« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Only Thing You Need to Read Today About the Election

We are three days removed from a brutal election for the GOP. A lot has been said.

I have decided it is virtually all bull crap.

Whenever the GOP loses — actually going back to some time around 1972 and the re-election of Richard Nixon — Democrats have told the GOP they are going to lose the demographic battle. Demography is only destiny when you party is obsessed with race as the Democrats are.

Let me explain my thinking with a story from the Old Testament people tend to ignore and work my way up to Dick Cheney. Seriously.

In the Old Testament, Moses had an apprentice named Joshua. Chosen by God to be Moses’s right hand, Joshua took over from Moses. When Joshua died, the wheels came off. Don’t believe me? Flip your Bible to Judges 2:7. Joshua died and all the elders who had surrounded Joshua died. Within five verses we are to “And the people of Israel did what was evil in the sight of the Lord and served the Baals.”

Five verses later!!

No, Baal has nothing to do with Dick Cheney. Succession does.

Moses had a succession plan. Joshua really did not. It didn’t take long for the wheels to come off the wagon.

In 2008, George W. Bush had no successor. Dick Cheney did not run. When administrations have successors, they plan out the succession and the power and the transfer of power and the coalition. Bush had no need to do that. What happened? Old wounds opened up and the GOP had to go back to 2000 and refight old fights to settle on the guy George W. Bush beat. A good bit of the coalition balked. Mitt Romney sprung from that and had the same problems. He was weak and had a hard time solidifying the coalition.

The coalition that turned out Election night 2012 to re-elect Barack Obama is Barack Obama’s coalition. It is not Joe Biden’s coalition. It is not the Democrats’ coalition. It turned out to elect Barack Obama in 2008. It did not, despite his pleas, turn out in 2010. It will not turn out in 2014. In 2016, Joe Biden, despite his claims now, is going to be 74 and too old to make a good attempt at the Presidency. If, for some reason, he leaves office sooner than that, the Democrats are going to tear each other apart to fill the seat or the President will pick a care taker.

Either way, the odds are the Obama coalition is subject to fracture in 2016.

This does not mean it is the Republicans’ coalition, but it does give the GOP a chance. The GOP also has a chance in 2014 to again replace its own side with fresh faces in primaries.

Since Election night, the usual voices who always tell the GOP to abandon conservatism are again telling the GOP to abandon conservatism. Never mind that exit polling shows the nation still thinks the government does too much. The public, however, just did not gel with Mitt Romney who did a bad job connecting with voters.

That leads me to three key points.

First, Mitt Romney was a deeply flawed candidate. Your next must read should be this by Charles Krauthammer.

Romney ran a solid campaign, but he is by nature a Northeastern moderate. He sincerely adopted the new conservatism but still spoke it as a second language.

He is being far too charitable to Mitt Romney’s campaign (see e.g. Project ORCA), but Romney was a flawed messenger with his campaign even refusing to allow Paul Ryan into inner-cities to defend policies. The campaign also refused to defend and push back on the “war on women” narrative allowing people, post-election, to claim the GOP really did get hurt on social issues. Well yeah, you do tend to get hurt when you keep getting punched in the face and smile back. The GOP must rebuild its narrative with a candidate who is capable of telling a story that does not involve squatting on potties in France.

Second, the biggest problem the Republicans had on Tuesday night was not demographics, but turnout operations. Karl Rove learned all he could from Lee Atwater and seemingly learned nothing else. We’ve been using the Lee Atwater playbook since the 1990′s. It got us, by the skin of our teeth, through 2004, and that was it. We’re using a 20th century tactical playbook in the 21st century against a Democratic Party that innovated and updated and knows our tactics as well as we do. Rove & Co. spent a whole hell of a lot of money on advertising in an already saturated media market. Meanwhile, the Romney Campaign’s Project ORCA collapsed. They might as well have called it Shamu because it bit the leg of the campaign and wouldn’t let go. If you haven’t read this post at Ace of Spades HQ, consider it your second must read of the day.

The GOP must bring its tech and tactics up to 21st century standards.

Third, the GOP long term does have a demographic problem, but so do the Democrats. As much as the GOP needs to improve with hispanic voters, the Democrats have a white voter problem. The GOP more likely than not has another few election cycles before the demographics with hispanics become insurmountable and, in the meantime, can find ways to reach out to them and talk to them that do not include amnesty.

Frankly, as I noted yesterday, if you are going out to speak to the unconverted, you don’t talk about the trinity, communion, and what not. You speak in language the unconverted understand. Immigrants to this country know they are here for freedom and opportunity they did not have in their native land. But they may not really understand what “free markets” mean.

As the sun comes up this morning, the GOP stands ready to capitulate on every issue under the sun, blaming conservatives along the way. Already, John Boehner says the GOP will do nothing more on Obamacare, then did the customary walk back after the blow back. Trust his initial statement — he intends to do nothing on a law that remains opposed by a majority — not a plurality, but a majority — of Americans. Republicans in Washington have sore rear ends because they got their butts kicked Tuesday night standing behind the consultants they’ve always used and the candidate they deemed “most electable” against the guy anybody could beat without a credible message.

So what should Republicans do? Fight on. Don’t listen to those who say we must moderate, we must abandon values, we must abandon principles, etc. They are wrong. We must reach out, but that does not mean surrender.

For those of you who think we’ve lost the country, well then you have nothing left to lose. If I’m right and Obama’s base won’t turn out in 2014 like it did not turn out in 2010, you might as well swing for the fences because you’ll either get all or nothing. Right now all you’ve got is nothing.

So fight on, my friends, fight on. When the Democrats mock us for not changing, remind them we did the same to them after 2004 and then 2006 showed up. And let’s start finding candidates now and prepare them to primary those Republicans who go wobbly. Heck, those groups who keep score cards should score the GOP leadership votes and score against anybody who supports McConnell or Boehner, just to drive the point home we aim to fight — even them.

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • robertshaw

    Erick,

    Who was your preferred candidate if not Romney?

    You had better face up to the truth. Romney lost in large measure because he had to deal with extremists on the lunatic fringe during the primaries.

    You are living in a reality distortion bubble where you seem to think that people like Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum, Rick Perry and Herman Cain are something other than a complete embarrassment to the Republican party and the country.

    I will tell you something about brands in general. It doesn’t matter if you are talking about automobiles, fashion, gadgets….whatever. If a brand gets to the point where people embarrassed by it, then that brand is circling the drain.

    That is where the Republican brand is now. Circling the drain. Soon you will need a plumber to retrieve it.

    There was only one other candidate that might have had a better chance than Romney in the general election: Jon Huntsman. And look what happened to him.

    Who else do you think could have done better? You are living in a fantasy world. The American people do not support your extreme views.

    I say this as someone who once voted Republican. But not anymore.

  • tvass2

    I always thought it was funny when Sean Hannity would have Rove on the program and call him “the architech.” I wondered exactly what Rove had built that was of lasting value because he never had a succession plan. The other part about your suggestion that I think needs review is that Democrats who voted for Obama are firmly committed socialists and nothing in the way of facts matters because the only value of importance is promoting socialism and no tactic is beneath them to achieve a socialist society. They are not irrational in the pursuit of their goal, they are simply insane. They have achieved the socialist society, so I need to ask you: What is it of value for individual freedoms, the rule of law, and property rights that exists today or in 2016 that you think can be reclaimed, even if the right had an effective appeal to the ideology of individual freedom that would win an election? As soon as 50.3% of the voting population of socialists could transform the nation, they did it and destroyed the heritage of freedom for the other 49.7%. The society of individual freedom that you once knew and loved is dead and gone forever.

  • http://www.liberaljungle.com rightthinkingone

    This is a long-term trend from what are today’s Liberals, something that they inherited that began in America well over a century ago. There are some tools to fight this, not at a political “party” level per se, but on an ideological and cultural level. We need to get to the source of the problem: The dogma of the Left and how it has infiltrated and spread its tentacles, and what we can do about it on a day-to-day basis. I hope this could help: www.liberaljungle.com

  • Common_Cents

    conservative in the primary, republican in the general. Some of us seem to have forgotten the 2nd part. Wow, because we had a flawed candidate, we should give up to the other side? Gee, lets do better the next game? While we gave up this game? It’s time to change a few quarterbacks and players on the field.

  • trutexan

    The problem was that R&R didn’t activate the base and millions of registered Republicans stayed home last Tuesday. Now why is that?

    Watching this video last night from HBO’s Newsroom (warning, language) it struck me that the actor’s description at the end is exactly how I, as a firm Conservative, feel about America. What’s interesting, is that this guy is a Democrat, big time. He says, “We fought the war on poverty, not poor people.” I see Liberal policies as a war on the poor – to keep them poor. Whereas I see Conservative principles as a war on poverty, not the poor, and those principles can be used to pull the poor out of poverty if given the chance. Depending on your political view, this guy is talking about how all of us, the American people as a whole, feel. They just think he’s talking about the other side and not them. Again, now why is that? Answer, messaging.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXUgj3Y2E18

  • becky5

    It is true that the field was pathetically weak. But are you seriously suggesting that the 3 million Republicans who didn’t show up for Romney/Ryan on election night would have turned out for Huntsman?

    I say this respectfully, but if you used to vote Republican, and now vote Democrat, and did so only based on “branding”, then what do you really stand for? Are you for more spending/debt or not? Are you for more heavy-handed government or not? Do you want the government running your health care or not? Are you for the too-big-to-fail banks getting even bigger (as they have under the Democrats) or not? Do you want liberal supreme court justices or conservative supreme court justices? Do you want endless money printing or not? Do you think the country needs a top-down multi-trillion dollar transformation to stop “man made global warming” or not? These are not trivial issues, and all of them trump “branding”.

  • renl57

    From 1932 through 1976 I would say, the Dems built a coalition of working-class white ethnics, blacks, Jews, and Southern white conservatives, which amounted to about 50% of the electorate throughout that time. That’s 44 years, from FDR through Carter. The coalition did NOT break up after FDR’s death; rather, it held together for decades more.

    Republicans only won the White House when the Dem President got us into real trouble: 1952 (Korea), 1968 (Vietnam).

    We don’t know yet if the Obama coalition will survive the end of his administration. If the next Dem nominee is also from that coalition (female and/or Hispanic), it could keep that coalition together for years to come.
    Don’t sit back and just hope that the Obama coalition will break up by itself.

    The GOP has to work to break it up. It has to peel away Hispanic votes. It has to definitely peel away female votes. (Single women are the second fastest growing voting group in America, and they went for Obama by two to one. )

  • raginpatriot

    BTW, I’ve long had a theory that George W. picked Cheney precisely because he wouldn’t run and precisely not to have a traditional succession plan — that the plan was to leave the path open for Jeb Bush. Of course that got derailed with the (largely media induced) unpopularity of George W. by the time he left office.

  • JimmyGee

    RobertShaw, spoken like a true Troll!

  • sktpk

    Someone who voted Republican one time – a long time ago.
    If you think a liberal like Jon Huntsman would have been a great pick for the Republicans, you are like every other Democrat I know .
    ‘Tis to laugh that Democrats would offer serious advice to the opposition on the best candidate for them to oppose.

  • gafisher

    The “extremists on the lunatic fringe” were the GOP Establishment which pushed Romney on the voters in spite of uninspiring showings in the primaries.