« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Gravity Hits The Obama Campaign

Grind It Out On The Ground Time

This is a must-read Sean Trende column on why Obama’s bandwagon strategy has demanded that he remain in the lead at every point in the campaign. I’ve been saying for months now that Obama’s fundraising in particular – and even moreso, his ability to deter Romney from raising money from business – was hugely dependent on convincing business interests that Obama’s regulators would still be calling the shots after the election and they should not feel safe about going all-in to be rid of him. This is also why Obama’s team has gone nuclear in its attacks on individual polls that show cracks in his armor, moreso even than usual for political campaigns and much, much moreso than usual for campaigns that are ahead in most of the polls. The same goes for Obama’s ability to draw huge turnout from young voters and other traditionally low-turnout groups.

Today’s battery of good polling news for Romney (including a boost from Gallup switching from a registered-voter to likely-voter model) is far from proof that Romney will win the election, but it is a blow to the overwhelming narrative leading into the first debate that the race had already been won by Obama, and that any skepticism of polls assuming an overwhelmingly Democratic electorate was conspiracy-level crackpottery. At last check, the liberal-run TPM polling average had Romney up by 2.8 points, a wider lead than the 2.5 point lead Unskewedpolls.com was showing. The state-by-state polling may not be entirely caught up yet, but it usually lags; John McCain was clinging to swing-state polling for weeks after he fell behind for good in the big national trackers.

Republicans have been saying for weeks that this was still a close race. Today, the polls caught up to that. Obama may yet win, but he can no longer do so just by projecting inevitability, running out the clock and letting the media bury any story that threatened to help Romney under horse race coverage. Obama and Biden have been ducking tough questions – Obama does interviews on The View and music and sports radio, while dodging the White House press corps; since joining the ticket, Paul Ryan has done 197 interviews, while Biden in the same time has done 1. You can run like that when you’re way ahead; you can’t if you actually need to get a positive message of your own out.

There are three debates left to go (including the VP debate), which will let a national audience judge the campaigns for themselves, and despite Democratic dissatisfaction with Jim Lehrer’s refusal to act as a gatekeeper running interference against Romney, it’s unlikely that the moderators of the remaining debates can protect Obama and Biden from having to win those debates on their own.

COMMENTS

  • determined5

    Yes, the donations are to assure access. Companies “have to” donate to the winner – in order to protect their flank. Surely each business person will cast their individual vote for Romney, even if they have felt compelled to donate to BO (as well as Romney).

  • mauiisl

    I completely agree (for what that is worth). Terrible actors, terrible plot, insanely expensive tickets to a bad play. Time for Mickey Rooney and the remains of Judy Garland (Pelosi) to retire.

    However, in a world made dreary by the current Squatter-in-Chief, I say we keep WC Fields (Clinton, of course) around for the sake of comic relief .

  • fightnright

    kowalski – must add an interesting note to my post. When re-checking the original Scott Brown campaign video clip of the zer0, I came across an editorial cartoon in the Massachusetts Daily Collegian. In it, Brown’s iconic pickup truck was driven by – you might have guessed it, none other than Monopoly’s Uncle Pennybags himself, trailing cash like confetti behind him.

    Meanwhile, the background of charity, good works, and service (lately chronicled for us by Dan McLaughlin in another of his articles, IIRC) that Romney has left behind as an uplifting trail goes unmentioned. These kinds of ‘props’ for Mitt, Democrats prefer kept offstage.

  • fightnright

    great post, but thinking Pelosi as the beautiful, truly enchanting Ms Garland (! even sitting next to one another in the same sentence!!) is just a ~little~ ouchy …. ;-)

  • http://www.facebook.com/true.spence True Romaine Spence

    Call him a Potemkin President, an empty suit, the emperor with no clothes, whatever — the result is the same. Obama, sans TelePrompTer is who he is, and that is not very good. Nor was it ever. He’s always been more of a myth than a man, and the myth is pretty threadbare these days.

  • http://www.facebook.com/true.spence True Romaine Spence

    I think so as well. But if he hasn’t this time, the next debate is bound to do him in. All the debate prep in the world is not going to help him at this stage because the “feel good fuzzies” are gone. The next time he’s on stage, every twitch, every “uh” every look-around-where’s-my-TOTUS is going to be fried indelibly in the voters’ brains. The only thing that might save him is if a certain segment of the population starts feeling sorry for him because Mitt is beating him up too bad.

  • stuart little

    Indeed, Clint had it so right. The Oval Office chair has been empty metaphorically for nearly 4 years. All the while Obama is parading around as the a Marxist Trojan horse which he really is wreaking havoc.

  • celador2

    Ryan does well anytime, every place. October 11 will be no different. Ryan will answer questions even though he will be thrown on defensive by moderator Martha Raddatz who had Obama as a guest to her 1991 wedding. He later appointed the groom to head the FCC. Unmasked this raw personal link shows not mod objectivity but a motive to sway the debate outcome Biden’s way.

    The media show one more time the clannish , incestous too close for comfort relationship between media and DNC politics. They are dedicated to the defeat of Romney-Ryan.

    Still, just as Romney won the first debate more than Obama lost it,. Paul Ryan will show he has answers and also commands the figures on budgets and debt He has voted to send troops to war. He and Biden differed on supporting the Iraq surge 2007.
    Will VP Joe Biden explain where all that stimulus money went? Was he not the watch dog to oversee that no funds were wasted? As one so tied to the stimulus Biden might provide insights on that Recovery Act we viewers do not see.

  • MF

    Pelosi would be played by Margaret Hamilton, if she were still alive.

  • Pingback: Dean Clara

  • Pingback: Waldo Gibney