he makes a mistake, if he goes down the path of the big spenders, it is Eric’s job, your joub, my job, and everyone else’s job to keep the fire to his feet the entire time he is in office. If he does a great job, I will be there patting him on the back, but we cannot just blindly support the man “come hell or high water” especially if he is the one who brings the hell or the high water.

  • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Loren Heal

    It doesn’t have to be in every story.

  • http://teapartisan.wordpress.com Loren Heal

    No, Obama knows what he wants, to do, he’s just not man enough to get it done. He’s lazy and incompetent, as well as being anti-American, or we’d be in an even worse situation than we are currently in.

  • benson1

    There’s another plus for Romney. He met with a very controversial man who the left describes as Islamaphobic. This guy is an expert. I read this so many months ago I don’t remember where I read it, but I believed it. It’s my belief Romney understands the danger we face from Muslim immigration and doesn’t intend to cowtow to liberal multiculturalism. I think he’ll stand up strongly against any attempt to implement sharia law or any other encroachments by Muslims in the US. This is one area where we can’t afford to have a wishy washy president. I hope I’m right.

  • kimley

    I believe with all my heart that Mitt Romney is the most qualified candidate we have ever had running for president. His life experiences and talents have prepared him for this moment in time. We are most blessed to have him – end of story!!!!

  • tngal

    Who left the gate open on the squishy pen last night? Now they’re running around all over the place, baaing and bleating, and generally being nuisances.

  • danvito

    Glen: Yes, it’s our job. Just like taking out the garbage and giving meds to the cat. Excuse us if we hope for an opportunity to vote for a candidate as our pleasure, instead of just a “job”. Since Ronaldus Magnus, I’ve been voting as a job, then spending 4 years raising heck as Conservative values get thrown under the bus – and the train.

    I have a principal: Listen to what people do, not so much what they say. This is particularly valuable when it comes to politicians. I’m overjoyed that Zero had his head handed to him on Wednesday night and thank Romney for doing it with a smile on his face. BUT, when it comes to Conservative values, what Mr. Etch-A-Sketch has done speaks most clearly.

    Mitt Romney: At least he’s not a commie.

  • Daveevad1

    If Obama wins we won’t have any Presidential feet to HOLD to the fire.

    First things first. We need to impart TOTAL support to Romney-Ryan and every Republican Senate candidate (even Akin), in order to get Obama and Reid out.

  • JuneUSA

    I don’t like Obama. I don’t like anything he has done to bring our country down. What worries me is, even if 75% of us vote for Romney, how do we win over the illegal votes? Fraud is rampant in this administration and they are totallly out of control. They go by “anything goes to win”. I am so tired of the lies and that is their new campaign. Just listen to Axlerod and Reid and on and on and on. We deserve an honest election. I want values back in our country. Politians have taken over and 90% are tainted. It is time they cleaned house themselves and put regulations and fines on cheating, lies and illegal acts, and put our country and Constitution first before themselves.

  • tngal

    Good one danvito. Mine says vote for Mitt. He sucks less.

  • rkinroanoke

    While I enjoyed the battering of O the other night, in review there was much that Romney said that I really liked. Even more in his speech to CPAC Colorado yesterday. It is our job, not just to get him elected, but to hold him to his rhetoric.
    When he spoke of liking teachers but it being a state and local government job to hire them, we need to hold him to that.
    When he says he will look at programs and ask is it worth borrowing from China for this, he needs to know that we agree and expect him to live up to that.
    When he speaks of the Constitution with reverence I stand and cheer; but expect him to continue that while in office.
    When he talks about the potential devastation of our crushing debt and the need to reduce it; we exhale and say finally! But we need to make him know that we expect him to mean it; with a big Veto pen if necessary.
    Nearly everyone reading and posting on this site is going to vote for Mr. Romney. Many will help with money and work to GOTV.
    But the effort does not stop November 6th. That will be the end of phase I. If we really want to rein in government, we need to let Mr. Romney and the Representatives and Senators we will elect know, that getting elected is not the goal; it is what they do after that matters.
    Liberals judge politicians on their intentions.
    Conservatives judge on results!

  • ConstitutionMan

    Everyone, please don’t be like Dems and read into Glenn’s comment words that are not there. I believe he means “come hell or high water” until November 7th!

  • celador2

    EE, ^
    ZAP , BOOM,BAM! and HOT STUFF!

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    The report is Obamaloney – the U6 unemployment number is unchanged. Rick Santelli actually called that it would get to under 8%. Obama and his minions will try to use it to change the narrative, certainly.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Millions of Americans out of work. Our workforce participation at record lows. 1 in 6 Americans in poverty. Americans trying to make paychecks that are an average of $4000 smaller meet gas prices that have doubled.
    Not just a statistic, not just a talking point. Real people, and real victims of Obamanomics.

  • Lucky3511

    lets impeach the God King, then charge him with treason and anything else we can get him on. He will fit nicely in Gitmo

  • zeprin

    The Prez is showing himself to be a Tough Guy when he can kick someone when they’re down. Or throw a punch when his buddies are holding his target. But One on One, he’s showing what he is. A coward. Someone else is supposed to take the blows in his place. Americans will forgive a lot in their Presidents. But Wishywashiness and Cowardice are the two things they will never forgive.

  • Lucky3511

    Nobody asks you to. Just get the great pretender out of office and into Gitmo. Then we can all work on trying to wake Romney up to the fact that America likes to work. Not sit on their butts and collect welfare. SO help us get Jobs Romney.

  • commonsenseobserver

    We have to keep Mitt, Paul, and America in prayer. The new job numbers have convinced me that Chicago will do anything to stay in power.

  • gerrym51

    I’m sure no one ever 100 percent agrees with everything any candidate says-ever been married

  • Albert Maslar

    Liberals are in lockstep over their agendas that are their god.
    Conservatives are basically for doing the right thing at the right time
    for the good of God and Country, concepts anathema to modern Liberals
    now going back 100 years and calling themselves Progressives. Liberals
    die over the right of killing babies in the womb, 1.2 Million per year
    since Roe v. Wade in 1973, 80 Million to date including progeny, and
    they wonder why consumer can’t spike the economy; because we killed the
    goose that laid the golden egg. When words don’t mean what they say,
    Liberals change the meaning like in marriage that was always and
    traditionally between one man and one woman that they pollute to same
    sex, multi-sex, and whatever. Conservatives can disagree about certain issues and politicians but they do no disagree on Natural Law principles.

  • celador2

    bar, imo The post was about Obama’s failings on a personal and policy level and frankly Romney by comparison comes out well.
    The jab you perceive, which I do not see, is that EE positioned his own views into the essay to tell us from where he speaks on the spectrum, but so what. He reminds us of his past opposition as he is a conservative but is now solidly backing the party nominee.
    The rest of the insightful post boosts Romney personally and diminishes Obama’s serious lack of skills and priorities to be president. Obama lacks the drive to look people in the room or problems in the eye. Obama prefers Big Bird and birth control as fighting issues. Romney has that abilty to address the major issues of our day– from Middle East chaos, to joblessness unending,
    Romney’s the man.
    Romney-Ryan 2012

  • commonsenseobserver

    Hahaha. The newest job numbers seem to encapsulate the Obama presidency very well: the part-time President.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    yes the numbers are indeed driven by a large increase in part time employment. Only Barack Obama would consider that good news.

  • celador2

    glen, I have never read such a compelling essay on why to vote for Romney. It lays out policy and personal qualifications to be president and CIC clearly and the comparisons all are in Romney’s favor. Al queda black flags fly over US embassies andObama fusses about a fake birth control issue as his campaign priority. There is no middle gound, no nuance in that essay—-its Romney all the way.
    Romney-Ryan 2012

  • streiff

    this type of posting will get you banned if it continues. You only escaped this time because I took the time to review comments you made on other sites.

  • ihateliberals

    it is funny that the President’s catch phrase is “Forward”. The thing is you can’t move forward if you are looking down. to move forward you have to be aware of what is ahead and be prepared to deal with it or there won’t be any forward motion. Forward is not the direction we are moving unless the new forward is really backwards. worst thing is that we not only are going backwards but side-slipping into the ditch as well.

  • WA_Cowboy

    Wow Erick. Well done.

  • streiff

    let’s point them out some time after January.

  • fisk2521

    I think we have to ask ourselves some important questions. As we watched the debate, whom did we feel was a man that did everything he could to be honest and not lie to the American public? And which one has done everything he can to deceive them? Where can we place our trust for the future of this country and its culture? I think the answers are obvious. Frankly, I think the President looked menacing, and unfriendly….his lack of eye contact and demeanor told us all we need to know.

  • commonsenseobserver

    But I think this latest jobs report does highlight the danger of attacking statistics rather than the policies behind them. I think Romney showed signs of attacking on policy and philosophy, and hopefully he and Ryan will.
    Judging from Biden’s 2008 debate, he will try to attack Mitt’s record. And talk a lot about GM & foreign policy. We need to deconstruct those talking points that Romney didn’t have a chance to himself.
    It’s a fundamental difference of records, philosophies, and results. We believe in free people, in communities, friends, and families. They believe in government first. We believe in measuring outcomes, and the difference we make in people’s lives by expanding opportunity and preserving security. They believe in pork.

  • commonsenseobserver

    He did try to look right at the camera, and it made things even worse. He looked shifty and secretive, much like the caricature of Mitt he’s been trying to paint.
    I thought Romney would do well to try that, but he didn’t. Perhaps he will in the last debate, and maybe Ryan in his.

  • ihateliberals

    At this point in our history this election has nothing to do with who the Republican candidate is. It could be Big Bird and we would still have to support and elect him in order to stop Obama. maybe big bird wouldn’t be any better but at least one socialist candidate would be stopped in his tracks. if we agree that this became the greatest nation in the world based on our freedoms then we have to always vote against people that want to stop the free markets and that always has been the Liberals since the beginning of this country. We can’t worry about what kind of President Romney might make until we sto the known failing President that is in office now. If romney doesn’t cut it at least in four years we can try again. with Obama in for another fours years there might not be a chance to try gain.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Obama is really silly. Does he really think we wouldn’t catch:
    1) Part-time jobs
    2) Big government
    He just opened himself to more attacks in exchange for an unemployment rate that’s still too high and workforce participation that’s still at record lows, and prices at record highs and incomes at record lows.

  • ipeduto

    Nice analogy, Erick – that’s why you are so good. While Romney is no conservative, Obama is no American. There’s no real competition.

  • soljerblue

    Judging by glen’s post above, he not only doesn’t get it, he doesn’t want to.

  • soljerblue

    Obama is long on hate and short on intellect — thus a perfect tool and puppet for the commie left that is backing him, funding him, and steering him on the course they want. Obama on his own would be a pushover, as he was Wednesday night. It’s the long, shadowy line in back of him, and the ‘bots voting for him that scare he!! out of me.