« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

A Look at Chuck Todd and Conspiratorial Media Incest

I got a great laugh out of this Chuck Todd near meltdown on Meet the Depressed the other day. His voice quivered in moral outrage over Jack Welch suggesting something was up with the unemployment numbers last Friday. Chuck Todd proclaimed, “What we’re doing, we’re corroding trust in our government in a way, and one time responsible people are doing to control it. And the idea that Donald Trump and Jack Welch, rich people with crazy conspiracy, can get traction on this, is a bad trend.”

He really does not get it. Chuck Todd reflects most of the media not getting it. As ratings decline, newspaper fold, and they all scream about how biased Fox News is, they do not get it.

Neil King is a political reporter for the Wall Street Journal. He is married to Shailagh Murray who left a reporting job at the Washington Post to take the job of Joe Biden’s communications director. She replaced Jay Carney who moved to the White House and who himself left Time to take the communications director role for Biden.

John Harris of the Politico is married to an abortion rights activist who used to run NARAL Virginia.

The Politico’s Chief Washington Correspondent, Jonathan Allen, left the Politico to work for Debbie Wasserman Schultz, then returned to the Politico.

Andy Barr of the Politico left the Politico to work for the Democratic National Committee and now works for Richard Carmona, the Democrats’ candidate for Senate in Arizona against Jeff Flake.

George Stephanopolous of ABC News used to be a strategist for Bill Clinton and even after becoming Chief Washington Correspondent still engaged in regular conversations with Rahm Emanuel, James Carville, and Paul Begala from the Clinton days. (Ironic, isn’t it, that John Harris wrote that story)

Michael Scherer of Time, where Jay Carney left to go to Joe Biden’s office, got his start in left wing publications, as did Ezra Klein of the Washington Post who famously created the left wing Journolist filled with Washington journalists and pundits to bounce around themes in the left wing echo chamber.

Linda Douglass of ABC News left ABC to serve as Chief Propaganda Officer for the Obama White House in charge of getting Obamacare through.

Andrew Rosenthal of the New York Times made up the story about President George H. W. Bush being surprised and taken aback by a common supermarket check out scanner. The story was made up by Rosenthal who was not even present. Andrew Rosenthal is now the Editor of the New York Times Editorial Page.

The BuzzFeed crew are mostly left of center, hang out with left of center reporters and pundits, and the media considers them and their cat GIFs the second coming of a supposedly objective Huffington Post.

Chuck Todd himself is married to a former DNC staffer and he worked as a Democratic staffer to Senator Tom Harkin. He works with Chris Matthews who worked for a Democrat in Congress and Jimmy Carter. They both work with Andrea Mitchell who is married to Alan Greenspan, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve. And they’re all just a degree or two removed from Tawana Brawley thanks to their relationship with MSNBC host Al Sharpton.

In other words, Chuck, it is you and your colleagues in the New York-Washington media corridor who are corroding trust — not by covering what Jack Welch and Donald Trump say, but merely by reporting as you do on the issues you cover or are not covering. The American public has grown cynical and tired of a left-leaning media establishment that refuses to acknowledge its own liberalism and that has become insular and removed from the affairs of Americans across the country. The media establishment relates to people who live within 25 miles of the Atlantic or Pacific and relates poorly to people who live within 50 miles of American river valleys other than the Hudson.

[This post has been up for an hour and I have to say I feel a bit bad as people are taking it as me really slamming Chuck Todd. While focusing on Chuck's comments, I think he is but one example of the Gang of 500 — what Mark Halperin calls the political press and pundits who drive and set the conventional wisdom — and the vast majority of the reporters in the DC-NYC corridor have the same lament and concerns and they are all so badly disconnected from the reality of the situation]

The only major news network that seems to understand and report on issues people who live near river valleys cares about is Fox News. But the media would rather wash their hands of Fox and claim them a “conservative” organization that recognize that most major media outlets don’t know jack about what happens around the Mississippi River, Missouri River, Red River, Tennessee River, Ohio River, and the rest of the prominent river valleys in the country. Flip on any major news network other than Fox and you’ll be greeted by reports heralding gay marriage, an issue that has failed repeatedly in more than half the states, a generally liberal social world view, Washington compromising jacking up the national debt, and unquestioning acceptance that a poorly produced video on the internet caused our American Ambassador in Libya to die. You’ll probably even get some poo-pooing about excesses of the First Amendment with regards to Coptic Christians and Citizens United, but rarely about pornography or the press itself.

Compounding the problem is a bipartisan Washington establishment that has likewise grown insular, only going home to campaign. These Republican and Democratic politicos and members of the press are sometimes married, sometimes having affairs, often times at cocktail parties together, and over time think more and more alike.

Consider this — I’m willing to bet that Chuck Todd thinks Jim DeMint, Mike Lee, Rand Paul and the like are fire breathers. Like many other members of the media, Chuck & Co. lament the loss of people like Richard Lugar, Robert Bennett, Evan Bayh, Olympia Snowe, etc. Those Senators “reached across the aisle.” But in reaching across the aisle, they made the American public reach around and grab their wallets. They and their wonderful bipartisan compromises drove us to $16 trillion in debt. The guys who fight the compromises and fight the debt increases are routinely the villains and the press frequently ignores their heroes are the ones getting us in the messes. But they are “adults” and “grown ups” and “mature.”

While Chuck and the rest of the press lament the national debt, they refuse to hold accountable the bipartisan compromisers who voted on the measures that got us to $16 trillion in debt.

When Chuck Todd laments the corrosion of “trust in government,” what he is really lamenting is that the American people have caught on to the way the game is played and the public now realizes just how complicit the media is. Compounding that, the public largely now realizes just how in bed — sometimes literally — the press is with members of the Obama Administration. There is a revolving door between liberal organizations and the mainstream press. For every one Republican who may become an “objective” member of the press, there are many more Democrats who do the same. Further, for all the Republicans who do it, there are many more liberal than conservative Republicans who do it.

The press is full of herd mentality, group think, and incestuous relationship with power and politics. The press also lacks a lot of self-reflection and accountability. What self-reflection is done is often subsequently ignored.

What Chuck Todd lamented, with his voice quivering, is that the media has failed. They are no longer reporters and watch dogs. They are regurgitators and lap dogs and fewer and fewer Americans believe them. He can be outraged at supposed crazy conspiracies, but it is the actions of the American political press and their relationships within the corridors of Washington that made it possible.

No one trusts the media and that is the media’s own fault. No one trusts government any more and the media is complicit in that by failing to be the objective press it pretends to be.

——- Updated at 7:37 a.m. on October 10, 2012 ——-

Let me add a bit to this as the sun rises here in Macon.

A week or so ago, Tucker Carlson released the full video of Barack Obama giving his race speech to a black audience at a university. The media collectively said, “Oh, pffffft. We’ve covered that. This all ya got?”

I went on CNN that morning and the anchor said CNN had covered that. Well, actually, the media didn’t cover it. There were a few short write ups, but the media did not cover what Barack Obama actually said. They did not report that Barack Obama told a black audience that the federal government did not consider blacks in New Orleans as part of the American community. He very clearly did this. The audience knew exactly what he meant. He said New Orleans had been denied waivers of the Stafford funding matching funds requirement. The media never pointed out, as Barack Obama whipped the crowd up, that he had voted against those waivers.

Part of the problem, if the media is honest, is that much of the press corp agreed with what Barack Obama was saying. That’s why they did not consider it news.

After the Libya fiasco, Mitt Romney spoke and the media proclaimed he’d made a gaffe in his statement. No, there is a sizable portion of the nation that really does believe Barack Obama bowed to world leaders (he did and we have video of him doing it) and traveled around the world apologizing for America. But the media acted as if Mitt Romney had made a gaffe pointing these things out.

Time and again the media reports on gaffes and does not report on stories that not just conservatives, but people outside Washington and New York, are talking about. Time and again, the media decides something is so or something is not so and reports it as the media sees it even when a sizable portion of the country disagrees with them, whether it be abortion, gay marriage, global warming, war, poverty, Hurricane Katrina, Mitt Romney’s campaign, Obamacare, and the list goes on and on and on.

The press corp often ridicules various factions in the country for being stuck in echo chambers oblivious to their own echo chamber from which they rarely escape to experience America as most Americans live it.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Common_Cents

    Way to engage Erick!!! Wait, F. Chuck Todd has a wife? wow.

    One of the best slams is Donald Trump on the phone w/ F. Chuck Todd.

    It’s a must listen/see. Look at Todd’s face after he got a smack down. He was shaking for a few minutes after that whipping. LOL.

    Trumps handling is very instructive. If Republicans get in media hack’s faces and call them out, they back down and get flustered. We need propaganda media bootcamp for all Republicans.

    How do we embed video?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtS8M1qKk3E

  • The_Rebel

    Excellent diary, Erick. Since you were mentioning names, I would have liked to see you bring up David Frum and David Brooks as two examples of Republicans who became “objective” members of the press.

  • MaskedKayakMan

    Yes, yes, yes. All true. The press is biased and leftist and corrupt and corrosive. And every day I read or hear about how the dinosaur media is going extinct. But every day I wake up and the NYT is still there, the LAT is still there, the WaPo is still there, and so is MSNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, NPR, C-SPAN, seemingly ad infinitum. If the dino media really are going extinct, it sure is happening at a snail’s pace.

    A pox on all their houses. Even FoxNews is mostly crap. Since when is truth and accuracy in reporting “fair and balanced”? What the hell is that all about?

  • http://www.isthatbaloney.com/ IsThatBaloney.com

    That pretty much just lines up how incestuous the state run media really is. And liberals freak out about Fox News? The next time I hear a libtard give me that Fox News line, I’m sending them straight to this article.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Who says a guy can’t be gay AND married to a woman? Peter Allen was married to Liza Minnelli; Rock Hudson married his agent’s secretary (for appearances); Charles Laughton and Elsa Lanchester were married for many years–both were gay and both enjoyed their very open marriage. As one comedian remarked some years back, “If a gay man wants to get married, he needs to do it the old fashioned way and marry Liza Minnelli.”

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    Seriously, this is uncalled for.

  • http://www.facebook.com/GreaterNashuaTea Gntp NH

    With the suspect polling we now see, the liberal “media” is drilling holes in the floor of their leaking dinghy. Everyone is gawking at how blatant they have become, in their desperation to save liberalism and socialism, before its last gasp. They have evolved, catching up with Hollywood, and their sense of personal accountability is now a useless appendage.

  • Federalist10

    Erick- uncool dude! Spill the beans man! Which reporter(s) is smoking cigars and eating pizzas in the WH?

  • Federalist10

    Classic! Donald doesn’t call no damn body! Thx for putting that up.

  • tlhoward

    Well, how about this one, just put up on The Daily Caller: Martha Raddatz, scheduled moderator of Thurday’s VP debate, had a guest to her 1991 wedding, one Barry Obama. Yep. She should have to announce that right before she introduces the candidates.
    What a piece of you know what is Washington.
    http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/10/abc-news-scrambles-to-cover-up-barack-obamas-attendance-at-vp-debate-moderators-wedding/

  • Neo

    Pres**ent Barack Obama was a guest at the 1991 wedding of ABC senior foreign correspondent and vice presidential debate moderator Martha Raddatz.
    Obama and groom Julius Genachowski, whom Obama would later tap to head the Federal Communications Commission, were Harvard Law School classmates at the time and members of the Harvard Law Review.

  • marktx

    The household survey probably is cooked….at the very least there will probably be major downward revisions to the numbers in the next report. How convenient….

  • kw2012

    I didn’t see the article as a slam on Chuck Todd. Clearly liberals are being hyper-sensitive and defensive with Obama on the ropes. There is a huge silent majority out there, just witness the reaction to chik-fil-A this summer. But Obama has been so polarizing, my colleagues at work and myself no longer discuss politics. But we will be at the voting booth even if there are New Black panthers prowling around with billy clubs trying to intimidate voters.

  • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

    That was a tour de force. I noted Newt’s comment: People don’t trust Washington because people don’t trust Washington. I guess he intended to deflate the conspiracy meme.

    I’d phrase it more that “People don’t trust Washington because Washington has done so many things that either don’t appear trustworthy or don’t turn out to BE trustworthy.” IOW, Washington has EARNED our distrust. And I’ll include the SCUM as part of Washington.

    Let’s see if I can come up with a half dozen or so instances real quick….

    Failed to cover the PA voter intimidation case properly.
    Justice Roberts lost his mind on ObamaCare.
    The AP sends out a picture of Mitt Romney that looks very strongly as if it were photoshopped, and even if it weren’t, it would still never have been printed if it were of Pres. BO.
    Mitt’s high school shenanigans deserve an in-depth front page article in the WaPo, but Fast and Furious does not, and Congressional inquiries about it are called “witch hunts.”
    Asking for ID disenfranchises voters, but taking jury duty lists from voter registration rolls does not.
    Pres. Bill Clinton pardons the husband of a woman who has donated millions to his cause, but it hardly rates a nod.

  • cmjay

    The LEFT is now having a CONVULSION and / or HEMORRHAGE .They are using BIG BIRD as a LIFE SAVER. How pathetic.

  • rickbillies

    Erick:

    You hit the nail right on the head. The Washington-New York press axis is so self-centered that they don’t see how biased that they have become. Honestly, Freedom of the Press no longer applies to them because they are not journalists but advocates. I love when they accuse Hannity, O’Reilly and Beck of bias. Hannity said ‘I’m an advocate. I know it and you know it. The problem with the media is that they don’t know that they are too.’

  • Chillycat2

    Chuck Todd and the rest of the relic media are getting quite testy and some clearly angry that the American public are questioning if not outright rejecting what they are putting on our plates. The pervasive attitude of leftist politicians and their tongue bathing media is not just that they know better than us but also that they are better than us. Americans can tell that and so many have turned their backs on the so called media and their rotted products they are trying to pitch.

  • brianjconway

    If the article is a slam on Chuck Todd, I’m not upset by it. The blubber headed
    slobbering leftist nabob has it coming. He personifies the problem with the main stream media. I, who come from a newspaper family have little is any respect left for either print or television journalists. They are suspect until they earn my respect.

  • http://www.justintribble.com Justin Tribble

    I think it should be noted that many of us do like Chuck Todd and appreciate his analysis. I think he does an excellent job, but some of his pained looks the past few days are hard not to notice.

  • barry41

    Media follows what will make them money. Regardless of moral values.

  • tngal

    What? And no mention of Jim Lehrer? In the immediate aftermath of last week’s debate these same pundits were excoriating Leher for NOT injecting himself more into the debate. Not throwing in gotcha follow-up questions to Romney or helping Obama by giving him follow-ups that would open the door for him to get points in. They were very brazen in dismissing one of their own last week for not injecting himself more into the debate. They expected Leher to run roughshod over the process because that’s what they would have done. As a general rule we do trust the media. We trust them to be biased. As they see it, its their duty to weave memes and help kindred spirits on the hill.

  • MichMike

    His analysis is based on a total lack of knowledge of the evidence or just plain lies. You may find him pleasant, but that should not fool you into considering his propaganda as anything other than what it is.

  • docnick

    I remember Chuck Todd when he was a younger man… I am still waiting for him to grow up. Ron

  • MichMike

    The MSM will continue to struggle to be vialble financially. It will be fun to see these elitists, 1% if you will, deal with shrinking salaries as their organizations see continued revenue decline. Then we will hear the howling. Maybe they could get used to this by giving more of their income to the government now, as they all so desparately desire to do.

  • Stevelsn

    Actually they are cutting their own throats (as their declining fortunes attest) but are so fanatically wedded to their agenda that they can’t do otherwise.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Greg Sargent and the New York Times talking about Bain and outsourcing again.
    Can’t Team Romney just fight back with a message that will also immunize them against the other Bain bombs down the road? A clear, simple, and memorable one.
    Because Chicago probably has a wealth of shiny objects. Same for his Massachusetts record.

  • http://granitegrok.com/author/mike Mike Rogers

    Excellent. I’d just add, in view of your references to buzzfeed’s cats and regurgitating talking points, that pussycats regurgitating unsavory hair balls is more like it. EG Chris Matthews.

  • http://www.generalpatriot.com/ GeneralAl

    Chuck Todd is another Baghdad Bob. While the invading troops are right behind him, he claims everything is secure! Get your head out, Chuck!

  • xerocky

    I’m not saying that I don’t agree. The numbers could be fudged, and the ‘when’ they decided to dump it seems suspect to me. All I’m saying is, look at what the numbers are made up of, and then consider why that govt. report is somehow top news on every station. That’s all you need to know. For someone like Trump, after all of his birther whatever, that he himself didn’t handle all that well, to chime in that the numbers are a fabrication, is counter productive. ALL stats are fabrications, all stats can be twisted to mean pretty much anything. That’s a given. The question is why all of a sudden does a pile of stats become top news, and then add to that that the stats just happen to be twisted in such a way to take some heat off of dear leader. We all know the answer.

  • onenationundergod

    Standing ovation!

  • veritaseequitas

    Who else would hang out with or marry a Liberal Leftist except for another Liberal Leftist? Nobody else would have them. They are kind of like alcoholics, stuck together with the same twisted view of things.

  • BlueShadowII

    My attitude toward nearly all celebrities, including particularly those in the media, is to be or, at least claim to be, ignorant of them. “Chuck who?” or “Kim who?” or “Which Stephanopoulos?” are such satisfying put-downs and so much easier on my indigestion.

  • xerocky

    You know, Bain seems like such a non issue to me at this point. You have a choice of someone who ran Bain Capital who at some point made money for someone somewhere at the very worst, and someone who would sue a bank to make a loan that doesn’t work for the bank or the borrower, and then later would go on to sue those very same banks for making those loans.

    No matter what Romney did at Bain (IMHO a good deal of it was about as good as could be expected by anyone anywhere), it beats a community organizer who doesn’t understand business, and doesn’t understand the real needs of community that he’s deluded himself into thinking he ‘organized’. Look at the record of how all of those loans he helped secure performed. They did about as well as Solyndra. That’s all anybody needs to know.

  • commonsenseobserver

    This reminds me of how awesome it would be if Boston revived the “Biggest celebrity in the world, but his star is fading” line.

  • barleycorn

    He may be a delightful dinner part guest but he stinks at being an objective reporter. His “analysis” is hopelessly biased by his emotional investment in liberalism. The interview Hannity did with Jim Lehrer had a very interesting (and honest) comment from Hannity. He complimented Lehrer on his ability to be fair and admitted they he (Hannity) could not do the same. You would NEVER hear that honesty from Chuck Todd.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    To accurately describe the behavior of liberals is to “slam” them. Really, the best way to get accused of slander by a liberal is to quote a liberal.

  • henrythedog

    I too was shocked that Chuck has a wife. Is this just another way of obfuscating the truth?

  • gadsden4256

    90% of the media has the integrity of Joseph Goebels. Chris Matthews is in a category by himself: “A danger to himself and others”.

  • davenj1

    Chuck Todd is like any other reporter in the lamestream media. They portend to be objective reporters- they have even convinced themselves in their minds that they are objective. What gets me is that they are self-appointed arbiters of truth. Because Jack Welch supposedly misspoke- or however its is characterized- this is, in their minds, somehow indicative of those “stupid, troglodyte Republicans ‘clinging to their guns and bibles.’” Look at the coverage of the Tea Party in the MSM- trivialized and marginalized when not being slandered. All, that is, until the 2010 midterm elections which gives me hope in that people basically tune out these people. If and when they are listening to the MSM for facts (ha ha), the reality of electoral politics does not match their weird reality and that is what really perplexes these “reporters.”

  • FAAR OUT

    This, plus thousands of similar articles, have convinced me that we need regulation to insure that when an incumbent is “fired” that ALL his/her staff members are prohibited from ever-again working for any Federal legislative branch agency. My thesis is that it is NOT Congress, Stupid but rather the lifer bureaucrats that are the culprits. Show me where I’m going wrong, here.

  • commonsenseobserver

    I’m really starting to get pissed off by some of the BS coming from the MSM and Democrats. They’re just plain disgusting.
    Even the better ones have gone Washington.

  • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

    Well said, Erick. We rarely watch NBC – the last time was when we saw Brian Williams bow to BOzo either right before or right after conducting an interview. As for Chuck Todd and that Caligula-like hairdo of his … the few times I’ve seen him, he all but sneered when talking about anything/anyone outside the Beltway. Let’s hope all these job-hopping, inter-married “pundits” are in the process of commiting Incest-icide!

  • davenj1

    Just one more comment before I sign off. Look at watch Chuck Todd and how surprised and perplexed he is when discussing polls showing Romney ahead or close in key states. Like any liberal, for example, the fact that senior citizens in Florida support Romney over Obama is perplexing because, after all, isn’t Romney that bad guy who wants to make granny pay more for Medicare and take away their social security benefits? He can’t understand why polls show enthusiasm is greater for Romney than Obama because it just doesn’t fit his worldview. It really is sad…almost like a mental disease- MSM Reporter Delusional Syndrome or something.

  • harlan

    “What we’re doing, we’re corroding trust in our government…”

    He should have stopped right there.

  • Common_Cents

    how STUPID is the RNC to agree???? Not one debate on FOX, agreeing to propaganda media debates with propaganda moderators!! RNC and Republican leadership needs to go.

    It was a miracle Jim Lehrer let’em run and stayed out of the debate as a participant. Good on him. I hope he sees the viciousness of the propaganda media as he was blamed for Barry’s butt kicking.

  • xerocky

    From the wikipedia page from ‘JournoList’, it’s old news but…

    “After Klein shut down JournoList, a new group, calling itself “Cabalist”

    It’s not like they paused, let alone stopped, or truly questioned what they were doing. There was evidence in the first JournoList that they collueded bury the Wright story, which to some degree they did. That is, in fact, a conspiracy.

  • fuzzyuno

    Excellent, I mean excellent write up.

  • Common_Cents

    Here is another classic MUST WATCH slam of the whacked media, by Newt
    Gingrich, slamming an idiot reporter at the RNC after Palin spoke.
    Newt left this idiot speechless and I bet the guy is back doing traffic
    reports on a local affiliate.

    Gingrich needs to hold a hostile propaganda media bootcamp for ALL Republicans.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjGhy8LVwAo

  • auntielib

    This is a great article, because it factually lists the NUMEROUS incestuous relationships between the “news” media and the Democrat Party.

  • Common_Cents

    i disagree, we cannot sit there and let them fester, Its time to get in their faces and take them on, one on one and call them propagandists. They still have a stranglehold on nearly half of America, brainwashing people every day.

    Your thinking is fine for an informed RS reader who can see propaganda, but not for tens of millions who just read MSM propaganda headlines and sound bytes.

  • nwnewt

    Well written article that exposes the depths of the incestuous relationship between the Democratic party and those who would be the “banner carriers of our free press”. However, the problem isn’t just the presence or numbers of like-minded people in the press, it is a two-fold fundamental problem that such enlightened people as these should see, but apparently never do. First is that the left views most of their positions as being the morally superior position which ultimately spins off the types of arguments that you hear about conservatives such as racist, greedy, Islamophobes, homophobes and on and on. Secondly, when you combine an unquestioned belief in moral superiority with an unchallenged world view(within their circle) the very notion of unbiased reporting becomes impossible. Because of the presence of emotion about the issues, the concept of what stories are important, which questions should be asked become skewed. I could do a better job of providing a more balanced view of the happenings in Washington, but because my conservative beliefs are also carry a lot of emotion I would not even begin to assert that my reporting would even approach an unbiased assessment. IT is unbelievable to me that such enlightened people cannot understand the scope of their own inadequacies. IT is truly a danger to the republic.

  • sinz54

    The Eastern liberal press–from Boston to Washington DC–has always leaned left, along with the LA Times.

    But when Obama came along, they really bonded with him emotionally, to a degree they never did with Gore or Kerry. Obama was the first doctrinaire left-wing President in over 40 years. And he was black, and talked like a college professor. For them, he represented the epitome of everything they had ever wanted in a President.

    The press lost all their remaining objectivity–and they won’t regain it until Obama leaves office.

  • UpLateAgain

    You are entirely correct. The bias in the media is not so clearly seen in the stories they cover as in what they refuse to cover (at least….until a few days after Fox News has shown a story to have actually been significant).

  • Hex_Omega

    I get what you’re saying but Romney and Ryan can’t reach the sliver of undecideds out there if they insist on a FOX hosted or moderated debate. They HAVE to go on the major networks and agree to the moderator, though I agree they certainly have a grievance here with Raddatz. Also, many people still do not have cable or satellite TV because they cannot afford them in this economy. The debates NEED to be accessible to every voter with interest in the election. Republicans would not benefit benefit by pandering to the choir. They need to reach the people who may be leaning for the Phony in Chief but who can still be persuaded to switch. It’s a tricky game.

  • sinz54

    In fairness, I don’t think you can hold that against her. Obama was just another student then. Probably a lot more students and faculty–including the staff of the Harvard Law Review–attended her wedding. How was she to know what their future careers would be like.

  • nwnewt

    Nice try, media bias is well documented. Liberal both in the news rooms and in editorial boards outnumber conservative leaners by more than 10 to one. As I pointed out in my earlier post one cannot live in such an environment with a singular world view based in a belief of moral superiority, and have any approach to an unbiased reporting.

  • sinz54

    The civil servants that comprise “the permanent government” in Washington don’t change when Administrations change.

  • mikeman

    The obama press really is the lame stream media. The most recent example is the media’s acceptance of the “video made me do it” cover story in Benghazi.

    These people have no credibility–they don’t deserve their tv shows, newspaper jobs, etc. They are the government press, the Baghdad Bob’s of America.

  • http://bookstore.westbowpress.com/Products/SKU-000204726/Can-Mitt-Romney-Serve-Two-Masters.aspx Jay Strawbridge

    The media, especially Fox News Network, covered the true record on Mitt Romney in order to get him in to the Republican nominee position. They were derelict in their duty to bring the truth to the American people about this completely false facade’ they helped to
    conjure up of Romney. FNC had the facts on Romney. FNC HID THE FACTS ON ROMNEY.

    Romney is just as bad as Obama, in some cases, worse. But the American People
    will not know it unless they dig on their own. I read the book “Can Mitt
    Romney Serve Two Masters?” and I highly recommend it if you want the facts
    on this horrific candidate that has been trust down the throats of the American
    People. Obama is the nightmare we know, Romney is the nightmare to come.

  • Hex_Omega

    Not only that… they covered for Clinton, smeared HW Bush and Reagan every chance they got. Media bias is not a recent phenomenon. It’s been festering for the better half of my 40 year lifetime.

  • streiff

    In case anyone cares NotThereYet is gone. Not because I disagree with his post, though it is both stupid and counterfactual, but because he’s a lefty that has a track record off side of posting anti-Republican and anti-Christian slurs.

    In other words, this is a garden variety troll.

  • sinz54

    The other half of the electorate leans left and has no problem with the stuff being put out by The New York Times and other liberal media outlets.

    Erickson was right: They’re not writing for Red States primarily. Their audience is the Blue States. The Blue States aren’t Democratic because of the media. It’s the other way around. The media has to lean left because that’s who their audience is.

    I saw one survey of New York Times readers that shows that the NYT’s readership is overwhelmingly liberal.

  • UMO74

    You need a drool cup…the insanity, dear friend, lies with both parties. You suggest that the right is less culpable for our dilemma than the left, yet both vote for the continued dominance of our culture by Big Biz, Big Pharma, Big Ag and the military/industrial complex. When the populace no longer believes that institutions are legitimate, social chaos is just around the corner.

  • Sherlocktoo

    The lying media is controlled by liberals. The wish to brainwash the general public, the same way they were brainwashed in college by liberal professors (note to the politically correct, the term liberal is used instead of statist). Now is the time to trash the liars in the state run media, who are in the tank with Obama. Buy nothing that is advertised on the networks, and write letters to those producers who buy time from the networks.

  • bobmark

    Dude, you need to get out more. The news organizations and commenters you listed are a long way from “far” right. And PolitiFact and FactCheck are a long way from non-partisan. I don’t know about OpenSecrets so will not comment on them,

  • Richard

    Well said and all too true.

  • OldOakTree

    Makes me remember Glenn Beck’s tv show. His main thing was to show video footage of liberals. The video footage itself WAS the expose.

  • AmericanHorseman

    You can condense this article down to these ten little words.
    Americans don’t believe the mainstream media because they are communists.

  • keithbo61

    Yep, only in the world of the lefty loon is stating a obvious considered a gaffe. Because naturally only that which has been ‘properly’ vetted and spun by a consensus of fellow loons is it considered obvious. The eyes and ears of mere mortals are not qualified to draw such conclusions.

    This is why it was nice to finally watch a real-time debate with the liberal MSM relegated to the cheap seats. In the end the high priest of the lefty ideological world view was left in tatters. Yet instead of questioning the merits (or lack thereof) of the left’s ideological arguments, they return to doing what they do best, making excuses, playing the blame game and trying to spin the obvious.

    Unfortunately for the liberal MSM the 60+ million who watched the debate do indeed have their own eyes and ears. And contrary to what the MSM wants to believe, most do not appreciate being told what they heard and saw.

  • CHEMST

    Bravo! I rarely have to admit this, but I couldn’t have said it better myself. This column deserves a Pulitzer Prize.

  • funwithknives

    “…and Erick Erickson hits one,… out-a the park !! ”
    Boehner gets emotional, over real people, and he’s a softy.
    Up-Chuck Todd gets ‘his quiver on’, and he’s an Advocate of Real Journalism.
    The SCUM/Gang of 500 have by their own built-in biases and selective reporting , rendered themselves not essential to The Layman.
    They know from their fellows that technology is rendering them and their trade obsolete and instead of adapting and looking at what might just bring them some new found pride-in-craft, they whine, squeal and want to keep it, as-it-is and was.
    America is passing them by at a rate that shortly is going to become very apparent.
    On or about 11/10/2012, there is going to be A New Revelation about where you,and all of us, obtain facts, that are germane to you and yours.
    The Made-Up polling numbers and the incrediblly one-sided reporting of Our Sainted Media will be called into question, examined with some Objectivity, and like The TEA Party Revolution of 2010 {aka: The Shellacking} Citizens are ‘going to vote’ once again. But with feet and wallets this time.
    It will surely ‘Suck to be You’, Chucky-Dearest….and you will have done it to yourselves.
    {P S : I am ‘so’ gonna use that ‘Gang of 500′ label…}

  • Bill S

    Per your addendum, Erick – the basic problem is that the Gang of 500 believes that they should be influencing the news, rather than simply reporting it.

  • streiff

    you win an IP ban.

  • Bill S

    Sorry, skippy … you don’t get to resurrect yourself.

  • jschmidt2

    Thomas Sowell on Obama;s hate speech-

    Why
    is the date of this speech important? Because, less than two weeks
    earlier, on May 24, 2007, the United States Senate had in fact voted
    80-14 to waive the Stafford Act requirement for New Orleans, as it had
    waived that requirement for New York and Florida. More federal money was spent rebuilding New Orleans than was spent in New York after 9/11 and in Florida after hurricane Andrew, combined.

    Truth
    is not a job requirement for a community organizer. Nor can Barack
    Obama claim that he wasn’t present the day of that Senate vote, as he
    claimed he wasn’t there when Jeremiah Wright unleashed his obscene
    attacks on America from the pulpit of the church that Obama attended for
    20 years.

    Unlike
    Jeremiah Wright’s church, the U.S. Senate keeps a record of who was
    there on a given day. The Congressional Record for May 24, 2007 shows
    Senator Barack Obama present that day and voting on the bill that waived
    the Stafford Act requirement. Moreover, he was one of just 14 Senators
    who voted against — repeat, AGAINST — the legislation which included
    the waiver.

  • 1uncle

    Left-wing media should look at the plank in their own eye.

  • Bill S

    Bye, lefttroll.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    What is the problem with “slamming” or “really slamming” actions that deserve it? Nothing. In fact, it is a sign of cowardice not to. Todd really slammed Welch with no justification. He and the 500 need slamming, really.

  • Dennis Wise

    Todd’s reaction to this on twitter was predictable. What Todd doesn’t understand is that this piece was not in regard to his effect on the day to day elections, it was about the bigger picture. I’m thinking Todd’s coverage of the debt ceiling showdown and the credit downgrade. He still thinks that was right wing extremism bringing the nation to the brink. That type of coverage had a big impact on that particular political showdown, but it also affects any further attempt to address the issue.

    Todd does not care. Listen to him defend the media, or talk about Drudge’s unfortunate impact on media coverage. Chuck Todd thinks he is in the political media and if you don’t agree, well, he right you’re wrong.

  • tngal

    Agreed. He certainly deserves a pulitzer more so than some people who get Nobels.(Gore& Obama to name but two). I’m not even sure those two deserve the prize in a box of cracker jacks.

  • taylorwolken

    There is a certain irony in complaining about those moderates who compromise and the herd mentality of the left while many here fall in line to vote for a liberal republican like good little lemmings.

  • bobbythebuilder

    Chuck Todd, interesting how someone like him rises to NBC’s upper level of reporters. Put him in a medium local market and I doubt he would last 6 months. He does what he is told and takes his inflated paycheck all the while lamenting the propaganda of the progressive communists.

  • bflat879

    There is little hope for this group. As you said, they don’t even realize what they’re doing.

  • Common_Cents

    It will be sweet to watch them self destruct, and agree we need to lend them a helping hand in doing so ;)

  • Jacobite2

    Not slamming; burning.

  • PittsburghTiger

    Hey Dummy….I am agreeing with Flagstaff!

    I am saying that if this was under GWB…then, we would hear about it 24 hours a day…like the LameStreamMedia lived off of Iran-Contra. And how the LameStreamMedia covers for Obama….
    Take a step back…and read….slowly….what I had written…..

  • superlogi

    This article is right on. However, there should be economic retribution against the 4th estaters who have, virtually, created this mess and are actively promoting its increased severity. One has to wonder, what’s in it for them? Certainly, they can’t be pushing for economic armageddon or taking this country from super power status to that of a 3rd world also-ran? That is the question, I would like answered.

  • spainishirish

    Sharp analysis and your “river valley” metaphor is a very good one.
    Barack Obama’s unvarnished stupidity has revealed the mainstream media as a hotbed of idiocy. Given Obama is the type of person the media considers intelligent, it speaks just as much about that institution as the pathetic president it has supported.
    Unfortunately for Gov. Romney and Rep. Ryan, the media is too far in for Obama to do anything but go down with the incumbent. There will be unprecedented peer pressure on Martha Raddatz Thursday and moderators at the final two presidential debates to carry water for Biden and Obama. They likely will do so. While I haven’t seen much comment on it, even Jim Lehrer crossed the line a few times and attempted to help the flailing president last week.
    Romney is likely to win this election. The biggest loser won’t be Obama, though. Even in the back of his narcissistic mind, Obama has known all along he was out of his depth. The mainstream media will be the biggest casualty. History will record that it was the MSM’s descent into undisguised advocacy that sealed its fate.
    Good riddance and a good enough piece to cause me to comment for the first time in more than a year.

  • storm22

    Well done sir!

  • Lynn Otting

    At times, more often than not, it is tough for me to listen to the media with their slanted views on almost every topic reported. The one exception is Shep on Fox. His take on the news is always entertaining with no spins…

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    Referenced it yesterday.

  • http://www.justintribble.com Justin Tribble

    Obama narrative this week and for the debate: “Romney’s a liar.”

  • bobmark

    You left out the “nanny-nanny boo-boo”

  • ras743

    Fine piece. You left out Nancy-Ann DeParle, deputy chief of staff to The One, and wife of Jason DeParle of the New York Times, with whom I once worked at another newspaper. (Aside: If there were ever a reporter whose political views could qualify him to obtain a secure place at the Times, it was Jason. He once did a lengthy series on the death penalty that amounted to a hagiography of the liberal icon, Sister Helen Prejean, which was summed up by one of his fellow reporters, in a newsroom that was not exactly a conservative hotbed, as “angst-ridden b——t.”)

  • craigbardo

    This is the best article by Erick that I’ve read.

  • http://www.asterling.com asterling

    I have no problem with this. It’s 100% true. I don’t understand where any complaints would come from.

  • mrmacphisto

    Exactly. When it comes to actual reporting, Fox is pretty even keeled. No doubt where the commentators lean. And a couple of the liberals they have are more than talking points machines. Kirsten Powers seems like a pretty fair Democrat and has gone after the Obama Administration over Libya lately. I may not agree with her on many things, but I at least can respect her.

  • noogan

    Bravo. Well done.