« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

I Donated to Barack Obama

The President has come under fire for the shoddy verification processing his campaign does for donations.

In light of this Newsweek story about the Illegal-Donor loophole with Team ObamaA while back, among conservatives, it was even a story that he was doing this shoddy credit card verification for overseas donors.

So, after talking with some lawyers about the process, etc. I donated to Barack Obama. Sort of.

It is rare that I do something where I feel the need to talk to lawyers first. But giving money to Barack Obama was one of those times.

I didn’t actually do it. I made up a name, made up a passport number, made up an address in Russia — hell I made everything up except my credit card number and expiration date.

Got that?

Everything was bull**** except the actual credit card number and expiration date. Everything.

Go try that with Target or Amazon or Apple or Mitt Romney’s campaign and see what happens. Here’s a hint: it’d get rejected.

When the zip code does not match, it would get rejected.

When the name on the card does not match, it will probably get rejected.

When nothing matches, it will get rejected.

Barack Obama’s campaign processed my very generous $5.00 donation.

Thankyoufordonating

For several days my bank listed it as processing.

Obamadonationprocessing

Then this is where the anti-climactic end to my story comes. The donation ultimately did not go through after three days of being listed as “processing.” There was no explanation.

Had the Obama campaign turned on basic verification, my transaction would have been rejected immediately. Instead, it lingered for a few days before being rejected.

I do not know what processes the Obama campaign employs to weed these out. It actually appeared, based on the way it processed for several days, that the bank stopped it, not that Barack Obama stopped it. For the liberals saying my donation did not go through so there should be no problem — here’s the problem. The Obama campaign processed the donation. It was Bank of America that stopped it, not Team Obama. Team Obama let it be processed, something that would not have happened in Romney’s campaign or most any retailer in the nation.

I do not know why they chose not to use the credit verification value system (CVV). I am glad, ultimately, that my donation was rejected. But I wonder if I had put in other data that seemed more credible — not a ridiculous fake name, a passport number of just multiple zeros, etc. would it have been rejected?

It sure seems the easiest, front line defense to avoid these sorts of transactions — a basic CVV check for credit cards — should be the default setting for campaigns. In Barack Obama’s case, it wasn’t. For pre-paid cards, several people tell me the situation is even worse and the transitions most likely will go through given the security set up of the Obama campaign.

This, like his failure to make eye contact with challenges, is just another tell tale sign that something is amiss with Team Obama.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Michael Dugas

    You can type in the drop down box….while its blank….and not dropped down. Just did it myself.

  • Michael Dugas

    You can type in the drop down box while it’s blank and not dropped down.

  • CuriousGuy12

    Yeah but you can’t type the name of a state that doesn’t exist in the list. This is sounding really phony and if it’s incorrect the record should be corrected ASAP because it just makes RedState look bad.

  • salvagesalvage

    You did not donate the Obama as a fake Russian, the process that the Obama campaign uses to vet the donations IS THE BANK OF AMERICA you fucking retard.

    Yes, the campaign is totally set up to check out numbers, they wouldn’t use oh I don’t know A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION that already knows the laws, has the tools and the experience to do so.

    LIKE BANK OF AMERICA.

    I know CNN had to hire a wingnut to get the wingnut dollar but did they have to hire THE STUPIDEST FUCKING WINGNUT on the Internet?

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    Actually, I used a proxy.

  • grateful_red

    Um, sorry to break it to you, were a nation of laws. Not just the ones you agree with (see also immigration) but all of them.
    Donations from foreign nationals are illegal. If you think that is wrong/unfair – have the house pass a bill, the senate pass the same bill and have a sitting president sign it.
    Until then quit trying to rationalize/excuse blatantly illegal activity because the means justify the ends you desire.

  • Bill S

    I’ll just blacklist you here and hope that it trickles through to your other Disqus sites

  • grateful_red

    No – but Tim Geitner is doing this with the federal printing press…. He just keeps cranking out more bills, handing them to the fed in exchanging them for treasury notes so we can keep spending them to buy votes.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    I will give you five bucks if you will buy yourself a life with it. Pathetic.

  • ihateliberals

    There is just so much wrong with the Obama campaign and this just adds to verify the corruption of the Chicago Gang. These guys make Al Capon look like a Sunday school teacher. My personal Opinion is that foreign citizens and governments should not be allowed to donate to any American government campaign or candidate.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Kossler/842345064 Bill Kossler

    This comment from Seth Millstein was flagged by Redstate as “inappropriate:” “I tried to donate to Obama with fake credentials. It got rejected. Therefore, something is amiss with Team Obama.” Nice logic there.” Apparently Redstate’s idea of “inappropriate” is not a personal attack, as most of the comments are personal attacks on Obama. Rather, pointing out the obvious, major flaw in Erickson’s thinking – that’s “inappropriate.” We see the measure of the man here.

  • Serenata

    I also love Claude Rain’s closing line in “Casablanca”: “Round up the usual suspects”….I have a litany for that–like the entire B. Hussein Obama white house.
    Such rank corruption and actual treason, but who believes it, and who is really listening?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Kossler/842345064 Bill Kossler

    Since you tried and failed to donate illicitly, where is your evidence that it can be done? You somehow forgot to include that in your article. Perhaps an oversight? A big oversight to forget to include any evidence that what you claim is actually occurring? Or could it be that you have nothing? You tried and failed, and this “it was the bank” ruse is a lamely transparent diversion. So it was the bank? Were you expecting a handwritten letter written by Obama himself and brought to you personally by Robert Gibbs acting as a bicycle courier? The bank has no reason to turn down the donation, unless you’ve maxed out your credit card. This is a lame propaganda effort even from you. Why didn’t you just write some other, less obviously nonsense, smear after this idea fell apart on you?

  • focusedthought

    Hey look, you missed the point too.

    Erick is saying it would be appropriate for Obama’s campaign to have rejected his donation because it claimed to be coming from a Russian, with no passport, or employment, or anything indicating they even MIGHT be a legal donor. Instead, the bank (apparently) had to stop the donation. Why is it so difficult to (at the VERY least) require someone to at least claim to have a valid reason to donate?

    As pointed out, both online companies and other political candidates have set up their accounts to do more thorough checks, and to reject such “donations” out-of-hand. Why can we not expect that level of transparent honesty from the president?

  • http://lvjohnston.blogspot.com/ lvjohnston

    OK, part two of today’s quiz… CC processing/data capture starts with… anyone? Yes, the site taking the CC information (and neglecting to capture the CVV code to prevent fraud…)

    The bank has additional checks (name ,zip etc) to catch any that a site admin would ‘inadvertently’ let go through.

    Hollow laughter is all I hear… sort of like the maniacal laughter that one hears in the old movies set in the mental hospital… not scary or funny… really quite sad.