« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

To Beat the President

Even if you get pissed off, make it to the fourth paragraph below please.

I have spent five years and a few months loudly saying Mitt Romney could not win the Presidency and a month and a half actually thinking he could through no act of his own, but rather the act of the President failing miserably in the first debate.

I should have stuck to my guns and I’m sorry I did not. But the truth is, had I, most of you would have left RedState long ago in disgust and even now I’d be being burned in effigy by major voices within the GOP for talking down the nominee. In the past few months there has been little gained, with so much at stake, pointing out the failures of the Romney campaign. Pointing out the polls were not rigged has still left hard feelings with a number of you. But it turns out I was wrong about them being skewed too far to the Democrats.

But here’s the thing you all need to understand as you are convinced the United States has rejected conservatism and embraced liberalism — there have been ten American Presidents defeated at re-election. Nine of them were subjected to intra-party challenges in the year of their re-election. The tenth was Herbert Hoover who, unlike Barack Obama, Americans blamed for the Great Depression.

The odds were never with us historically. It has nothing to do with an embrace of one world view or rejection of another. It is just damn hard to beat an incumbent President who is raking in millions and laying a ground work for re-election while your side is fighting it out in a primary.

Primaries make challengers stronger. But they also let the other side lay groundwork your side will never have the time to lay.

In that vein, the Romney campaign outsourced a good bit of its ground game to state parties and others. It was a bad decision. Go back to Scott Conroy’s article from June 13, 2012;

While the Romney campaign now has a small presence on the ground, at its lone statewide office — in Metro-accessible Arlington — fresh-faced interns far outnumbered paid staffers on Tuesday.

The campaign largely outsourced its Virginia ground operation to the Romney Victory Fund (a joint committee shared with the national Republican Party), which maintains nine offices throughout the commonwealth. Romney aides suggest that the coordinated effort is an advantage, since the campaign does not have to compete for volunteers and other resources with the Republican committees.

As Ben Domenech noted that morning in The Transon, “That… that’s the plan?” It was the plan. It failed.

In 2008, faced with an entrenched consultant class within the Democratic Party, Barack Obama put his team — and it was his team — in Chicago. Mitt Romney relied on the usual suspects still in good standing with the campaign from the last time and now.

It did not work out.

To beat an incumbent President is historically a near impossible task. Romney’s campaign operation made it even more impossible. That’s just the reality.

It has nothing to do with a rejection of much of anything, but Republicans should now reject that model.

COMMENTS

  • the_invisible_hand

    Centralized party control seems to be paramount. We have to figure out what the message is and knock people in line.

  • adamd

    I am surprised there has been ZERO mention of how early voting screwed us. Had their been no early voting and people voted on election day we probably would have won. Sure the Republicans put some effort into early voting but nothing even close to the Democrats effort.

    Romney and the Super PACs were way to gentile. Obama has been a terrible President and they did nothing to really beat into people skulls that his Presidency has been a train wreck. $16T is debt, 15% unemployment (using the U6) and 45mm people on food stamps should have been numbers so beaten over people’s head that they could not ignore them. Sure they were mentioned, but they should have been mentioned at EVERY opportunity. Although it was nonsense, the phrase “war on women” became a phase everyone heard. There was no such thing from the Republicans. Everyone knew who Willie Horton was in 1988 and despite the MSM failure to report, most people knew about the Swift Vets in 2004. Most people who voted for Obama think the economy is improving (which it is not) and going to get better (which it is not) rather than know that the national debt is now $16T, we have 15% unemployment and there are now 45mm people on food stamps.

    For 2016, the Republicans need to make an all out effort to attract Hispanics and Asians to the party. There has to be a real grass roots effort to reach out to them. Asians and Hispanics could find a home in the Republican Party if they were properly approached and learned what the key issues are, rather than the Democrats usual nonsense. If we cannot win in 2016 after 8 years of Obama’s terrible Presidency we are in trouble.

  • Snertly

    I doubt there’s enough oxygen to sustain life at those rarefied heights of conspiracy paranoia.

  • texashistorian

    What about a party within the party? A clearly identifiable group with a platform, organized leadership, funding etc. A Reform Republican party or something along those line. It would stand with the GOP when it agreed, but would push its own agenda without compromise, run its candidates under its own label, and eventually destroy the old party.

  • synchronicityii

    “When the facts are on your side, pound the facts. When the law is on your side, pound the law. When neither the facts nor the law is on your side, pound the table.” Blaming the media is pounding the table. Stop it. Either it’s wrong, in which case it’s a misleading analysis that will lead to more mistakes, or it’s right, in which case… nothing. There’s nothing to be done.

    And while I’m on this topic, um, what? The highest circulation paper in the US (the WSJ) is conservative. The highest rated news network (Fox) is conservative. Last I saw, a study claimed that 91% of talk radio is conservative. 41 of the top 100 newspapers endorsed Obama, but 35 (only 17% less) endorsed Romney — and one that didn’t, the WSJ, basically devoted their OpEd page to electing him.

  • wbcoleman

    Try criticizing the drive to criminalize abortion here at Redstate and see what it will get you.

  • adamd

    1 – yes
    2- yes
    3 – I am saying we need to reach out to them. They agree with us on most key things. We have done a terrible job attracting them to our party. There is no reason Asians do not vote for Republicans the way blacks vote for Democrats.

  • adamd

    It clearly does matter. States like OH and FL we were down 20% with 20% of the ballots cast before a vote is cast on election day. Sure a vote is a vote, but we need to get our base to vote early so we can check them off and then worry about undecideds who determine the outcome. Getting your base to vote on election day is a waste of energy and unnecessary if they can vote early.

  • fightnright

    New generation immigrants (which will most likely never again be primarily built of Judeo-Christian Europeans) have always historically/traditionally voted for Democrats who run on populist platforms.

    Old generation poor immigrants knew that if they failed to succeed through hard work and application, they would have to beg bed and board from similarly burdened family members, or go home. Many new generation poor immigrants have been weaned from arrival on government programs promised to them and extended family members by the populist/Democrat party.

    The public school program, a key source of beginning cultural and political understanding for non-English speaking immigrants is run and informed by Democrats and leftists. Primary school education no longer includes a grounding in Western values and founding principles. Moral and cultural relativism and multi-culturalism comprise the school curriculum. American exceptionalism and not only no longer taught to new generations of voters, it is denigrated; a concept treated with contempt.

    It may remain difficult for Republicans to win very high/broad turnout Presidential elections- only interim contests top-loaded with politically aware activists – with one coalition built overwhelmingly of middle class and working class older American generation males. Whether the Republican party should have a primary goal of building new coalitions including many more demographic groups will be the central question facing the right in the next four years.

    All is not lost for conservative philosophy, but it may take some decades
    before the economic success of hardworking new Americans informs their thinking, leads them to want to protect that which they have built and earned, and a new middle class of conservative Americans emerges.

  • tcgeol

    History is always and without exception informed by your world view. Your values are based on your world view. That makes it impossible to teach history without touching on western values.

  • rebar

    If we are to believe Chris Matthews, the election was sealed by the magnificent hurricane response by Obama (R U kidding me???). This boob said, “I’m so glad we had that storm last week”.

    I can’t believe Comcast will let him get through the week without being fired.

  • freemkts

    Perry would have been a disaster debating Obama. Mitt should have never joined in that dogpile against Perry for offering in state tuition to illegal immigrants though. That’s how you lose 71% of the Hispanic vote.

  • tlhoward

    Can’t possibly agree. They would have eaten him alive and unfortunately, the public would have seen Perry, heard Perry and thought, “Bush 2.” It’s just a reality.

  • JSobieski

    Lies by the left regarding minorities still doesn’t explain why Romney received almost 3M fewer votes than McCain. All those polls re: D party ID were correct, but none of us believed those polls because we assumed Romney was running ahead of McCain. McCain’s ground game was pretty horrible; both campaigns outsourced that stuff.
    Why did we lose 3M votes? Why did we not realize it until it was too late? Answer these questions, and you have a career as a professional consultant.

  • tlhoward

    No, the Hispanic vote is Dem, no matter what. Do you really think Hispanics in battleground states had any knowledge of that GOP debate? They have been taught that Barry is their friend. That battle had been won months before with his little move for those here illegally since being kids. The other psychological truth here is that as brown people, they see themselves as a minority, just like blacks (read, Barry) is a minority. They see the handwriting on the wall. They are up next. People of the USA, get ready to see Senor Villaragoso, mayor of the failed city of Los Angeles, running for the Presidency.

  • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

    I believe our AZ county GOTV was very good. One race is still undecided for us (although a network has called it). The Dems poured a lot of money in for ads that were not only scurrilous, but factually untrue. They were effective, even against a very, very good Senate candidate who has a splendid conservative record in the House. Truth in those ads was never a consideration.

  • fightnright

    Your answer makes me wonder if you have spent much time in the social
    services community or worked with immigrant populations. I’ve not only
    worked for decades in that milieu, but my husband and I have also
    fostered handicapped and at risk illegal immigrant ‘anchor babies’ in
    our own home.

    I did comment above about the trajectory of success for most hardworking
    immigrants. Many of these struggling immigrants that we both admire
    are here illegally and
    working in the underground economy while also collecting government
    entitlements with their spouse or partner.

    From the cost of a birthing
    room in an American hospital, these new immigrant children are entitled
    to many benefit programs – food, schooling, housing and medical – that
    are paid for by families which have a tough time paying for necessities
    themselves. (Nurses’ desks and social service providers in Metropolitan
    hospitals have a pet name for that passage – they call it ‘American
    Express’.) In NYC, we are recently seeing men from cultures, with
    multiple ‘wives’, setting up several households with children. Many
    (though not all) of the fathers we see do work long hours all day, every
    day, but the extended households are supplemented by benefit checks, rental help and
    food stamps.

  • franklinwasright

    The point is that the foot soldiers, the boots on the ground need to be delivering the message. Soldiers need their Generals to boost their morale in order to face the fight and win. The people I interacted with at the Victory Center in WI were exhausted from their fight, and there weren’t any leaders helping to raise them back up. This blog could be a source for that, but Erickson decided it was more important to be seen as right rather than rally the troops to victory. I understand that this is often frowned on by those on the right as dishonesty, maybe it gives off the impression of propaganda which is what turns off conservatives. But the simple fact is that the Democrats know how to pump up their foot soldiers, and they are winning elections.

  • franklinwasright

    I think that is what Erick was doing, pissing and moaning. Kowalski is pointing out a weakness that the right has, they fail to inspire people, even those within their own ranks.

  • JSobieski

    Agreed that we are asking the wrong questions. My question: Why did Romney get fewer votes than McCain? I suspect that answer has to do with social issues. More specifically, there are far more people out there motivated to stop abortion than there are to lower tariffs. There are a lot of Republican voters who wouldn’t mind raising taxes on the rich just as there are quite a few Democrat voters who think government does too much, but still vote for Obama. I suspect that we are misreading the election results big time. I would be curious to see data regarding self-identified evangelicals. I think it is quite possible that while American voters think Republicans are better on the economy, they still vote Democrat on the issue because they just don’t like the implications. I wonder if there was ever any data collected as to how many Reagan voters supported Reagan economic policies?

  • JSobieski

    Neither the ground game nor Sandy explain why McCain outperformed Romney. 3M McCain voters were not impacted by either (1) or (2).