« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

We Forget

There is no permanence in politics. All is fleeting. All is cyclical. We find comfort in our cycle and distress when others rise to the top.

Right now, conservatives are bitterly disappointed. Some choose to check out mentally. Some have decided to throw in the towel. A few blame the American people. Many think the gig is up, the show is over, and destiny is undone.

Demography is not destiny and neither is the ever growing leviathan. Many think so now, but they forget the ebbs and flows of the tide of history. Conservatism is not done. The message of freedom and opportunity is not done.

No immigrant comes to the United States wanting to be on welfare. They come for a better life of hard work and success. What conservatives forget is that people forget.

And conservatives have done a terrible job reminding people.

Since Ronald Reagan rose from the ashes of the Goldwater movement, Republicans have articulated a message of freedom and opportunity — a rugged individualism that says if you work hard you can be what you want and do what you want. But people forget.

In the last decade or so, Republicans began to assume everyone just naturally agreed. They stopped explaining. They stopped being evangelists. Worse, conservatism morphed into Republicanism and instead of being about ideas, both became about the acquisition of power for the sake of power. Republicans no longer articulated a core set of principles through policy, but policies designed solely to keep them in power. The party leaders and many of its candidates began to do the same — freedom became a platitude, not a policy.

During Barack Obama’s tenure, Republicans tried to blur every line, make every compromise, and often surrendered before a weapon was even pointed at them. They did not articulate a positive conservative vision, but a defensive position that Obama was bad and they were good with little to show for it. They cut deals that sold out their core to preserve their power. They do so even today.

Republicans assumed Americans got it. They assumed Americans and Republicans were still speaking the same language. But they weren’t.

Politics is cyclical and Americans are forgetful. Republicans forgot that. They failed to keep advancing. They failed to keep explaining. They relied on on the tried and true that became the tired and stale.

Tax cuts? Yay!

Pro-life? Yay!

But what else? Under Republicans and Democrats alike, the tax code has grown more complex, the lobbyist class has grown richer, and the banks have gotten too big to fail.

Moving forward, the conservative movement from within the GOP needs to advance new ideas, not just dust off and repackage old ideas. The principles remain the same. The principles are fixed. But the ideas that advance those principles must fit into the twenty-first century.

The GOP should start with education reform. They should tackle tax reform. They should work the break up big banks by forcing big banks to capitalize further. They should not shy away from tackling social security and medicare reform — ideas that did not hurt them with senior citizens and will ultimately help them with younger voters. They should still fight to repeal Obamacare and explain to the American people why it is sucking the life out of the economy.

But more importantly, conservatives must be able to show Americans in this age of a stagnant economy that conservatism has ideas not just to make one prosperous, but also to help the poor and needy. There are those who do depend on and deserve a helping hand. If the GOP cannot show how small government lifts people up and provides for those who cannot, the GOP will fail.

Republicans should not be afraid to be obstructionist, but must be willing to explain that the obstruction prevents the passage of ideas that history once discarded before we all forgot.

These are exciting times for the conservative movement. But the conservative movement must get up and lead now — lead with conservative ideas for the GOP, not a Republican agenda packaged as conservative. We must begin again anew talking conservatism as evangelists, not fellow travelers. We must remember we are not in a permanent decline, but a cycle of politics that is only permanent if we let it be.

Our think tanks must stop producing white papers designed to woo donors and must produce ideas designed to persuade voters to limited government.

In 2004, George W. Bush beat John Kerry, delivering a surprising defeat to the Democrats. Two years later, the Democrats took the House and two years after that took the White House.

In 2014, like in 2010, Barack Obama’s base will not show up as it did in 2012 and 2008. In 2016, it will split between factions in a diminished field of a shallower bench with no guarantee that Barack Obama’s coalition is the Democrats’ coalition. The GOP will have a deep bench of articulate conservatives.

We must lay the groundwork now with fresh ideas embedded with timeless principles sold by voices who understand people forget and must be reminded why America is great and why conservatism helped make it that way. We must continue, as a conservative movement, challenging and ending the political careers of Republicans who carry the banner of conservatism while selling it out.

We must still be willing to fight against the implementation of Obamacare, a policy still opposed by a majority of Americans.

Be of cheerful heart. The world spins on and I fight on. Join me. Let’s take the country back as happy warriors for a cause we know is right that too many on our own side have forgotten is right.

In the words of William F. Buckley, Jr., RedState, the conservative movement, you, and I must stand athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • commonsenseobserver

    Now that’s better.

  • ipeduto

    That people forget is true. BUT will we still have an America to restore by 2016? Obama’s agenda is to so weaken our country that it will be beyond restoration. I will be here but continue to feel great anxiety.

  • 6t9boss

    I respectfully take exception with the comment Conservatives have done a terrible job of articulating our message. I drank the koolaid in 94′ and was full bore for the GOP until 06′ -08 when Conservatives WON primaries in Northern states and the GOP LEADERSHIP along with looney Karl Rove took them out. Our problem is not working within the GOP anymore…we have walked that “Mile” long enough. I think after this debacle it is time to form a Conservative Party ( Tea Party..whatever name you want) and display to the country an actual difference in ideals. Which is something the GOP IS NOT going to allow as long as we remain. We are alot like the minorities in the Democrat Party ..ignored and distained until election day. Like I said the problem the GOP has today is getting me to vote for any of them again. I have left the plantation with no where to go.

  • conservativepatriot

    It is certainly true that Republicans have not articulated the conservative vision and have systematically caved in to what can only be called socialist ideas. However, you must look at the world and see the overwhelming success of socialism. Not economically, because even the old semi-socialist European nations are now unraveling, but in being adopted by the citizens of democratic and semi-democratic nations. Despite all their woes, the French have just elected a communist, as we have. It would appear that the majority of people everywhere are attracted to the idea of getting something for nothing, at someone else’s expense. We know that hard work and self-reliance made America what it is today, but telling people that they must work hard and it will be perhaps a generation before immigrants can move out of their tenements doesn’t sell anymore. Immigrants may not come to this country looking for welfare, but they come to this country wanting an immediate fix, instant “wealth”, which from their point of view is nicely achieved by their welfare payments. They may want a job, but they are perfectly happy to simply have food stamps and other things they did not have in their countries. When we read that they are in “poverty”, we forget that we calculate the “poverty level” with respect to the average income of Americans, not of the people where they come from. By those standards, they are rich, and so they will never vote to lower those benefits. They assume that someone will always be working hard and that the government will share the fruits of that labor with them. There is absolutely no way that the conservative message can appeal to those people. When you add the number of people who understand nothing about foreign affairs or anything more than that they want unrestricted irresponsible sex, drugs, entertainment, social media, and so forth, the liberals have a coalition that is not going to be stopped by an explanation of conservative values.

  • commonsenseobserver

    America is more than a country. It’s an idea. Perhaps that idea will be better off if the country goes through full-throttle Obamanomics the next two years.

  • jeffro1340

    You are very wrong on one point. People do come to this great country for free money. That’s how we lost. Obama bought this election on welfare and kickbacks through the stimulus and scared immigrants. He won because people were scared of losing what they have. Romney’s 47% figure in his statement was 4% too low.

  • jonedanger

    Handbasket Reaches Terminal Velocity – Film at Eleven

  • jamesmpratt

    We live in an age of celebrity. Even modern hillbilly moonshiners get more air time on “reality tv” than conservatives. A new day of constant messaging is needed on a 24/7 basis in media from both conservatives and RNC that levels the playing field with the complicit mainstream if we are to reach and change hearts and minds of the new young socialists and unbalanced uninformed electorate.

  • jonrobin2

    What a bunch of hooie. The nation looks more and more like California each year, and so it will politically. Conservatism is dead until there is some sort of financial catastrophe that forces it upon a people who do not want it (e.g., Greece).

  • commonsenseobserver

    Although, of course, the idiots then turn to tax hikes first. They’ll raise taxes all the way to 90% if we let them.

    And perhaps that may be better for the American ideal ultimately. Just hurtle over the fiscal cliff at full speed and, yes, introduce lots of good, Conservative legislation, but also just sit on our hands and abstain when the votes come, because that is the will of the people. Nancy Pelosi can become Speaker again if she wants. We lay out our ideas, the Democrats can pass them if they want.

    The Democrats will have another two year shot, with even more freedom to enact socialism. Let’s see if it’s John Boehner or Harry Reid who’s crying at the end of it all.

  • jiminga

    Truth is, over the last generation Democrats have become Socialists and Republicans have become Democrats. Regardless of how we describe ourselves, all have moved left as we adopt political relativism. Our annual $trillion deficits still occur with a Republican controlled House which holds the purse strings. Conservatism has become a catch phrase as the GOP continues to “go along to get along” to gain re-election. And with Tuesday’s election confirming the status quo we will continue marching away from the America we once knew. God help us…please.

  • renl57

    Here’s an experiment, like one of those puzzles in crossword puzzle books.

    We know that most of the conservative base has been:
    Married White Christian Heterosexuals

    Now: Try changing one or more of those words:

    Married => Single
    White => Hispanic
    Christian => Atheist (atheists now make up 10% of the population)
    Heterosexual => Gay

    Can conservatism still appeal to those different groups?

    Can conservatism appeal to single Christians? How about single non-Christians?

    Can conservatism appeal to Married HISPANIC Christian Heterosexuals?

    Can conservatism appeal to married gays?

    Etc.

    Because conservatism MUST expand beyond its current base. Changing demographics mean that as a percentage of the electorate, Married White Christian Heterosexuals are getting smaller and smaller. That’s a prescription for extinction.

  • potkas7

    Your remarks begin with a faulty premise: a nation’s Demographics IS its destiny. And ours are not good.

    Beginning in 1965 the Democrat Party pushed through a conscious change to immigration policy to open the floodgates to non-European immigrants in a bid to gain permanent political hegemony. Concurrently they pitched the doctrine of “Multculturalism” destroying the previous paradigm of E. Pluribus Unum.” So where are we?

    The Baby Boom generation is entering retirement. For the next dozen years 5 million or so will leave the workforce each year. The Boomers are the best educated generation in history. Who is replacing them? It is a sad fact that the rapidly-growing Hispanic population has the lowest educational attainment with fully a third not finishing high school and less than 4% having advanced degrees. Quite frankly,one reason we no longer travel to the Moon is we no longer know how to do it.

    40% of American children are born out of wedlock condemning them, for the most part, to a life in the underclass. This is not my opinion, this is the conclusion of Harvard social researcher Charles Murray who has written a shelf of books warning us of the negative implications of the rise in the number of single mothers. But we’re not listening.

    The Democrats have won the day. But their’s will be a Pyrrhic Victory. Sadly, we will all go down with them.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Ayn Rand is looking a lot more prophetic by the day, even if I disdain her philosophy.

  • renl57

    When Bush ran for President in 2000, he got 40% of the Hispanic vote.

    When McCain ran for President in 2008, he got only about 34% of the Hispanic vote.

    When Romney ran for President in 2012, he got only 27% of the Hispanic vote.

    There has been no large-scale cultural change among Hispanics. The Hispanic immigrants in the last few years aren’t much different from those ten years before.

    The reason for this steady decline in Hispanic support for the GOP is the fact that too many in the GOP base make them feel unworthy and unwelcome.

    It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    If you start out by proclaiming that immigrants come to America looking for handouts, don’t expect them to listen to your message and possibly vote for you. And even middle-class Americans of that ethnicity will hear your nativism loud and clear and be scared away too.

    Sorry, I’m not a defeatist. I’m not willing to withdraw into a steadily shrinking echo chamber of Married White Christian Heterosexuals and curse the rest of the world.

    Conservatism CANNOT be just for white folks.

    If we can’t accept that, it’s truly dead.

  • 1stRichard

    It is a no win situation. This is the first time in history we have seen a downward trend in the growth of US labor force like this since the 1950, we lost about 8 million jobs in this in the past 4 years. With unemployment averaging around 9% and higher for the past four years, 21% not in the work force, over 46,700,000 on food stamps, 4,300,000 on welfare, 5,600,000 on unemployment insurance, median household’s net worth dropped 28% in less then four years, energy costs more then doubled in the past four years and so on. It will only get worse and the next president if republican will be blamed for the mess they inherited by the media. It is now a no win situation, the liberals have poised the presidency and will blame the GOP with the help of the news media if the GOP takes back the presidency. The established GOP committed suicide.

  • gscandlen

    “Republicans” are the party of business, usually big business. Business has no principles. It is perfectly willing to use government to get an advantage. It likes regulations that hamper its competitors. It signed on to ObamaCare thinking the mandate would bring in more customers. It cares nothing about freedom for anyone but itself.

    “Conservatives” must be (and hopefully are) about freedom and values. Freedom for everybody. Freedom to succeed, freedom to fail, and freedom to start over again. And values of faith, family, and limited government as defined by the Constitution. The values that go beyond material riches to include humility and kindness.

    Small wonder that these two groups find it hard to get along.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Well, the Federal Marriage Amendment ought to be dropped first.

    How do you want us to appeal to Hispanics when they freaking believe that Obama is better for the economy than Romney?

  • gscandlen

    Nonsense. Demographics are NOT destiny. The core of the Democrat New Deal Party used to be Irish and Italian Catholic immigrants. Today those demographies are considered white conservative oppressors.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Not really.

    “the chief business of the American people is business”

    The difference is, cronies or entrepreneurs?

  • gmat

    “But more importantly, conservatives must be able to show Americans in
    this age of a stagnant economy that conservatism has ideas not just to
    make one prosperous, but also to help the poor and needy.”

    The best way to help the poor and needy is with jobs. I would like to see conservativism become strongly associated, in the minds of all workers, with all aspects of job creation and reemployment, emphasizing state and local level initiatives.

    Republican Governors’ Association has good experience supporting governors in this area; also consultancies like American Institute for Full Employment, with their ideas for retraining, wage subsidies, restructuring unemployment insurance, etc.

    Making jobs the priority also supports other parts of the conservative agenda, limiting the need for safety net programs, strengthening families, and probably other things I can’t think of right now.

  • potkas7

    You apparently don’t understand what the word Demographics means. It’s not about short-term political preference. Those Irish Catholics went to Notre Dame, Fordham, and Georgetown. Built companies and worked on Wall Street. That’s how they became the “Oppressor Class.” But they also laid brick, welded, and did finish carpentry. Who’s going to be the skilled labor of tomorrow? At a time when society is demanding lavish benefits we have an upcoming working population lacking in the kind of skills that will fund those benefits. The weekly social security contribution of a guy cutting lawns or working in a restaurant kitchen is not equal to a guy making steel, or working for Caterpillar or Boeing.

  • mong001

    As a Christian and conservative Republican, I’ve felt for some time that the GOP has to be more welcoming to immigrants. The Scriptures tell us to be hospitable to the alien. That doesn’t mean we accept illegal immigration, but we need to show that we understand why people flee other parts of the world (i.e. Mexico) to pursue a better life in the U.S.

    On a different topic, I know we’re all tired of hearing numbers and statistics, but has anyone seen how Romney faired vs. Congressional Republicans in terms of overall vote total. I’m wondering if he underperformed compared to conservatives in the House.

  • http://www.conservativefiction.com kywrite

    You get our Latino politicians to go on Telemundo regularly to TALK about it. We have several very talented ones now. Let’s use them. Let’s reach out. We – often literally – do not speak their language. Let’s change that.

  • earlgrey

    Obamacare is here to stay so I dont’ really see how the first few lines of your post have value. I think it is very hard to personally work so hard (this isn’t my job) and give so much (as much as I could afford) and still see such a dramatic loss to such an incompetant guy.
    STill though as long as Obamacare is here to stay our country will never be the same. The reality of that makes it very tempting to “check out.”
    The worst part is sharing this with my kids. There was no way to avoid letting them know I was working to get Romney elected. THe mail, the time spent at polling stations, time at phone bases. I feel so badly for them.

  • bookie

    I think most of our effort needs to go into battling Obamacare. It still represents the end of freedom and the doorway to more oppressive mandates. I wonder what would have happened if instead of all the political ads we would have sent everyone an actual copy of the Affordable Care Act? I wonder if either Romney or B.O. read it. Also, during the debates I don’t think anyone really demonstrated either visually or conceptually what a trillion dollars looks like or represents— much less 16 trillion and beyond. The old “a picture is worth a thousand words” saying still holds true. Besides getting in shape and trying to stay healthy, what can we do to battle Obamacare?

  • commonsenseobserver

    Probably.

    On the other hand, he did infinitely better than state-level Republicans, including and especially U.S. Senate candidates not from blue states.

  • lefthandrightword

    Blah Blah Blah You trash Romney, you blame conversatives, you blame the American people – Erick I’m tired of you for awhile.

  • donr

    You seem to use the words Republican and GOP interchangeably.

    Am I correct or are there two different groups we must confront?

    How do we change the leadership of the Republican Party?

    Can the Tea party play a role in this change and which Tea Party Group is best to join?
    If we are starting to regroup we might as well regroup correctly and end the fragmentation in the Conservative ranks.

  • joans

    ‘No immigrant comes to the United States wanting to be on welfare. They come for a better life of hard work and success.’ But, our welfare is a better living than in most countries.

    We need to work on our ‘big tent.’ We need to make more immigrants feel welcome in our party. At one point we did that, but we have lost something and now we are alienating the immigrant. We are making them feel that there is no reason for them to vote Republican. We need to address our issues with the black voter. At a recent gathering in my area, I could count on the thumb of one hand the number of blacks. The number of Hispanics wasn’t that large. We have become the party of the white person. And the white person is quickly becoming the minority.

    We need to be appeal to people of all ethnicities. We need to appeal to both sexes. We need to appeal to everyone – regardless of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, marital status, religion, sexual orientation, or whether or not an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. In short, we need to broaden our appeal. Standing pat on abortion is the quick way to oblivion. That should not be our total focus and far too much of the time, that is the single focus.

    Frankly, our party should not care who you marry. Traditional marriages will continue with or without our taking a stand on it.

    I could go on. But basically, the fact is that the Republican Party has become a tired old party instead of a grand old party.

  • tngal

    You want a refund?

  • hunter

    Eric,
    I would respectfully point out that what this election demonstrates is that the Reagan coalition which has more or less been able to put together a governing national majority since 1980 (but barely at any time) is becoming less and less viable.
    The combination of Republican party faithful, evangelicals and conservative democrats is no longer getting the job done.
    But coalitions are living things. They change. The environment they exist in changes.
    This has happened to our coalition and it is time to confront it directly and soberly. No big fantasies of millions of voters secreted away waiting to hear the right combination of words.

    We are losing and it will only get worse as the Republican coalition paints itself into the corners of gay marriage, reproductive rights, and immigration. Apparently pot legalization is likely as well to be part of where we are out of touch.

    I am sorry but demographics is in many ways destiny and we are no longer going to put together winning coalitions nationals and eventually down ballot if we do not change with the times.

    The pummeling in the Senate is a wake up call on women’s issues.
    Gay marriage keeps the gay community- and those who have gays in their families, or friendship or work circles at the least more open to democrat bs.
    On reproductive issues, we can tell ourselves that we are on the right side, but what are we on the right side of? We are not going to stop abortion. Period. It is over. If a Republican even frames the issue in way considered insensitive to abortion, they will lose. We have the lost seats to show for it. The Catholics compromised with Obama, supporting Obama on his apparently worthless promise that there would be conscience exemptions. He reneged on his promise and no one, not even the Catholics, have been able to get anyone to care in any substantive way. I know for a fact that many sincere active Catholics had no problem voting for Obama

    However, it is Immigration lost us the national election. If we do not get right on this issue it will get much worse. We will see the losses extend down ballot. If Romney had gotten even the few votes McCain had gotten in 2008, we would still be hoarse from celebrating the tossing out of Obama.
    The harshness we took on immigration cost us the votes of former voters. WE chased them off. As big a supporter of talk radio as I am, and I am one, we need to back down on the inflammatory fantasies about immigration and self-deporting. As self serving as Obama’s fiat dream act was from the political point of view, it was humane and apparently brilliant. There is a message in there that democrats got that we did not. We in grass roots kept the issue so inflamed that Bush’s efforts to make a grand compromise failed by our efforts. Everyone involved with Hispanic and Latino immigrants knows someone or of someone who is in fact here illegally, and knows that at least that person is not a gang banger criminal. There is a lesson in this someplace. I hope we learn it. The Hispanic demographic reality is not going to make elections easier in the future.

    This election left egg on face of a lot of very experienced smart people who bet on the viability of the Reagan coalition as it has existed. The old numbers and models failed for a reason. In engineering when models fail in the face reality, you adjust the models and then adjust what you are building. In science (except it would seem climate science) the same. I would suggest that that old coalition has lost its edge.

    Politics is the art of the possible. If the goal is to have an ideologically pure platform and not worry about votes, then change nothing. If the goal is to win elections and move the country towards a positive vision, then we had better figure out what is possible in current reality and be willing to compromise accordingly. All is not lost, we have an increasingly effective ground game, but we need the votes to work for. It is time to look at what is and figure out what we can do. Not to do what I despise Obama for doing: blaming everyone else.

    Respectfully,
    hunter

  • hunter

    They know Obama is better for them on immigration. You have missed the point.

  • loosetooth

    It is with a cheerful heart that this progressive offers some advice to my conservative friends. Real advice, not trolling BS.
    1. Adopt this mantra: “The problem is not Big Government, the problem is Bad Government”. Then describe the top 3-5 ways in which the government is bad and how you will fix it. This should be easy (this is a LOT of bad government out there) and it supports the general theme of becoming the party of Solutions, a huge opportunity for either party.
    2. Get to know the poor and working people you want to vote for you. Very few want handouts, but the majority also don’t see themselves an entrepreneurs. Most of these folks want to work hard… for someone else. A tax cut is less important than a good school, affordable health care and a decent retirement. Show how conservative ideas will provide these.
    3. Chill out. I know both parties are very negative (Obama negative ads 85%, Romney 80%), but, for now at least, white males are the most powerful group in our society. Powerful people need to be extra magnanimous in their tone. Still fight 100% for your values, but rally your troops with solutions not anger. This one is hard because “sunny” doesn’t sell on talk radio, but it is important.
    Thanks for listening. This country needs (at least) two strong parties.

  • JimmyGee

    I would love to agree with you Erick, but we are out of time….

    I read an article in American Thinker that makes me want to cry. In the next 6 months three treaties from the UN will be signed by Obama, two of them will be devastating to our immediate future: 1. Control of the internet being transferred to the UN, and the 2. arms control treaty.

    With the UN controlling the internet, websites like this will be deemed a “Hate Site” and will be shut down. In effect it will be used to supersede our First Amendment. And the UN gun control treaty will supersede our second amendment. Eventually, Obama will be coming after our guns. Why else would NOAA and the Social security administration (among others) be buying hundreds of thousands of .45 hollow-points bullets? The wrath is coming and it is Obama… He will move like a dictator, because he has been the last four year in all but name. He will lead by policy and decree. The congress has yet effectively been able to STOP him from doing anything that he has wanted to do. Yes, they do stand up to him. But that is not the key, they need to STOP him. They had four years to end funding of Obamacare and they didn’t. What makes you think they are going to stop it now? Boehner is already sending signals that he is open to raising taxes. Obama has his Blitzkrieg, and he have congress’s Marinot line.

    Here is a link to the article in American Thinker:

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_second_term.html

  • gscandlen

    Nonsense again. I know a whole lot of Latino immigrants and they are the hardest working people I know. It is offensive to stereotype them as cutting lawns. They are working their way up the skills ladder, doing carpentry, drywall, plumbing, then on to opening restaurants, gas stations, working in banks, becoming managers, and on and on and on. This is the way every immigrant groups has succeeded and Latinos are no different.

    Around here every dry cleaner is Korean and every hair salon is Vietnamese. Maybe you think Koreans and Vietnamese are “destined” for that kind of work.

  • Next93

    I’m afraid I have to agree with this sentiment.

    If the productive class couldn’t regain control in this economy, it wasn’t because of Romney, his strategy, or a lack of ground game. It was because we’re simply outnumbered. The deadbeats have the executive branch, they’re going to have the judicial branch, and it’s just a matter of time before they make he House irrelevant.

    The Progressive dream of a majority permanent dependent is at hand. They now have irrevocable control of our health care, student loans, and within the next 4 years, we’ll be at thier mercy for energy. The new “Department of Business” will decide how much anyone can make. I wouldn’t be surprised if they revived the plan to nationalize 401Ks, so we’ll be at thier mercy for our retirement. The only people who will be allowed to get rich in this Brave New World will be lawyers who specialize in gaming the government benefits systems (and, of course, politiciains).

    We are now a nation of the depenent, by the dependent, and for the dependent, for ever and ever, amen. I don’t expect to see a return to power by the productive class in my lifetime.

    If anyone knows the way to Galts Gulch, I’ll gladly pay you for a copy of the map

  • gscandlen

    Right, like I said — Republican (crony) or Conservative (entrepreneur).

  • commonsenseobserver

    Oh, sure, the guy has a reckless disregard for the law.

    Yes, we welcome legal immigration, but anything approaching amnesty is a bridge too far. And border and interior enforcement must be part of immigration reform.

    What’s so crazy about that that some Hispanics hate?

    Welcoming legal immigrants is one thing. Embracing criminals is another. Any path to legal status must involve waiting in line.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Not really. There’re still Conservative Republicans. The distinction isn’t that clear.

    And some liberal Republicans can hardly be said to be pro-any business.

  • westcoastpatriette

    So, why don’t you leave for a while? Or better yet, why don’t you leave for good?

  • warrior300

    Erik, what you propose needed to be done four years ago, before Caesar Obama and his minions had the power to destroy the constitution, and now deliver us into the hands of international organizations; but I will play along as if it mattered.

    From my perspective, Erik’s remarks are the difference between being a
    conservative and being a libertarian. A conservative recognizes that
    there is a need for a limited federal government, but not just to the
    point of making war and treaties with foreign governments and the
    coinage of money.

    Along with all the issues Erik mentioned
    above that need attention, I would like to expand on those. The power
    of the federal government must be used to curb the avaricious appetite
    of Wall Street to have a truly free enterprise system. Only the federal
    government has the power to protect the little guy from the big roller
    predators. Only the federal government can balance varying interests,
    so that yes, even Americans are protected from their worse instincts.
    Examples: No more too big to fail. The banking law passed by Congress
    during the first two years, Sarbane-Oxley, which Republicans whine about
    as being too restrictive actually adds an additional eight financial
    institutions like the Chicago Commodities Exchange for future bail-outs
    and exemption from the penalties that were placed in the law. Get
    banks back to their traditional role that doesn’t allow them to sell a
    product and service lines outside of their once traditional banking
    roles. End the bundling and sell-off of mortgages and require that the
    selling of a single mortgage to another financial institution would
    require notification to the mortgage owner. End balloon mortgages, and
    tighten the requirements for lending. Republicans were great some years
    back to further restricting personal bankruptcy policies. While at the
    same time the GOP opposed consumer protection by reigning in credit
    card debt and the number of credit cards banks were more than willing to
    stuff down the throats of the American public. Is it no wonder that
    the GOP is simply seen by most Americans as the public be damned, we,
    the GOP are here to protect the big money interests? If the GOP
    doesn’t find some balance in protecting the middle class with the
    interests of corporations in particular, it will doom itself to the
    marxist outcome of the current administration that will be far worse
    than anything corporate responsibility will produce. The GOP must get
    out from under the mantle of corporativism.

    Think outside the
    box, and develop a new economic paradigm that produces wealth in ways
    that are no longer based simply on consumption. The world’s technology
    produces too much for the population to consume, and often with
    conspicuous and junk products that consume vital natural resources.
    Think outside the box, and develop a new paradigm that recognizes that
    Developed Countries have used technology to eliminate so many jobs that
    will never return, that the technology of the next ten years must
    greatly reduce the cost of housing, utilities, etc; so that people can
    live a comfortable life-style while working fewer hours, so everyone can
    have a job. Speaking of education, the future will require how to
    teach people to use leisure time wisely to benefit family and their own
    personal growth, so that society does not continue its descent into the
    abyss of decadency and debauchery. Education must be more than just
    teaching people skills simply to get a job, which is all the public
    schools hammer home to students today. Yes, government does belong in
    the bedroom, when it involves protection of human life.

    The myth
    that if one works hard and applies themselves they can be whatever they
    want to be is just that a myth. It can be a useful myth to encourage
    people toward personal responsibility and self-sufficiency, but not
    everyone has the same abilities and opportunities as everyone else.
    While the middle-class is declining in their personal incomes, you can
    not expect them to support the above principle, when so many at the top
    have made huge fortunes not producing anything but tremendous wealth for
    themselves from the gambling casino mentality of high risk rollers, and
    then add their failures to the national debt. While at the same time,
    CEO’s make millions running companies into the ground; destroying
    communities, by closing companies that were profitable, but not
    profitable enough; and getting millions of dollars in golden parachutes,
    while companies suffered huge losses. The stock market needs to be
    recalibrated so that short term profits are no longer the reward, while
    long term investment needs to be encouraged. The corruption of
    flipping houses overnight for unearned speculative profits, the taking
    advantage of easy credit and house mortgages that people should not have
    been entitled to, and the destruction of what little assets people have
    with reverse mortgages; are just further examples of the corruption of
    the masses with the attitude that it’s all right to take advantage, it’s
    legal.

    The list is endless of what Wall Street, Hollywood, the
    Music Industry, and Madison Avenue have done to destroy the moral fiber
    of the majority of the American people. Unfortunately, the lesson of
    history is that affluence begets decadency. We have three generations
    now beginning with the Baby Boomers, who have been very receptive to
    being psychologically conditioned to anything that supports
    victimization, irresponsible behavior without consequences, and rampant
    hedonism. Take care of those who truly need it, but how are Republicans
    going to address the moral collapse of our society, particularly the
    large proportion of minorities and the largest numbers and increasing
    proportion of the White population who are having children out of
    wedlock with the expectation that government will support them? This is
    the number one reason why so many single mothers support the democrats,
    not reproductive rights which is a narcissistic plaything of the
    professional left-wing women class and their cohorts among the country
    club Republican women. The problem is further compounded by the fact
    that in some states, mothers encourage their teen-age daughters to have
    babies, so the mothers can become their grandchild’s foster parent and
    clean up nicely from the government for a comfortable life-style for
    each grandchild at tax-payers expense. Everybody is at the public
    trough from the corporations to the politicians, to the everyday
    Americans.

    What will the GOP do to eliminate or at least drastically reduce lobbyists? What will the
    the
    GOP do to support an amendment to the constitution that eliminates all
    campaign and financial contributions by corporations, non-profit
    foundations, and the labor unions? Already the 2016 campaign has begun
    as Republicans and Democrats alike are jockeying for positions for the
    next election, and people speculate over who should be the most potent
    candidate for the next Presidential election. The campaign cycle needs
    to be rethought and dramatically shortened. This is the 21st Century,
    we do not need to have candidates barn-storming all over the country in
    this modern age of electronic communications. The fact that U.S.
    Senators can be away from their duties for months on end campaigning,
    goes to show what little they do in policy-making. While these senators
    trust their staffs to carry the ball, and the lobbyist tell them how to
    vote.

    Of course, little of any of what is proposed above will
    happen, because politics has rarely been about the public good. It has
    always been about self-aggrandizement, and cronyism, and politicians
    prostituting themselves to the highest bidders. No one leaves Congress
    without being better off financially than when they came into
    Congress–witness Marie Antoinette Pelosi or Dennis Hastert.
    Politicians like Al Gore have shown, they can really clean-up once they
    leave office. The major problem facing the American public is “It is
    not the economy, stupid.” The real problem facing Americans is the
    moral breakdown of society. Deal with the moral break down and the
    economy will then take care of itself for the greater good of the many.
    Instead, we have taught or best and brightest that an Ivy League
    education will provide them with the skills and knowledge to develop the
    algorithms to create further schemes to separate the common man from
    his money and financial security without any risk to the creators of
    these schemes. Don’t expect human nature to change, and don’t expect
    the middle class to believe the b.s. handed out by the GOP about how we
    can all be whatever we want to be if we just work hard enough. Much of
    life’s success is who you know. How you use other people’s money in
    speculative ventures where they are left to hold the bag when it fails,
    etc. etc. etc.

    I admire you Erik. Your heart seems to be in
    the right place, but the problem is much greater than just messaging,
    and the “powers that be” will go down fighting before they will choose
    to do the “right thing”.

  • commonsenseobserver

    1) Big government is bad government. We need limited government. Yes, open, accountable, small, and efficient, but above all responsible. Conservatives do not reject the state- indeed we embrace it in some areas, but we reject the extension of its frontiers and size far beyond what most would consider prudent, to put it mildly.

    2) Indeed. And how would you get those without good jobs being created?

    3) Romney was sunny enough, thank you. It was Obama who was crawling in the mud.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Erick is not the only person on this blog.

  • quantguy

    “Business has no principals.” Interesting you then proceed to lay out, explain what you think are it’s “principals.”

  • satchman3

    I don’t like to stereotype but I don’t understand the GOP’s failure to appeal to hispanics. I do some business in Mexico and through that know a number of Mexicans I also know some South Americans and the folks of hispanic descent that I know are family-oriented and very hard-working.
    Many are very religious and faithfully go to church. As far as I know these folks take a dim view of homosexuality.

    Maybe the GOP has failed to embrace the ideal of the US being the land of opportunity for foreigners or maybe the GOP has been successfully demonized by liberals but it seems to me that there should be a good match between the conservative values of the GOP and the hispanic community.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Who said he was?

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Great job EE and more later from GC.

  • edintexas

    There are more Hispanic elected office holders who are Republican than those who are Democrat. Perhaps part of the problem is the Republicans, particularly Conservatives, don’t count people as “Hispanic” (or Black, Asian, etc.), but rather simply as people?

  • http://www.neoavatara.com/blog neoavatara

    Agree 100% Erick.

  • runner12

    Great job, EE. Agree 100%.

  • Bill S

    I’m tired of you, after only one comment.

  • hunter

    not much common sense in your answer.

  • runner12

    That’s right. Blame the social issues. Why do so many run to that argument? It is false and will keep us spinning in circles. Look, the reason we lost is quite simple. Antiquated GOTV techniques, poor outreach to minorities, and running a moderate platform. Note: Romney did not run on social issues. So can we kill that false meme?

  • runner12

    My bad, meant to say running a moderate candidate, aka not conservative.

  • jaykali

    Erick has a positive spin, but I think a lot of us fear the permanent majority that the Democrats may be close to forming. In Europe left-wing ideology won a long time ago, so much so that even a ‘conservative’ party is basically just left-wing to a lesser degree. The demographics here could prove the same for a long time. Not forever but for decades? so a bunch of white people stayed home.

    Reading Jay Cost this morning makes me feel like maybe if we had had a better candidate this time around, someone like a Scott Walker type or Rubio type that we could have pulled it off /this/ time. But what ab 4 years from now? The demographics will be even worse. The Democrats now have a winning formula for how to get people out even with no 2nd term agenda and no real track record to speak of.

    Who knows what will happen in 2016 – we don’t know who the candidates will be, what the state of the economy will be and so on. And IF the economy is bad we don’t even know for sure that conservatives won’t get blamed for it. We are likely going to have a stalemate to some degree legislatively for 4 years bc of the House which sets up as an easy scape goat for Democrats. So it does feel kinda hopeless right now. I hope the conclusion we reach this time around isn’t just that Romney wasn’t the right choice or a good campaigner, both of which might be true to a degree. We actually need to reach young people and minorities, particularly hispanics. And also women. The Republican reputation with women is absolutely terrible right now. We can’t be the party of suburban white males, it just isn’t going to work. There is so much I think that needs to be changed, I am eagerly awaiting some ideas.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Well, given that a majority of the country voted for four years of a complete failure, perhaps you are expecting too much from me.

    I had a good quote from Tolkien, and I continue to use it after the election.

    “Dawn take you all, and be stone to you!”

  • commonsenseobserver

    So we can be tired of Erick today and yet have things to share and learn with others. Not you for today, of course. Maybe Erick has something nice tomorrow. Or something interesting pops up which we can all discuss. :P

  • hunter

    runner12,
    Brushing off my longish essay as you have implies I did not make myself as clear as I had hoped.

    We lost due to the Hispanics not voting as they had in prior elections. They changed their voting habits due to something. What was it?

    You are the one, I would submit, holding memes that should be reconsidered. Obama had fewer votes than in 2008. Romney was as strong a conservative as we could find and get people to vote for. Do you recall the primaries?
    I pointed out the social issues as a corrosive impact. I offered some insights on the two Senate races blown out of the water due to the social issues you brushed off. And at the end of the day, I would also point out that all issues are social issues. All politics is about people and their lives, and issues involving how people live are by definition social issues. We do not have politics for rocks or cattle or trees, except that people care about them.

    The point of my post is pretty clear: The nature of the coalition that has allowed Republicans to win nationally has lost its power. If we do not do something about it, we will eventually lose down ballot races where we are doing pretty currently.

  • hunter

    we need some plain looks in a good mirror without use of flattering light.

    We lost to a loser President who has shoved through unpopular polices and has acted irresponsibly on major issues. we are the ones who failed to frame this effectively. The rejection of criticism and hints of an echo chamber mentality do not bode well for the future.

  • earlgrey

    Yes I pretty much agree with you, sadly. And if it isn’t true than why did we hear so much about how this is the most impt.
    Election in our lifetime?

  • commonsenseobserver

    And I don’t know what your standard of common sense is, but it is not mine. Limited governments, job creation, and praise for a decent man.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Self-deporting was stupid phrasing, but the basic idea of enforcement is a necessary part of any comprehensive immigration reform.

  • commonsenseobserver

    “The people have spoken. They must be punished”
    - Ed Koch (D-NYC)

  • gscandlen

    Huh? Look above. I did not write “principals,” I wrote “principles.” If you are going to snark at least get the quote right, or risk looking foolish.

  • Kyle-MI

    But we have tried to sell Hispanics on conservatism, but all they care about is continuing the flow of illegal immigrants. That is their number one priority. Their voting shows that they don’t care about anything else, no matter what their words say.

    If we capitulate on amnesty, then their is no stopping them. They will never give the GOP credit and the vast majority are now hooked on liberalism.

  • celador2

    The third parties Libertarian, Constitution and Green do not win partisan elections and all credibility is placed upon the two big tents Democratic and Republican parties. So unless there is an anti trust action to bust the two big parties and allow members to us part of the name, the two major parties are the most credible road to political power.

    What is possible is a caucus and that has been done The Teaparty caucus headed by Michele Bachman, the Study Group in House are examples of conservatives inside the GOP. Democrats have them too like Progressive caucus and Black Congressional caucus.

    If you form a third it will take a massive walk out of GOP to join it similar to when the Republican party was formed around 1854. Whigs left, Free Soilers joined maybe even a few Demcorats. The Republican party would replace Whigs down the road.

    There have been big bang thirds along the way. Teddy Roosevelt had Bull Moose that cut into Republicans in 1912 and helped Wilson wIn WH. NIck Longworth his son lin law once lost his seat to a Bull Mooser. More recently we have seen them in 1940s, 60s and 1990s with Perot. Third parties have a spoiler history fair or not and Republicans often avoid them as did tea party in 2010.

    Pat Buchanan won more votes than Bush lost by in three states— Iowa, WIsconsin and NM in 2000. Democrats have not forgiven Nader his Green 3% in 2000.

    That leaves the Republican party as the live party.
    No one has taken that first step and gotten anywhere. Bob Barr did years ago and few followed his example and joined Libertarians.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Maybe you need to hone your troll skills. The comment was meant to be nothing more than a degrading swipe at Erick — nothing to learn there that I can see.

  • gscandlen

    You wrote — “Only the federal government has the power to protect the little guy from the big roller predators.” — but then all of the examples you give are the opposite — the federal government using its power to protect the Big Guys. And that is how it always is. We need less, not more, of this kind of “protection.”

  • Kyle-MI

    Your “advice” on 2 just shows how stupid and biased your are. You really think that we don’t know any of the poor or “working” people? You don’t think that we aren’t “working” people ourselves? You don’t think that tons of us don’t go and help in soup kitchens, habitat for humanity, etc? It is just the same old liberal cliches which are absolute garbage.

    And white males are not the most powerful group in our society. White males are a minority of college graduates, a minority of new professionals, and a minority of the voters.

  • googoo

    Good luck, Erick. Good luck, conservative Republicans. Maybe Crazy Uncle Joe was onto something because let me tell you, I have a new spring in my step this morning, and it just so happens to feel eerily similar to the release of chains. No longer am I bound to a party that has delivered absolutely none of the promises it has made to me since 2000. But hey, since it’s all cyclical, I’ll just hang out and wait for all the conservative goodies to come my way in 2016! Awesome. So please take my sincere best wishes with maybe the slightest chuckle that on November 6, 2012, conservatives lost the country, and on November 8, 2012, RedState is rallying its troops around the war cry of business as usual. That’s some inspiring stuff, good sir.

  • commonsenseobserver

    I didn’t write the original comment, just to clarify.

    But, yes, perhaps Erick did deserve that degrading swipe. For today.

  • Kyle-MI

    Sick and evil. Just plain sick.

  • googoo

    How so? Seriously.

  • renl57

    In fact, over the summer, the Romney campaign was challenged by some Republicans to take on the “too big to fail” problem. At least he could have shown that despite his financial background, he’s not just a prisoner of banks and Wall Street.

    But his advisers said no.

  • celador2

    It is disruptive to any culture to have a radical disruption and influx of people who impose their culture upon that of the people livig here. The bigh language shift and drain on rexources are two ways illegal and even legals strain a communitry. There is a feelin gof being overwhelmed when all of a sudden walk down the street and no one knws a word of English.
    US does not control who becomes the future stock with amnesty yet we grant it to one demographic group as we pander and chase votes. Ordinarliy we do have a say with legal immigrants. With Hispanics mostly Mexicans they come first and bring families so there is a two tier system of immigration. The illegals are rendering Mexcians the largest demographic group in US. They break our laws and we point the finger of blame at Americans for being mean or unwelcoming? The self loathing I read in this thread is misplaced.
    And we are supposed to say welcome , bring it on?
    Might I propose an alterantive for a thought–universal application of the law is necessary in a republic. Dr Benjamin Rush said that in days the nation was founded. That core principle once taken for granted ‘universal application of the law’ is not so relevant anymore is it in an era of aiming to be Democrat lite more than republicans, small r, is it.

  • commonsenseobserver

    I wouldn’t put it past Valerie Jarrett to assassinate Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia, if the quote I’ve been seeing is true.

    “No election to worry about after this is over and we have two judges ready to go.”

    Of course, not a reputable source at all, but we all have our fair share of conspiracies :P

  • renl57

    AFAIK, Romney never helped out in a soup kitchen or Habitat for Humanity.

    Romney gave a lot of money to charity. But he first had to earn that money in order to give some of it away. And he earned it as a venture capitalist.

    “Venture capitalist” isn’t a profession that Americans really understand, much less admire.

  • basil

    I truly truly wish I could buy into this. I so want to. But I fear it is simply wrong. The gig is up, the show is over, and destiny is done. This is no longer the America we knew, and never will be again.
    I, like other conservatives, have become occupants more than citizens. We live in a country with values we do not share, and destinies we cannot change. Occupants that simply must pay the toll assessed upon us for being occupants. I no longer feel any loyalty to the U.S., or pride in calling myself an American. And believe me, I know how sad this sounds – there is no one it sounds sadder to than me. And it is not sour grapes, or anger, or, as the “winners” would like to label it, hatred. It is simply reality.
    I think I may have been a little late in coming to the realization of fact. The turnout for Romney was less than the turnout in 2008! The turnout was less despite the abject failure of the prior 4 years, depite that this was probably the last opportunity to hold back the flood waters, despite everything. It was less.
    A Republican may indeed be elected in the future. They may even call themself a conservative and labeled as such. They just need to be one with “progressive” views. But the label will not change the underlying philosophy which I cannot share.
    The only positive spin I can put on this is that it will save me time and anquishment. There is no reason to dwell or focus on that which must simply be accepted.

  • givemefreedom

    “No immigrant comes to the United States wanting to be on welfare.
    They come for a better life of hard work and success. What conservatives
    forget is that people forget.”

    You ARE W R O G ! ! ! with a capital ILLEGAL ALIEN!
    America and it’s borders have been crossed by (M)ILLIONS to (specifically) gain access to all the FREE liberal progressive democrat machine programs! Those same (M)ILLIONS are occupying places designed for We the People.

    MY PROOF???

    Observe the inability of anybody, politician or law enforcer, to articulate and operate a program and policy to remove illegal aliens from within our midst. Sheriff Joe Arpaio is perhaps the ONLY man with enough principle to do so and HE is stopped by federal authority from being effective.
    The majority of Immigrants are coming here for the freebies, pure and simple.

  • renl57

    I wish the GOP did better among the engineers and entrepreneurs of Silicon Valley.

    When most Americans think of “job creators,” they think of upstart high-tech companies like Apple and Google, not banks or hedge funds. Places like Silicon Valley are the exemplars of American high-tech entrepreneurship.

    But in this election cycle, the managers and employees of companies like Apple and Google donated heavily to Obama. Other companies strongly supporting Obama included Intel, Oracle, Adobe, Ebay, Twitter, etc.

    http://peninsulapress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Screen-Shot-2012-11-06-at-8.54.45-PM.png

    How come these job creators don’t consider the GOP as being in their corner?

  • hunter

    But we did not do much of that in the argument, nor did we do it well.

  • commonsenseobserver

    You didn’t think no one wouldn’t like a good subsidy and China real estate waiting, did you? ^^

  • googoo

    America changed two days ago. It actually happened before then, but conservatives who aren’t good enough to post their thoughts at RedState couldn’t get the message to you. That’s why you were surprised at the results of the election, and we were not. Did you know that history tells of many great societies that no longer exist? There were revolutions and tough choices and bad times and – gasp! – even political models that had to be challenged, and sometimes it took some time and effort and even some new ideas every now and then. In what direction has the country drifted since the 1960′s? And did you laugh at the people who told you, “When your country’s gone, you won’t even know it?” Because even in all its sadness, I find humor in your kind today. Obama’s ground game is THEIR ground game now, and it isn’t going away. It’s over. You have no idea how tough some of the choices you’re going to have to make will be.

  • clowngirl

    Nice post Erick!

  • commonsenseobserver

    His advisers said no to everything. Including Paul Ryan.

    On the other hand, no one can fault him for lack of effort.

  • commonsenseobserver

    To try and cast Romney as anything other than decent, capable and compassionate is disgusting.

    And the American public bought into it.

    Perhaps the Romneys were just not meant for federal politics.

  • celador2

    I can not remember the ful quote but the last few line stay with me always. From Mr Patrick Henry of Virginia upon debating the actions and prinicpies for liberty. Should there be a new nation designed upon self government?
    “I know not what course others may take but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.”
    Thank you, Mr Henry , beloved father founder for that clarity of position.
    Henry was not one to cave in anticipation of a victory for the King and his majority supporters of loyalists. No nuances or pragmatism about changing demographics. He was part of a small minority who knew he was right and who wanted the chance to build a new nation on GOD given fundamental principles.
    Marriage is a state issue where it is regulated through marriage licenses that have set crieria who is eligible to marry. No Close blood relatives, age of consent, married to no other and opposite sex are the criteria for a license in most states. IMO it will be around awhile.

  • loosetooth

    @Kyle- good catch. I did not mean to say conservatives don’t know working and poor people. I was referring to the GOP party leaders who IMHO seem out of touch with this group, especially Latinos, for whom education, heath care and retirement security are important. I think there are plenty of conservative ideas that could speak to these folks, but this election proves that just saying “opportunity society” and “lower taxes” is not enough.

  • givemefreedom

    to conservativepatriot: our conservative philosophy got 49% of the popular vote. Take out the 3% of liberal progressive democrat machine vote fraud and cheating, remove the illegal aliens and reassess your position.

    There are LOTS of us conservatives that live here and we don’t have to convert many “others” to regain control. There are many ways to do that. We just have to make up our minds that “white guilt over slavery” has been atoned.

    It is time to fight back against racism . . . . BLACK RACISM . . . .Latino RACISM . . . American Indian Racism . . . . and all the other minority forms of RACISM.
    White conservatives are NOT the exclusive proponents of RACISM. We should no longer make RACISM a reason to pass legislation to appease the minority class.
    NONE of it has worked to attain a RACE BLIND society. In fact it has had the opposite effect.

  • celador2

    You will not see me throwing welcome flowers in the path of illegals of any age. I would match a legal for every illegal who gets amnesty and have a lottery from where does that new immigrant come? Mexico gets all the amnesty and paths to citizenship.
    Or stop all applications and visas for all until the border security is settled and no more illegals.
    .

  • googoo

    They are not close to forming the permanent majority. The have formed it. Logon to Facebook and page through your Newsfeed, not at the posts before the election, but after. Look who now reveals they were proud to vote for Obama. The sweet single mom at your local Baptist church who thought Obama deserved a second chance. The Catholic Latino couple who disagrees with Obama on just about everything but just couldn’t bring themselves to trust Romney. The proud Jewish immigrant who posts in Hebrew, gives daily updates from Israel, and her latest status update is a message from Netanyahu congratulating Obama on his victory. We’ve lost the country because we lost the culture, the message, the media, the borders, the language – everything – we lost America – we gave it away – without a fight – and now we look around, as if something tragic happened overnight, and wonder what happened.

  • renl57

    Obama beat Romney among unmarried women by two to one.

    The first important idea is always: When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.

    The GOP has a huge gender gap problem with women because over the last year or two, the GOP base has actually implied there’s something weird about women:

    - An unmarried woman who is not a virgin is a slut;

    - A woman who’s been raped has the biological power to prevent pregnancy;

    - A woman seeking an abortion will lie to authorities about having been raped;

    - The advent of birth control has given women the capability to engage in unnatural sexual practices;

    - Women can’t think logically and intellectually, so it was a mistake to give them the right to vote.

    Don’t laugh, I’ve seen these kinds of comments coming from Santorum, Akin, and even some folks right here on RS and other blogs.

    And don’t think it doesn’t matter. In the age of YouTube and the Internet, anything said anywhere goes viral everywhere.

    So here’s my idea to the Akins and Mourdocks and blog posters:

    Don’t shoot your mouth off about women anymore until you’ve had the opportunity to run your ideas past your own wives and girlfriends and moms. Let them give you a sanity check.

  • celador2

    Good point but election 2012 has pundits like Coulter and we at RS as posters using language and thinking of the Democrats and multiculturalists. This demographic language does not do justice to universal princpiles and equality under the law.

  • alaskaescapeartist

    Perhaps it’s only semantics, but as this recent election demonstrated, words are important.

    “Conservative” is not a “movement”, it is a bedrock. Certainly, it can be labeled a movement in terms of its level of pervasiveness or contraction within the population, but think about it for a minute.

    Even the most liberal of my friends (and I have many) are “conservative” at their core. They conduct their affairs conservatively, they handle their money conservatively, and while many of them are pro-choice… the thought of themselves, or a family member willfully terminating a pregnancy is repugnant to them.

    So what are we left with? Liberalism is a disassociation in many cases…. “I wouldn’t do that, but I don’t want to impose my values on others.” We could debate the narcissism of THAT perspective for days, but the antithesis of that approach is NOT a movement.

    Conservatism must be branded and identified as people trusting their inner voice as it were, and equally importantly, there is no crime in living according to your values and do it openly for the world to see.

    If the perceived “shame” and “judgmental” labels can be properly exposed as myths, liberalism would be exposed as a much more radical way of thinking.

    Being conservative, or thoughtful, or reasonable… and yes, compassionate and charitable, is not something we move towards. It’s in us already.

    The “message”, if that’s what we’re talking about here, must be that it’s vital and acceptable to lead your life without concern for what others may think of you. It’s surprising (disappointing to many) to learn how little others actually pay attention to us… but the results of people believing otherwise, is now seeing catastrophic results.

    Movement? What movement? People are fine “where they are”… they just need to trust it’s okay to be there.

  • givemefreedom

    If all you wanted to do was win an election you’d do fine.
    The “conservatives” I know want to “save our nation”.
    We want more than political power, we want recognition that our Liberty and Freedom are inspired by a document written by (immigrants) 200 years ago and that very document is quickly becoming irrelevant along with our Liberty and Freedom.

  • celador2

    I do not see a flood wiping us out.
    The Demint Senate Conservatives group got three new members, Cruz, Fisher and Flake. Wisconsin held all its House seats it won 2010 and a blessing at state level happened. The state Senate is returned to Republicans at 18-15. They also hold Assembly 60-39. After two years of thugs and recalls, the papers lament Gv Walker has unchecked power or both chambers of the legislature just as he did when the recalls began. All that money and hupta do for nothing. Poor Democrats. They need to ask are they relevant.

    Conservatives doing reform are alive and kicking,.
    .

  • givemefreedom

    TELEMUNDO???
    You mean continue and support separation of RACES???
    Somewhere that melting pot of America has been thrown out of the kitchen of America.
    Divided we fall . . . . whether it be by states rights or ethnicity.

  • givemefreedom

    I’m with you. NO AMNESTY!

  • pghmike4

    Fundamentally, the majority of the people in this country don’t believe in the precepts you’ve written about. Some examples:

    No one who’s ever been ill on an individual health insurance policy believes that an unregulated health insurance market serves its customers, or ever will: the imbalance of power between the insurer and the customer is too vast. Here in PA, if you get sick on an individual policy, the insurer can raise your rates arbitrarily, effectively making the insurance irrelevant.

    The majority of people in this country have a “middle of the road” attitude towards abortion: it should be legal in many cases, but illegal past 4-5 months, unless its required to save the health of the mother.

    Most people really don’t care about the deficit. Dick Cheney didn’t care about the deficit. And realistically, the markets today don’t care about the deficit, otherwise the Federal government wouldn’t be able to sell 10 year bonds at less than 2% interest.

    Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush weren’t conservative in the sense you’re writing about, and the government didn’t shrink or reduce its responsibilities while they were President. George W. Bush probably came the closest, although he hardly shrank government, and he hardly was popular, especially by the end of his second term.

    As long as Democrats stay in their current center-right position, the Republican party will continue to shrink. And those true conservatives who made the mistake of saying what they believe, including Romney, Akin and Mourdock, were defeated for doing so. That’s why there’s a Democratic White House and Senate.

    The only reason Republicans held onto the House is the large number of gerrymandered districts in states where both state houses and governorships are Republican, like Pennsylvania. Over time, this advantage will disappear as well.

  • disqusplaya

    Glaringly missing: any mention of social issues, or God.

    Contrast the GOP platform response of the government role on private sexual(health) matters, to that of Obama on gun control in the debates. A typical pet issue of liberals, many now see the issue of gun control as “lost”. The nation has decided – we want guns – and it seems finally the Democrats are learning, and are moving on.
    Will the GOP come to the same conclusion on abortion? on same sex marriage? or will we see a new binder of “rape men” in two years?
    There is tremendous leverage in knowing where to pick your battles. Now is the time for the GOP to decide.

  • celador2

    I would say maybe they should learn English but that is asking too much under multiiculturalism for conservatism. It is not easy to learn Spanish for most English speakers but that is what we have for a future, isn;t it?
    A loss of English as the Language of the US is big. I make no apologies but that thought of my beloved Englsh falling by the wayside throws me into deep mourning.

  • disqusplaya

    -FACT CHECK-

    Immigrants make up 13% of the population, but 16% of the workforce. By pure numbers alone, your theory is disproven.

    Typical industries of immigrants: construction, food service, agriculture. My personal experience (construction & agriculture) is that hispanics work VERY HARD, often harder than whites.
    That many immigrant women chose to stay home and raise a family instead of working should not be thought of as “freeloading”. This is a traditional, conservative value and there is a -GREAT- deal of opportunity for the GOP to leverage here.
    Erick is exactly right, and until conservatives have policy based on facts and data, and discard anecdotal “evidence” and prejudiced notions that don’t match reality – their solutions will be impotent.

  • fieldofdreams

    This is my first time on RedState (I’ve been reading this blog as a conservative Republican for a long time). Hopefully any advice to get settled into Red State would be greatly appreciated. :)

    Erickson said: No immigrant comes to the United States wanting to be on welfare.
    They come for a better life of hard work and success. What
    conservatives forget is that people forget.

    He’s absolutely right. And that goes double for minorities. A lot of minorities don’t want to be on welfare and they don’t want a hand out. Like everyone else, they want to be part of the success of capitalism, raise kids, have a family, and work hard to achieve the American dream.

    Romney never reached out to these specific minorities as well as Obama did. But I’d be willing to wager if they voted for Obama, they were among his least enthusiastic supporter in a sea of unenthusiastic supporters. I believe if a specific pitch and outreach (done through a grassroots organization starting in 2013; please, stop with thinking that outreach is done only in election years) is made to these groups, the Republicans will pick off these people. And that could translate a 50-48% win for Obama to a 53-45% win for the Republican nominee in 2016.

    Just my two cents there …

  • heideho102

    I agree that there must be some outreach to the Latino community or we will continue to lose elections. Conservatives can not get their agendas implemented if we don’t win elections. With respect to the fact that Conservatives do not promote illegal activities by pandering to illegals the way Democrats do, we must promote ourselves to those who are here legally. Have more Spanish speaking events for Latinos. I was deeply moved by the Latinos who spoke at the Republican Convention and couldn’t help but wonder why we don’t have more of that. It needs to begin now. Not in 2015 or 16. Give people time to hear our message in a relaxed, more honest sounding atmosphere. During elections it seems like everyone is lying just to get our votes.

    I also strongly believe we Conservatives can do a better job getting out our message to college students. Why do the Liberals seem to have a lock on them? We should start handing out fliers on college campuses that promote and contrast our ideas with Democrats’. I would bet very few college students who voted for Obama a few days ago, did so realizing what they were pulling the lever for. They are in college in order to get higher paying careers. Do they realize they were voting for higher taxes? Taxes that would be pulled out of their pay checks. Honestly, I don’t think any of them realize yet, that Obamacare will cost them. It is not FREE. I think the Republican Party did a horrible job getting out that message and how destructive Socialized medicine is to our economy and our health. When Obama says he want to redistribute wealth from the rich to the lower classes, do they realize he is talking about THEIR wealth too? I doubt it. All they know is Romney was the rich, uncaring white guy, and Obama was the cool guy. They didn’t know who or what they were voting for. The Liberal talking points is the only side they heard.

    Conservative principles need to be articulated NOW. We should begin an outreach movement NOW. Not wait until the next election cycle.

  • gizmo

    Erick, as much as I want to believe what you are saying, the elections & people on the street say differently. Francis Schaeffer, back in the ’80′s predicted this and we’ve been moving towards it for many decades now. We no longer accept realism, reason or truth. We’ve thrown out any basis for Truth so all is moving towards the absurd. Whatever one wishes to “believe” is “truth” – fro them – even without any basis or factual roots. “We” just elected a President for a SECOND TERM that lives a lie for even the facts of his life – no birth records, a CONN SSN, no school records, a “created” manhood – whom we KNEW what he’s done the last 4 years. “We” elected a Congresswoman who claims to be “Indian” & others that based their whole candidacies on 1/2 truths, outright lies & twisting words – “it” comes to mind.
    So, until we are successful in successfully building Worldviews/mindsets based on Truth again, until we are able to throw Santa Claus’s bag off the train, it’s not going to make much difference.
    I’m NOT saying that we don’t try – that’s the whole purpose & reason for LIFE is to guide & help others open their eyes to Truth – but what a battle we’re going to have!

  • pghmike4

    Did you not hear Romney talking about making the country so difficult for illegal immigrants that they’d self-deport? Some of those people have been in the US for decades, have US citizen children, and don’t want to leave. Some of these families have relatives who can vote, and they’re not going to vote for someone who wants to deport their family.

    They’re also not going to vote for someone who supports allowing the police to ask them for “their papers” every time they’re seen on the road, just because their skin is brown.

  • celador2

    I was not surprised and knew the incumbent had an advantage and he won 50% and GOP held House. We picked up state Houses. Obama won by entitlements, Santa Claus as Rush says or givng away stuff as OReilly calls it.
    I was deeply depressed for sure before the vote as I saw the signs obama would win in my state, but relieved the loss was not greater like his margin of win 2008 with both chambers of Congress. I know its all going downhill but there may be hope in 2014 and 16 for conservatives.

  • disqusplaya

    Are you an actual engineer/entrepreneur, or are you projecting?
    The “main reason” has nothing to do with immigration. I own a software startup, and I hire -EXCLUSIVELY- in the United States.
    The main reason techs vote (D) is one of psychological disposition. The very traits that make someone passionate about innovation are anathema to the principles of conservatism – looking back to tradition, strict top-down controls, actions based on morals.
    If anything, I think it would be accurate to describe techs as “socially liberal libertarians”. Frame it that way, it’s a group that the GOP can capture (with some policy redirection).

  • pghmike4

    In all honesty, we’re not going to turn into Greece. Look at Wikipedia’s articles on central banking to understand the difference. The US doesn’t depend on an external central bank to print its money; Greece does. The US can always absorb more Federal debt, and apparently the current debt hasn’t strained any part of the economic system.

    What can happen to the US is inflation, but when the US can borrow at < 2% for *10 years*, inflation simply isn't a worry to the bond markets. So, if you're waiting for a Greek-like crisis to hit here, you'll be waiting a *long* time.

    Didn't Dick Cheney say that deficits don't matter? I don't agree with him on much, but I think he nailed that one.

  • ceili_dancer

    I remember quite a few stories about the Romneys getting out there and doing the hard work for people they may or may not have even known. While he didn’t do a photo op at each one, I think that stands out more than posing in front of a shovel or taking ten minutes on a ladder to hammer a nail into a 2×4 so cameras could get the right shot.

  • disqusplaya

    Interesting point re: disruption! And yet in our birth and throughout the 19th century, robust immigration was seen as a source of innovation, “new blood”, new ideas, and lets be honest – cheap labor. Look at many of the “great inventors” of the 1800s and you will find a 2nd or 3rd (or even 1st!) generation immigrant.

    I suppose we are now beyond the need for this kind of influx of new ideas?

    It reminds me of an Onion headline a few years ago “Second generation Mexican immigrant complains about illegals taking jobs”. LOL.

  • celador2

    . Defense of Marriage Act may hit Supreme ct Obama will not defend It It allows states to opt out of full faith and credit part of constitution so states that ban gay marriage can still do so.
    Full faith and credit had a part B but that is a fall back.
    The Supreme ct may decide the fed gov can not deny Soc Sec and federal benefits to gay married couples and also that no state can refuse to recognize the marriage of same sex couples. No state can prohibit..
    All but nine states and DC have marriage not only illegal but some define marriage as a man and woman in state constituions. This would be a sweep if the high courts overturns DOMA.
    Anyone that supports Self goverment and Tenth amendment follow this case, marriage law is now a federal guarantee if DOMA fails
    .
    That amendment will not get a floor debate in Senate. Its all for campaign show.

  • Melody Warbington

    Considering the hit my family’s income, not to mention our retirement nest egg has taken over the last 4 years, your #2 is way off base. I can’t afford higher taxes. The “good” schools of liberal indoctrination are at least partially why we’re in this mess, and come January, the country is about to find out that “affordable health care” is the biggest fraud to come out of Congress since Social “Security.” Considering that, it’s gonna take a lot more than a chill pill to get me to calm down. Keep your two cents of advice. That’s all it’s worth.

  • lineholder

    Sorry, Erick, but most of the people I know are just burnt out on politics right now. They’re more concerned about the economic impact another four years of Obama is likely to bring. General consensus at this point is “If we thought the last four years were tough…we ain’t seen nothing yet”. They’re putting together contingency plans for worst case scenarios so that they can ensure their families are provided for. They aren’t interested in any level at all in “rallying of the troops” right now.

    In talking to some Liberals at other websites, they seem to be totally oblivious as to what they’ve signed on for by voting for Obama. One even stated that since the plurality of the American people have voted to support the Liberal ideology, Conservatives have a social responsibility to do so as well. (“New patriotism”, you see). Not only did this Liberal expect Conservatives to support their ideology, we’re also expected to do so happily (which is as ironic as it gets, I think). More or less, the response this person got from Conservatives at that website was “you guys voted for this…you own it…if you want the Liberal ideology to succeed, then step up and carry the social responsibility yourselves”. That’s a task that apparently presents something of a problem for Liberals right now because a rather significant number of people who voted to support the Liberal ideology in their votes for Obama did so with the belief that they could exercise their rights without having to accept any responsibilities. (Mostly in the entitlement group).

    Try rallying the troops again in a few months.

  • GremlinJones

    I don’t know. That’s the major theme pushed by Fox post-election. Hammered on by host after host. But I don’t know what to think any more. It’s clear to me that Fox and Rasmussen lied to us, day after day, week after week in the runup to the election. The Democrats I know are hardworking, Christian people. I guess I’m just more skeptical of what I’m listening to now.

    I don’t think there is a problem with our conservative message. Sad as it is, I think Romney’s religion hurt him. And as unpopular as this may be on here, I think some of the more flamboyant conservatives have been saying crazy things that allow the Left to paint us all as crazy (Bachmann, West, Akin, etc) These are good people that can’t stop themselves from saying crazy things from time to time. I think the movement needs to be tweaked, not overhauled.

  • billcor

    YESSSSS ERICK! I have been coming back to your site for your POSITIVE, NON-CIRCULAR FIRING SQUAD of a message. Thank you thank you!

    However, one point. I think we as conservatives need to be more DATA-DRIVEN. It broke my heart to read all the projections and unskewedpolls and then see what happened on Tuesday night. We were in a bubble before election night! We need to out-data the left!

  • billcor

    YES! i agree with this. While I’m obviously not for amnesty, ( or “pandering” to anyone ) WE NEED TO FIND A WAY to be relevant to Latino communities.

    Erick raises a great point: This should be based in finding SIMILARITIES between our communities and “theirs”. Jack Ryan , apparently wanted to give speeches in the inner city about opportunities and personal responsibility, but was reined in by the Romney camp. IMHO Congressman Ryan had the right idea!

  • adair

    Whigs and Free Soilers weren’t worried about losing $$$$ from the Party when they left it to form the Republicans.

    Bob Barr’s joining the Libertarians was viewed by most of them as his trying to take over the party by using Republican and Democrat sleaze methods … which worked to get his nomination, because he knew more inside baseball than the Libertarians who had been laboring in the party for years.

    So it would likely be beter to form a completely new party than to try to use an existing one. And by this time the Reps and Dems control SO much money, the third party would be crushed every time

  • evilbloggerlady

    http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2012/11/time-to-get-plumb-mad-dog-meanthats.html Time to get plumb mad dog mean.

  • redcal

    GREAT post, googoo. We can’t fix our problems by withdrawing even further into our echo chambers. This was totally predictable.

    And I see even more of this behavior now from my fellow “conservatives”. After months of this “unskewed polls” nonsense, “BLS” nonsense, “birther” nonsense, etc, etc. How is any of this conservative? Aren’t we the party of rationality and logic? The second that I saw the whole right-wing media apparatus latch onto UnskewedPolls.com, I realized — it was over. You don’t question basic statistics unless you know you’re getting the rough end of the pineapple.

    We have to be willing to jettison the uglier parts of our base that are shielding us from the majority, and stick to fiscal issues. No more Lee Atwater style dog whistles. Those belong in the 80′s. We have a clear, distinct, valuable, sorely needed vision on fiscal issues — why not share it in a straightforward way that doesn’t strike the majority of the country as tone-deaf and tin-eared to their lifestyles and demography?

  • redcal

    You are the problem, not the solution.

  • redcal

    Are you kidding? The whole point of politics is to distill out the fiscal and moral essence of these choices. Do you think sending it to anyone would accomplish anything besides getting used as a doorstop? Have you read it yourself? Here’s the link — it’s more than 2000 pages.

    http://www.healthcare.gov/law/resources/authorities/patient-protection.pdf

  • christopher770

    I dont think so. I believe it more to be the case of their preceved negative message bolstered by Obama’s main stream media. Hispanics by their own actions and way of life, based on discussions with my Hispanic friends, are natural conservatives.

  • oneconservative

    Very true Erick. Although many of us are simply burnt out of politics, a new day will come. Let’s not forget our principals. We do need to reach out and educate more people, especially young people (they will get educated fast when reality hits them in the face) and Hispanics. Let’s lick our wounds for a few days and then come back with an optimistic message.

  • bobreeder

    Amen x 100, Erick! There is, and has always been, only 1 way to successfully reverse the long-term century-long downward trend toward socialism: Educate the public on the dangers of big government and the benefits–for all Americans–of less government. If we only fight this battle only in the political arena, we will sometimes win elections, but we will never reverse the downward trend.

    After the disastrous 1974 elections when we lost 25% of the conservatives in the House, I pushed a national organization, where I worked for a couple of years, to produce a quarterly publication called the “TRIM Bulletin” (Tax Reform IMmediately) which not only exposed voting records of House members, but elaborated on conservative principles so the public would understand the underlying principles. Millions were distributed in Congressional districts over the next several years and it definitely had some positive effect.

    Knowing how critical it is to educate the public to create the foundation for long-term success, I have been pondering for a few years how we can accomplish this goal. I have not yet concluded what is best method to achieve this, but the one idea that I thought of is to create a website with a concept like “American Constitutional Education” where a person could learn the fundamentals step by step. I know Hillsdale College has something like this but I’ve been too busy in our business to explore this.

    I do know this: In the 1960′s I was involved with a small group of conservatives in our community who put together a series of educational classes for people to learn of our conservative principles in a more in-depth way. What was the result? I saw people who went through this become conservative activists for the rest of their lives. I saw that a nucleus was created which became a beacon of light to all who came in contact with any of these newly educated conservatives and who were now highly motivated spread the good message.
    If an effective educational product were produced, I believe many conservative organizations would help promote it. Let’s all think of ideas on how this could be achieved.

  • adair

    We’ll be at their mercy for energy … and how in heaven’s name did the people of North Dakota (isn’t that where the oil boom is?) vote for the Democrat for Senate????
    Someone noted that when Obama talks about being in favor of “all of the above” sources of energy, he means all that are above ground … nothing that has to be drilled or dug out of the ground.
    As Earth explodes in December (according to the Mayans), we’ll be able to point at the hapless Democrats and say, “Ha ha ha! Hope you enjoyed those 6 weeks of dictatorial power!”

  • asap100

    Believe it or not many on the left would like to do the same , and create a leftest party .

    Wait , some did , its called the green party . And their a party for you , I’m thinking the Libertarian party

  • deltawing

    The most enthusiastic proponents of “diversity” and “multiculturalism” are the people who have never experienced it.

  • evilbloggerlady

    http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2012/11/are-hispanics-natural-conservatives.html This is some disturbing data. While I absolutely agree the GOP needs to reach out to Hispanics, this data (if true) shows a fundamental shift (which is not limited to Hispanics). It is a class, and arguably a racial, shift that is going to send us off in a very bad direction.

  • christopher770

    Right….and I think that Romney did that to go along with the Rep. candidates to get him to the convention. And I agree about the asking for your papers was a huge deal for Hispanics. However, that was campaign strategy from the get-go with Obama and Axlerod waging war on Az. Build the narative to bring over the Hispanic voters. They did and they won.
    I tend to agree with Herman Cain that it may be time for a brand new party. To bring moderate democrates and republicans under one umbrella of Fiscal Conservatism and a more liberal social agenda.

  • http://brainshavings.com Puddle_Pirate

    My new attitude toward the federal government is: “let it burn.”

    We conservatives have tried for decades to persuade people that conservatism works.  We’ve appealed to logic, history, reason, and common sense.  Sadly, we conceded the battle for the culture, and politics is downstream from culture.

    The “Long March Through The Institutions” of the cultural Marxists crossed the finish line on Tuesday.  They have a stranglehold on the news media, on Hollywood, on the education system, and on the federal government.  The republic is mortally wounded, and it won’t be reborn until society implodes first.  The electorate prefers “free stuff” over freedom.  So be it.

    The drones who put these petty tyrants in power refuse to see the inevitable consequences, but they will experience them in all their gore and violence.  It saddens me, but it’s inevitable.

    I’m searching for a nice rural plot of land with fertile fields, healthy woods, and fresh water.  When the idiots who crowd the cities finally turn on each other and on their Democrat masters, my family & I will be not be caught in the crossfire.

    Screw ‘em.  Let it burn.

  • rexetnostrajura

    To whom do we “articulate our message”?…to individuals who don’t even know the meaning of the word “articulate”… at this point in time we could “articulate” till…till obama produces his birth certificate…it won’t make a bit of difference.

    Until we take back the education and entertainment industries…at the very least an equal share of each…we are not going to get anywhere.

    Conservatives MUST get serious about WITHHOLDING their hard-earned cash from democrat/liberal-supporting businesses/enterprises…so many conservatives still patronize organizations etc. that actually despise those same conservatives…Rush’s support and massive endorsement of Apple come to mind.

    Imagine if just half of the 49mil people who rejected obama were to withhold just 50% of what they usually hand over to their opponents, for the next 4 years…refuse to support/ endorse…however you choose to call it…all democrat/liberal/obama supporting enterprises…SUPPORT ONLY those that hold your views.

  • lineholder

    Sorry, but you’re wrong on this one. It isn’t just a matter of central banking issues. It’s also a matter of shifting the bulk of employment in the US from the private sector into the public sector. And if you think that isn’t one of the goals of the Obama admin, then you need to look closely at the policies he’s been hinting will take place during his second term.

    One of the reasons America has been so successful economically is that our nation has been willing to derive economic growth from a dynamic source, i.e. private sector activity, rather than relying on a static source, i.e. public sector activity.

    The biggest problem with relying too heavily on static economic sources is that it diminishes the potential of revenues that can be gained from outside their own system. You can check both domestic and international trade trends of Greece to see how this works.

  • Kyle-MI

    You are completely absolutely and totally wrong about Romney. He did work one on one with poor and “working” people. He did lots of charity work getting his hands dirty. He did not just give money. It is too sad that even conservatives have drunk the liberal cliche kool-aide.

  • streiff

    I don’t know where renl57 is getting his info on a lot of things. You are correct. But Romney also didn’t do a very good job of articulating what he’s done, either.

  • Wubbies

    Erick, I agreed with you whole heartedly, but……

    I am tired! I am tired of the Republican moderates who redistrict good conservatives out of office. I am tired of Republican moderates who ‘combat’ conservatism and reach out across the isle in bipartisanship with Democrats. The sad part is that I am not tired of fighting the Democrats. I am tired of being disarmed and sold out by Republican moderates. The same Republican moderates who gave us Bob Dole and John McCain and the ‘most electable’ candidate this election cycle.

    It is sad to say but I am too the point where I do not want to hear it anymore. Our Illustrious linguine spined Speak of the House is already laying out the caving cushion so he can capitulate on taxes as quickly as possible. It is sad to say but the hope of beating these people any time soon is gone out of me.

    Does this mean I am going to give up? No it definitely does not mean I am giving up. It will take me a few weeks to get over what they have force fed us, again, but I am not giving up.

    I can take pride in my state sweeping the federal elections with a 60% to 40% in both elections. It doesn’t help in other states though. I make calls and I send what money I can but I still have job and bills to pay so I am limited on my out of state participation. However, I will never give up.

    I am all the more determined to drive these RINO’s from office. I just need a good nights sleep and a clear head again. We will get there.

  • aeaeren

    “Right now, conservatives are bitterly disappointed. Some choose to
    check out mentally. Some have decided to throw in the towel. A few
    blame the American people. Many think the gig is up, the show is over,
    and destiny is undone.”

    What I think today, Who is John Gult? Let them wallow in their handy work. I am sorry I am not in the mood to be pep talked and the likes. I am a realist and the facts are the HOUSE is not going to hold any line, they are not going to obstruct one bit they will roll over like lap dogs and we will take it in the teeth. Many people will be unemployed here shortly and the problems will accelerate and you know who is going to be blamed, YUP the Republican House will be and these idiots will preach it everyday. This election was VERY nasty unlike any other I have seen and frankly I am not going to turn the other cheek anymore. I am not advocating violence, but I am NOT willing to help or do anything for any Obama voter. Sorry I am bitter now and the Democrats did it with their nasty campaign. I am not throwing in the towel, rolling over or checking out. I am truly scared if I can survive the next 4 years unscathed and the fact I have to subsidize these misguided, ill informed, hateful people really just makes it even MORE of a bidder pill to swallow.

  • Kyle-MI

    That is the sad part. Hispanics are absolutely brainwashed. They simply will not listen to reason even if they personally are conservative.

  • celador2

    You have to have a mass move from GOP to the new party and hope a flood is created that keeps moving. Is there an issue like slavery and Dredd Scott driving the new party push today as there was 1854? They would fight a war that tore this new nation apart and lost 600,000 men.
    The Republican party was founded in principles of liberty and the opportunity to be what you wanted.
    In the contetx of that looming war and abolishing slavery the Republicans won some elections. WInning elections is critical. Barr never won so faded has he not as a Libertarian force?

  • Kyle-MI

    That is one of the fundamental problems between liberals and Christian conservatives. (Not that I hold Mormonism as Christian, but the relevant rule is the same for both.) It is a fundamental tenant of Christianity to not brag about your charitable efforts. Liberal have no such restriction. In fact, they can brag about using other people’s money to help. We are not suppose to be doing charity in order to score political points. And so the liberal get away with painting us as out-of-touch, uncaring, and unwilling to help.

  • Kyle-MI

    That is what we thought about the internet bubble and the housing bubble. The national debt is a ticking time bomb. WHEN it collapses it will hit hard.

  • eddiethegeek

    “They come for a better life of hard work and success.” – I used to believe this to be true. It used to be true. I really don’t think so anymore. Certainly many come to work hard and succeed – but many do not. And they ALL seem to vote for the free stuff.
    And our “post-racial” President was basically re-elected because blacks supported him 96-4%. That is racism, pure and simple, although you’ll never hear that on MSNBC.

  • celador2

    Jack Kemp RIP one of my favorite Republicans was for small businesses and lower taxes. He worked with anyone who wanted to build a small business and spent most his time in minority communities. He was a mentor to Paul Ryan ,who shares may ideas of innovation through small business, is a free market man by example. He put forward small business growth as Romney has in campaign..

  • lineholder

    Don’t know how true this is, but one of the things I’ve seen posted at black websites is that Obama rallied the black community (and quite possibly Hispanics as well) when he suggested establishing a Secretary of Business. Apparently, they are reading this that one of the functions of this role will be to provide oversight in regards to affirmative action hiring.

  • Melody Warbington

    Nailed it, lineholder. We made some purchases last night and are formulating our survival plan to take care of our family. I think part of the disconnect here is that those of us in the older generation see more clearly what has been lost over the years and the freedom that was tossed aside on Nov. 6 in exchange for a handful of goodies. Our culture is completely different. I know a lot of folks who are tired of fighting to save a country that half the country doesn’t want and a good number of those who do aren’t willing to help with the heavy lifting. Right now, at least for the foreseeable future, I’m putting my family first. (By the way, check your emails.)

  • celador2

    Anything else they object to?

  • marcustullius

    “No immigrant comes to the United States wanting to be on welfare.” Really? As a Hispanic immigrant I can tell you this happens all the time. If you are a single mother in Juarez, why wouldn’t you prefer to live in Oakland at government expense? Everybody should read Sean Trende’s piece “The Case of the Missing White Voters” on RealClearPolitics.com. The 6 million white voters who voted in 2008 and did not vote in 2012 swamp by multiples the rise in Hispanic voters from 2008 to 2012. Had Romney not been seen by rural whites as a rich, lying Mormon boss from Massachusetts picked by the establishment, he could have swamped by several multiples the increase in Hispanic voters. Obama got 10 million FEWER votes than in 2008 and we still lost because we did not run a populist who can connect with the people.