« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Art of Compromise

There is incessant talk of the need for conservatives to compromise on their principles, even though Democrats have never showed a willingness to compromise on any of their sacred tenets.  However, there is little thought offered by the wizards of smart in the Republicans Party as to the meaning of compromise and how to effectively pursue one.

Let’s excogitate over the definition of compromise. Compromise doesn’t mean one side giving up the farm; it means a shared give and take on the important issues in dispute.  It also involves shrewd tactics and tough negotiations.

To that end, we can all agree that when one side immediately and publicly states its willingness to concede the main points of contention without a commensurate agreement from the other side, that is a failed strategy for compromise.  We can also agree that when one side fails to state their demands for a compromise, they enter negotiations looking feeble.

The debate over the fiscal cliff is a great example.  A number of Republicans have preemptively announced their support for raising taxes.  Others have said they would agree to raise taxes to avoid the defense sequester (even though Obama has already weakened his leverage by saying that the sequester will never happen).  As such, the entire narrative surrounding the fiscal cliff is a question of whether Republicans will agree to a “balanced approach.” However, Republicans have never gone on offense by demanding specific minimum spending cuts even as a precursor to raising revenue.

The reality is that Democrats have never agreed to anything more than notional baseline cuts over 10 years.  They have not agreed to close down a single agency or office, much less a full government department.  They have not put on the table a plan to eliminate even a few of the 2,184 assistance programs.  And they never will.  So why are Republicans talking about revenues before Democrats are putting welfare reform/entitlement reform or discretionary downsizing on the table?

The same thing goes for Obamacare.  Why is Boehner saying that Obamacare is the law of the land before we even begin negotiations over the tax cliff, which includes numerous tax hikes scheduled to take effect as a result of Obamacare?  Why would Obama feel he needs to negotiate even on partial repeal if we are preemptively ceding the entire issue?

As for illegal immigration, if we run around agog like a bunch of buffoons screaming at ourselves about the need to grant full amnesty and create millions of new Democrat voters in 10 years, what incentive do Democrats have to negotiate a reasonable compromise on the issue?  Why would they feel the need to compromise on reforming our legal immigration system to include more high-skilled workers from the First World when we are willing to supply them with a plethora of poor voters who will help them create a permanent majority?  Let’s talk immigration reform, but let’s put all the issues on the table, including enforcement of temporary visas, tendentious treatment of third world immigration, and welfare reform.  If our enforcement laws against the current crop of illegal immigrants are in need of reform, the 1965 Kennedy immigration bill is also in need of reform.

We all agree that there is a time for compromise.  We all believe in the need to compromise on a number of issues.  But when you have the stupid party negotiating with the truculent party, the last thing you get is compromise.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • Ann_W

    Republicans need to be signalling the willingness to work with the president, but insisting that he present his plan to them. This man has played the game “I’ll show you mine, if you show me yours” for long enough. The Republicans have nothing to work with and when they present their plan Obama just demonizes them and nothing happens. Repeat after me, “the president needs to show us his plan for avoiding the fiscal cliff.” These people need remedial PR lessons.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Well stated. We are piss-poor negotiators and need to stop ‘negotiating’ with the press. It’s enough to tell them “Hey, we were elected too, our voters want us to limit spending and keep the economy strong through fiscally responsible policies that dont sock it to the workers and productive people in the economy.”

    If *I* was opening up the negotiations, I would be putting everything the Democrats dont want on the table:
    - Spending cuts now in FY2013 of at least what is in the sequester, or let it ride
    - Cut Obamacare taxes, the medical device tax, the house-sale tax, the employer mandates
    - Cut Obamacare subsidies, in particular the unaffordable 4X explosion in Medicaid
    - Cut Obamacare agency spending
    - 10% reduction in domestic discretionary spending this year and next
    etc.
    and then ask Obama, so “how badly do you want your tax on the rich? Do all the above and its yours.” …. and then go from there.

  • Viet71

    I’d like Boehner to know this.

    I voted for Nixon, Reagan, and Romney. I like guns. Am 67 and a vet.

    And I’ll pay what’s fair in taxes. Just don’t sell me out. I’ll know it if you do.

  • bassethound

    But the sad part about it is that they will STILL blame the GOP and come up with some stupid “sabotage” theory.

  • Pingback: The Art of Compromise | Liberal Whoppers

  • http://dezignworx-ae.com tsquare

    First… compromise as defined by Democrats is what happens after they beat you into doing what they want you to do.

    Second, I’m not so sure Obama wants a compromise. As it stands, come Jan 1st he gets what he wants… higher taxes, and a gutted DOD.

    Lastly…Speaker Boehner should call the House into session, pass a bill…
    doesn’t matter much what is in it, and then send the House home. Oh they
    should ready a conference committee, but there really isn’t any
    need….

    The Senate will never pass a bill (like they have not passed a budget in 4 years) and the rates and cuts happen as of Jan 1st.

    Elections have consequences… this is what the people voted for.

  • daniel22

    Forget it!! There will be a show with a bunch of bad actors having the lead. We will end up with higher taxes and less to show for it. Boehner has already stated a willingness to cave si I expect less than nothing. If the Bush tax cuts are not extended then the average Anerican tax bill will go up $3400 dollars. The republicans will claim a partial victory when the taxes are raised only $3399 dollars.
    The republican party in my opinion is dead. They are just another arm of the democratic party that plays a script meant to mollify a portion of the American electorate. Their job is not to do anything but to look busy. They accomplished this by the art of compromise.
    People or groups can only compromise so far before they have compromised what they absolutely stand for. After that they will fall for anything. If these last few years have shown me anything it is this. The American Dream is not dead it is just ignored for instant gratification. If this fight were along truly ideological lines then people would have a clear vision of the future and know the direction to go. As it is the lines have been blurred in favor of sound bites and photo ops. Independence means more than being rich. Freedom does not mean entitlement. Responsibility is not a four letter word. Rights do not mean that your feelings will not be hurt. If we listen to politicians and compromise those truths then we become as rudderless of a society as we are now.

  • 2warabnvet

    Senator Helms once said, “Compromise, hell! That’s what has happened to us all down the line — and that’s the very cause of our woes. If freedom is right and tyranny is wrong, why should those who believe in freedom treat it as if it were a roll of bologna to be bartered a slice at a time?”

  • brojohn2

    Boehner has already capitulated. There can be no compromise when the RINO in charge is already giving up the fight. Mitch McConnell and Boehner are both RINO’s and need to be gone from leadership. The problem we have with that is the rank and file are cowards and won’t stand up to these guys and so the status quo, capitulation from Republcans and forced taxation from the Democrats will remain the rule in D. C. Unless and until we stand up and defeat every one of these spineless twerps we will continue to be the losing party. If we are not willing to do anything to rid ourselves of cowards in our party, then it is time to form a new party (Conservatives UNITE).

  • brojohn2

    You and I both voted for Nixon, Reagan and Romney. I like guns, and am also 67 and a vet. I hate the thought of the Republicans selling us out, and will do all in my power to defeat any Republican who votes to do so.

  • http://rightwardjournal.com Jeff Swanson

    First and foremost, the President bet his total campaign on ‘the rich paying their fair share’. Ok, if the President does not get that increase, he will have failed at his primary objective.

    If we give it to him a tax increase, is there spending that can be extracted from him. No, he doesn’t want to give away the candy of entitlements but people are already understanding that this is on the table.

    I’m not sure that giving the tax increases away makes fiscal sense but I am wondering if the increase in debt is worth the sacrifice.

    We’ve survived higher taxes (not that I want them) but no one survives an all consuming debt.

  • Pingback: Darnell Muray

  • Pingback: Solomon Parthemore

  • Pingback: Francisco Piearcy

  • Pingback: Elinore Reddicks

  • Pingback: Cecile Griffing

  • Pingback: Gustavo Thingvold

  • Pingback: Robin Engram

  • Pingback: Newton Taulman

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: randki tarnow

  • Pingback: randki warszawa

  • Pingback: distill synonym

  • Pingback: randki wroclaw

  • Pingback: Morris Stuedemann

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: Gilbert Skiles

  • Pingback: organizzazione matrimoni toscana

  • Pingback: Fun Santa ideas

  • Pingback: colonne doccia

  • Pingback: alcoholic beverages

  • Pingback: Willetta Destefano

  • Pingback: Navigate To This Site

  • Pingback: over here

  • Pingback: breastactives

  • Pingback: Helen Mcwatters

  • Pingback: Enoch Mcklveen

  • Pingback: skachat igru karos

  • Pingback: cell towers investment

  • Pingback: madam lux

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: Enedina Richiusa

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Rolf Brais

  • Pingback: Alycia Noguera

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installations

  • Pingback: Mikel Benes

  • Pingback: Juliette Plantenga

  • Pingback: Sid Mellinger

  • Pingback: curriculum vitae

  • Pingback: thel Addison

  • Pingback: Benita Pinedo

  • Pingback: Annamaria Radar

  • Pingback: webhosting

  • Pingback: Gino Krammer

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: distilling equipment

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: number search free

  • Pingback: Grant Mckenty

  • Pingback: Rosetta Toguchi

  • Pingback: Gaston Arciola

  • Pingback: Francisco Silveria

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: beer-making

  • Pingback: หอพักโชคชัย 4

  • Pingback: Jonna Alegria

  • Pingback: Scooters

  • Pingback: Julian Taibi

  • Pingback: Janyce Frees

  • Pingback: koi

  • Pingback: strona z randkami