« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

I am Thankful for John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy

Not quite two weeks removed from Thanksgiving, it is worth giving thanks to John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy. I really am thankful for them.

Yesterday the three of them purged fiscal conservatives from committees as punishment for being authentically fiscal conservatives. Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina was put on the Financial Services Committee to show fiscal conservatism had nothing to do with removing Congressmen Justin Amash and David Schweikert, but that just causes me to question Mick Mulvaney’s conservative bona fides now.

Congressmen Schweikert, Amash, and Congressman Tim Huelskamp now removed from the Budget Committee, have been punished for daring to defy John Boehner during the debt ceiling fight, etc. They pointed out what would happen with John Boehner’s deal. They were the Cassandras of the fiscal cliff, predicting we’d be exactly where we are and they voted against getting us here.

They have now been punished.

On the same day John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy punished fiscal conservatives for standing up for their convictions, they sold out their own convictions by agreeing to raise taxes by $800 billion. They intend to seem reasonable to the press in negotiations with the White House. They’re going through an elaborate kabuki dance, but they’ll get blamed nonetheless.

Pointing their fingers as fiscal conservatives now punished, casting them out as scape goats, will do nothing to woo the media or the White House, but we should be thankful. We should absolutely be thankful for these three men.

As the sun rises this morning we can look at John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy and know the opposition is not just across the aisle, but in charge of our own side in the House of Representatives. All the time and energy I would otherwise have to spend to convince conservatives that these gentlemen would be a problem for the GOP has been spared. They’ve proven it themselves.

And now is a time for choosing for Congressman Scalise. He said he wanted to work with leadership. He said he wanted to move closer. Leadership has now signaled that it has no interest in working with conservatives without compromising not just tactics, but principles.

If Congressman Scalise sells out conservatives in the House to work with House leadership who’ve just sold out their own principles in the name of looking reasonable, conservatives will need to find a new home outside the Republican Study Committee.

In the meantime, Freedomworks, Americans for Prosperity, Club for Growth, Heritage Action for America, Madison Project, Concerned Women of America, Susan B. Anthony, Gun Owners of America, etc. etc. etc. must start working hard immediately to find quality candidates to challenge incumbent Republicans. These three men and Karl Rove over at Crossroads are going to work hard to stop conservatives though.

Conservatives must seek retribution or become the paper tiger John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy just declared them to be.

COMMENTS

  • davesinsanantonio

    We have just under two years. That should be enough. Here is the checklist, in order, to find the candidates who will save this country instead of selling in out “reasonably”.

    Integrity

    Courage

    Constitutionalist who loves the country and not the party

    Conservative

    Not just worried about election/re-election, but what is best for the country

    Willing to fight for what is right, not just what will sell

    Can articulate the message in a persuasive way

    A proven track record of acting/voting/speaking true conservative principles

    No hidden “Gotcha’s” in the background that the Dims will exploit

    Will stay on message and not fall for media “Gotcha” questions

    If there is something to add, please do. But, please, don’t just quibble about the order, this isn’t a question of my order vs. someone else’s. It is a question of the character and other traits which will be called upon to save this country. Saving the country is much more important than scoring hits and points.

  • 1stclasspettyofficer

    I’m concerned that the irony used in the title of this piece might mislead a few people, particularly people like me who scan headlines and sometimes do not read every article. If one were to do that with this article it would be very easy for them to miss the point completely, and with such an important point as this, it might be wise to re-title and re-post this article.

  • gscandlen

    I don’t know if it is conservative vs. moderate or being bold vs being a weenie. Obama is bold. He said he would veto anything that didn’t raise tax rates, the economy be damned. Harry Reid is bold. He said the idea of working with a President Romney was “laughable.” Both men have made their positions perfectly clear and everyone says, “well, that’s the way it is, you have to deal with it.”

    Boehner could have said “taxes ain’t going up, deal with it.” Obama has the veto, but Boehner also has the veto. Nothing gets spent unless the House agrees to it. Period. That’s the way it is, ceal with it.

  • timcooper62

    Dave, there are people like that out there, they just don’t want the media rectal examination. As soon as someone steps forward, the media begins the junta to destroy them. A person would have to be insane to want to run for office

  • docnick

    These three are core GOP…. This is where the Republicans Party is….. Most, I think, in the Tea Party accepted this some while back. We are stuck in that third parties indirectly by their votes support the liberal Dems indirectly.

    How does anyone who sees these men in front of camera think they are men of moral strength and courage?

    It appears that only a complete meltdown will wake up the voters in both parties. Maybe, not even then.

  • oldtownyankee

    I have been following this fiscal cliff BS and moves by the House Leadership closely. What do we do? Boehner, Cantor etal are saying “hey look at us Republicans look – look , we’re just like Obama only not as bad”. I see a growing democrat majority for ever. This is exactly how Massachusetts became the looney bin we are today. Sometimes I feel that I’m living in an alternative universe.

  • Ausonius

    Content, comfortable, country-club Republicans of the ’60′s: that is what our Gang of Four (let’s add McConnell) remind me of. Content with being a “loyal opposition” and give lip-service to Conservatism, while stabbing the philosophy in the back every time, so that they can seem “above the fray” and “high-minded.”

    Remember the Whigs: why do we need such a Republican Party? This version of Republicanism is called the Democrat Party.

  • celador2

    Boehner lost 40 seats in 2006 and more in 2008. It took s grasroots constitutional conservative movement, the tea prty to cross the country in buses, rally and yell at Townhalls over Obammacare, debt and growth of government. The tea party movement elected limited government conservatives in 2010, not John Boehner.
    But those freshmen made a fatal mistake. The voted for the House caucus leader Boehner for Speaker 2011. ”

    Tea party freshmen made it possible for Boehner and Coantor to take leadership of House. Boehner acted as if he owned the place, the People’s House I mean that had just seated a group of limited government reps to DC to clean house and govern with a perspective on ennumerated duties to reduce size and scope of spending.
    Boehner lost seats in 2012 and may lose more 2014. if his wishy washy brand is what they sell. as a eason to vote Republican

    He never respected and does not fear the voters who are the party base that gave him the majority to become Speakrr. I’d like to think his hobbled personal rule will fail. It will eventually but for the next two years Boehner and Obama will be sitting at same side of table fr too much of the time.
    Wait, 2014 approaches.

  • http://www.CoastalNCInsurance.com greg7564

    I am one of the people you described above. I don’t have the time the Author has to do all the research. I am to busy trying to work. I truly did not understand this article. This article is a great example of the problem. Liberals water things down better for their readers than conservatives. They do not speak in analogies and in this case hidden ones. I don’t like Boehner but will support him until he makes the wrong choice and does not fight Obama and all his Socialist Cronies for the other half of the voters in this country who did not vote for him. Surely Bo’s has to see if he lets O’s agenda win we all lose and especially him personally and Professionally? To the Author, KISS Keep It Simple Stupid!

  • westcoastpatriette

    Both of you are being silly. Anyone who reads Erick regularly would know he uses sarcasm and hyperbole in his titles quite often. If you don’t have the time to read an article, you certainly can’t judge its content from the title — and if you do, that’s on you.

  • celador2

    Good list!
    We need people that will take on repealing and fighting Obamacare every step of the way. IPAB a 15 person appointed panel is outside oversight. It will run Medicare. But all of ACA is top down whether states through exchanges paticipate or not.
    Top down panels do no make for good free markets environments that rely on competition , innovation to eliminate waste and grow demnd. Tht free markert approach is what lowers costs, not a cost control IPAB in DC.
    We can not take a flourishing free market economy for granted.

    Economic growth and innovation will become pale and puny solutions not relevant just like all freedoms that fade away if not nurtured and supported.

  • kycon

    It’s unfortunate that in the wake of an election where trying too hard to ‘me too’ our platform cost us the win, we’re going to double down on saying “ME TOO!” Boehner and the rest of the House GOP leadership needs to wake up and realize that the reason that Republicans don’t turn out is that they don’t like to vote for ‘Democrat Lite.’

    If we want to turn this country around, we have to be bold. Boldly stated ideas, bold ideological positions, and bold congressional leadership. Draw a line in the sand and say, “No more!” Stake a position that increased taxes are a non-starter. Heck, let’s hoist the Democrats on their own petard, and push for implementation of the Simpson-Bowles plan. That sounds a little crazy, but Guy Benson makes an eloquent case for it here: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/11/30/simpson_bowles

    Most important is the fact that it would be extremely hard for the other side to use their usual demonizations of the Republicans to lobby against it. More Democrats than Republicans voted for it in the first place, and if it was enacted, we’d get a bunch more spending cuts than we are likely to get any other way.

    Additionally, we’d be offering up a huge compromise; one that the media couldn’t help but report on. That’s a big deal, and would further put the Democrats over a barrel. If they didn’t agree, and we went over the cliff, they’d be hard pressed to point the finger at our side and scream that our reticence caused the problem.

    I know SImpson-Bowles wasn’t perfect, but judging from what we’re being offered now, it’s a vast improvement.

  • richtfan

    time to primary all of the marginal GOP candidates no matter who they are. it is high time to let them be challenged and defeated by tea party candidates and/or get enough conservatives in the House that Boehner wouldn’t get re-elected as speaker. what a tool.

  • Lindbergh

    Nothing gets spent unless the House agrees to it.

    That’s exactly why Boehner’s RINO army is going to fold and give Obama what he wants, because for them, spending money on their friends is the only reason they ran for office.

  • http://www.mattmodleski.com mattmodleski

    I agree with almost all of what you’ve written with a few tweaks. Integrity and Courage are a must and part of integrity is to say you were wrong at times in your past. The idea that an adult could have lived their whole lives without making a mistake has become an unreasonable expectation in our leaders. I believe Einstein was correct when he said “setting the example isn’t the main means of influencing another, it is the only means.” We must be focused on that and be honest when we fail, support an idea that failed, or simpl set the wrong example. The repeal of Glass Steagall has created banks that are too big to fail and an insurance industry that has too much influence in DC; it was a mistake to do it. The second Iraq war from a leadership and foreign policy perspective didn’t make sense at the time and certainly in retrospect should be labeled a mistake. Those are two examples of what I mean.
    We need to be able to “sell what is right” not fight for what’s right. Our leaders need to be great communicators based on their core convictions, without a teleprompter. I’m not saying to never give a teleprompter speech but we should be able to generate enthusiasm based on selling the value of our convictions and the value of America to the rest of the world not as the Left wants her but as the example she has been. We can always be better, but we are still the best hope and example in the world for what’s possible when an entire nation strives to be her best, one person at a time.
    If we are honest and believe in the country before party, can articulate why we believe what we believe and how it will help the nation, can admit a mistake and what we learned from it, and can raise money nationally without our party’s help using the internet, I believe we can elect good people to office. The nation can’t wait any longer, the time is now. God bless.

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    Lesson Learned from 2012: DONATE TO CANDIDATES, NOT PARTIES.

    After the disaster that was Mitt Romney, and now we see these fan-dancers in the GOP Congressional Leadership, anyone who gives actual money to the French-Cuff Faction known as the GOP is a toady and an idiot. Nothing else.

    In a sense, Boehner is more despicable than Obama: At least Obama is the real deal. He knows he’s out to fundamentally transform the nation into some sort of progressive utopia– such as it is. Boehner doesn’t know WHY he’s there, other than for raw power, and the perquisites which attend it.

    And, of course, the really, really awful part about the hi-jinx of Boehner and the Boyz is that they will cave, and buckle, and sell out –morning, noon, and night– and Conservatism will STILL take it on the chin, as if they took some principled stand. What a nightmare these next two to four years will be…

  • wlcjr

    I mightbe the only one here that actually wants the tax rates to go up. I want them to go up because I have come to the conclusion that low taxes and small govt are mutually exclusive. By having low rates, people think govt solutions are affordable. The masses and some of the wealthy support Obama’s “tax the rich” mantra, and I for one am tired of arguing philosophically against “manna from heaven”. The left is not arguing with reason and logic they are arguing with emotion. Logical arguments will not convince them, so we are fighting a losing battle.
    Plus, we all know that raising taxes will not solve our budget problems because it probably won’t raise revenue at all, much less raise it enough to fix our problems. So then we remain in the same battle, except Obama does not have his bludgeon to beat us with.
    I realize the tax pain will effect others greater then me, but I do not wish to aide the economy in any way, for doing so will validate Obamanomics. Why should we take the political hit for advocating lower taxes and entitlement reform? By doing so we are playing right into Obama’s populist hands.
    We don’t have a revenue problem we have a spending problem. But the focus will remain on the revenue side until we take the narrative away. I say agree to Obama, give him enough rope to economcially hang himself by the midterms.
    Now I agree that criticizing Boehner is correct. Because we should basically walk away from the table at this point and let any deal be seen as a Dem plan.

  • celador2

    I hope Boehner reads it and thinks about it.

  • bobmark

    And doing so keeps them there.

  • ihateliberals

    Ericki have been preaching against these people since the 2010 elections and the first debacle of Boehner. As for Karl Rove I was against him before it was cool to be against him. As long as we allow these people to control the congress it might as well be all democratic. Why we continue to0 call these people Republicans is beyond me. I use to call these types RINO’s but in these later years i have come to realize they are Liberal Republicans. That is why they hate conservatives so much. because the Republican Party stood for conservatism for so long there are many people that have been lulled into continuing to believe that Republicans are conservatives. That is n’t the case any longer. What is the main difference in John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi? one isn’t as ugly as the other one. With John Boehner continuing to be the Speaker of the House he will lead the Republicans to defeat in 2014. Obama will continue to bagger Republicans and put them in a losing situation continuously until in 2014 the Democrats will take the House back. Right now with the Fiscal Cliff Obama wins no matter what happens and the Republicans will be to blame. Conservatives need to form their own quorum in the House and the Senate and stop allowing the Republicans to totally rule. Would this be easy to do/ NO but it could be done with people with guts. We are in desperate need of a conservative Party. we tried to move the Republicans back from center and it didn’t work so now we need to fight them head to head. If we don’t then this country will never be the Great America that it once was or could be again. I will have Risk my life in the Military for nothing and so many would have died for nothing.

    People laughed at me in 2009 when i predicted the Presidential lost to Obama and now they laugh at me when i speak of the need for a new Party., We’ll see whose laughing in 2014 if things don’t change and fast.

  • CFPeterson

    Also, anyone paying even a little attention knows that those guys haven’t been doing anything budget-related at all that Eric would be thankful for. The title hooked me, because I was like, “okay, what’s this all about…”

  • runner12

    The question is are there enough House Republicans with enough courage to vote against Boehner for Speaker? Those who support him again shpuld also be looked at with scrutiny.

  • jaykali

    Darn. Well so what’s in it for Rove to not elect conservatives?

  • eddiethegeek

    Except this is neither sarcasm nor hyperbole. Erick is expressing thanks that the leopards in charge of the GOP caucus have “shown their spots.” There can be no doubt that the individuals in charge of the House GOP have betrayed the conservative cause, and because this is so clear from their actions, and because we have a much clearer picture of the task at hand, we can be thankful. That’s not sarcasm or hyperbole.

  • Adjoran

    We just lost an election to the most socialist head of state ever in an English-speaking country, and the Democrats strenghtened their control of the Senate. We broke even in the House – only because of our redistricting advantage – and in the media (because we had no seats to lose there).
    The choices are two: we either get the best deal Boehner can wring from Obama, or we say let it burn and go over the cliff. Those are the choices.
    Don’t like Boehner? Have a tissue, Nancy. He’s in, he has control of the House caucus and there is no credible threat to him, or even a recognizable group of dissident conservatives. Turning him out is a total fantasy.
    So whining that Boehner isn’t being “tough enough” in negotiating with Obama is just plain unrealistic. Obama doesn’t give a rat’s patootie. He’s not moving far, if at all. Boehner’s main task is, in fact, presenting the most reasonable appearance for the general public. He has no leverage at all.
    If reality offends thee, pluck thyself out of the GOP and go form your own party. Blessings upon you and your house – but once you walk out, please do Republicans the favor of no longer whining about us, mmmkay?

  • fightinmad

    The time has come for those of us who hold to true principles of freedom as conservatives to understand that it is pretty well over. During the election process there were several hundred conservative churches banding together to pray that God would give us a second chance and allow us to have victory. He did not! As I stood in the ashes of defeat and pondered the outcome I realized that what happens here and now is not on our schedule. Many of you believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, as do I, and if you believe the Bible at all, it is very clear where we are headed. We can angst all day about it. That will accomplish nothing. I have concluded that the only hope for mankind is the God/man and His ultimate return to this earth to establish His Kingdom. Of course there will be a 7 year time period (The Tribulation) where His followers are removed and the world is left to fend for itself. Oh my, then the Democrats, Liberal Republicans and the heathen in general will reap exactly what they have sowed. That, as what is soon to happen to America, will be nothing like they have planned. People will suddenly wake up, but it will be far too late. The day of reckoning will be upon them, and that without remedy. And our God will sit up in heaven and laugh at their calamity as spoken in Psalms 2. The only good news is for those of us who know Him personally as our Saviour, we shall not weep, we shall rejoice that we rest in His everlasting arms! As Jesus Christ said,”When these things begin to come to pass, LOOK UP for His coming draweth nigh!” I must admit, I go outside every morning and catch myself looking up.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Maybe irony is a better word. It’s still repugnant that this is the way we have to be thankful…know what I mean?

  • abeldred

    Erick, I believe the ship has sailed. Conservatives must move past the notion of reviving the GOP as the party of Conservative principles and ideas. It is time to make them the irrelevant 3rd party and forge a new alliance with Conservative thinkers in a strong party movement. Re-name the Tea Party to remove the negative connotations and elect those who will actually stand up for the people. (i.e. Ted Cruz)

  • edintexas

    Sure. And pigs will fly.

  • celador2

    Hmm ya got a point there, buuddy, but hope springs eternal.LOL

  • General_Confusion

    In other news John Boehner said he wanted to thank the Tea Party members efforts for putting him back in charge in 2010. He also went on to say “Suckers!”.

    P.S. Who knows, maybe he just didn’t want to burden those Tea Party folk with committees. Such a nice guy.

  • whitetop

    With idiots like B, C & M Obama doesn’t need a majority. These people who are suppose to be the opposition will give Obama everything he wants just because they don’t want the New York Slimes or the Washington Post to say anything bad about them. One has to think Boehner spends too much time in the tanning salon and that has fried his brain.

  • kipling

    Time to amend the “Conservative in the Primary and Republican in the General” rule when it comes to the GOP leadership. Boehner, Cantor, et al have now declared open season on fiscal conservatives (probably all conservatives). It is time we responded in kind. We should support a conservative primary challenge to Boehner. If Boehner wins the primary then we should support a third party challenge in the general election. Even if it throws the seat to the Democrats, it will send a message to the establishment that we are fed up with their tactics.

  • celador2

    and to anybody interested in replying to Ausonius comment –

    How are things different and or the same today than in 1854 when Republican party formed. What conditions pushed Republicans to be the second big party and hold that ranking?
    How can SUch a move out of Whigs into a new party make it today given tody’s conditions?
    Only R and Ds win partisan elections.

  • Marcus_Traianus

    I have stated many times that Mr. Boehner’s weak leadership and destructive behavior is a primary source of our Parties ills. We hold the House despite his behavior.

    That said, retribution is not a strategy. It is a recipe for continued failure and division.

    Look no further than the opposition party to understand your own failures and their success.

    We don’t have a strong caucus because factions divide the party instead of bringing it together cohesively. Proof? Look at the number of Republicans who voted in the last election and the result.

    We have only ourselves to blame. But we do have a great view to watch the almost irreversible destruction and are warmed by the fiction we sacrificed victory for a principled stand.

    Democrats have embarked on total war. We demur to fratricide and finger pointing.

    If you disagree, you negotiate from whatever position one holds to work towards common goals and victory.

    Until this basic fact is grasped Republicans, they will continue to watch from the sidelines and most-likely lose any majority we hold.

  • celador2

    Amnesty is the new power game in town. Cut a dea lwith the deviil and guess who wins?

  • celador2

    We ain’t seen nothing yet.

  • audax1

    House GOP in was not only cc in the 60′s but also the 70′s and right up until Newt’s Revolution in 1994. Ford-Michel-Boehner, no difference.

  • audax1

    Guess you’ve never heard of Australia under Bob Hawke…..or the UK under a string of PM’s after Churchills War years and before Maggie Thatcher.

  • rightlane1111

    You have no idea how many people feel exactly like you do. We have a choice…the fight will be hard…but if we do not “change” the current Republican Party…then it is time they go the way of the Whigs. That will mean that ordinary people…not the power brokers…like Rove, etc. are going to have to give up time and get credible candidates and yes…even rename the party and get a platform that is published. We have two parties…Obama and Obama lite. Obama lite is in the majority and they don’t give a darn about the people. That means that their in-house enemies, the TPM, who put Boehner in charge have been stabbed in the back. If we dare to question…we are treated as if we were some illiterate populace that needs to be shown how.

    Our problem really is…which Tea Party Movement is not connected with those mentioned in the article, i.e., Freedom Works, Crossroads, etc.

  • redbirdpatriot

    Agree. However, I believe we should focus more on quality than quality this time around. Identify the right people to fight in the right districts. Just a simple example……Given
    a fixed amount of funds, I think it’s better to spend it on 20 quality candidates than spreading the same resources on 10 additional “marginal” candidates to
    make it 30 with the intention of making a bigger splash or voting out 10 additional “squishy” Republicans. Sooner or later that additional 10 will come around when they see the world changing around them….or will be beaten in future primaries. Also, with the additional 10, we run the risk of a few “marginal” candidates going off the reservation OR being viewed a crackpot due to their poor communication skills.

    I’m not suggesting 20 is the number…..just recommending that
    we focus on qualify for the 2014 primary strategy.

  • rightlane1111

    This is everyday people who are sick and tired of the Republicans. We can’t do anything about it…yet it is our money. We are held captive to Boehner’s gang just as sure as we are Obama’s policies. Many people have just given up. Many of them just stayed home in the 2012 election (low turnout). People don’t like their candidate chosen for them. People don’t like Rove on TV 24/7 once they have figured out he too is a Progressive. We have lost our ability to change the course. Our TPM put Boehner in charge and he has spit in their face. The TPM needs to be united under one platform and must not waiver. Only then will the people MAYBE be willing to put time, effort and money into their organizations. At present, they feel beat and with no hope of any change. So…Mr. Boehner, Mr. Canter and Mr. McCarthy have been working for Obama all this time…and we never saw it. No wonder Jim DeMint in retiring.

  • rightlane1111

    Because he does not share their beliefs.

  • plh

    Excellent post! In a world where an alarming percentage of our educators, journalists, and political leaders have been leading us astray – knowingly or naively – for decades, we are facing an electorate that has less and less of a real understanding of history, economics, or even human nature. I’ve given up on the Republican leadership, who it now appears would rather again go on record supporting a stupid compromise with that would result in more of the same with Republican caucus votes than just saying enough is enough, let this newest step in the wrong direction pass with Democrat votes only. Time for the shotgun (a figure of speech, all you “gotcha” people) approach. Primary everybody. From the Speaker on down. The more of them we target (again figurative), the greater our final numbers in Congress. And while doing so, no more money to the Party, just the individual candidates.

  • celador2

    What goes up must come down. Obama will mess up as bad as Pelosi did in time. Conservatives sweep into the House and this time boot Boehner and co 2014 or 16.

  • earlgrey

    What about American Majority Action? I am ready to start contributing again, I just don’t know where yet. I’ll be checking into Madison Project as well.

  • celador2

    By purging and not nurturing and promoting the tea party freshmen who put him into Speaker’s office Boehner dis-enfranchised the very voters who put him there. In other words, Boehner has disenfranchised us in the House.

  • tnguy

    Hence, the fruits of conservative in the primary, republican in the general. At least that notion is in its death throes now, although I suspect that it is too late to save our way of life. We’ve tolerated the rot with an (R) after the name because they had to be better than the other guy.

    Conservatives have completely lost control of the party to moderates and career politicians. Worse, men like Boehner do far more to hinder conservatism than anything Obama/Pelosi/Reed could ever do. I don’t have a Bible in front of me to quote exactly, but Jesus said to be concerned with the beam in our own eye, rather than the spec of dust in our neighbor’s. That’s where we’ve failed. We’ve promoted men like Boehner and McConnell to the degree that now they control the entire party apparatus, and conservatives are outcasts. We’ve focused all of our guns on democrats instead of the republicans who’ve worked behind the scenes to thwart us at every turn. The GOP has kept a leash on us for a quarter century, and now we’re adrift, and I don’t see a unifying message emerging.

    Ultimately, the leftist agenda is only thriving because we’ve allowed it to. It is our fault. We voted for GWB, even as he pushed a big government agenda that would’ve made Bill Clinton blush. We keep re-electing men like McConnell and Boehner. We supported men like Romney and Dole and McCain, knowing that they believed more in making government work than they did in liberty.

    I don’t know if the hour is too late or not. I fear it is. And we conservatives have no one to blame but ourselves. God help us.

  • brojohn2

    In less than 2 years we will have another election, we can elect conservatives to the House, or we can elect Republicrats. I call upon my fellow conservatives to abandon this republicrat party and work to build a truly Constitutional Republic through the Constitution Party. Enough BS about finding the right Republicrat to replace the ones already in power! To hell with Rove, Cantor, Boehner and the rest of these RINO’s.

  • civil truth

    Unfortunately for your argument, it won’t come down that way. For the prime example of why not, take a look at Paul Krugman over the past four-to-five years. No matter how much the administration’s/Democrats plan has failed, he argues 1) it’s not enough stimulus; and 2) the Republicans have no legitimate alternative.

    That’s the problem when you deal with totalitarians; they know they are right as a matter of faith and nothing will dissuade them that they’re wrong; it’s just that their plans hasn’t been implemented correctly, and failing that, that enemies of the state are sabotaging their rule (c.f. Chavez, Stalin).

    Look at California: the worse their economy gets, the more the Democratic majority increases because Republicans are “anti-sex”. Faith all the way.

    The only way to deal with this is to explain your position/alternatives and stand firm in opposition. But that takes courage and articulateness – and above all commitment. It’s far easier to share the loot, as we are seeing.

  • celador2

    The Republicans in cliff negotiations come off as cheap Democrats .We need principled tax payer advocates who stand for limited government by contrast to Obama.

  • streiff

    you are only surviving this because of your posting history. This is at least the second time you’ve advocated third party. If you do it again you are gone. Voting third party is the way to guarantee Democrat domination of government. So let me reiterate. Next third party call gets a ban. Whine about this and get a ban.

  • Bill S

    Tell you what, genius – you come up with a workable “compromise” that doesn’t throw conservative values into the dumpster and I won’t boot you out of here. Mmkay?

  • disintelligentsia

    A proven track record of acting/voting/speaking true conservative principles

    No hidden “Gotcha’s” in the background that the Dims will exploit

    In the media’s telling of things, “true conservative principles” are “Gotchas”. Welfare reform is painted as oppression of single moms and racist oppression of minorities, education reform is the oppression of teachers (not the unions) and poor defenseless children, enforcement of immigration laws is the racist oppression of minorities, social security reform is the oppression of grandma, etc.

    Liberals don’t view things through the lens of reality – they don’t see labor, money, property or anything else being a limited resource that can be taxed or stolen to the breaking point. More money can simply be printed (to hell with devaluation), the plebes can be forced to work more and property rights exist solely at the whim of the state because the elites know how to make the best use of all property.

    A liberal’s lens is power and everything they view and report in the media is interpreted through that lens. That’s why everything is about oppressors and victims and “empowerment.” In their view, anything that stands in the way of their unbridled power is evil. Limited government is evil because it is a restraint on their power. Fiscal restraint is evil because it restrains their ability to give out goodies, which in turn buys votes and therefore, power. Reigning in taxes reduces their power because the power to tax (stealing at gunpoint) is the power to destroy.

    It’s not a man’s sins that the media finds repugnant. It’s his virtues.

  • ncfamilyman

    RedState’s premise of continuing to work within the Republican Party should be questioned if we don’t make any headway against these jackasses in the next 4 years.

  • http://parsoned.blogspot.com parsoned

    I believed in “conservative in the primary and GOP in the general”. I even advised my congregation that this was the wise way to approach stewarding our votes. But this election and its aftermath, the purge of conservatives by the liberal Republicans, has convinced me that it is a fool’s errand. I’m not sure what the alternative is at this moment. But I know this: we should make sure that every liberal, sell-out Republican is defeated for re-election. If we primary them and they still win, we vote third party. Because there is no real difference between a Boehner and a Democrat, other than the rhetoric.

  • streiff

    if you don’t like it, there are plenty of other places you can post. That has been RedState policy since its inception and we’ve announced it over and over. Why you are surprised is beyond me.

  • drifter

    The Republican Party is not now an ethical political entity. It is run by stealth liberals. John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy must be ousted if conservatism is going to survive therein. If there is no championing of conservative causes within the GOP, then a third party will be started– and will grow as the worn out GOP dies behind it…

  • streiff

    http://www.redstate.com/posting-rules/ See Rule #6

  • mtmnd

    Mr. Erickson is absolutely correct. To put it mildly, fiscal conservatives are repeatedly disrespected and ignored by the GOP. He’s is also right on the money about trying to get more conservatives into the body. But what about in between elections?

    In between elections, the GOP leadership comfortably ignores conservatives because they can. They know that the conservatives have no where else to go, and unfortunately they are correct. Unfortunately, the “conservatives in the primary and the GOP in the general” is really conservatives in the primary and the GOP in the general and in everything else the GOP wants to do between primaries. The GOP’s day of reckoning only comes on primary day, and the rest of the time they act as if they are unchecked on the right, and they seem to be correct in their assessment.

    So what is to be done between elections? I am somewhat at a loss. Obviously a third party is not the answer. But something must be done between elections to try to check the GOP from the fiscal right, otherwise the GOP will continue to keep the conservatives tucked away in a pocket where conservatives out when needed, but otherwise ignored. Since conservatives are already being ignored, why not turn the tables a bit and ignore the traditional leadership and start trying to exert real leadership in the realm of public opinion? The GOP leadership does not want to work with conservatives, but what is to stop conservatives from trying to resolve the problems despite the GOP leadership?

    For example why not come up with a third proposal in addition to the Geitner and Boehner proposals? Only make it a proposal which avoids the trappings of the Boehner plan, without Trojan Horse tax increases disguised as vague and unidentified “loophole” reform. Why not call out the phony spending “cuts” and propose exactly and explicitly what spending needs to be cut? Lead by example, and by so doing point out just how embarrassing, wishy-washy, and dishonest the other plans are. And do so openly, publicly, and loudly.

    Sure the particular plan will not carry the day, but it will take the fight to the GOP and educate the public. Congressional conservatives should demonstrate that, contrary to what the GOP leadership claims, there is an option other than capitulation. The goal would be to extend the primary season by always making the GOP answer to real conservative values. Even between elections.

    These suggestions seems pretty obvious and aren’t even novel, but I just don’t much of it happening now.

  • libertynugget

    Now if we could only get one of those to run in the primary!

  • tarmac

    OK, for transparency purposes I will admit that I think we should agree to the marginal tax rate increase for the top 2% (because that gets the item off the table and it is the one that is a losing proposition (tax rates will rise when we go off the cliff and a bill is introduced in January to peel back those increase for the bottom 98%. Everyone will vote for that bill). What I’m just not able to figure out from the comments is how anyone actually intends to fundamentally change the dynamics. It is right now just a fact that the vast majority of Americans support the notion of increasing the marginal tax rate for the top 2% (67% by the last survey). We can all rail against the idea that we have a “spending problem and not a revenue problem” but the vast, vast majority of America simply disagrees with this notion. Obama got more than 3 million votes than Romney and the only states Romney got that McCain didn’t were Indiana and NC (and we all have to admit Obama getting IN in 2008 was an anomoly). Remember, no republican candidate for President since 1988 has gotten more than 50.8% of the popular vote or more than 286 electoral college votes. That’s over 24 yers and is incredibly stunning if you think about it. One could argue that it is because the candidates weren’t conservative enough. However, the “more conservative” candidates couldn’t even get out of the Republican primary this year so even the totality of the Republican party is unwilling to vote for a more conservative candidate to run against the Dem candidate. So, maybe 20% of the population wants a more conservative approach but, numerically, that isn’t a winning hand. We can fool ourselves that more people believe in a very limited government but that is, in fact, a fool’s errand as it really, really is a minority viewpoint. Would love to see how folks would actually change the dynamics as, numerically, most of the views expressed do not come close to representing 50% of the population (hate to be a kill joy but I’m just stating facts).

  • streiff

    I think you’re lost. We aren’t here to negotiate terms of surrender. According to you 2010 didn’t happen. Yet it did.

  • cbartlett

    Dittos CF – I thought the same thing after reading the title. My first reaction was “what have those guys done NOW?!?!” because I knew it couldn’t be anything good.

  • JKnight

    The stimulus bill spent about that (probably more) over a few years. The new revenue from increased taxes or reduced deductions, etc. would be over a 10 year period.

    For some reason, the government loves to plan it’s spending over 10 year periods.

  • curtmilr

    Wow! I was never aware of that rule!
    One question, Streiff, since Jim Demint, Sarah Palin, and soon many others are pointing out that GOP leadership has abandoned conservative principles completely, how will we be able to advocate for those principles within the GOP? I’m a Life Member of the National Committee since the ’80s, but it certainly is no cause for pride any longer.
    The GOP leadership has set our cause asea in a leaking boat without oars, sails, or a rudder. This is scandalous!

  • sgtjoe

    It truly is time to start a move for a national referendum on term limits, political contributions and just taxes. It won’t come from DC or any other elected pol, so it has to be the people – us. I didn’t serve six years in the Marine Corps, fight in a war, Viet Nam, and spend 40 years suffering the after effects, PTSD, just to watch some power mad freak show destroy all of our freedoms.

  • streiff

    have Jim DeMint or Sarah Palin left the GOP to form a third party? If not, I think you have your answer.

  • streiff

    1. There is no such thing as a “national referendum.” The Constitution does not allow for it.

    2. The Supreme Court has ruled that term limit laws passed by states limiting terms of their Representatives and Senators, that is federal office holders, are unconstitutional as the Constitution does not recognize any limitations other than age/citizenship.

    3. The only way to get term limits, a profoundly bad idea, is via amending the Constitution.

  • fightnright

    Those who support GOP insiders like Boehner find themselves reliably supported by that same powerful contingent of GOP insiders as well. Those who threw conservatism and conservative voters overboard are not going to abandon their career comfort zone that easily. That’s what happens from the top down when punishment from the bottom up (grass roots) is measured as negligible, versus the rewards for compliance to a liberal-ized agenda. In politics, as with other social/cultural adaptations, any collective behavioral change comes from collective behavior mod.

    As I’ve had to say too many times here, the day we will find enough House Republicans with the courage to vote against establishment players will be the day that we have enough authentically conservative Republicans who are willing to put principles before position. To maintain permanent support for representatives willing to make sacrifices in their lives and political careers. we all probably will have to be ready to make a few more personal sacrifices in our own. Organize and work to make it clear that first-principle candidates are ~more~ likely to be re-hired by their citizen employers than those who repeatedly compromise the values that made them originally win our approval, and their congressional seats.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    drifter,
    Do you have a strategy for ousting the stealth liberals in the Party?
    Thank you,
    CW

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Boehner, Cantor and McCarthy did not sell out their constituents.

    The Republicans in their respective districts gave each of them a greater number of votes than any of their rivals in the primary elections.

    They truly marvel at how unorganized and disunited the conservatives are in their respective districts and how, despite their liberal squishiness, not enough conservatives go to the polls in their respective primary races to defeat them.

    Elections matter. Especially primary elections.

    Their constituents are now getting exactly what they voted for.

    Thank you.
    CW
    http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

  • tarmac

    my comment wasn’t to outline terms of surrender but, instead, to elicit comment on how one proposes to change an America where, factually, the majority support increasing the marginal tax rate, support the DREAM Act, now support the right of gays to marry, support the rights of women to have an abortion (especially in the case of rape and incest) etc. It is simply a numerical question. One can say that the answer is to have a “different message” but the simple facts point to an America that seems to not support the alternative positions to those just noted. I just don’t see the answer that we just need to keep espousing views and, somehow, folks will eventually agree with us. As of right now they don’t and the gap widens every day on all of these issues. So, the question is how does one alter this phenomenon besides arguing against it (knowing that the argument only represents about 20% of the electorate). To me it is simply an intellectual conundrum where I have not really seen a good answer.

  • streiff

    tell me your answer. Because right now I think you are trolling because two of the three comments you have made have been virtually the same… and what I think counts.

    So it’s up to you. Either propose how to deal with it or just say you think we shouldn’t bother with being conservatives any more and leave.

  • http://parsoned.blogspot.com parsoned

    Given the fact that I have fewer than a dozen or so posts, I’m not primarily looking for a place to write. I, do however, like many of the articles and blogs. Why I’m surprised? I don’t often read the comments metas.

    Your party, your rules. But I don’t think it’s all that productive as a tool for discussion. But, as I said, your party, your rules.

  • streiff

    we’re not about discussing everything. We live in the the real world. The fact is that there is no third party out there that has the vaguest possibility of winning anything, if there were we’d see scads of Constitution Party people elected to state and local office.

    If we are going to have an influence it has to be electing candidates that have our views and striving to gain as much control of the GOP apparatus as possible.

    Messy? Yes. But there are no magic wands or fairy dust in the real world.

  • http://about.me/l.v.johnston lvjohnston

    The similarities are all around between 1854 and today’s political climate. The country was as deeply divided and passionate distrust of federal control was rampant much as it is today.

    The difference is that today we are firmly entrenched in a two party system through court rulings and other arcane election laws. Laws that prevent smaller political parties from being able to field candidates in all 50 states are the rule not the exception. The major parties we have today were not all that powerful 150 years ago so there was a real necessity in getting smaller/regional political parties into a coalition for a particular candidate.

    While I am not one to support a move towards a 3rd party, the TPM must not be cast aside as Boehner, Cantor, and company have done. There are a many who still feel the outrage that prompted the TPM to take hold as a real group within the GOP. Now, how to keep the principles alive while cleaning out the RINO’s? That is the question for the ages.

  • http://parsoned.blogspot.com parsoned

    Just checked your link. The blog hasn’t been posted on in 18 months…

  • becky5

    I actually appreciate comments like this for the clarity they provide — a perfect illustration of the establishment Republican mindset. Adjoran, I may be alone here but I don’t think your post is going to have the effect you think it is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Freeman/100000368940261 Jeremy Freeman

    Erick you should have posted the video of Boehner at CPAC in 2012 saying that the dissension it the party is good and needed.

  • celador2

    I see a third party as a road to nowhere seeking political power and access to that power.
    A thiid party can not get more than the Republican party does for access to power. So for practical reasons Jim Demint is inside the Republican caucus. if they get 51 Senator Demint gets a chair and US gets a budget..
    Demnt could not pull off 51 seats in a third party so he works out of GOP caucus and has more access to political power than were he in a third party or outside the GOP caucus. Tht is how it looks.
    Republican pparty won by conquest and 600,,000 died by 1865. South was Solid Democratic party after reconstruction, weak but solid. Grant was a popular general and was elected pres 1868. The war helped give GOP an edge in much of US. And building an industrial economic system yook off–ah but there was a demand for that.
    I isee no third party that ever wins a partisan election today. A lot of republicans would have to walk and make a case they need a new party for policies and access they can not get inside GOP.
    .

  • http://about.me/l.v.johnston lvjohnston

    While I disagree with your stance on increasing taxes, I do understand the logic behind that idea. The problem is that in the interim, while hoping that the electorate figures this out, there will be many people across the country who will be severely harmed by any increase in the tax schedules. Further to the point, I would rather see improvements in the economy viewed as a win for the people and businesses who have succeeded – in spite of the economy – rather than as a validation for the administration’s policies.

    I do agree with this statement: “The left is not arguing with reason and logic they are arguing with emotion. Logical arguments will not convince them, so we are fighting a losing battle.”

    That in my mind is the main reason that the left continues to amass wins in the general. The GOP leadership needs to get passionate about what they believe in. ‘Wet noodle’, ‘bland’, ‘dispirited’, ‘lame’, ‘out of touch’… I could continue but those descriptions seem to fit the current leadership in Congress. To explain, we can usually tell when a progressive is posting here because their ‘vitriol’ is normally a dead giveaway. But that same ‘vitriol’ is what is used use to stir up the masses to their side. I will not waste time in spelling out the parallels of this approach with its use by despotic regimes throughout history who used the same ‘mass frenzy’ to elicit assistance from their populace to do incredible evil. For it’s ‘principled arguments’ coming from our side but ‘vitriol’ when it’s coming from their candidate.

    Either way, in this day and age of a 24/7/365 news cycle, we can only hope to win by extolling the power of our vision, the honesty of our principles and the passion we have in sharing those with others. Each and every day. In each and every stump speech. In all communications with the public. Either we get fired up to sell what we know are the best overall solutions to the problems we face or we go silently into the night.

    Unless and until we can field candidates who also have that same ‘fire in the belly’ – not just to win – but to defend their stated vision and do so with a clear and compelling emotionally driven argument and reasoning *with* the logic to back up their ‘feelings’, we will need to be content with wandering in the wilderness.

  • http://about.me/l.v.johnston lvjohnston

    Thank you for your service, Sarge!

    I would add one item to that referendum you’re starting, “all laws apply equally to all citizens including elected officials”. I for one get tired of hearing about ‘wavers’ from this law or that… and I don’t even want to get started on the ‘golden parachute’ retirement plans that are extended to far too many elected officials.

    If the elite in DC were to face the same benefits as the rest of the citizenry, the SS and Medicare/Medicaid programs would be fixed posthaste – election year or not.

  • 1689

    How about open-revolt? Refuse to caucus with the Republicans! Start your own party! Refuse to go along with National Suicide! Show that you have spine, backbone, & character – even if weepy, let’s golf, always-tan Boehner doesn’t have any.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    You’ve got to define what “work within the Republican Party” means.

    The problem is not enough conservatives are “working within the Republican Party.” As in “in” the Party being defined as actually being a member of the Party with voting rights — the right to vote for the Party leaders, directly and indirectly, and the right to vote as a committee member to endorse candidates (or not endorse candidates) in the Republican primary elections.

    Some here at Redstate are “in” the Party where they live as precinct committeemen (it’s called different names in various states) and they understand why this position has been rightly called “The Most Powerful Political Office in the World.”

    There’s a war going on inside the Party between, now, three factions: conservatives, non-conservatives and Ron Paul followers. Whichever of these factions has the greatest number of precinct committeemen across the nation is going to have the best chance of electing their candidates to the local district committee officer slots, the county county officer slots, the state officer slots and to the national committeeman slots. The faction with the greatest number of PCs in each local district committee and county committee will have the best chance of having their favored candidate win the all-important, traditionally-very-low-turnout primary elections.

    In a nutshell, the reason the Republican Party does not have “conservative enough” leadership is because there are not enough conservatives “in” the Party — in the PC ranks.

    About half of the PC slots are vacant, on average, in every local committee. The fact that there’s about a 50-50 split between conservatives and faux conservatives in the Party is reflected by the make-up of the RNC and the kind of “conservatives” that have been elected to the RNC Chairman slot.

    Want a more conservative Republican Party? Then become a PC and get every conservative you know to join you.

    Thank you.
    CW

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    parsoned,
    Glad you visited the site.

    Getting inside the Party where each of us conservatives lives matters.

    Example. Got a call today from a PC in a nearby legislative district. He was wondering whether conservatives or moderates were in the majority now in our county (Maricopa County, AZ, where 70% of registered AZ voters live). I told him I didn’t know but that at my LD leadership elections last week we had a good turnout and all of the conservative candidates for the officer slots won and almost all of the state committeeman slots were filled by conservatives. Why? Because we have a strong majority of conservatives in the PC ranks. Many of the new PCs are from the tea parties.

    He told me that he believed in some of the other LDs the moderates were winning the officer elections.

    So on Jan. 12 we’ll have our county committee reorganization meeting. All elected PCs in the county can attend and elect the new officers. If a majority that show up are conservatives, we’ll have new conservative officers. Maricopa County has just under 700,000 registered Republican voters, about 6,400 PC slots, and about 52% of those PC slots filled. Clearly there are an addtional 3,200 very conservative Republicans among those 697,000 or so Republicans who are not “in” the Party as PCs. IF we conservatives could entice 3,200 of them, or even 1,000 of them, to become PCs, then we conservatives would enjoy a very strong majority within the Party and we’d easily elect conservative officers at our county committee meeting and then, a few weeks later, elect conservatives to our state chairman slot and the other officer slots (because the elected PCs in each district elect the state committeemen — there’s one state committeeman slot for every three elected PC slots in a district).

    Bottom line: fill up all the vacant PC slots across America and a lot of our problems go away.

    For example, if every vacant PC slot in America was, right now, magically filled with a conservative, then at every local Republican committee meeting, and at every county committee meeting, and at every state committee meeting the members could pass a resolution condemning the actions of Boehner, Cantor and McCarthy. The PCs “are” the Party.

    We just don’t have enough conservatives united and organized for real political action inside our Party.

    I hope this helps.

    Thank you.
    CW

  • http://llphsecondrevolution.wordpress.com/ spoasteph97

    I think Congressman Mulvaney will be a strong conservative voice. Also, Rep. Stutzman was placed on the Financial Services Cmte. I think the leadership are feeling sorry for what they’ve done. Praying for Mulvaney and Stutzman that they will stand strong!

  • commonsenseobserver

    Retribution??!
    Amash had it coming, of course, even voting against CCB.
    Erick has undermined the party leadership at every step of the way, thank God, calling them out for betraying Conservatives, but now he has assumed the role of the Inquisition. There cannot be a “time for choosing”, the Republian party remains one party, and House Conservatives must work reasonably with the leadership, with the expectation that hope that either the leadership gets some sense, or movement Conservatives actually get down to work defeating establishmentarians without selecting candidates like Todd Akin and Sharron Angle and Christine O’Donnell.
    Erik hardly helps the cause when he sits here, mounted on his perch, calling for the maintenane of some imagined permanent split in the House Republican Conference. Disagreement among different factions does not make it necessary for them to essentially become different parties. If Conservatives are appointed to Committees while others are removed, the automatic labelling as “traitors” is downright stupid, and rather petty and, indeed, disloyal.

  • http://about.me/l.v.johnston lvjohnston

    While you are correct about our personal salvation and the only way to get there from here, let me interject here to say that the Lord in His wisdom has the ultimate decision on who will be the kings and rulers. Not saying that those people are always the ‘bestest and the brightest’. In some cases, pure evil was allowed to rule to further His kingdom (Pol Pot, Stalin, Herod etc.)

    But we will *not* know the reasoning until we are once again on the other side of the veil that Paul referred to in Corinthians as ‘looking through a glass darkly’.

    Each day I awaken and am able to take a breath, it means that I still have work to do here – so I’m not ‘pretty well over’ by a long shot. But do keep looking up each day as that is what we are supposed to be doing as we await His return.

  • commonsenseobserver

    It is appalling that many Conservatives are opposing efforts to negotiate even as they continue to insist on avoiding the fiscal cliff whih contains even more tax hikes. It is a fantasy that Conservative “purity” can be defended either way. Either you let Speaker Boehner negotiate, or you damn well shut up when he hurtle over the cliff with full tax hikes.
    Of course, Obama sees that as an option, while I also favor letting it burn, but you just seem to view it as some ordinary political budget scuffle.
    I certainly recognize why Boehner would want to reduce tax expenditures to simplify the code, and agree to bring in some revenues to avoid even larger tax increases, even if I favor those tax increases as part of letting it burn. But, in any case, Barak Obama has signalled his commitment to rate increases, so I think we can focus on defeating our common opponent.
    And then hold them accountable in 2014, rather than shrieking at them for two years and then losing any influence you have along the way, because they, after all, took the effort to run and work, you only took the effort to comment in between.

  • curtmilr

    Obviously not, streiff. But I should clarify, not YET!

    GOP leadership is the proverbial bug in search of a windshield on economics, and they will destroy the party, just as the Whigs foundered on the slavery issue.

  • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula Bolyard

    Boehner raised $20 million last election cycle. $20 MILLION. He couldn’t care less what conservatives think.

  • http://llphsecondrevolution.wordpress.com/ spoasteph97

    God Bless Congressman Jeb Hensarling: ” Rep. Jeb Hensarling, the incoming chairman of the Financial Services panel, actually fought to keep Schweikert on his committee, several Republican sources said.”—Roll Call

    This is why we need more conservative chairmen!

    Here is the link:http://www.rollcall.com/news/purged_conservatives_are_taking_aim_at_leadership-219664-1.html?pg=2

  • westcoastpatriette

    True colors emerging, commonsense’? Those were pretty low blow comments about Erick. You don’t seem to get how treacherous the RINO’s are and you are more than ready to agree with them an awful lot.

    Better not forget what this site is about. And it isn’t going along to get along with the establishment who is ready to betray and dis us at every turn. Erick is hardly disloyal — much less stupid.

  • Finrod

    People have been looking up and waiting since the 1st Century. The rest of us are fighting the fight here.

  • gallifet

    Whoa! Hold on there just a second streiff. Did I just read your last post correctly? Who exactly do you think you are? Ban this…pound sand streiff.

  • Bill S

    It’s fun when idiots commit commentocide. Bye, asshat.

  • perdido

    Boehner is a Statist first, party man second. He is at the level where party doesn’t matter, but the liberal cause does.
    Face facts. This is nothing new or unexpected.

  • perdido

    Brilliant. Here’s how it works, folks:

    Five minutes after being sworn in, the guy you elected to be your representative to the Federal Government becomes the Federal Government’s representative to you.

    Here’s an example: 70%, roughly, of the electorate are against ObamaCare. Yet, we have ObamaCare. I hasten to remind all that 70% is a SUPER majority of any congress anywhere on the planet. Who, pray tell, is being represented here?

    We could gain a lot of traction by refraining from referring to those clowns as Republicans and call them either Statists or Liberals.. At the least, the very least, we should always refer to them as Liberal Republican (John Boehner, LR OH) or Conservative Republican (Jesse Helms, CR, NC)

  • commonsenseobserver

    In the end, though, at least he had the good sense to try and keep his job after putting up a fight. We can’t afford two more years of Spencer Bacchus embarrassing us.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Nonsense.

    The establishment here knows that they have the same option we all have. Capitulate, (and/or) compromise, or hurtle over the cliff. If our purpose is to prevent tax hikes at any cost, well, there’s no way to achieve that. If it is to “stand on principle” by doing absolutely nothing on the Hill, then say that clearly.

    The House Republican leadership has chosen to negotiate, and to remove those who stand in the way, precisely because no one in the right wing dares to stand up clearly for hurtling over the cliff.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Let. It. Burn. But don’t blame Congressional Republicans for compromising if you aren’t willing to risk that yourself.

  • southernfox

    Bravo! Bravo! Bravo! Erick said it and we better listen and get workin’. We knew, we knew, those guys were RINOS. Now the proof is in the puddin’. The two-step is over and now time for a relief team. The political bullpen is ready and waitin’ for a new crew. Warm up those conservative arms and get pitchin’.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    perdido, you have hit the nail on the head. Once a congresscritter is elected, there is virtually nothing “we the people” can do to control them until their next primary election. If they believe their constituents aren’t organized and united sufficiently to mount a primary challenge (take a look at the margins by which Boehner, Cantor and McCarthy won in their respective primaries) there’s virtually no control over them at all.

    Until we conservatives get organize and united where we each live for real political action, we’ll never elect decent people to represent us.

    The best way each of us can get organized and united is by helping to steer conservatives into real political action where it really matters: inside the Party itself in the local Republican committees.

    Go here to learn more: http://precinctproject.us

    Thank you.

    CW

  • littlehouse18

    Hold on, now. I read the letter from Boehner et al to Obama. It’s on the Fiscal Times website. The $800B is meant to come from eliminating loopholes and actually REDUCING tax rates. Was that not OUR PLATFORM during the election? We need to really be sure what’s going on before we holler about the proposal. Actually, I was complaining about it too this morning before I read this letter. So I’m concerned about how we’re getting our information. Who is putting this out there?
    Of course, if Boehner were transparent about this then we would have good info on which to base our judgements. Instead, because of his past history and lack of communication to us, it’s easy to believe he would quickly cave. And now – his treatment of conservatives! Yes, I agree, this leadership needs to go and good candidates should be found to primary them. But I wonder if the tax story is being put out there by Dems.

  • littlehouse18

    I like Mark Levin’s idea that the GOP simply propose to cut rates for the ’99%’ and leave the Bush levels in place for the ’1%’. Most people will be okay with that. Then let the Dems refuse that, as they probably will. Then we at least have a chance of rightly blaming them for the ensuing troubles, and being able to take credit for trying to help average folks.

  • whoframedrudy

    I remember we were discussing strategies to pass universal healthcare on NoQuarterUSA. I pointed out that to pass universal, Dems had to be willing to lose seats. They lost seats and they got Obamacare.

    When you’re near death, the doctor asks “if your heart stops, do you want us to try to resuscitate you?” It’s only a spiritual question. They might restart your heart, it beats another 6-12 hours, then it stops again. That’s what this Boehner compromise sounds like.

    For the time being, the losers in America make up an electoral majority–the unwed mothers, deadbeats, burnouts, benchwarmers, traitors, and a spattering of not-especially-bright urban heirs and divorcees coasting on white privilege. Most likely, the U.S. has already been destroyed. Great powers rise and fall. I never thought I’d live to see the downfall of America, but here we are in Hail Mary mode. Boehner is immaterial to the future. Republicans have to be willing to lose their seats.

    Fiscal cliff? What is this, Eraserhead? We’re already over the cliff, we just haven’t crashed into the ground yet. I say bring it on.

  • ncfamilyman

    CW, I *am* a precinct committe chair in #19 here in NC. WE know how to do it in NC, we’re one of the reddest states in the union now: 1st Gov in 24 years, 1st House and Senate in over 120 years, and we even just won the Lt. Gov. Our successes stop at our borders though. Everyone is so engaged here. I don’t understand what’s going on everywhere else. We have the same liberals to battle here.

  • ncfamilyman

    You’re right of course. I am just frustrated. We’re a model of success here in NC. I just can not understand why we can’t be as far to the right at the national level as the Communists are to the left. These people are real, actual Communists. They are out in the open now. In the 50′s their kind of activity would get you a visit from two FBI agents. Now they are IN CHARGE of the FBI. I feel like an enemy in my own country. And in my own party at the national level.

  • gmat

    You have a great opportunity in NC, with unemployment at 9.6%, to set an example for the rest of the country about how putting the GOP in charge translates into getting people back to work at good-paying, full time jobs.

  • http://haakondahl.com/blog haakondahl

    You can forget about Scalise:

    “Our mission for the 113th Congress is clear. We must protect the American Dream for future generations by working to pass conservative solutions to the many problems facing our nation.” –Representative Steve Scalise, Boehner’s new Republican Study Catamite. http://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-chosen-lead-rsc-113th-congress

    This is nonsense. We cannot pass a damned thing and they know it. There will be no “conservative solutions” in the next four years. So the only thing that this poop-scooper Steve Scalise is doing here is setting us up to accept “the necessity of compromise” in order to get juicy pork bills passed. These are the same Republicans who complain that they “only control one-half of one-third of government”. So it is beyond stupid for them to claim to work to pass conservative solutions. It is dishonest and transparently so. Conservatives would focus on stopping the Obama agenda, not pretending that we can pass legislation. But conservatives are no longer welcome in the GOP.

    Why? Now that Boehner has put his guy Scalise in at the top of the RSC, it will serve as a rubber-stamp for Boehner’s Obama-friendly agenda, to be negotiated over golf.

    The Republican Study Council used to be a conservative caucus, and now it is not.

  • ncfamilyman

    AMEN. Higher federal taxes are not going to help us. It would be real leadership to lower the state income tax.

  • reagansucked

    Thanks Erick! If those rightie groups follow your prescription and look for your idea of “quality candidates”, the Republican Party will continue to get smoked at the Presidential ballot box from here to eternity! I LOVE it!!!

  • http://gardenslegal.com morstar150

    I would like to take this opportunity to invite everyone in the death spiral state of California to come to Florida. We have no state income tax and we have many programs to assist all you “greedy” successful entrepreneurs in your relocation to the Sunshine state. We have oranges, palm trees, tennis and golf, sunshine and a Republican governor and legislature. If you are interested in coming back to earth feel free to contact me and I will get in contact with the corporate friendly government planners. We even have this concept in Florida called the “right to work.” For those of you from union controlled governments we welcome your successful business and welcome the opportunity to bring something that unions have not been able to deliver for over 20 years, MORE JOBS.

    Your dream home waits for you. Oh yeah and on that front, the cost of comparable homes in Florida are about 50% less expensive than in California. We’re waiting. Why are you?