« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A Constitutional Republic, Not a Democracy

In case anyone needed a lesson in understanding the difference between democracy and a Constitutional Republic a.k.a. Europe and America, tonight’s results should serve as a clear message.  This is democracy in full force.

Why did we need a constitution?  Why are popular elections not a sufficient means of preserving liberty?

A pure unbridled democracy is a political system in which the majority enjoys absolute power by means of democratic elections.  In an unvarnished democracy, unrestrained by a constitution, the majority can vote to impose tyranny on themselves and the minority opposition.  They can vote to elect those who will infringe upon our inalienable God-given rights.  Thomas Jefferson referred to this as elected despotism in Notes on the State of Virginia (also cited in Federalist 48 by Madison):

An ELECTIVE DESPOTISM was not the government we fought for; but one which should not only be founded on free principles, but in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among several bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others.

Thus, a constitution that limited and divided the power of government was necessary to preclude elected officials from imposing tyranny on the people.  This is why they adopted a constitution with limited enumerated power, divided and checked across several branches and levels.

In other words, tonight’s narrow majority victory for Obama and the Democrats should not be so consequential.  Pursuant to the society we are supposed to be, elections are not the end all; the Constitution is the end all.  Elections should not be so consequential.  Forty-eight percent of us should not be forced into the tyranny of a government-takeover of much of our lives just because 50% vote for insidious characters who want to grow government for their own sake.

Yet, we no longer live in a Constitutional Republic.  We live in a pure democracy – one that is similar to Europe, in which the majority can pretty much vote for people who will vitiate the Constitution and implement any form of tyranny it pleases.  Screw the minority.  Yes, so much for minority rights, progressives.  As founder John Witherspoon noted, “pure democracy cannot subsist long nor be carried far into the departments of state – it is very subject to caprice and the madness of popular rage.”

Yet, there is still one element of our Constitutional Republic that has been preserved; the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches and the separation of the individual states from the federal government.  We have held onto the House with roughly the same strong majority, plus we have added a number of new conservatives.  Additionally, we have picked up some state legislative chambers, increasing our majority control over a record number of state governments.

 

It is in the House and in the states that we must make our stand for God, Country, and Constitution; for liberty, freedom, and the American way of live.

If you’ve noticed over the past two elections, it is in the lower offices – the House and state legislatures – that we have made the biggest gains.

On a personal level, I am committed to growing a conservative majority in the House and the states, while holding the existing members accountable on all policy issues.  Through the Madison Project, Red State, and other venues, I and my colleagues will not rest until we grow a strong bench of viable conservative leaders who will, someday, run for higher office.

Onward, soldiers!

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • http://aaroninvestigates.wordpress.com/ contructiveConservative

    The point which should now be obvious is there is no room for bipartisanship or compromise.

  • WmCraig

    The most important protection, the limitation on direct taxation by the federal government, is the true power behind the division of government. The 16th and 17th amendment changed the constitution to an extent that the map says it all. Our power today is limited to damage control in the off years.

    President Obama has set a precedent for ignoring Congress. They serve only as a foil for him to justify his continued abuses of power. Yes we have gained power there, but it was never effectively used. If Congress does not risk shutting down the government to enforce their rights to control spending, what have we gained?

    Given that the American people gave Obama a mandate any effort to curb spending now could be destructive leaving us with out any conservatives at all. Given that we handed Congress a mandate in 2010 and they did nothing with it when they could and not be blamed for the consequences I don’t understand how we can take a stand and survive it.

  • WmCraig

    In 2011 the conservatives could have risked shutting down the government because they were given a mandate. People were mad at Obama, and many people didn’t know what they were getting.

    Yesterday’s vote puts an end to any idea that we can change the course. People know what they bought this time, and they bought it anyway. Any attempt to contain the President will be seen as going against the will of the people. It will diminish if not destroy the conservative movement.

  • dutchletter

    Agreed. Unfortunately, we may need to balance our ideologies. (Even typing this is a bitter pill. I voted with my heart, but my mind is taking over.) This is how America reinvents itself. We can fight it or take advantage of it by learning from the experience.

  • rustyoldgarand

    Calling the U.S.A. a “pure democracy” is nothing short of ignorant. Hell, calling European-style parliamentary democracy pure is also wide of the mark. Give your head a shake; the sky is not falling. The division of power in American still functions, and Obamacare passed the senate with 60 votes, not the 51 needed for a basic majority. I share your frustration at the outcome of this election, but let’s go easy on tearing down the country because we don’t like the president. Congress still has more power than the POTUS, anyway, and we still have congress.

  • rustyoldgarand

    At the very least, we need to change our stance towards immigrants, because without the Latino vote we are at sea as a party. I don’t really think anything more is needed; it’s not like we lost this one in a landslide. But yes, small changes will have to be made to the party platform. Rubio in 2016 and a tack to the left on immigration is looking more and more like the winning strategy. If that’s the only change the party has to make to reestablish a winning coalition, I can live with it.

  • gunnyg2002

    While I would agree with you, Obama bypasses Congress and they do nothing about it. DC is broken, Congress does nothing, Dingy Reid and the Senate ignore the Constitution i.e., no budget for the last three years, and the 47% put a fraud back into office.

    Sorry Brother but America, as we knew it, is gone. The sooner we realize THAT, the better off we’ll be.

  • gunnyg2002

    The Republic is dead. Long live the Republic. The 47%ers have realized Jefferson’s worst fears that they know that they can vote themseles largesse from the Treasury and do so at will. This was an election for freebies and big government, nothing else.

  • Locked and Loaded

    This.

  • grumpyKoz

    Many immigrants come from countries where all they now is tyranny they have no idea what individualism is. They have not been trained or taught that they are responsible for them selves.

    It is very hard to believe that a country where the growth of the socialist population is growing faster than the free population will ever go back to a representative republic.

    The dominance of the socialist voting class is taking over.

  • jfpurdue01

    We now have 29 governorships. How many state houses do we have? 30 is the threshold that we need in order to call a constitutional convention, which is what we need in order to get amendments for term limits and a balanced budget. If we can’t do it at that level, then we need measures on the ballot in every state asking the people “Do you support calling for a constitutional convention for the purpose of requiring the federal government to operate under a balanced budget and establishing reasonable term limits for members of congress?” I don’t see any way that would fail in 30 states if it was on the ballot.

  • renl57

    Columnists like Linda Chavez and Jeff Jacoby suggested we could advocate streamlining the legal immigration bureaucracy to make it easier for qualified Hispanic immigrants to come to America legally. (Currently all the paperwork and hoops to jump through can take many years.) That would show that we do welcome Hispanics who come here legally and want to contribute to this country.

    The response from base conservatives? VERY negative. There doesn’t seem to be all that much support among the GOP base even for LEGAL immigration. Even though Hispanics who come here legally usually turn out to have a strong work ethic and a strong family ethic. They certainly *act* more like conservatives than like Occupy Wall Street protesters. Why don’t we welcome them?

    Because over on National Review, Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Reform continues to advocate shutting the door to all immigrants, even legal immigrants. He claims America is overpopulated already. But minorities will interpret his statement as suggesting that America has too many of *them* already.
    We need to welcome *legal* Hispanic immigrants to this country, and to welcome them into the GOP. And we should stop listening to nativists like Krikorian.

    A state like Nevada is now less than 60% white. Without minority votes, no Republican can win a statewide election there anymore.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Well, that was precisely Romney’s message. Didn’t work against stop gap amnesty.

  • renl57

    We have the House.

    The Senate confirms Supreme Court appointments and treaties that the President makes with foreign powers.

  • congoman

    Unconstitutional? We lost an election…it has happened before. Get a grip.

  • DerKrieger

    Since we’ve abandoned federalism we DO have a tyranny of the majority. As long as states ran most of their own affairs people were well insulated from the agenda of the opposition party but since we’ve federalized everything we conservatives in Red states have to worry about CA electing a Pelosi or Boxer and NV electing a Reid.
    If we want to preserve liberty we have to return to federalism.
    Read my diary for much more on this topic.

  • Pingback: Carletta Snaples

  • Pingback: Car Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: distilling alcohol

  • Pingback: Mining Technology

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • Pingback: stencil art

  • Pingback: martial arts blog

  • Pingback: do you agree

  • Pingback: You Could Try This Out

  • Pingback: bgdfgdfgdfgdf

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: working from home uk

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Julie Leiendecker

  • Pingback: Store Display Installations

  • Pingback: Remote Control

  • Pingback: noclegi roztocze

  • Pingback: at bing

  • Pingback: Annett Blowe

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: real active instagram followers

  • Pingback: meio ambiente

  • Pingback: Dumpster Rentals

  • Pingback: Dumpster Deliveries

  • Pingback: mold testing

  • Pingback: Allevamenti Rottweiler

  • Pingback: "????? ????? ????"

  • Pingback: Rosamaria Froebe

  • Pingback: Benita Pinedo

  • Pingback: weight loss diet

  • Pingback: local one night stands

  • Pingback: madamelux

  • Pingback: land of nod discount

  • Pingback: bear grylls messer

  • Pingback: cell service affiliates

  • Pingback: Jamaal Arenburg

  • Pingback: cheapest car insurance

  • Pingback: Organo Gold Scam

  • Pingback: natural green coffee bean

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Medical Marketing

  • Pingback: cell phone number search

  • Pingback: Corey Heddlesten

  • Pingback: Logan Hynek

  • Pingback: Alba Amezaga

  • Pingback: executive uniform

  • Pingback: Kristian Medler

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: female hair loss treatment

  • Pingback: Jess Schouweiler

  • Pingback: read more

  • Pingback: listen to this podcast

  • Pingback: bmx bikes

  • Pingback: lida ile zayiflama

  • Pingback: Lloyd Biehn

  • Pingback: https://acss.asu.edu/forums/index.php?action=profile;u=913

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: Orwellian is Good Description of Obama Government « Lighthouse Patriot Journal