« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

No, Mr. Boehner, the Constitution is the Law of the Land

Yesterday, Diane Sawyer asked John Boehner in an interview if he planned to push for repeal of Obamacare.  He responded that “the election changes that” and “Obamacare is the law of the land.”

No, Mr. Boehner, the Constitution is the law of the Republic.

In April 2011, following the failure of Republicans to defund Obamacare during the first budget battle, I wrote the following at Red State:

If it is reckless to shut down the government over Obamacare, then there is nothing in the budget worth fighting for.  Due to the degree of entrenchment of the existing entitlement, even Paul Ryan’s plan will not balance the budget for another 26 years.  If Obamacare is not defunded within the next year, it will be virtually impossible to completely repeal and will make a balanced budget an impossibility.

Well, they said all along that we’d wait until 2012. They were sure we’d win the election.  Ironically, by running away from the Obamacare issue, they ensured that we would not win the election.  Now that they lost, they say tough luck on Obamacare.

Yes, I know what you’re thinking: “if we create gridlock over Obamacare, we will…..”  We will what?  We will risk political reprisal?  Then what are we fighting for in the first place?  If we are unwilling to fight the implementation of a 4th entitlement program, how will we ever have the moxie to fix the existing ones?

Obamacare, when fully enacted, will take over 1/6 of our economy, create permanent dependency for tens of millions of Americans, induce unsustainable inflationary pressure on the cost of healthcare and health insurance, and saddle the next generation with crippling debt.  Every intervention, program, and mandate prescribed under the 2010 healthcare law, if left intact, will limit freedom, increase insurance premiums, create more dependency, and lead to rationed care.

For all the talk about the need to adjust our views to confront inexorable demographic challenges, they have no understanding of the permanent electoral juggernaut that will be created by dependency on Obamacare.  Aside for the policy disasters that will arise from the beast of Obamacare, the permanent implementation of Obamacare will create enough new dependency across all demographics that we will never be able to win an election anyway.

This is it, folks.  If we are unwilling to engage in a fight to the death of Obamacare, there is nothing worth fighting for.  And frankly, there will be nothing to fight for.

COMMENTS

  • commonsenseobserver

    Correct.

    But voters aren’t interested in the Constitution. I remember exit polls actually showing people in favor of Obamacare. Forward.

  • partyof1

    If Boehner won’t work to jettison Obamacare then we should work to jettison Boehner.

    Obamacare will destroy itself and the health care system and the economy eventually. We can get rid of it now or get rid of it later but the sooner we start, the less pain there will be. How much of their precious entitlements will Greece get to keep?

  • Common_Cents

    It’s something how we fall for that crap every time. “Well, we’ll REALLY fight if X happens….” “oooh, they’ll really own it then!” ummmm not.

  • jimmyg

    The premise, or at least the title of your diary is incorrect, Obamacare is the law of the land under the Supremacy clause of the constitution.

    “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.” U.S. Const. art. VI, Paragraph 2

    I see your point, but I do not see what you are proposing, unless you are proposing fighting a fight that has previously taken place. That train has left the station.

  • http://brainshavings.com OhioCoastie

    If Boehner won’t work to jettison Obamacare then we should work to jettison Boehner.

    How?

  • sbradsha

    The CBO showed a practical path forward with their “Extended Baseline Scenario” (from their 2012 long term budget report).
    All we need is enough politicians to suck it up and do what is necessary to put us on that path.

  • celador2

    2014 here we come!

  • jackm

    Impeach Roberts, then? Because I don’t think he is going to volunteer to leave.

  • rightlane1111

    Obamacare has so much more in it then healthcare and they have so many taxes in it…that Fitch is not the only company that will downgrade us. I guess people were not paying attention to what was really in the bill.

    Oh…SHOUT OUT to Chief Justice Roberts…did you work for Putin at one time?

  • rightlane1111

    Boehner is a wuzz…does that answer your hope

  • DerKrieger

    I have been writing and will continue to write about federalism and my belief that only federalism will defeat the Leftists. We have solid conservative strength in the Red states and therefore have far more influence there than at the federal level. If we can get our states to reclaim their 10th Amendment rights we CAN defeat Obamacare.

    The Founders gave us horizontally and vertically divided government for a reason but we’ve pretty much abandoned our vertical division and agreed that the states are subservient to the federal government, that the South therefore is subservient to the Left coast and NE. No!

    Below is a letter I mailed to ALL GOP governors yesterday via snail mail. I plan to write the RGA and to try and enlist as many TEA Party groups as possible to the federalism cause. I hope we can start discussing this strategy seriously here at RS. I’ve been writing about it for some time in my diary.

    Dear Governor,

    I am writing as a deeply patriotic American, a veteran, a husband, a father, and someone who loves this country too much to give up on it.
    I, like many conservatives, am extremely disappointed in the outcome of the election; I believe if conservatives don’t act to stop the president we will emerge from his last four years as a socialist country with only a thin veneer of free market capitalism and individual liberty remaining.
    Having become quite intimate with the Constitution over the last several years I believe our ‘salvation’, if you will, is the 10th Amendment and a return to federalism.
    The Founders, as you well know, didn’t seek to establish an all-powerful central government with the power to dictate how we free citizens manage our lives, and I refuse to submit to such a government. I demand to retain my God given right to take care of myself. I will not become a subject whose life is directed from cradle to grave by a smothering nanny state.
    The Founders, in their infinite wisdom, included the 10th Amendment in the Constitution to explicitly state that those powers not specifically enumerated to the federal government were to remain with the states and the people.
    Since the Wilson era, and possibly since the end of the Civil War, the federal government has usurped more and more of the states’ rightful powers and over time reduced the states to little more than administrative units of the central government. This centralization more than anything is responsible for much of the gridlock and acrimony in DC as the liberal and conservative world views clash over how large and intrusive the federal government ought to be. The Liberal agenda of redistribution, ‘fairness’, equality of outcome, et al cannot succeed without the centralization of power.
    So much of what comes out of the federal government today and since the New Deal is grossly unconstitutional and well beyond their enumerated powers.
    Obamacare is perhaps the best, most recent example of unconstitutional legislation; in spite of the SCOTUS ruling.
    Now that Obama has been reelected Obamacare is likely to become permanent until such time it, and other programs, collapses the welfare state. Since Obamacare is without a doubt unconstitutional, I believe that it is well within the 10th Amendment powers of the states to reject it and to prevent its implementation within their borders. Without cooperation from the states it cannot survive.
    I believe that it is well past time for the states to reassert their constitutional powers to rein in the federal government, protect their citizens from the rapacious predations of the socialists that have taken over the Democrat party, and to seize back those powers that have for so long been usurped.
    The beauty of federalism is that it allows the states to compete with each other to limit government, limit taxation, and allow states’ residents to mold their state governments to best suit their needs. With the usurpation of so many states’ prerogatives that system has broken down. Now the impact of Nevada electing a Harry Reid has serious repercussions to me as a citizen or Arkansas. It wasn’t supposed to be this way.
    I am writing to all GOP governors, the Republican Governors Association, and as many TEA Party groups as possible in the hope that I can get someone, anyone, to take up the banner of conservatism, Americanism, the Constitution, and the reestablishment of self-determination and liberty through the use of the 10th Amendment. I hope that We the People can count on you to be one of the leaders of this movement.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Time to call on the 31 Republican Governors, Daniel, and enlist their aid in standing against the implementation of the unconstitutional power grab called OCare. It is immoral for the Governors to abandon the Constitution and implement it — it is their duty to protect the people from the federal encroachment on their freedoms and uphold the Constitution.

  • westcoastpatriette

    DerKrieger — we were writing our comments at the same time. Good job. :) ) See my comments on this thread.

  • nolongeramused

    The problem is not demographics, it was getting the people out to vote. They stay home for moderates but they are voting with their hearts and their religion and life is about to get very serious so they better start using their heads. In the 70′s interdependent trading would have cured these problems but being conservative meant keeping new ideas from infiltrating old skool business practice. Heritage spoke of single payer to curb socialized medicine. Never mind both sides of the aisle pillaged the funds in a ponzi scheme that will cost us our freedoms. Conservative thought was to pay for abortions and BC in an effort to curb population growth and abortions are much cheaper than food stamps and medical care for a lifetime. I will remind everyone that there has always been more white people on welfare than black, thought the percentage is higher for blacks. Newt finished welfare reform to get people working thinking that would curb the birth rate and it did as long as the economy was good. Instead of loving the sinner and hating the sin conservatives put their noses up at the whole business. A worker program would have given a vehicle for those who just wanted to feed their families without letting them vote illegally and would also open the doors to great minds to born here, into an assimilated American way of thought and life while closing the border would keep us from home grown terror that comes across the border. The wall was defunded and there was no response from the right. There was no communication. Women have been having abortions since the beginning of time and birth control by way of abstinence is a good thing to teach but young ones make mistakes while learning and that has been going on since the beginning of time as well. Love the sinner and hate the sin. The hypocrisy produced by the far right has killed any chance of winning. How may of those in the Tea Pary will be alive to vote again in 4 years? And the hard right has never come forth and told us about the race to the One World Nation between the bankers and the socialists, never and that just really pissed me off! Had those 3 million know they were going to lose their arses and wealth they would have gotten out but instead of putting that on the line Mitt ran as a moderate with all the right qualifications and everyone would rather have the bankers win than the socialists. The hard right is making the rest of us who love the sinner and hate the sin pay for our Christian beliefs and to them I say they will have to answer for that and pay dearly in taxes. How about the rest of us who have it to give? Reform health care properly! Allow civil unions! Allow diverse families with kids to share in our wealth! What wealth you say? The wealth that left us in the 70′s and has never been brought back because the right moves forward without a care for the whole. And while we are at it with lies, how about Soros meeting with Volcker to reorganize the money system so the US doesn’t dominate, rather the UN, in Bretton Woods, NH!

  • westcoastpatriette

    “Roberts job is uphold the Constitution according to the law.”

    You’ve got your head screwed on backwards. The Constitution is the starting point to determine whether laws are legitimate. Congress has no authority in the Constitution to mandate healthcare federally. Period. And Roberts was a coward in his ruling.

  • Agelaius

    We can fight every step of the way, and Obama still owns the economy in terms of the mid-term election and 2016.. Why not fight? Supposed we refuse to fund Obamacare in the House? The economy is still likely to tank in an Obama administration, and we can still hang that on him in 2014. The economy is not going to substantially improve, particularly if we hold the line on our most important issues and Obama needs to come begging. We have to key pressure points – sequestration (i.e. “the cliff”) and raising the debt ceiling. We control the House, and we are going to for a long time since the 2010 elections and GOP dominance in the state houses means we decide the congressional district boundaries. As long as Boehner is not in accommodation mode, and we hang tough, we either get the concessions we need, or Obama drives the economy off the cliff and we get another bite at the apple in 2014 or 2016. Politics is not bean-bag, folks. When you lose, the best thing you can do is get off the floor and go on the offensive. I don’t see a downside, in terms of either policy or politics, of doing everything we can to obstruct, shut down, stop, and eventually dominate this Adminstration. Obama’s blinked before, and he’s not that strong of a man. Make him blink again. Make him blink twice, and then just for good measure obstruct his agenda further even when he starts giving in. You know what was one of the best selling points about Mitt Romney? With Romney, we would have had a functioning political system. Obama cannot broker a “bipartisan” deal unless we let him. We should never give up, and when his faux “bipartisanship” fails, we should make sure he gets the blame. Unless we think the Democrats can successfully blame us, and take back another 15 seats or more in 2014 in a map that we drew, the strategy should be to continue to shut him down in the House.

  • googoo

    If you’re a conservative and have ever made fun of blacks for voting for Democrats when that party takes every black vote for granted, then please take out your voter ID card. If there is an R under party affiliation, then slap yourself across the face right now. Your children are counting on you. Your grandchildren may never know you. Rush Limbaugh isn’t really going to tell you when it’s time to give up on the GOP. This is serious business, folks. This is not a hobby, this is not entertainment, and this is not business as usual and let’s just keep plugging away at this thing. What a damn shame it will be when the conservative movement dies by suffocation within the bowels of the Republican party. Shame on us, and may God forgive our souls.

  • Agelaius

    Law of the land! It’s not the law of the land unless our party says so. We have a majority in the House and can filibuster in the Senate. If we can just hold on, we define the law of the land… not them.

  • funwithknives

    I can ‘barely’ conceal my disgust, Regarding Boehner. It would be worth it to me personally, to ‘put out his lights’ and in a squared circle and do the time for it.
    This chump has simply got to be shown the door, toot sweet.Given the time he can go get a spinal transplant (If IPAB says it is O K and he isn’t too fricken’ old) and go do something he is Qualified for. Beats hell out-a me What That might be, though.
    Sure didn;t take him long to raise a white flag,…eh, nudge-nudge……

  • partyof1

    Donate time and treasure only to groups or candidates who support repeal. I’m not going to give a dollar to any party that does not have a repeal plank and actively works to thwart its implementation. “Obamacare is the law of the land”? pfft You mean like immigration law?

    When the cash flow stops, then they will understand.

  • funwithknives

    If The Constitution is a Contract (and it most surely is) then why would anyone who can read standard contract law books wonder about it? If there is ever a question about what it ‘might’ say, all resolutions are to favor the beneficiaries of The Contract. We (The People) are the beneficiaries, so, reduced to simplicity Roberts did NOT do what he KNEW & was legally bound to do. He legislated from the bench and no one of any import, short of the four Neat Justices to his right were or is calling him on it.

  • Common_Cents

    the ultimate battle is going to be between states and every growing fed central govt. How do you even begin to reverse the tide?

  • celador2

    Yes Obama is one trying to change the constitution, This is a case with room for more than one state villian. Roberts also gets top billing for his role in keeeping it on the landscape instead of rendered unconstitutional as he knew it was.

    John Roberts is the vile force much as was Roger Taney in 1854 when he went outside Dred Scott and nullified Kansas- Nebraska Act and on and on. Robert to me is a traitor here so toxic and self serving were his actions.( I know not technically is his decision treason.)

    He called what was a violation of Commerce CC a tax and that is how he went the extra mile to see the law as constitutional. He did that after first voting with the four conservatives and Kennedy to strike it all under CC over reach. The federal gov had no business regulating health care from DC top down., they decided He changed at last minute and looked for a way out, how to uphold ACA. . Kennedy tried to keep him but Roberts was gone from the majority by June 28.
    And what he did may have been for his personal image not the constitution

    .He had been intimidated by Obama and Reid no doubt. But he forever altered the course of history with that switch vote.
    He is not a judge as far as I am concerned he is a ego driven hack.

  • celador2

    Roberts is out of the picture except for LIberty Univ. It is up to Congress and pres to change the law. That means remove a Democrat from WH or it will not get changed. Repeal and alterations are with the legislative branches and states.

  • celador2

    Some exit polls have proven wrong and they all favor liberals. If exit polls are your standard then be cautious. Kerry did not win 2004, Scott Walker not only won hisi recall by seven points it was never close as those exit polls showed. And Obama did not win NH primary 2008, Hillary did.
    Exit Polls are polls and but samples. We need not treat them holier than Scripture.
    Most other polls show favor in repeal ACA. And strong oppositon is shown in referenda that nullified it. OK , MO are two states that did nullify as did Ohio in 2011. Many GOP govs hold back on what to do with exchanges. Of course the stste votes show public opinion. All of us are subject to this top down take over of our Health care.

  • celador2

    Are you saying the dye is cast, its inevitable, live with it?

  • celador2

    I do not think this is about an immediate shut down but more issues long term like growing spending and tax cuts and mandatory cuts.

  • celador2

    Boehner could defund Ocare with little trouble but there may be some auto pilots provisions in place.

  • http://brainshavings.com OhioCoastie

    You appear to be operating under the assumption that Boehner, Cantor, McConnell, and the GOP will give a flying crap what we conservatives want.

    Think back to the ancient prehistoric era of November 2010. Boehner & friends were handed a monster victory by the Tea Party, which made him the Speaker. He immediately began capitulating, and never stopped. Now it’s 2012, and the momentum has shifted back to the utopian statists. By what bizarre logic do you conclude that Boehner will get tougher and not weaker?

  • franklinwasright

    Boehner has always been accommodating, you really see the leadership in the House holding the line like this? If they accomodate in any way, or if there are any negotiations, they will become the scapegoats when it all collapses, as it is sure to. If we get out of the way and let them have whatever they want, it makes it that much harder for them to blame the GOP. Forcing a collapse sooner rather than later ensures our party is in a better position to react, as another generation of this and there won’t be a Republican party left.
    I see what you are saying about taking the offensive, I agree, I just don’t think that the battleground should be in the House. I think it needs to be done at the state and local level. We need to be grooming the candidate for 2016 now, and we need our governors and state legislators to fight the good fight and try to strengthen our state and local resources so the collapse of the Fed won’t be so painful.
    I understand you want to go down fighting. I want to fight harder as well, but I also want to fight smarter and right now we are in basic survival mode. We are up against people who will fall on their own sword for the sake of their ideology, that is a hard foe to beat.

  • celador2

    You have a good tactical point. I recall the Republicans joined Demcrats to fix a nightmare provision of Obamacare early that hurt small buinsess about paper work or forms to fill out. RS had a thread on that action. By fixing the early parts of O’care Dems wanted fixed that were to take effect masked its damage and true design and Dems took no heat. They also did not own it entirely with GOP doing even one action. I don’t think there were any more fixes to help it.
    We have 30 ish governors which is a record on which to stand and find good people to run. That shows life in the states not all of us exist in a top down nation. US is not designed to be top down.
    We do need the Senate and I am opptimistic if economy is slow we may get it sooner than 2016. Some Democrats may cross over as we grow the majority. .Obama will be bold and repeat much of what he did term1 and will not deal with debt.
    GOP must not cooperate and own what he does. Except on budgets and debt. There he must not get allo the credit..

  • celador2

    Instead of trying to repeal Obamacare let us repeal the US and start all over. Call a constitutional convention and get it right this time. Too many things slightly out of whack that need fixing by the people and their representatives in states.
    This comment is not soley in jest but expresses a wish of what could make things right quickly. The new dependencies are what scare me with Obama and ACA specifically. The Democrats will be a big party soon.

  • runner12

    Agreed. Time for some peaceful civil disobedience.

  • runner12

    Boehner is an idiot. Enough said.

  • stevenharris1

    Daniel, I am a true conservative but think you are off base on “Obamacare.” We have a child with a pre-existing condition. When I changed jobs the only reason he was picked up on new insurance was due to the Affordable Care Act. He was uninsurable without it. Looked into it then and almost whole thing is from Heritage Foundation. Health care is something everyone will use, no way to opt out since doctors will treat anyone who comes in. A lot of things wrong with it but trust me, if you had a child with pre-existing condition you would like it.

    Also, it is not government take over. It is private insurance companies getting more customers! So while I don’t like all in “Obamacare” on balance it will be good for us in long run.

  • joeshmoe

    How can you simply write off exit polls. The main republicans just attempted to ignore the polls before the election and where significantly hurt by this. Relying on gut feelings over scientific data is a recipe for disaster. The exit polls show a 99.95% accuracy. The predictions of Hilary vs. Obama where not exit poll statistics but reckless guesses, as where your other examples.

    Saying exit polls are just samples is like saying evolution and gravity are just theories. We need to stop lying to ourselves and attempt to make a change

  • joeshmoe

    This is exactly the kind of rhetoric that the democrats have been hoping for. Boehner and the more moderate republicans have been pushed to far by the Young Guns and the Tea Party.
    If you keep up this rhetoric and ignore your largest growing demographics, Cubans and young libertarians, then the party will be torn apart. We will move into a three party system of the Old Moderate Republicans, Tea Party and the Democrats

  • joeshmoe

    Shouldn’t the real concern be that the republicans forced a shut down instead of how long Obama “allowed” it?

  • joeshmoe

    I wasn’t aware it was unpopular, I thought the exit polls showed support.

  • joeshmoe

    Actually almost all bills that are an increase in spending include new taxes or new spending cuts. Under Bush 1 and Clinton there was a rule that whenever you wanted to lower taxes or raise spending in a bill you had to either create equally as much revenue or spending cuts. This was forgotten under Bush 2 and has stayed the status quo for Obama which is why we have our deficit problem today.

  • joeshmoe

    And once you remove him there will be a massive fallout in the republican party. He does have a large influence and a lot of republicans in congress won’t follow Erik Canter. If you remove Boehner you will remove the republican party because we will move to a system that mirrors England’s three party system.

  • crusty

    The issue of taking over one sixth of the economy is the numerical value. It is not what is important here. A doctor reported on a radio interview a month ago his office received a “tablet” government issued. Tablet is a generic term for an internet connected device the nurse uses to note every detail of the doctor’s interaction with the patient. The nurse transmits said information to HHS who then determines what treatment/medication the doctor can provide. Now then you say the insurance company does essentially the same thing controlling costs. They try, however you can change insurance companies or pay for it yourself. That is no longer true. The government decides whether you get treated or not. When the doctor complained he was told it is a $100,000 fine for the first offense and for the second the same fine plus jail time. The doctor claimed he threw the electronics into the trash and will close his practice if this is implemented. It is not a matter if the one sixth is accurate, clearly it will be greater. What matters is you no longer have a treatment option. You are at the mercy of HHS and they get to say if you live or die. This intrusion has granted them the authority to require a smart car, solar panels or anything else that is in the “national interest.” If you do not understand that then there is no hope for you. Do we have to shake you to get you to understand it not about the size of the economy they took over it is about power and stealing your rights. Repeat after me, “I now need HHS’s approval to get medical treatment.”

  • crusty

    I have no confidence in Boehner to undertake this battle. Nothing is going to happen until the balance of power shifts. I do not see that happening anytime soon. It is more likely this whole fraud of an economy implodes. I do not like that idea but it appears what will happen before any shift occurs. We can argue Romney was a lousy candidate that changes nothing. The truth of the matter is the “dumbest generation” could not see how dangerous the fraud in the oval is. More than likely it will have to get a whole lot worse before these fools reach a nirvana. My take is that will be too late. In the nineties I realized it was time to get my “house” in order. It took close to ten years of sacrifice to get completely out of debt. Just before the housing crash I sold the money pit an old Victorian and retired. A few years ago I fled the high taxes and fuel bills of the northeast and built a new house paying cash for it and all the furniture. The Salvation Army made quite a haul of my old stuff. My pension and Social Security provide fifty percent more than my monthly obligations, food, property taxes and utilities. After five years of retirement I have not touched my IRA. I am hunkering down playing defense. I never made more than thirty-five grand, worked my way through college paying as you go graduating with a Masters degree and no college debt. Being poor and conservative most of my life while charting a responsible course I managed to get here debt free. In an old John Denver song there was a line that speaks loudly to the mess this country find itself in. He sang “don’t spend more than you have.” Those are not exactly the words but it is the message transmitted. The big worry is health care as I am active with no ill health I am aware at some point soon HHS is going to tell me to take a pill. For one who has never accepted a hand out preferring to go without first this premise is likely to end badly. I will still tell them to go to H—.

  • crusty

    Steven you may get an advantage with pre-existing conditions but you lost so much more. Now Kathleen Sibelius gets to tell your doctor what he can do for you. If he disagrees, well tough. Kathleen knows far more about medical care than a guy who graduated from Johns Hopkins and worked for years in Hitchcock Medical Center. I am sure you can wrap yourself in confidence that your child is in better hands when Ms. Sibelius determines his net worth before approving treatment. Yes, pre-existing conditions were a problem, however you ignore many states had requirements placed on insurance companies that forbade denial because of pre-existing conditions if you applied for replacement insurance within the year after losing yours. You ignore many free medical services offered by the Shriners, St Judes, Hutchinson and many others. They too now need HHS permission. So your kid is burned over fifty percent of his body the Shriners would treat that free, no longer it depends upon HHS determining if the acceptable amount is 48.5%. It matters not what the professionals say. But this is good, sure, on what level can you predict with any confidence your child is in better hands? Did you read about the poor woman in England who need a specific drug to keep her alive? A proven drug that works. NHS said no it costs too much. The drug company offered to provide the drug for free. NHS forbade providing the drug for free because it was not acceptable to make allowances for some. So the woman suffers a preventable painful death which could have been resolved at no cost because NHS without any medical training said no.

  • Pingback: No, Mr. Boehner, the Constitution is the Law of the Land – RedState | Celebrityz

  • wonkista

    You are funny. The Constitution is the law of the land and the Supreme Court affirmed that Obamacare was constitutional. Move on.

  • rightlane1111

    Oh…I agree that Bush spent way too much money and did not know how to use the veto pen…but…DO YOU REALIZE that this idiot has spent more money then all the presidents combined. It is time to take the country back.

  • dukeroyal

    Boehner has never wanted ObamaCare to go away. That is why the House has repeatedly voted to fund it. All the repeal votes were just for show. After all this is the same guy who said we will fight for $100 Billion in spending cuts and ended up with nothing but smoke and mirrors. Jim Jordan or another reliable Conservative should challenge him for the Speakership and the whole left wing leadership in the House needs to go as well.

  • WmCraig

    Forget the demographics. If you are right then this administration will be lucky to survive four years. And people will be ready for real change. Osama bin Laden had it right. They will come, they will conquer, they will get bored, then you can defeat them, When the cost of sustaining something that can’t benefit this becomes painfully obvious they will leave.

    The progressives won, not let them own it. Don’t protect them from their own stupidity, Help them along. For example, Obama wants to raise taxes, let him raise taxes, add to it, up the ante, but add in restoration of the Medicare Advantage. I want to see them vote against it again.

    Fighting a fake like Boehner did in 2011 will just give the next Democrat candidate ammunition, Lots of acting like an obstructionist and all the while spending more than Obama. If we couldn’t risk shutting down government when we had a mandate, we are never going to do it after he was given a nod and a second term. Now the only practical way to win is to throw our full support into everything he wants to do, let him tax and spend until it hurts. Do it right and he owns it all. Come next election the democrat will have to explain why all the taxes didn’t help, the republican can simply say cut them all, start over.

  • Lisasusernamealreadyexists

    Please, please don’t. Those of us with seriously ill children are united at the most basic level, whether liberal or conservative, whether supporters or opposers of obamacare. Party divides appear trivial when viewed through the lens of a sick child. Never accuse us of not having thought it through when it’s all we can think of. Shriners and St Judes can’t help most of us. The emergency room can’t either, except during an acute crisis. Our system is flawed in many ways that obamacare won’t fix – my own son ended up in the emergency room last year after our private insurance company repeatedly denied coverage of the medication his doctor fought unsuccessfully for. We don’t all agree on the solution – this debate is heated and passionate and occasionally uncivil on my rare disease support group list. But please don’t lecture parents of sick children on the specifics of our own problems.

    Steven I’m glad obamacare is helping your child. If we succeed in reforming it I hope the new system does an even better job.

  • pablocruize

    Mr. Boehner needs to be replaced by Paul Ryan or someone of similar stature and presense. No offence to the Speaker by it is time for the next generation who have more to lose and more reason to fight to take over the speakers chair.

  • Pingback: “Republicans can win again if they become Democrats…” — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami

  • Pingback: Desire Even

  • Pingback: Ian Kanahele

  • Pingback: Gaynelle Brannick

  • Pingback: Yuk Mceneny

  • Pingback: Donny Lasswell

  • Pingback: Jacquelynn Winterberg

  • Pingback: Mitchel Lyau

  • Pingback: Kristin Bielecki

  • Pingback: Virgilio Winterberg

  • Pingback: URL

  • Pingback: Free Money

  • Pingback: Carlo Gangwish

  • Pingback: Courtney Standberry

  • Pingback: Erick Kopps

  • Pingback: Julietta Hershelman

  • Pingback: Elana Fantroy

  • Pingback: Quinn Kehr

  • Pingback: Raymundo Try

  • Pingback: Narcisa Clayburn

  • Pingback: William Ruffins

  • Pingback: Susan Saumier

  • Pingback: With Options Dwindling, The Battle Against Obamacare Continues in The House and The Courts «

  • Pingback: Carmine Sweeting

  • Pingback: Darron Zarro

  • Pingback: Irena Griggers

  • Pingback: Wade Scalzi

  • Pingback: Nick Berczel

  • Pingback: Lane Tartaglino

  • Pingback: Eugenia Ellworths

  • Pingback: Carri String