« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The (impotent) Press worried about being shut out of Obama’s second swearing-in.

So I read this opening sentence from a Politico article about the White House press corps reacting to… well, read:

The White House Correspondents Association is strongly urging the Obama administration to allow press access to the president’s official swearing-in ceremony on Jan. 20, following indications from inauguration committee officials that the event could potentially be closed to the press.

- and I have to ask myself: And if Obama declines to allow said access, then the press will do… what?

The short version of all of this is: January 20th is a Sunday, typically when that happens the White House has a quiet swearing-in on that day and the formal event the next, no worries, nothing unusual about that.  Reporters are still allowed in to document the event.  Only, this time the administration is apparently seriously considering shutting out the reporters entirely and giving them an official White House photo to mark the occasion – and there’s nothing unusual about that kind of casual, precedent-indifferent arrogance from the Obama administration, either. The Media apparently isn’t happy about it, which leads to the next question: who is least worried about the hurt feelings of the Media, here? Me, you, or Barack Obama?

Moe Lane

PS: You cannot make me respect you if you do not respect yourself.  If the Media wants to avoid these casual humiliations, then there’s an easy way to do that: stick Barack Obama on the metaphorical griddle until he starts squawking.  Until then, they can suffer.

COMMENTS

  • checkmate2012

    Thanks for the laugh Moe! Recall the 1st swearing in was a do-over in private…hmm. Ya got love Chuck Todd’s whining in the Politico.com article: “Call me shell-shocked. I’m stunned that this is even an issue; it boggles the mind,” NBC News White House correspondent Chuck Todd told POLITICO. “This is not their oath, this is the constitutional oath. It’s not for them. It’s for the public, the citizens of the United Sates. It just boggles the mind — How is this even a debate?”

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/press-fear-obama-private-swearing-in-84776.html#ixzz2EQsTxvkr

    Wow..who is “their” and “them”? Don’t we have just one prez? And I had no clue Ed Henry was the president of the WHCA!

  • gnelson

    This is great! It’s about time that the press got a taste of the true Obama. If they don’t get in, they’ll just squeal like pigs and go on kissing his butt. What a bunch of tools!

  • romeg

    I have a vague recollection that his first swearing in had to be redone because John Roberts ‘misspoke’ when administering the oath. I would google it but I really don’t give a rat’s patootie. Even if he refused to take the oath as required by the Constitution it is, without a doubt, the most meaningless exercise in which this feckless moron engages in his entire public life. The swooning press corp is NEVER going to put him on that griddle out of fear of being called racist, the unkindest cut of all.

  • spinoneone

    Maybe they don’t want the press to see him sworn in with a Koran?

  • gunnyg2002

    You took the words right out of my mouth. Keith Ellison will be there to cheer him on!

  • WmCraig

    This is just the first exercise of power by “the one”. He wants to make sure the press understands that it is by his grace alone that they get their daily bread in the form of “stuff” to sell to their readers. The press will shed itself of trouble makers who complain about this, and suddenly realize that the President is doing everyone such a big favor by not interrupting their Sunday. Headline: private ceremony benefits population burnt out on politics, news at 11:00. After all the rich have the day off and the rest of us have to work our second or third part time job. Can’t interfere because it might reduce our contribution to the payroll taxes.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    You do recollect correctly, romeg.