« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

If The Election Were Held Today, Mitt Romney Would Win

Just under a month ago, I noted to much criticism that were the election held that day Mitt Romney would lose. The right did not like it, but it was the simple truth. At the time, Romney was flailing about badly without a coherent message. I wrote that he could turn it around, but at that time he had not.

Well, who knew Mitt Romney’s October Surprise would be mopping up Denver with Barack Obama. I still haven’t been able to calculate how many calories Mitt Romney consumed eating Barack Obama’s lunch that day.

Nonetheless, it made a difference. What is so telling is that throughout the debate Romney hammered the most consistent message he has had since he finally found a consistent message — too many people are out of work and we can do better now, not by waiting for Barack Obama to get his act together. The commercial Romney did in the past few weeks looking into the camera, talking about our problems, resonated with swing voters. It particularly resonated with women. His debate performance solidified it.

Liberals are now in full meltdown and the press is doing “how can Obama turn it around” profiles now.

If the election were held today, the race is so close and momentum is so strongly with Mitt Romney right now, I believe he will win the race. Never mind that the Politico has been telling us for two months that the race is flat out over.

There is still peril out there for Romney. If Barack Obama is able to just utter one sentence without stuttering, we know the media will declare him the comeback kid. Republicans are getting terribly cocky about Paul Ryan’s debate with Joe Biden. They shouldn’t. Swing state numbers are still shaky. But the aggressive Romney has actually worked.

The question I have is whether or not he keeps it up. It clearly worked in the debate. Romney schooling Obama gave voters what they wanted. Many of us, myself included, have had a sense that voters were just sitting out there waiting for Romney to show them that he could, in fact, lead and did, in fact, understand both what is wrong with the country and what he could do to fix it. For a variety of reasons, though we all know he could demonstrate both those things, he never has effectively with swing voters until the debate.

More striking, it was more an “emperor has no clothes” moment than anything else. Finally, swing voters saw Obama the way conservatives have seen him all along.

Put it to you this way — for four years, conservatives have ridiculed Obama for his inability to speak without a teleprompter. The right has generally used this critique against him through each big speech and it has been treated dismissively or racist by the left and media. Before the sun rose last Thursday morning, every leftist in America was lamenting Barack Obama’s lack of teleprompter. The conservative critique finally found ground outside the conservative echo chamber.

The same thing happened with the conservative critique of Obama as petulant and thin skinned. It took this debate against Romney for everyone else to see him as we have long seen him. That’s important. It means our criticisms of the President have moved into mainstream opinion and makes it difficult for him to overcome those now.

There will still be ups and downs between now and Election Day. Mitt Romney could still blow it. The President could be resurgent in future debates. After all, past Presidents have mostly always lost the first debate. Americans could decide they believe part-time burger flipping now considered a full time job is a sign the economy is turning around.

But were the election held today, we’d be looking at President-Elect Romney. We should at least enjoy it today.

COMMENTS

  • rkinroanoke

    Erick – the value of the statement a month ago and the value of the statement today are essentially the same; that is almost no value.
    This is like looking up at the end of the third quarter and saying if the game were over now my team would win. The game is not over. There is a month left. As much fun as the past week has been it is now time to pour it on. Keep pounding the play that works and for goodness sake, no prevent defense. (OK, sorry, enough football analogies).
    As good as Romney’s debate was, there is room for improvement. Just one example.
    When O brought up the $5 trillion; Romney could have, and should have, used this an opportunity to bring up how these 10 year projections are done. Something along the lines: You must be using a static projection that assumes that when tax rates change people’s behavior does not. However, history shows us that when you lower the tax rates revenue to the government increases. We saw this with Kennedy and Reagan and even you, Mr. President, told Charlie Gibson in 2008 that when we lower tax rates revenues goes up. But you only care about the perception of fairness. Well, we already have the most progressive tax structure in the world and my plan doesn’t change that.
    Or something along those lines. I can’t believe that Gibson interview is not a mainstay ad with footage from Reagan and Kennedy added in. Senator Brown in MA has a great ad using footage of them.

  • bdtex

    Best comment so far in this thread.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    “Were” or “will”? EE states: “If the election were held today, the race is so close and momentum is so strongly with Mitt Romney right now, I believe he will win the race.”

    The sentence is incoherent and the conclusion reached about “today” is because voters care more about a debate performance than their economic condition after 4 years of Obama? Or is EE “sure” Romney would now win because of new polls? Can’t tell but I’m glad EE is, today, optimistic. That this kind of “reporting” narrative plays into the liberal MSM narrative that never blames failed liberal policies, but rather, blames debate moments and tracks their own polling to supposedly substantiate their view is sad.

    Romney will not win because he follows pundit advice from day to day. Polls always change in every election cycle and anyone can read a poll and tell you what it says. Having the confidence to plot a strategy based upon facts and common sense and the economy stupid, rather than Gallup, is impressive. The former, not so much.

    Yes, debates can change polling. But what is the cause of poor debates? Facts that can’t be debated away that could be known months ago. Conservatives should trust Carville’s rule AND FULL STEAM AHEAD.

  • jamesm

    Erick, just like your prior article you set up a straw man that no one can prove is wrong or right because no one votes today. Clearly you are relying on polls. What is lacking is a clear analysis to back up your opinion. From a journalism standpoint the quality of your articles is not what it once was. Many of the Front pagers and community are writng much better journalistic pieces. Come on Eric! Time to bring your “A” game. We are less then a month before the election. I know you can do it.

  • bdtex

    Who are the pollsters who conducted those polls? Did the polling period include Friday,Saturday and Sunday? I’ll be curious to see the numbers around Wednesday. By then pollsters will have 3-4 full post-BLS days in their numbers.

  • Cheeseheadmike

    I feel really really good about the way Romney is trending. I think that Ryan is going to hand Biden his ass on Thursday, and I don’t see Obama improving in the next round of debates. I personally never thought he was a good communicator to begin with. However, NEVER underestimate the Republican’s ability to screw up a perfectly good opportunity. We’ve seen it happen too many times to get too comfy now.

  • bricko67

    Yes, its looking much better

  • Cheeseheadmike

    Great post, Kenneth. Obama spent hundreds of millions of $ all summer trying to portray Romney as Satan’s accountant. All Romney had to do was show that he was a reasonable, thoughtful, competent leader with plans for the future. You know, the opposite of Obama. He did that in spades. Now the people have more than just a choice – they have a guy who they can feel good about when they vote.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Why just a week ago we had all this hand wringing and unsolicited advice, and I told you so’s. It made me sick. I really wish conservative people could have a little more hope and positive attitude. And this is coming from a known pessimist.

  • Tbone

    The fact that Obama will at least get 45% of the vote means that we should start temporarily sterilizing people at puberty and not reverse it until 25 and only then if they can pass a test of American History, capitalism, government structure and Big Band music.

  • rkinroanoke

    I agree about priorities and time limits; but I have been waiting four years for someone, anyone (bueller, bueller) to stick that Gibson interview back in his face. And yes, it was a great debate; but there are two more between them and one with Ryan and Uncle Joe. We need to not relax and think we have it in the bag. That is my real point. Keep the pressure on, stay on message, and bring it home.

  • nativetexan41

    Romney did move some voters, that is exciting!! We need Romney , he gave an awesome speech today.

  • http://lukos.com Ed54

    Most Americans had never seen Romney speak unfiltered. They didn’t know Romney, they knew the media commentary on Romney, and saw the excerpts that the media wanted to show them. That all changed on Wednesday.

  • edintexas

    Foreign citizens usually don’t get to vote in our elections, but according to the report newly issued by the Government Accountability Institute [GAI], they apparently are invited to contribute to one campaign currently collecting an astounding amount of contributions in small, non-reportable amounts. According to the Fox News reporting this morning, about 43% of the hits on the barackobama.com contribution webpage were from foreign countries.

  • soundnfury

    If Obama is tempted to bring up Romney’s 47% comment, Romney should counter by saying that Obama has written off tens of millions of unemployed workers simply to make his unemployment numbers look better.
    In response to the scurrilous attacks on Romney for “not paying his taxes for 10 years”, Romney ought to expose Obama for allowing his campaign to accept over $275 mil in unreportable campaign contributions. It’s time to bring a gun to the knife fight.

  • Viet71

    Reminds me of my socialist sisters (teacher, lawyer, 72 and 77). They’ve always believed married couples should have government permission to reproduce.

    Truth is, Tbone, lots and lots of smarties who could pass your tests look down on conservatives and always vote Dem, no matter what.

    I take good common sense over education any day.

  • westcoastpatriette

    The race is entering such a critical juncture and the stakes are so high, that Romney seems to be the perfect challenger for the nation right now. Six months ago, some of Romney’s comebacks in the debate would have infuriated me, but now they seemed pitch-perfect for a nation weary from watching the economy spiral out of control while the parties in Washington are paralyzed by partisan gridlock.

    Specifically, when Romney highlighted to Obama how he was forced to work with the Democrats in Mass. — emphasizing the need to “work across the aisle” in order to get things done — it was like a breath of fresh air to reasonable people (even though it makes conservatives very nervous) and resonated across both parties as something a grown up would realize as essential to problem solving for the nation right now. Things are ironically working in Romney’s favor at this point. Fascinating.

  • Bill S

    Good bye, lefttroll

  • Bill S

    Funny, I was thinking exactly the same about your comments.