« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Two Roads Diverged: Jim DeMint Leaves U.S. Senate for Heritage Foundation Presidency

I got the call before the news went out. Jim DeMint, the standard bearer of the conservative movement in America and conservative king maker, is leaving the United States Senate.

He will succeed Ed Feulner as President of the Heritage Foundation.

While my initial reaction was one of sadness that we are losing the clearest voice in the Senate for conservatives, the upside on Jim DeMint’s departure from the Senate is mind boggling. Mitch McConnell likes it when people compare McConnell to Darth Vader, seemingly clueless that Vader lost the Death Star twice to a rag tag group of rebels in really beat up, hand-me-down spaceships.

If McConnell smiles at hearing the news Jim DeMint is leaving the Senate, he should remember Obi Wan Kenobi telling him . . . errrr . . . Darth Vader, “If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.” Jim DeMint’s power in the conservative movement just grew exponentially. A man who was going to retire in four years anyway, will now be leading the conservative movement from its base of operations for years to come.

Without Jim DeMint we would most likely not presently have in the United States Senate Pat Toomey, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake, Ron Johnson, and Ted Cruz. We would not have a Republican establishment that now worries conservatives might actually primary them.

Without Jim DeMint we would still have a conservative movement that is part and parcel the Republican Party in name, word, and deed. DeMint showed the Republican Party can be challenged from within and that conservatism can be distinctly voiced from within the party moving it right, not moving with it.

On January 3, 2011, Human Events named Jim DeMint the “conservative of the year.” I had the distinct privilege of writing the summation of the honor. I noted, “DeMint’s tenure started out like that of most freshmen congressmen — anonymous and committed to bringing home the bacon, much like Rep. Inglis who, when Senator DeMint moved up to the Senate, moved back into his old House seat until the tea party movement threw him out in 2010.”

But during the fight over No Child Left Behind, Jim DeMint got his first real taste of Washington politics and decided he needed to change it. For a time, he teamed up with conservatives in Congress to fight within the GOP and move the party right. But there were not enough of them so he went out and found them.

The Heritage Foundation’s founding is a similar tale. The American Enterprise Institute was the think tank of think tanks in Washington prior to the Heritage Foundation’s founding in 1973. It is nonpartisan, but mostly right of center. In 1964, several top AEI staff including its President, William J. Baroody, Sr., served on the side as policy advisers to Barry Goldwater. That raised the IRS’s eyebrows and, after dealing with the IRS, AEI made in a policy to be center-right (mostly), but very nonpartisan.

By 1973, with Nixon and price controls and the Rockefeller Republicans, the conservative movement was ready to form a decidedly, unapologetically conservative think tank to support the ideas of conservatism through a growing movement of conservatives in Congress. It’s founding and present mission is to “formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense”. The Heritage Foundation set the stage for Ronald Reagan. Without Heritage, no doubt Reagan could have won. But Reagan’s ideas and policies were incubated in the Heritage Foundation. Heritage was the foundation of the Reagan Revolution.

The three founders of the Heritage Foundation were Paul Weyrich, Ed Feulner, and Joseph Coors. Since 1977, Ed Feulner has been the Heritage Foundation’s President.

One of the things I have been most fearful of within the conservative movement is the realization that many of the leaders of the movement are hitting retirement age. Some have already passed on to be with their Maker. When I go to many of the off the record conservative meetings I get asked to attend, I see people my parents’ age and older. The Reagan Revolutionaries are retiring or dying.

The present generation knows Reagan from history books, not from living in his America. The up and coming leaders of the Republican Party were kids, not even in high school, when Ronald Reagan was President. Nikki Haley turned 9 the day Ronald Reagan was sworn into office. Mike Lee was 9 too. Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal, and Marco Rubio were 10. Paul Ryan was 11. Ken Cuccinelli was 12. Scott Walker was 13. I was 5 years old.

The conservative movement, still so attached to Reagan, risks becoming a relic of history as it fails to adapt to the twenty-first century tackling new ideas with its timeless principles. A great many conservative organizations have no succession plan. When their leader dies, the organization withers. All the money, time, and effort that went into the organization fades.

When Ed Feulner started the Heritage Foundation he was 39 years old and still eight years from the Reagan Revolution. He is now just past 70 and the nation is almost a quarter century removed from Ronald Reagan’s last year in office. Unlike many leaders in the conservative movement, Ed Feulner has actually led all the way. He did not pass off his role to be just a figure head. He has been engaged. He kept and is keepingconservatism alive well past Reagan, through reading a lie off George H. W. Bush’s lips, through Bill Clinton’s triangulation, even to now during this superficial revival of American liberalism in politics and popular culture. Like a monk preserving knowledge in the dark ages in a monestary, Ed Feulner turned the Heritage Foundation into a monastery of conservatism making sure the timeless principles of Burke and Kirk and Hayek and Reagan found the intellectual footing to advance philosophy into policy and policy into politics.

More importantly, Ed Feulner did it right. He has not left without making sure his organization could stand without him. In doing so, he made probably the boldest move since his founding — aligning an organization many, including myself, have criticized in the past decade as becoming too aligned with the GOP at the expense of conservatism itself and stumbling on health care policy, with the grassroots of the conservative movement. It is a near phoenix like move.

The Heritage Foundation, which more or less arose from the ashes of the Goldwater conservatism that failed in the late sixties, became a key player within institutional establishment Republican politics over the past decade, and now suddenly finds its founder retiring and passing the keys over to the man who has helped restart the conservative movement within the political wing of the GOP in the way Ed Feulner restarted the conservative movement within the intellectual wing of the GOP.

There is no better person to take Ed Feulner’s job. It is a marvelous transition. Ed Feulner knew he was not the indispensable man, but has now made sure the Heritage Foundation remains the indispensable organization within the conservative movement. That is a brilliant legacy.

As for Jim DeMint leaving the United States Senate, it is a very good thing.

The more I think about it, the more I think this is a great thing. Just yesterday, John Hayward noted Jim DeMint may just be the leader of the resistance within the GOP on the fiscal cliff deal. But DeMint has replenished the bench of conservatives within the Senate. As long as he remains there, the new conservatives will be in his shadow.

Jim DeMint is, like Ed Feulner, not indispensable. But his ideas are. It is time for the tea party senators he brought to the Senate to stretch their legs and prove they are Jim DeMint’s ideological heirs. In the meantime, he will be on the outside providing them the support and intellectual ammunition they need.

In June of 2008, one of RedState’s own founders, Ben Domenech, wrote about the conservative seeds of destruction. He opined:

if conservatism is to have any future, it is as a movement that does not put too much faith in the individuals who claim to espouse shared ideology. Unearned trust begets scandal and betrayal, and the coalition that won in 1980 and 1994 will only survive as a coherent movement in this century if it embraces the reality that conservatism is larger than the politicians who invoke its principles.

Conservatism is larger than Jim DeMint and Ed Feulner. But their shared legacies of expanding conservatism within the intellectual and political framework of the GOP just got stronger and more entrenched because of this bold and brilliant move. The Heritage Foundation Board should be commended for what, at this time in relations between the Republican Party and conservative movement, can honestly be considered a brave and genus move.

In a show of appreciation for Senator Jim DeMint, I encourage you to go donate to the Senate Conservative Fund and send a strong message to him that as he leaves the Senate, you’ll keep the PAC he created electing true conservatives to the United States Senate.

About the only thing that could make this more awesome is if Governor Nikki Haley ensures the Senate’s only black Senator is a conservative Republican who presently represents the congressional district in which Ft. Sumter sits.

COMMENTS

  • viperscale

    This is so sad. I am however glad that people like Rand Paul and Mike Lee are there to be the voice for the conservative movement…

  • westcoastpatriette

    As usual, I am trying to understand your perspective, but fail to see how this is a great move when he has four years left to his term. Why couldn’t he have waited until he finished? Just like when Palin left her post as Governor of Alaska early, it looks really bad and lets down the constituents and supporters who elected them. There must be a respectable explanation for why DeMint would take such drastic steps and I am trying to understand it.

  • bdirks

    “I got the call before the news went out.”

    Congratulations?

  • sandyd

    Senator DeMint has my full respect and if he feels like he can better serve conservatives outside the nightmare that our government has become, then we need to respect his decision.

  • surfcat50

    Sen. DeMint’s SCF was one of the few worthwhile political donations I made this year and I sure hope this move works out for the best.

  • tngal

    We aren’t blessed with an overabundance of republicans in the senate, let alone conservatives. We needed everyone we had! Not the best timing. Nothing against the Heritage Foundation, but this sucks. Best leave before I use up my entire daily allotment of nsfw words all in the next two minutes. ( I only get a couple hundred a day, so…I try to use them sparingly)

  • earlgrey

    Should we interpret this as DeMint playing the long game, since the short game is so bleak?

  • earlgrey

    I gave a lot to SCF during the past two election cycles too. I am still looking for a home for future donations, but frankly am still a little bitter that 2012 went so badly.

  • CarolT

    I love Senator DeMint, he has been my favorite for years. He’s the best we’ve had in the senate for years. I know now why the past few emails from the SCF haven’t been from Senator DeMint.
    I think he made the right decision, we need him in the Senate but he was going to retire in four years.

  • chief_cabioch

    I wish they would all band together and form a MASSIVE Nation Wide boycott of ALL the left wings talking heads show Advertisers and sponsors, and Stop funding our own demise, we need to force business’ to decide what side of the fence they are on, and stop giving them Our Money to fund our enemies , it makes NO sense for us to keep this up, and until we get control or OUR message, and OUR Narratives, we don’t have anything to shout about….

  • earlgrey

    Rubio started a PAC, but so far I haven’t supported it even thought I supported him heavily in his primary and general.

  • chief_cabioch

    obama probably threatened him if he was going to investigate obama’s eligibility

  • citadelveteran

    So… who is taking his place, and how do we assure we don’t gain another Lindsey Graham-nesty in his place?

  • donr

    Now what we need is the news that Boehnet lacks the Conservatives support in the House and will not be the Speakers of the House for 2013 and 2014.
    Life just keeps on getting better and better for us Conservatives. There is no downside to being a Conservative, it is always a fight, but there is no downside!
    Let is now condemn the Media to Hell; the proper place for there residence, boy will they get TINGLEs in HELL.

  • mmish

    I believe this is the conservative movement stretching its legs! I LOVE this move and I’m jazzed.

  • http://www.jackiewellfonder.com jlwellfonder

    I agree, very excited by the prospects of this move!

  • fastfission

    I believe the answers to all of your questiions are present in Erick’s post, which was very well written and has convinced me to become a contributor and member of the Heritage Foundation.

  • celador2

    This has made me cry. Oooh no no

  • norris

    Who will be appointed to his seat?

  • celador2

    I feel that way too. I was drawn to his SCF and its members. Human Events or Examiner did some detailed repotts on speches Lee and oyhers made and ,hey those guys were my kind of people in that they reference the constitution and limted government.
    Demint was the rock that wss SCF. He set the tone He won three seats Flake, Cruz and Fisher. How could he leave in our hour of need ,
    Someone step up quick, please.

  • celador2

    An individual alone is never as strong as that individual with support. Senate Conservatives Funds served as an unofficial caucus for a very specila group of conservatives with heir eyes on constittuion for authority. May that SCF still serve that role. It must be nurtured if it is to grow and sustain its members.
    I noticed Demint did not send out the news messages lately. But Cruz, Fisher and FLake sent out a letter so it looked cozy.

  • celador2

    No one can fill lthis void,No one at all. The loss is too deep.There is a big hole in the ground.

  • Lock_Piatt

    Many have said for years now that expecting elected people in DC to restore our Constitutional Freedoms and Liberties is like digging a hole in your yard expecting to find a diamond and gold mine. Just not going to happen.

    So, that leaves three remedies – Nullification using the 10th amendment [which the Supreme Court has used the 14th amendment to limit the power of the States] second is the use of Article V to repeal the 14th, 16th and 17th amendment – lastly is the Jefferson final option –

    I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. – Letter to James Madison (30 January 1787)

    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere. – Letter to Abigail Smith Adams (22 February

  • celador2

    Former Congressman and Governor Mark Stanford is the best tested conservative in SC. Recorda in office are the qualiications i use.
    His personal tragedy may keep him out/ of consideration however. Appointing an untested person based on race or gender may be in the cards but I do not think Nikki Haley or Scott can hold a candle to Standford in understanding contitutional conservative political action.

  • denverkitty

    Erick, this is the first article of yours that I’ve read completely through. Gratz! I think you’ve hit a lot of nails on their heads. Surprisingly, you used the phoenix analogy, which I used in the opinion that we conservatives need a new party, combining GOP/Republicans, conservatives, independents, and TeaBaggers…and I named it the “Phoenix Party”. I am also going to look up the Heritage Foundation, see about becoming a member, and contributing (money comes in in about 2 weeks). I think Jim DeMint has made a very good decision, and I think his timing could not have been better. Obama and the Democratic machine are moving way faster toward destroying America than the American People ever could have dreamed possible. It’s not going to take another 4 years for Obama to realize his father’s dream of America being brought down to her knees as a third-world country. The time is now to get reorganized, fired up, and focused on how we all move in the right direction…together.

  • sbm1

    what’s wrong with Tim Scott?

  • denverkitty

    Earl, I needed more than a cup of tea the night of November 6th, as I watched the “takers” and “stupid kids” put Our Beloved Nation on the pathway to He11. But take heart, we are coming together, formulating a plan, and will bring our Nation back to greatness and reliability…and you can my words to the bank!

  • greyeagle

    Well, if he is replaced with a Republican. We can not afford to have less Republican Senators there.

  • bgintn

    This Mark Stanford?

    On June 24, 2009, Sanford resigned as chairman of the Republican Governors Association, after he publicly revealed that he had engaged in an affair with María Belén Chapur, an Argentine woman.[1] He was later censured by the South Carolina General Assembly following a State Ethics Commission investigation into allegations that he had misused state travel funds to conduct his affair.

  • freemkts

    Christmas just came early for Lindsay Graham. With DeMint leaving the Senate, Gov Haley will appoint a replacement, but there will have to be a special election for the remaining 2 years of DeMint’s term in 2014. Graham is also up in 2014, so that means there will be 2 Senate races in SC that year.

    Odds are whomever gets appointed as DeMint’s replacement will face a primary challenge, as appointed Senators are usually considered illegitimate and the result of insider connections. With one raging primary going on there won’t be anyone left to seriously challenge Graham who is an established incumbent with lots of money.

    Not that some yokel won’t try, but they’d get crushed. The better bet for an aspiring Senator would be to run in the special election. In fact, knowing SC, there’ll probably be no less than 6 Republicans who try to run and the opposition will be split badly. It’ll be nasty too. SC Republicans play the meanest, nastiest, low down dirtiest politics around, and that’s just against each other!

  • westcoastpatriette

    If you’re really on our team, I would appreciate it if you edited your comment. You must realize “TeaBaggers” is a derogatory (not to mention vulgar) term used by our adversaries and is not used by those of us who consider ourselves a part of the Tea Party movement. Thank you.

  • sharkey

    I think Jim DeMint got fed up with the gridlock in Congress and he probably feels he can accomplish more good for the conservative cause outside of Washington D.C.

    Until Congress gets its act together and quits the bitter partisanship it’s highly unlikely Congresses popularity will rise above its current historic lows and little if anything will get accomplished to solve America’s myriad of problems. Problems, for the most part, that have been caused or made much much worse by a socialist Obama administration and Democrats in Congress such as Dingy Harry, Nanny Pelosi and a host of other progressive liberals who are incompetent at best and in many cases further weakening the government’s ability to act responsibly or provide a conducive environment that protects the American people’s well-being or United States’ national security interests both here or abroad.

    Republicans have hit a wall and they need to regroup (which they are doing by the way) but Republican leaders in Congress must NOT become Democrat-lite or cave to the horrible policies that got America into this mess in the first place. Ever since Democrats took control of both the House and Senate in 2006… America’s problems have accelerated almost unimpeded. It was only after Republicans gained back control of the House in 2011 that the tide was stemmed and Obama’s ruthless socialist policies *temporarily* held in check. Thanks to a multitude of conservative Representatives in Congress who had the backbone and will to resist Obama’s ruthless push toward European style Socialism, and consequently, the bankruptcy of America if not rectified.

    John Boehner must realize that caving to Obama’s ridiculous demands harms not only the Republican Party but also the conservative movement as a whole (which could be Boehner’s real intention??); the same conservative movement which ultimately has the “winning” argument to solve America’s problems. If Obama is allowed to get everything he wants, he won’t stop there, but will always demand even more. Obama is acting like a dictator and dictators never want to relinquish power; nor are they willing to compromise with their perceived ‘enemies.’ Obama has made it abundantly clear he will never give up his hell-bent Socialist/Marxist/Communist ideals, which allowed him (through deception i.e. hoodwinking a majority of the American people both in 2008 and in 2012) to become a dictator in the first place. Repeatedly “bypassing” Congress, breaking the law, polarizing the nation, trampling on the U.S. Constitution, and in his latest role… bankrupting the nation. With helicopter Ben and tax cheat Timothy Geithner and a multitude of liberals in Congress paving the way.

    If Republicans refuse to try and halt the Obama administrations push toward European style socialism in America (the same ideology that is currently bankrupting Europe even as we speak) or to prevent Obama’s unprecedented and ruthless power grabs that are sinking democracy faster than a lead balloon, then Republicans should just change their name to Democrat and be done with it. In other words, if Republicans are unwilling to effectively counter the most dire perceived threat(s) that face the United States of America – both in the near term and in the long term – then I,for one, don’t want to be associated with the Republican Party. I’ll become an Independent and vote ‘against’ any politician or policy that is detrimental to America’s survival and well-being.

  • remalimo

    Sen. DeMint, you have done well for the conservative movement inside the halls (Pit) of U.S. Congress. May you do well in your new position. I am sure that we will be hearing from you. God Bless and have a Merry Christmas. Thanks for your organizational abilities and may you be a thorn in the liberals philosophy.

  • GMScan

    Amen on Tim Scott!

  • nancyinnc

    As a conservative I support DeMint’s decision…after all, we rail against career politicians. I know Jim hasn’t got rich in the Senate because he’s an honest man. He will able to do lots of good at Heritage, and the SCF will survive.

  • stillnotlostinthebushes

    Just like that other tea party standard bearer — what’s her name again? Oh Yeah Sarah Palin. Seems tea party leaders are quitters, no matter how you try to gloss over it.

  • celador2

    Your post sounds like a rebuke of Sen Demint and even pleased he is out. Who do you think can replace him or should be not be replaced with a constitutoonal conservative at all?
    What standards should Gv Haley use to appoint a temp replacement for Demint?

  • stillnotlostinthebushes

    Wake up people! De Mint may be a tone-deaf bigot but he’s not stupid! The tea party is over — THAT is why he is leaving.

  • stillnotlostinthebushes

    Ha! Ha! Ha! Too funny. I suppose losing the election was also a great move for conservatism? It’s gonna be harder to beat republican candidates once they kick you loons out — hey, I know — you guys can start a third party! Yes! Do it! please!

  • stillnotlostinthebushes

    Agreed. There is hope for you celador2. Best of luck!

  • celador2

    Thumbs up! I do not live in Sc bit feel as you do,.
    The worst year I can remember.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Clean up on aisle three. A lunatic liberal is spewing foul-smelling stuff all over the place.

  • celador2

    He should not have left, not now. ohhhh

  • celador2

    Only temporarily will Demint be be replaced by a Republican. Soon like the next national election there will be an election for the seat. Until then the governor appoints a temp, I think.

    That temp appointed Senator may run statewide and had better be qualified at running and winning votes or the Democrat might win the Demint Senate seat. Only fools take safe seats for granted.

  • adair

    Sorry, only liberals/Democrats can be forgiven for indulging in “very public personal tragedies,” and Republicans aren’t nearly as forgiving.

  • CarolT

    I know but he must have had a reason to leave. I’m sad that he’s gone. I am working from home and heard him on Rush but it’s hard to hear everything when working. I took a break from work for a few minutes.
    At least he’s helped some conservative senators elected to take the reins.

    Maybe he was sick of the idiots he’s dealing with. I read about Boehner’s vengeance when those on the right oppose him, not that Boehner could do anything about Senator DeMint. Aren’t you sick of reading these things? Republicans have to stick together, some congressmen/women are too conservative? Boehner needs a wake up call. I should copy this and paste to that post.

  • celador2

    I doubt it will be too dirty unless outside groups move in with millions to destroy primary opponents. Sometimes cream rises to the top and merit wins as it should.Other times a weak third wins a backlash vote which is not so hot.
    Let the best man and or woman win the primary election based on voters needs and trust in SC.

  • pocketvenus

    Haley really needs to appoint Tim Scott. He is conservative and will uphold the standards set by DeMint. Looks like the battle of Conservative vs. squishy Republican just got serious. It is on!!

  • eltuba

    If he meant what he said about retiring at the end of his senate term, this might not be the worst thing in the world. His replacement will have a four year head start towards the next Senate elections.

    Assuming the people of S.C. are OK with him leaving early I think his decision should be evaluated on two outcomes. 1. Is his replacement a reliable and re-electable
    conservative?
    2. Does his tenure at the Heritage Foundation help

    the conservative movement in general over the

    next twenty years or so.

  • becky5

    So what’s the point of working so hard to get true conservatives elected to Congress if they just quit? I have a lot of respect for DeMint, but I don’t understand why he would do this now.

  • celador2

    Yes we are forgiving if the sinner repents.
    Look at Newt Gingrich. Rev Falwell worked with him back in 2008 and later pronounced Newt had been saved and that meant Newt was cleansed and able to start a new. Christianity is ideal for sinners, we must use it as a way to improve our lives through Christ’s message of redemption. When we sin we must repent and we must forgive others who have repented.

    Some in the state legislature orked with the gov his last year and they did the ststes business. Haley gave him as well as Jen credit for endorsng her. She gave Mark much credit as a mentor and role model on how to govern as a conservative. HE LEADS by his example. Period.

    Onlly Mark can maintain the tried and true values that have made a difference in DC conservatism.

  • streiff

    thanks

  • Bill S

    Goodbye, retread asshat.

  • pbhism

    Demint made a smart career move — the age of the climate change denying ideologue and extremist conservative is likely over; his impact will be diminishing and institutions like the HF will need to shore up their bases and circle their wagons for funding and media shelf space. It will be very difficult for Gowdy or Scott to hold the seat and McConnell must be very bummed that Demint is leaving — in fact, it’s going to be tough for Mitch to hold his seat. Though, I am quite shocked, I’m wondering if at some point another shoe might drop — maybe a health issue or a scandal of some sort. I doubt this story is over.

  • runner12

    I am saddened by his departure from the Senate. He is a true man of honor, whom the people of SC should be proud of. He believes in Conservatism and articulates his belief honestly, intelligently, and with grace.

    That being said, his movement towards Heritage gives me great hope for the GOP. I was not aware of this, but prior to being a stand-out Senator DeMint’s background was in marketing and advertising. I have a feeling that DeMint is going to take on the idiot establishment consultant class who has almost destroyed the GOP brand. From his interview with Rush today, I gleaned that he wants to introduce and articulate Conservatism in a way that reaches all Americans. He wants to go back to what real Conservatism is and not this big government, Rockefelller GOP garbage that the establishment has been pushing for decades.

    DeMint has not left the fight, he is simply switching tactics and taking on the heart of the establishment beast.

  • patsydecline

    I wish I shared Erick’s happiness. I’m taking this as my cue to take a step back. The checkbook is closed until further notice.

    It’s time to concentrate on local….and leave the federal scene to the lobbyists and powermongers. God help us all.

  • Melody Warbington

    I’d prefer that Herman take Taxby’s place in GA.

  • libertarianescapeplan

    I’m confused – you’re saying that it’s a good thing that moderate conservatives should be scared of primary defeats? Do you remember 2010 (Delaware, Colorado, Nevada, Alaska, and nearly New Hampshire) or even 2012 (Indiana, Missouri)? This party needs a dose of pragmatism over principle – would you rather lose an election with a sure Republican victory just to make a statement with an outlandish extreme conservative candidate, or have a better shot at pushing through a more fiscally sane agenda by not sabotaging the party from within?

    I’m tired of watching the Republican party throw away shoo-in races with fringe candidates. This is not a time when you want the Democratic party of entitlements and whatever-it-takes-to-keep-the-spending-going methods in power, and closed primary saboteurs are enabling this problem to perpetuate. There are great Conservative candidates that have been a part of this new wave, such as Rubio, Paul, Lee, Cruz, etc. but nobody on the rational side of Conservatism should ever want to see more Akins, Mourdocks, O’Donnells, or any of the other lunatics that would have otherwise allowed Republicans to capture a Senate majority and have Barack Obama in a far more compromising position.

  • becky5

    Pbhism — do you really think all those conservatives, libertarians and tea party members have just gone away and become totalitarian leftists such as yourself? What you’re seeing now is the disheartening realization by conservatives that we have no representation in Washington. Now of course you, as a totalitarian, rejoice in this. But if you think a few steps forward you might reach a different conclusion.

  • fightnright

    there there celador – if DeMint left us in our hour of need, there are
    two possibilities; he isn’t up for the coming ideological battles royale
    and should get out of the way to make room for conservative warriors
    who are willing to stand up in the front lines. Or, JDM may be
    disassociating himself from the current DC/conservative movement (such
    as it is) to do more influential work at his new post as Erick suggested; teacher, scribe, policy development and analysis, critic, historian etc.

    If DeMint is departing primarily in self interest, before his name and
    conservative creds are bloodied in the doomed crucible of Obama’s D.C.
    and its self-destructive congress, we’ll soon know it. If his mission is
    sincere in re-joining the battle from a fortified position more integral to the preservation of conservatism, we’ll soon know that too. I hardly can believe that given his record and his new position, JDM’s move will prove to be self-serving, but either way conservatives and conservatism can no longer afford to cede strategically critical positions to legislators who feel unequal to the brutal nature of the task ahead on Capitol Hill. In this one particular case, I’d advise having faith that a principled leader like Jim DeMint knows where his talents will be best deployed for the future of our country.

  • surfcat50

    Yeah, I’m a Floridian and contributed to Rubio so early it seemed like throwing bills off a high balcony so I was invited to contribute to his PAC sometime in the recent weeks. I remember thinking it had a name and mission describing a scope that I felt was already covered by the SCF so I thought I’d just let that simmer in my skull for a while. I figured if it was really just a Senator’s reelection kitty, I had plenty of time to come back around to it. Maybe Rubio’s PAC wasn’t ever at risk of stepping on DeMint’s.

    Now I kind of wonder what’ll happen to the SCF, though: who’ll honcho it, will that person be so truly conservative I don’t even question it, can future results ever reach the achievements of the past, etc. Given what Jim DeMint’s been able to accomplish in his short Senate tenure, however, I don’t know why I’d question his assessment of how effective he can be in service to our country but . . . still . . .

    On the other hand, I’m already a Heritage member so I’m sure I’ll be even more satisfied with that than I am now. As far as DeMint’s Senate seat, I’d sure love to see him, Nikki Haley and Tim Scott walk out of a coffee shop somewhere high-fiving each other.

    It’s not like we’re overrun with sane folks in the US Senatorium already.

  • pbhism

    I’m willing to face the reality of tomorrow and not hide behind the failed mythology of the extreme right. True conservatism has been reduced to sound bites and name calling — something you prove in spades. It’s pretty clear to any rational eye what is going on here… Demint is on the run, from his politics or his personal life — but, as I wrote, there is more to this story. It is time for an effective, not to mention, brutally honest, recalibration on the right. The global warming deniers and the flat tax whacks and the gun nuts have nearly destroyed a Grand Old Party. As for my politics, let’s just say “I like Ike” and dismiss name callers like you and Demint as useless ideologues that stand in the way of a healthier Republican future.

  • skofti

    Triple your salary, work less. Smart decision by the Senator!

  • clyde30475

    celador,I don’t like it either,but DeMint has to make HIS OWN choices. DeMint’s background is in marketing. Who better at Hertiage to get the message out to those who MIGHT be open to hearing it?

  • westcoastpatriette

    runner12, I’m thinking, too, that maybe he will help take on the propaganda press. They have to be taken down just as much as any liberal candidate for office or fossilized RINO.

  • Melody Warbington

    Yes, Herman is polling ahead of everybody that’s been mentioned as a possible challenger.

  • runner12

    Exactly.

  • celador2

    Joe Wlson may not defeat incumbent Graham who may have many DNC votes in SC. Graham survived reelection six years ago and may again, Wilson can not run for House and Senate. I do not want to risk losing Wilson.
    He would do well in a state primary for the Demint seat given his trusted and tested conservative credentials. But that is two years away if he is not appointed by Haley. Wilson into Senate would ease my mind– asap.
    I also like Mark Sanford for Demint seat but while SC gave Newt G a primary win they may not be so embracing with Sanford for his personal sins. He has repented but negativity still lingers.

    Wilson may be strongest leader for both DC Senate and national conservative principles imo. But he will not replace Demint.That void will not be filled.

  • celador2

    We do not know that it will survive and a think tank is not in line for access to diriect political power. Demint can vote , he can become a chair.Excuse me COULD have political access, not anymore.

  • runner12

    I think that you are reacting, instead of analyzing. One of the central reasons we lost this election was the 47% mentality and the hopeless recycling of Rockefeller Republicanism that drives the establishment. The GOP is seen by too many as a party that is no different than the Democrats, they just hate poor people and people of color. The establishment GOP has abandoned the principles of Conservatism that is populist in nature. The notion that smaller government actually helps all Americans whether rich, poor, a minority, middle class, etc. has not been articulated by these guys at all.

    What you witnessed with O’Donnell was painful, but necessary in the process (note that I left out Akin and Mourdock for the sole fact they were hardly fringe candidates. Both had held public office for many years. It was not their first rodeo, which makes their lack of media savvy even more puzzling. But that is another matter). In the zeal to replace those that were a part of the problem, due diligence was not taken. Just because something is bad and needs to be removed does not mean you replace it with anything. But it also means that you do not just replace the something bad with something just slightly less bad. Simply, we can and will find better Conservative candidates and it is important that we do.

    I might also add that neither Akin or Mourdock are lunatics. No matter how much I disliked Akin’s comments (and I did), he is not a lunatic.

  • skofti

    Back in a minute, I am going out to blow my own horn.

  • westcoastpatriette

    See my comments here: http://www.redstate.com/westcoastpatriette/2012/12/06/breaking-senator-jim-demint-leaving-senate-in-january/#comment-729722111

    I don’t think DeMint is an irresponsible opportunist and believe what he is saying about why he is making this move. He honestly feels he will be able to be more effective for the conservative movement at Heritage and the more I listen, the more I understand.

  • skofti

    Money, nicer surroundings, less irritation.

  • kowalski

    I shall not discuss my sentiments about Jim DeMint leaving the Senate, because my sentiments are irrelevant. What I will is say that it’s a great opportunity for him to lead the Heritage Foundation in redoubling their efforts on college campuses across the country, to expand the number of sponsorships for speakers on campus, and even to help endow professorships and Chairs of Institutes. I definitely think that kind of thing is what DeMint could do, and by invigorating the outreach on campus to people in their impressional young moonbat years, he could do a world of good that can’t be done from his Senate office.

    In other words I’m probably a little maudlin to see him leave the Senate, but I think it’s a smart move and I really am pulling for you here, Erick: I hope DeMint is the guy who can get Heritage onto more campuses, into more colloquia and special events, and into more tenured Chairmanships of Instititues at various schools around the country.

    When I was at Johns Hopkins I recognized the Heritage Foundation through a couple of bumper stickers on cars parked off campus. The handful of Conservatives around the area of Charles Street had them on their cars, and it was just a tiny group. This was in my larval moonbat stage, when I was just subscribing to Harper’s and hadn’t made the quantum leap to Z Magazine. The Conservatives not only were outnumbered, they were virtually invisible. They kept their heads down and kept quiet for the most part.

    Senator DeMint, if you’re reading this: when you get to Heritage you need to look very carefully at what is being done on University and College campuses around this country (don’t ignore the smaller schools!) and do everything in your power to leverage Heritage and make sure it is *actively* involved and visible on more campuses around the country. It needs to be sponsoring events, helping out student organizations, and most importantly getting Conservative voices on the List of Speakers at important events.

    Meet personally with the Deans of these schools and really reach out to student organizations and the professors you can identify who can help.

    Without concentrating on higher education in this country, the Conservative movement is doomed. Bobby Jindal is on to something with his comments about anti-intellectualism, at least in the sense that if you’re not recognized on campus and have no voice there, it’s impossible to change any minds and you also completely surrender any influence you might have over the view that young, impressionable and talented students form – not just of the world, but of Conservatives. You surrender that influence, and in many cases you’ll never get it back.

  • celador2

    Cain had a personal sideshow and dropped out. Unless he gets all that in order I can not see media ignoring the sideshow of charges and all we saw during primaries.

  • celador2

    The Heritage job is face saving and he may have some impact. But nothing compared to the force of his SCF newsletter to many Heritage readers from a sitting US Senator.
    i think he lost hope.

  • kowalski

    I think so. I can’t see any reason for him to do it unless he’s got something very important in mind. Unless there is some really awful horrible destructive blackmail that’s going on.

  • celador2

    Thank you too.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Gun nuts and flat tax whacks?

    You like Ike?

    Sure. I’m just worried Ike won’t be in H e double hockey sticks with you.

  • celador2

    Jim Demint is a man who is tied to grassroots not Beltway Dc lobbyists. He loves and respects the constitution which is relevant in his political activity. He was one or one of the few who were like that, not lured by the DC money and glitz.
    Self gov at state level was where so much belongs and less meddlin’ at national level.
    I saw Demint smil only once. Greta interviewd him back in 2009 or 2010 on Obama paying other people’s mortgages. He smiled at that and shook his head, and said there would be no more of that if his group get power.
    Demint had a way of makiing my day.
    .

  • diamondreo

    When asked jokingly by Rush Limbaugh today if either he or Ed Feulner
    had been pushed out by John Boehner, they both laughed while DeMint said “maybe a little the other way..”

    If we really trust and value him as much as we say, maybe we ought to trust his decision and be a little satisfied with anticipation.

  • diamondreo

    So far, I really don’t se a comprehensive game-plan coming from the GOP. Without the 2010 Tea Party, they’d be sunk even worse, though that’s hard to imagine. I’d hate to see a stronger Boehner/Lott/Rove/__________-type coalition that we have now even be successful. Maybe a good thing they’ve failed so publicly as they did last month…

    Heritage is Tea Party. They’re not a “small think-tank”, they’ve really got their stuff together.

    Now I look forward to a successful plan emanating from Heritage along with others to pack the Senate/House/Presidency with Conservatives.

    I believe that, though Obama wants to destroy the GOP, it’s already half-done.

    The best time to steal the Republican Party is soon after it’s recent near-destruction – it’s better than third-party.

  • celador2

    He lost hope that his conservatism, which is the only kind— that flourished yesterday stands much of a chance in DC tomorrow. It is not relevant with big borrowing and spending liberals running the show. His brand is that of millions of us too.

  • reagansucked

    Good riddance to a dimwitted, divisive piece of sh!t.

  • celador2

    pb, Name three or four Demint policies you consider extreme please. More if you like.

  • pbhism

    The only totalitarianism burdening the USA is the oligarchy and its greedhead lobbyists that have hijacked the Republican party. Democracy, by design, is full of compromise — the narrow eccentricities and fundamental ignorance of the real issues facing the world, and the USA today, have doomed any real conservative movement… Demint is abandoning ship — he is the first of many. I’m surprised the people on this thread aren’t better informed. The right wing news echo has destroyed some ability here to process the truth, methinks.

  • vangoghssister

    and the same to you

  • kowalski

    Heritage does a lot of work but I argue that they’re too much on their own “campus” and not involved enough elsewhere. Like I said, it’s going to take effort and I know that firsthand. If Jim DeMint has made this decision I think it’s important that he hears the advice. Heritage needs to be more present and less incidental and accidental to the college and university experience and more involved than it currently is. They have their own centers and institutes, they have their own Chairs, but they need to expand.

    It’s going to take money and it’s going to take someone at the helm who is really willing to put the work in.

    I have the feeling that America is going to need the Heritage Foundation a lot more in the next few years. I don’t know the precise reasons Jim DeMint made the decision, so my assessment is based on my trust in his judgment and the judgment of those whose counsel he values. I really want him to succeed in growing the Heritage Foundation now that that’s his choice.

  • chipbennett

    Boy, this announcement is really bringing y’all out of the woodwork, isn’t it?

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    I have heard speculation of Rep.Tim Scott.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Clean up on aisle 6, please.

  • Jack_Savage

    No, he’s not important – idiot sockpuppets posting on his website are the ones that are REALLY important! You go bdirks, jasonr and skofti! Truth To Power!

  • celador2

    Isn’t Haley up for reelection as governor 2014? Can’r run for both credibly.

  • Jack_Savage

    I’ll bet the Senate will still be there in 2016 also.

  • septembergurl

    Right. But if she wants a Senate seat she will have to wait a while as Grahamnesty will certainly not face a primary now. Sigh.

    Haley gave one of the best speeches at the RNC this year, she really laid into Obama. I had the feeling she might be looking ahead to the Senate. This would be great for her.

  • Bill S

    you won’t any more.

  • Bill S

    bye, leftscum.

    It’s been a banner troll day.

  • checkmate2012

    Bill, do ya’ll Mods see a “flag” when we flag it with the little down arrow when you hover on the name? Just curious as I read it on Disqus yesterday.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Only? Ridiculous.

  • commonsenseobserver

    On the other hand, her ratings are among the worst for a red state.

  • celador2

    Halley was an early Romney supporter but Newt swept the SC primary. A rising star had Romney won she still has ambitions for national offce.She scores with conservatives when she does conservative things boldly like taking on Obama’s NLRB and the SC Boeing plant. She is anti union and leads a right to work bandwagon. She can appoint herself to Senate as the temp but then she’d have to leave the governorship which is doubtful.
    Appoint a place holder and wait and see what 2014 brings. Graham was safe in 2008 and there was blowback against him then. He has more of the same coming. I wonder who the Democrats will put up for both Governor and Senate 2014.

  • celador2

    There is no way to spin this resignation, We can not put lipstick on a pig.

  • diamondreo

    Right now, I’m not positive what this is, but I’ll admit I try to put lipstick on it. It’s pretty hard to sort out the landscape right now; to see this change in the scope of what’s almost too confusing to analyze..a-little coward pivinish. Liberalism raging…talk radio and even a lot of the internet may disappear, every year it might look a lot worse…yet knowing our biggest enemy is bad republicans…they make us fight with one hand tied behind our back…hopefully he’s deliberated what he obviously sees more clearly than I…

  • donr

    The Senate is so over rated in getting things done. I believe that Jim will united the TEA Parties and take over the RNC/GOP.

    The SOONER the better for me.

  • celador2

    Thats some tough dude they caught! No one he made liberals cringe. LOL

  • celador2

    I want to think Demint will run for president in 2016 but my guts tell me is is out of the political arena.

    ABC news has started the ‘inevitabl’e’ brainwash road with a poll showing Hilary has high favorablity at 57% and leads adults. Registered rate her at 55%. She has support like Obama’s which made me groan.The ABC inevitable Hillary poll is an exercise in Psy Ops if ever there was one.

    Another poll PPP shows Michele Obama leading Sn Mark Kirk for IL Senate 2016 at 51-40. Kirk in early 50s had a stroke a year ago.

  • celador2

    You all do good work.

  • Bill S

    I use my iPad for a lot of this, so there is no “hovering”. I’ll try on my laptop.

  • celador2

    We await word from the SCF what next. I am very anxious about its future.

  • celador2

    There must be a conservative message that liberals do not control. That is the way to reach out and win voters. Letting Obama and Democrats control the message GOP look like cheap Democrats every time And then they retreat.
    We are not a top down nation but a federalist one. Most activity takes place at state ovel including education.

    Taxation is tyranny whoever collects it or however it is collected. We all pay those high taxes. Big government creep , creep and high taxes are the issues.

    Demint had freedom to control his SCF message but not that of McConnell and Boehner. Heritage has little say in much of anything in campaigns. Think tanks do not drive political campaigns messages usually.
    SCF is a PAC and can fund campaigns. Demint would be wise to stay connected to SCF.

  • celador2

    Yes delivering the message in our world view words and concepts not Democrats is essential for a conservative victory. But that can be done by McConnell and Boehner but is not

    Demint sees Democarts defining the message for a politcal stand off time and time again. He had had it with Republicans too close to DNC thinking is how it looks.

  • earlgrey

    I expect that rumor to be trending on Twitter today. :) .

  • celador2

    Amen and thumbs up!

  • celador2

    Here are a few thoughts in perspective on the primaries–

    Akin a fine sound member of House, won the backlash vote in primary but was a weak third throughout. Deb Fisher had a simlar win in NE. Two or more big outside conservative groups lined up and fought it out in primary in MO and NE going for the kill. The top two contenders fell in polls as voters can take just so much negative ads.

    Thus Akin and Fisher won after the top two knocked each other out is how i remeber the primaries.

    Mourdock is solid gold and would go to DC and deal with debt. RS was excited about his campaign. I was flying.

    WIth Mourdock in hindsight i think we who
    opposed Lugar and liked Mourdock went too hard on Lugar calling him every name in the book with no redeeming qualities. Save that kind of battle for Democrats. Mourdock was in trouble after June 28 When John Roberts declared O ‘ care legal. It was no longer extreme.

    Mourdock had no capital with Lugar voters after a toxic primary.The voters liked Lugar and the harsh campaign refected on their choices over the years. Mourdock’s win was a rebuke to IN voters good choices and that should not have been how they saw it But they did.

    In MO Akin ran a positive campaign compared to top two as top two including Sarah Steelman fought to the death. McCaskill wanted to have Akin as an oppoent. After Romney and RNC party abandoned Akin social cons helped but the fix was in.

    My point is had the primary not been so toxic one of the strongerr top two might have won in MO and Akin never the Senate nominee. Mourdock might have praised Lugar more and kept some support with IN voters.

  • diamondreo

    I’ve got to Skype this while I’m driving, careening.
    …so do we both agree heritage will need to increase both it’s reach and scope to justify demint? from the 1 interview I’ve heard it seems they have that in mind.
    the bird we had is now in the bush but it’s a lovely bush
    sorry about the punctuation… I’m sure that was the so brilliant that it was worth it all

  • sagreer70

    He and Dolly Parton have a lot in common.

  • brojohn2

    With Senator DeMint at the helm I may even renew my membership at heritage. I do hope that Rep. Scott will take the Senate seat and look forward to another conservative and pro-Constitution man/woman to take the house seat as well. We need principled conservative voices from all races to become a part of the house and senate. Of course it would be great if we can take back the presidency as well. Of course that is a few years away yet, but we can pray it will be so.

  • brojohn2

    Have you noticed that Sarah has become a more powerful voice for the conservative movement as an outsider? It also benefited Alaska since they would not have to worry with all the crap the MSM and Dem lawyers were throwing at her. It has been good for Sarah, and for the party. I love it when they say she is toxic and will hurt anyone she supports. Haven’t see any hurt, have seen a whole lot of losing dems.

  • brojohn2

    Small think tank???? You must be saying that as a sarcastic remark, Heritage is anything but small. It has been a leading voice for the Conservative/Constitutional movement for many years.

  • cbartlett

    Dittos kowalski! I posted this on another thread last week. I heard the President of our local univeristy chapter of the Young Republicans speak last week. The enormous funding, and subsequent liberal brainwashing by Democrats (DNC), on college campuses across the country, is absolutely astounding. When you couple that with the fact that the RNC is essentially ignoring the corresponding Republican groups, this helps explain why we continue to lose youth vote. I think a lot us of keep thinking that they will “grow out of it” when they get out and get a real job, but as you pointed out, if we “surrender that influence” at that stage in life, we may never get them back. It is a unique time in life when we have the ability to educate skulls full of mush (a Rush term). I keep hoping that the reason Jim DeMint is doing this is beacuse he sees this as a great opportunity for educating the masses in basic conservative principles and the need to greatly expand the influence and reach of the Heritage Foundation.

  • soljerblue

    If there’s someone Obama’s threats might not intimidate, my money would be on Jim DeMint.

  • jamesmpratt

    A Ronald Reagan only comes along every 50-100 years. Though many may try to take the baton from the great communicator — and will actually do quite well — the charismatic persona who loved the Constitution long before he loved politics does not get found by looking for him. That person is found because of who he is. A Reagan Revolution must continue until a man or woman of the quality who can stand against foes and embrace principle unflinching in the face of criticism, comes along so that the conservative era he/she builds may adopt their nom d’ guerre. I was 27 when Reagan took office. Don’t eulogize all of us yet, Erick. There were plenty of men and women just coming of marriage and family rearing age — and with a good 20-30 years left in us, we will be there at all the rallies, in the trench’s, writing, and donating. And DeMint will be a mover and shaker taking Heritage to a new level.

  • CarolT

    I can’t disagree with anything you said. At least he helped Cruz win this year. I don’t think there were any others, but I have been sick with a bug for two weeks and not too quick in my thinking.
    I hope your eye surgery helped and you recover soon.

  • funwithknives

    This is the first shot in the 2013 retaking/remaking of Conservatism.
    If Tim Scott gets appointed, it would be so far beyond ‘awesome’, a new word is going to have to be introduced to describe ‘utter bliss and joy’.
    I sincerely hope McConnell and Boehner are shuddering, just a wee bit.
    That would make this a Three-Fer……..

  • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

    Having been posted to the Savannah side of Georgia some years ago, my own conservatism caught fire beyond anything in twenty years prior. As it turned out, it was the soft power of Sen. Jim DeMint next door in South Carolina that was a major motivator.

    At my only RedState gathering so far, in South Carolina last year, I met one Javan Browder (brother, yep, I called you out on purpose), who was still carrying petitions to convince Sen. DeMint to run for the GOP presidential nomination. We stood back in awe of other bellwether ‘conservatives’ flocking to Gov. Rick Perry or deciding that the time to choose was upon them and could sense that all were picking a republican to back. I knew Sen. DeMint was a force-multiplier, so I waited. Sure I went with Herman Cain before the Florida Straw Poll, as I knew 9-9-9 or 9-9-9-0 or www.FairTax.com was the way to go to turn joblessness in America.

    This time afforded me again after The Hermanator dropped out to carefully consider another and the “anyone but Mitt” side of the republican party. As most of us realized as the GOP had with McCain in 2008, we’d face the same results with a Romney in 2012 — because neither had much “fight” in them. Senator DeMint stood as one with “fight” in him and with the launching of the SCF, drew other dark horse nominees across the nation to upend the GOP elitist’s choice. I can only hope I might be one of those in short order.

    Erick, you were on the mark with these two paragraphs alone:

    “Without Jim DeMint we would most likely not presently have in the United States Senate Pat Toomey, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake, Ron Johnson, and Ted Cruz. We would not have a Republican establishment that now worries conservatives might actually primary them.

    Without Jim DeMint we would still have a conservative movement that is part and parcel the Republican Party in name, word, and deed. DeMint showed the Republican Party can be challenged from within and that conservatism can be distinctly voiced from within the party moving it right, not moving with it.”