« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Texas Attorney General warns OSCE on Election Observations

Left-wing groups have gone to international organizations in the run up to this election, seeking to apply global governance to the United States. The results of this is that the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE, not the UN as is often reported) has announced it will send election observers, with the implication that Voter ID laws are a problem.

Now, the reason they’re only investigating Republican-run areas is that Republicans would never run to the OSCE or anyone else to interfere with American elections. But that said, we must not let the OSCE observers think they are above the law. The OSCE is a voluntary organization and it has no binding authority over anyone, which is why Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has warned the OSCE that Texas laws will apply, including bars on unlawful entry of polling places.

Abbott wasn’t shy as he closed his letter:

Elections and election observation are regulated by state law. The Texas Election Code governs anyone who participates in Texas elections—including representatives of the OSCE. The OSCE’s representatives are not authorized by Texas law to enter a polling place. It may be a criminal offense for OSCE’s representatives to maintain a presence within 100 feet of a polling place’s entrance. Failure to comply with these requirements could subject the OSCE’s representatives to criminal prosecution for violating state law.

It seems clear to me that if you’re threatening to prosecute foreign observers, then you’d have to arrest them to do so, because otherwise they’d just flee the country. Arresting OSCE observers would be a strong act to preserve the rule of law, which of course means he’s going to get strong opposition from the left on this.

But I’m sure glad America has Texas to take the lead on liberty and federal government, time and again. If not Texas, who?

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • paladin1

    Incredible that no Texan has replied to this diary. Atty. General Greg Abbott is a staunch conservative and you can be sure that Governor Perry, the finest governor we have ever had, is also in the loop on this topic. God bless them both for this great stand and God Bless Texas! Thanks for putting this out into the public record Neil!

  • partyof1

    A story on The Hill.com says the observers will be from Germany, France, Serbia, Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan.

    So are the left wing groups who want these observers saying we should have voter ID requirements like Germany and France already do?

    Or are they saying that Serbia, Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan are models of democracy that the US should emulate?

  • paladin1

    Great article Neil. Thanks for the props for Texas and for our staunch conservative Atty. General, Greg Abbott. You can be sure that Governor Perry is also deep in the loop on this issue. They have kicked international butt before and doggone if they are not doing it again. God Bless Governor Perry and Atty. General Abbott, and God Bless Texas!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Secession isn’t an option, and was decided in the case of Lincoln v. Davis, with U.S. Grant writing the opinion of the court.

    But it’s not necessary anyway. Federalism just needs states willing to fight back. I wish Texas hadn’t backed down on the TSA.

  • ateam

    So…is it true what I heard? That Texas is not connected to the national power grid? They don’t buy or sell power to the rest of the country. Wow. Looks like they could do just about whatever they want if they are truly power independent.

  • celador2

    These monitors will intrude upon the integrity of US elections and anywhere an AG can boot them should bar them. Keep them away from polling places. They are up to no good and have no business at US polling places meddlin in our internal affairs. Better safe than sorry. Good work, Texas.
    The Democratic party’s civil rights groups invited the UN affiliated monitors to observe Republicans for ‘minority vote supression’ not voter fraud. Fraud is often the case in election monitoring worldwide. Fraud is usually the main reason monitors are needed in Afghanistan or Iran or Nigeria, for example. This US request is partisan with political not civic motives.
    States regulate elections in accord with Voter Rights Act 1965 based on 14th amendment. The act was carefully designed to allow states legislatures to regulate and designate authority to counties. No state has to accept these DNC fronts to intimidate the general practice of voting in the states.
    Their invite is an effort to cast doubt on the integrity of those running elections as well as to intimidate the smooth runing of elections by imposing an intrusive foreign force whose mind is made up in favor of DNC cvil rights groups. Minority vote supression will be monitored by DOJ and some states. No need for more monitors.
    .

  • celador2

    Hats off to Texas governor Rick Perry and AG Abbott, and each and every one of them who takes part in banning this foreign outfit from Texas polling places.
    I am hopeful my AG, JB Van Hollen will do the same in Wisconsin. He fights voter fraud and has had a stand off with Holder and DOJ in Recall voting June 5 over the same made up concerns.
    A local county judge has the Voter ID on hold in Wisconsin.

  • tankertodd

    If the US starts a steep decline it may be Texas that becomes the home of liberty in North America. A combination of principle and backbone that can’t be stopped.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    That’s what the fire eaters thought in 1860, too, that nobody was going to stop them, particularly not the effete, statist north.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Anyway, secession threadjack over. Period.

  • cardcarryingmom

    it is true that wE here in Texas do, in fact, have our own power grid!

  • celador2

    IMO Obama and his DOJ abuse the ‘preclearance’ mandate and will continue that abuse of power if Obama wins 2012. Obama will treat the south especailly like an occupied state and deprive those state of as much self government as possible.
    Preclearance means states in old confederacy and those with a history depriving originally freedmen and descendents of slaves after civil war the vote need clear any change in election law with US DeptOfJustice DOJ. For 100 years blacks were kept from voting, but since 1965 there is no problem and preclearance is pro forma until Obama. Still any change needs clearance from DOJ. Holder has used a heavy hammer with Florida, Texas,. SC maybe more.
    Hence we see southern states being sued by Holder for newVoter ID laws. Holder uses preclearance and claims southern states still prohibit blacks from voting. The Supreme ct upheld an Indiana Voter ID law in 2006 or so and most assumed the voter ID was legal.
    Not so under Holder

    States that do not need preclearance to change election law like a Union state Wisconsin or PA have state judges declaring the Voter ID law unconstitutional. Ohio also lost an early vote law suit to Obama campaign. Ohio is now back to the voter laws it had when Democrats were in power 2008.

    Democrats and courts are learning how to overturn elections and nullify voting regulation. This UN affiliated monitor is one more blow by Democrats.

  • cardcarryingmom

    As Greg Gutfeld said, he’s moving to Texas if O is re-elected because “we grow balls on trees”. We, Texans, male and female alike, don’t cotton to interference or disruption to our way of life! Our leadership means what it says and will not back down. The people of my state stand solidly for freedom, independence and peace, but will never be pushed against a wall. And, Neil, if I were you, I wouldn’t be so sure that Texas wouldn’t secede- it is a constant discussion amongst the population and has been for several decades. We have the right in our state constitution to form our own militia to protect ourselves from external or internal dangers. That was a pre-condition to becoming a state, after the war at the Alamo. O sure as hell doesn’t abide by the laws of this land, protect the constitution or believe in state’s rights. Remember the Alamo!

  • edintexas

    We can pray that Holder’s over-reach results in the SCOTUS eliminating Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Texas case is working its way up fairly quickly.

  • edintexas

    “The act was carefully designed to allow states legislatures to regulate and designate authority to counties.”

    You apparently do not live in a “covered jurisdiction” (i.e. states which require Federal permission to change any aspect of their voting procedures or laws, primarily Southern States).

  • gunnyg2002

    Agreed. You can bet that Alaska would follow their lead and what can the Feds do? NOTHING! The Constitution does not forbid secession and even Jefferson stated that the oppressed should revolt. In fact, the DOI states that when necessary, we should revolt to form a better government.

  • gunnyg2002

    Nice that Texas is standing up. I love the fact that you have to show ID to vote in Alaska. And the chances of AK going Blue is slim and none and slim just left town!

  • gunnyg2002

    Mmm. From Alaska through the Mountain states and ending in Texas. Nice.

  • notpropagandized

    We’d have to fight off corrupt Fed govt AND a large % of socialist-inclined Texans that have always shared the state with the rest of us. All lovers of freedom should prepare to defy Feds gross trampling of the Constitution that we’ve grossly tolerated for too long. Greg Abbott and Rick Perry are true Patriots.

  • popdaddy

    Texas DPS has trained election monitors already assigned.
    I recieved an email today from the Travis County GOP regarding training for poll watchers.
    None of these Euro socialists will get far beyond airport and hotel bars or they will be behind real bars.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Threadjack over.

  • Guest

    U S Grant as a justice? I don’t think that is right.

  • celador2

    Democrats want as many votes as possbile for Nov 2012. They know its a crap shoot and they may not win.
    It looks to me like a tag team effort by all Democrats and liberal judges across the nation to stop Voter ID by courts or Holder and DOJ. Norhthern states have their new Voter ID laws on hold despite Indiana passing and the Sup Ct upholding Indiana voter ID years ago. Holder has hit states with preclearance hard and that may be what Court addresses. Is he on a civl rights mission or a vendetta?
    He has used it more than any other AG in a long time all over one law that was modeled on Indiana, Photo ID from the state.
    They should smack down Holder.
    i argued against Indiana State photo ID and took a lot of heat on a few blogs but I am angry at Hoder’s abuse of DOJ and the states being deprived illegally of making election law. In WIsconsin we need a photo ID for welfare but can not be asked to show it to vote.

  • PowerToThePeople

    Might want to work a bit harder on understanding what he actually meant.

  • celador2

    An Alabama official months ago went to DC to address Alabama preclearance and request to be released.
    What are the standards for the south under preclearance? How long is it for a state to live under those oppressive oversight election laws? What do they need to do to be cleared and operate under the same constitutional guidelines on election law as the north? The south has clean elections and no discrimination. Holder uses a state’s checking voter eligiblity as voter intimidation. Look what Florida has gone through.
    Not too long ago the Sup ct denied a southern request to end clearance, did it not? Under Obama such a request takes on new meaning. I pay attention.

  • Melody Warbington

    From http://yellowhammerpolitics.com/blog/hubbard-moves-to-block-united-nations-poll-watchers-from-operating-in-alabama/

    Speaker of the House Mike Hubbard (Alabama) said he will support legislation in
    the next session requiring all poll watchers in Alabama to hold U.S.
    citizenship.

    “The United States is the worldwide beacon of free elections and the
    Republican form of government, so having an international squad from the
    United Nations playing referee in our elections is insulting and
    absurd,” Hubbard said. “We’ve been holding elections in the U.S. for
    the past 223 years without the United Nations playing a role or
    enforcing the rules, and we certainly don’t want or need them now.”

    “If you can’t participate in an election in the United States, and if
    you can’t cast a vote in the United States, you really have no business
    serving as a poll watcher in an election being held in the United
    States,” Hubbard said. “It’s bad enough that Alabama remains trapped
    under the provisions of the Voting Rights Act, so we certainly don’t
    need anyone from the United Nations coming into our state and meddling
    in our elections, as well.”

  • nutstuyu

    Even in communist Illinois, poll watchers must be credentialed by the election authority at least two weeks before the election and be registered to vote in Illinois.

  • syjere

    Actually, Serbia has strict voter laws. They use the dye to make sure you haven’t voted already. At least they’ve got that going for them. I’m sitting here in Serbia wondering if I even want to go home…and that’s BAD.

  • jerseygalnny

    Great post. A good thread on this topic here: http://fundamentalrefounding.ning.com/forum/topics/un-group-to-monitor-u-s-conservative-poll-watchers-by-dr-susan The UN has too large a footprint on American soil, and also on American policy.

  • streiff

    no one is dragging you to an airplane, Scooter.

  • davesinsanantonio

    It is not a question of needing them. The purpose is to intimidate any local who wants to be fair to Republicans. It is to put a show of fairness on rigging the vote count. It is to intimidate voters who lean to the right from even going to the polls. It is to put a patina of law enforcement on stealing the election. If not this one, then one in the future. It is the same reason the unions and the New Black Panthers will also be out in force–to use that force where they can to get the results they want. They don’t care about the votes or the voters. What they care about is the appearance of winning the election so that they can use the power of the federal government, including the military or para-military forces to get their way, and the rest of us be damned!!!

  • trutexan

    Why should Texans feel the need to post in a circumstance where they find themselves the benefactors of common sense? Bravado like what AG Abbott has shown is no surprise to us. First time I heard of this I thought, “Well, of course” and good for him.

  • davesinsanantonio

    But, what the lefties really want to do IS to insult the United States, and any state that isn’t far left. I hope all the states where these puppets show up arrest them and their US handlers and keep them under lock and key until all the votes are counted and then deport them “with prejudice” so they cannot ever come back, and cost their US handlers all their money to defend criminal and civil cases in the courts.

  • veritaseequitas

    And yet, and yet, it was the NBPP – a tool of the Left, that threatened voters during the 2008 presidential elections? The OSCE doesn’t think THEY need monitoring?
    Every state should do what Texas is doing. We don’t need no stinkin’ outside interference.

  • Mars the Avenger

    As much as I have traveled through most of the world (except Asia) and lived in some countries, I have found that most every “normal” country enforces its borders, immigration policy and the integrity of its voting system, except, you’ve guess it, the US. We have become the chumps of the world because of this liberal mental illness infecting the would-be ruling class of our country of both parties (of course, Dhimmi-crats more than Repubs, but we do have our RINOs). Good for Texas. I hope that attitude spreads.

  • creeper

    OK. Lemme see if I have this straight. Our polls will be policed by foreigners and our votes will be counted in Spain. What could possibly go wrong?

  • bayoucastine

    Texas could
    generate a good income stream if Texans could figure out how to ‘teach’ the other 49 states and
    DC how to stand up and just say NO to any attempt by the feds or others such as
    the un [lower case] when attemmpting to infringe on sovereign States Rights.

  • wumingren

    My wife an I have been talking about moving from Minnesota to Texas in the event things get really ugly in America. If Texas wishes to challenge Washington, we will help them defend. We don’t want to be a part of a nation that would go to war to stop Texas from seceding. If there are people in Texas who do not want to secede, I’d be happy to consider a house swap with them. They can come to Minnesota to live in a Lib-prog state as slaves to the government, and we can go to Texas to live like the free citizens that we are.

  • vietnamvet1971

    Arrest their sorry Butt and show them and their Liberal LIARS they are Not above the Law.

  • vietnamvet1971

    YEP, just TRUST them we know there is no Hanky Panky going on. JERKS.

  • celador2

    Exactly the point. Holder is not in any need. He abuses the DOJ monitoring as it is. The foreigners can not enter a state however without its permission. Holder can not impose them and if he tries he may cause a landslide against Obama Even if a state governor agrees it may not be that easy as state law prohibits unauthorized people at poll places. It may take a law change and that takes time. A county clerk may still say no to unauthorized poll watchers.
    Monitor – foreigners will be here as a DNC partisan not a civic request They may hold a Prcon and shout out they saw voter suppression, Well, that is a blatant attempt to undermine the integrity of the election process by false accusations and intimidation.
    Several posters point to the first case Holder’s DOJ REVERSED in a Philly poll place in PA involving voter intimidation by known anti -white anti Semitic armed with clubs Black Panthers who stood in front of the poll place door making threats in 2008 during Bush years. The career prosecutors who were overturned resigned in protest.
    That Obama and Holder and their hack foreigners even say they are coming to monitor is a psy ops voter intimidation effort. It says to me Obama is not fit to be president and employs two faced hypocrites at DOJ more interestested in GOTV than justice

  • ipeduto

    The USA is a sovereign nation – we are beyond the need for Europe’s Organization for Security & Cooperation here. Love Texas & would move there if not for the roots I’ve grown in NJ.

  • doctorbob

    This is such a Leftist SCAM! Observers from Belarus? Kazakhstan? Oh, PLEASE! Can’t we have observers from North Korea and Cuba to complete the clown parade? The Left seems to act as if they are in charge of America now. We need to straighten out their little brains and see to it that they understand otherwise! We aren’t a Communist dictatorship YET, and I think Obama has simply awakened a Sleeping Giant to stop the Left’s insanity in its tracks! There is NOTHING out of order to ensuring honest, clean elections. Sorry, ACORN, you don’t get to steal this election! It’s MUCH too important to us!

  • irishgirl

    God Bless Texas. AG Abbott has done an excellent job in Texas.

  • irishgirl

    Just now saw it and I’m from Texas. AG Abbott is doing an excellent job here.

  • cardcarryingmom

    Come on down anyway! We would open our doors to y’all and welcome our fellow conservatives! (Our summers are hot as the hub of hades but that’s only for 3 months. The rest of time-it’s heaven!)

  • DerKrieger

    Regarding my comment yesterday about secession, Dr. Hanson at NRO has an interesting take. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/331398/are-we-becoming-medieval-victor-davis-hanson

  • travis690

    I agree with Attorney General Abbott. And maybe he might get the Texas Rangers (not the baseball team; the REAL ones) involved with helping keep the scum out of the polling places, since this would be a state-level crime.

  • roguelephant

    American Law is no longer to be considered primary according to all too many current jurists. How much of a sense of humor are we required to maintain?
    According to New York State Election Law: Section 8 500 (4) “Each watcher must be a qualified voter of the city or county in which he (sic) is to serve.”
    Having served over the years in most capacities below Election Commissioner, I know that the letter of the law is often violated, but the spirit ( i.e.intent) of the law has always been maintained – at least where I have served.

  • adeleintexas

    Upon hearing of this outrageous attempt to intrude on US elections and sovereignty by outsiders at the behest of what I can only describe as traitorous Democrats, I began sending emails, Tweets, etc. to Greg Abbott and other officials of the State of Texas, as I’m sure many other Texans did. I also urged those in other states to follow suit with their own state officials.

    True to form, within 48 hours, our Attorney General answered the call by sending a very clear and stern warning to the OSCE.

    Please note in this link http://www.osce.org/odihr/95107 to the OSCE’s press release titled /ODIHR opens mission to observe general elections in United States, there is a statement that reads:

    “The limited election observation mission’s deployment follows an invitation from the authorities of the United States.”

    Oh, really? I believe it behooves us to determine EXACTLY who those “authorities” might be and furthermore to educate those “authorities” in regard to our election laws, a service Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott so eloquently provided the OSCE itself. Want a clue? https://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/releases/2012/102312abbot_letter.pdf Read the full text of Abbott’s letter!

    It would seem that those “authorities of the United States” that approached this illustrious global ‘security’ organization, are quite ignorant of election laws in their own country – at least to the extent that as Abbott clarified, “Elections and election observation are regulated by state law. The Texas Election Code governs anyone who participates in Texas elections—including representatives of the OSCE. The OSCE’s representatives are not authorized by Texas law to enter a polling place.”

    Plainly there was a whole lotta ignorance going on between the Democrats and the OSCE that stated their… “Observers will assess these elections for compliance with international obligations and standards for democratic elections, including the commitments agreed to by all the OSCE participating States, and with national legislation.”

    Well, good luck and welcome to Texas, ya’ll. We’ll be sure to give you the welcome you deserve. And it would stand you in good stead to keep in mind that Texans don’t like interlopers as demonstrated by the long history of Greg Abbott, Governor Rick Perry and former Solicitor General of the State of Texas, Ted Cruz (currently running for US Senate) standing up to the United Nations, International “Court of Justice”, Mexican Government, the Bush Administration and more recently the Obama Administration – and WINNING. And lest you think the taunt AG Abbott issued on Twitter was just a few words, they date back to 1835 and the Texas and the Battle of Gonzales, so when a Texan says, “Come and take it!” you’d best heed that warning!

  • ihateliberals

    The leaders of Foreign nations Fear freedom more than anything else. Freedom means tha the population decides on how the government is run and not a handful of Fat communist that know their power comes from weak and uneducated people. Any place where freedom is suppressed like Cuba, Venezuela want the Liberals in power in America. They hate our constitution and do what ever the can to tear it down. The UN would especially like to see our constitution fail. Texas has been a leader in Freedom since Texas began and the rest of the country could learn a lot from them. This organization has no business in our business. voter fraud so far has never had an impact on our elections that isn’t to say that on local elections it hasn’t. The voter ID laws need to be made national and any one that opposes them are promoting fraud. Thhis BS story about disenfranchising poor people is BS. They actually for the most part have ID because they are on Public assistance. You must have a valid ID to receive that. Voter ID can and will slow the illegals and criminals from voting in local elections where they would have the biggest impact.

  • txn1st

    Secession is always an option when you are a Texan!

  • woode

    Yes! Come on down. The more conservatives the better. We’re proud of our history and rugged individualism. You will feel at home right away. (We do keep a few progressives around for entertainment purposes).

  • woode

    Texan is more than where you reside… it is frame of mind. Keep spreading that Texas spirit!

  • celador2

    Good man, Mr Mike Hubbard.

  • celador2

    Democrats also want to win by hook or by crook. if they can not win nobody will, is their line. If they lose fair and square they want a foreign monitor to say they were vicitms and really won.

  • tanstaf1

    You mean they’re not sending observers to Philadelphia and Chicago?

  • gnelson

    At least someone has the balls to stand up and support the law. Hey Obama, you need to study this situtation to help you understand how the rule of law works.

  • PowerToThePeople

    And I am sure you would get your couch bound lard ass up and out on the front line so you can set the secession example. You will show us how stupidity leads to bleeding.

    Just for you secession idiots, while it is and must always be an option, it must be the absolute last option. And there is no legitimate reason to mention it based on Obama policy. His policies are dead wrong, but that is what elections are for and unless he refused to abide by the results of the election and used the military to keep him in office, secession is not even on the table. All of you idiots who keep bringing it up feel free to strap on your rifle and head out to show us how it is done. Save the world your portion of the oxygen.

  • jimtexas

    Hi Neil, just a FYI on the Texas vs. TSA. The TSA had threatened to stop all flights to/from US to TX. With a Democrat Senate and Obama, TX didn’t have many short-term options. It was also the end of the TX legislative session (the TX legislature, per our constitution, only meet for 6 months every 2 years), so a special session would probably be required to change the law.

    I hope the AG gets a chance to arrest some of the OSCE observers. We need more push-back with Obama and his friends.

    The TSA only “won” the battle on the airports vs. TX-the “war” with the TSA will continue so the airports can eject the TSA in the future(hopefully).

    PS: The TSA, with Rep Sheila Jackson Lee’s encouragement, did searches and questioning of folks just riding Houston city buses, including “where are you going” and “why” type questions–no probable cause, warrants, or disruptive behavior–just unconstitutional harassment. There was such an uproar, I think the TSA only tried it once.

  • gs425

    The OSCE is an affiliated org with the UN. Any credibility given to them is repulsive. Like they UN, they should be cast for our shores.

  • gs425

    But what does the dye to prove you are eligible to vote in the first place?

  • spinoneone

    Commonwealth of Virginia Statutes 24.2-604 regulates who may approach closer than 40′ to any entrance to a polling place. Section (C) states than the only observers authorized within the polling place must be nominated by a political party or candidate and that each observer must be “a qualified voter in any jurisdiction in the Commonwealth.” I think that excludes OSCE observers.

  • http://www.jacksonjambalaya.com kingfish

    Fix your link to The Hill. It goes to hill.com

  • txn1st

    For the record I am neither couch bound nor lard ass,speak for you’re self. Stating a fact is not stupity.You are not a Texan or you would not make such a remark.

  • PowerToThePeople

    Actually numnuts, I can guarantee I have been a Texan a long time, much longer than you. While I do not reside there now, I still own a ranch in Boyd, pay state taxes there, have an office there, and spend as much time there as I do in SC.

    Second, it is always the “so called intellectuals and lard butts” who blab on about something so stupid as secession since it is not them who would bleed.

    Third, it is not a fact, it is stupidity. Already explained it to you as have others, not our fault you are too stupid to understand. And if you had one bit of sense, you would understand just how dangerous secession is, the many downsides to secession, and the very low probability it would have any success other than in seriously lowering the population of the states inhabitants via death.

    Now run along bub, your mom needs the computer and you need to clean the basement so you can have a place to sleep.

  • vandalii

    What it will prevent is multiple votes from single voter (the old “vote early, vote often” type of fraud). Much harder to vote as a dead person if one’s finger is already stained purple or green or whatever.

  • celador2

    The US was founded for the purpose of self government. A republic can run its own elections by its very defintion of self regulation and government. But a new type of view has emerged on the world stage that makes global intervention acceptable to some.
    Only foreigners or some outsider can be fair and balanced in monitoring elections since natives are too corrupt. That stinks and only US citizens should be poll watchers. Anyone poll watching for a foreign outfit has an independent agenda. I would not want those poll watchers watching my polls.

  • celador2

    You are nice!

  • celador2

    What a kind welcoming thing to say–pefect state for conservatives! Abbott and Perry well, my admiration grows by the moment. I found i admired Gv Perry in primary when he got into foreign policy and said all foreign aid would start at zero and have to be explained and that he would exit UN. His skepticism about one world UN impressed me.

  • celador2

    Now what can be so horrible so far you would not want to come home? We have a fast way to tell if one voted already , an absentee check that Wisconsin had in place for one election, the recall primary.upon entering a clerk ckecks the name then the voter moves on for a ballot in person if not on absentee list.
    Ink would not have caught an absentee double vote. Fraud and double or multiple voting is not same day in person voting as much as absentee imo.

  • brojohn2

    Here is one Texan who is proud of our Gov. and our Atty Gen. the word is: Don’t mess with Texas.

  • txn1st

    Oh such elegant speech from someone claims to a Texan.Had you been a native Texan you would have understood the comment.As for age if you’re older than 72 you can claim that distinction.
    I know Boyd Texas area very well.I also have a ranch near Possum Kingdom.I did not offer an opinion on secession at all, only that it is an option.Apparently you have a comprehension problem.

  • PowerToThePeople

    Nice backtrack attempt there bub. Might want to go up and edit or delete your comment if you are going to take this new approach.

    And I have that distinction there Jimbo, by a few years.

  • brojohn2

    Nullification – 10th Amendment says quite simply: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. STAND UP WE ARE THE PEOPLE. It is time for nullification to move through this nation.

  • txn1st

    I enjoy a good pissing contest,but I won’t accommodate you.
    Goodbye

  • Pingback: International vote monitors warn Texas: Don't mess with us – Reuters | Blackburn Vargas

  • PowerToThePeople

    That is too bad. Maybe next time you should drink a lot of water so you actually have some “ammo.”

  • Pingback: Texas Attorney General warns OSCE on Election Observations

  • Pingback: Program tv

  • jimtexas

    Let’s hope Congress will pass a national voter ID law for federal elections, since some states, i.e. CA, would never do it.

  • Pingback: Socialist Webzine: EDITORIAL: Blue helmets at the ballot box - Washington TimesSocialist Agenda Webzine

  • Pingback: Information

  • Pingback: Leia Elchert

  • Pingback: Dwight Protin

  • Pingback: Leonardo Soplop

  • Pingback: Neil Tollett

  • Pingback: Maritza Yelton

  • Pingback: Harris Clough

  • Pingback: Marita Docker

  • Pingback: Aja Delargy

  • Pingback: Loyd Mannick

  • Pingback: Danuta Bombaci

  • Pingback: Dwayne Zeals

  • Pingback: Mariah Danielovich

  • Pingback: Doug Nuss

  • Pingback: Leopoldo Borbon

  • Pingback: Cheree Friedland

  • Pingback: Sommer Aparicio

  • Pingback: http://www.goldarticlesdirectory.com/advertising/styles-of-girls-add-ons-and-why-virtually-every-new-woman-should-go-for-them.html

  • Pingback: Stuart Iacovelli

  • Pingback: Kristin Bielecki

  • Pingback: Free Money

  • Pingback: Jolyn Mogavero

  • Pingback: Don Jaggers

  • Pingback: Jeremiah Rohrdanz

  • Pingback: Birdie Alvidrez

  • Pingback: Julietta Hershelman

  • Pingback: Trudy Tieng

  • Pingback: Christoper Gordan

  • Pingback: Dinah Yedinak

  • Pingback: Samatha Embelton

  • Pingback: Laverna Ketron

  • Pingback: Devon Tiemann

  • Pingback: Eugenia Hasgill

  • Pingback: Kristian Medler

  • Pingback: Sherry Gillig

  • Pingback: Olin Thomassen

  • Pingback: Leticia Delmont

  • Pingback: Osvaldo Zukor

  • Pingback: Texas Declares War on UN Vote Monitors