« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Three Tools to Educate an Uninformed Electorate on the Fiscal Cliff

Over several months now, I have been devoting attention to the question of how conservatives can win both policy debates and elections, not by appropriating policies that Democrats advocate and putting a Republican stamp on them, but rather by educating Americans and converting those who don’t already share our perspective to it.

My basic thesis is that we win by getting more people to agree with us (others would have us believe that we win by getting us to agree with more people).

In the last election, we saw a significant failure on this front, both with regard to our own nominee being less committed to both conservative policies and this effort than many of us would have liked, and with regard to the result (voters supporting the guy who ran on a platform of higher spending and more debt).

We also saw Republicans fail to use technology and digital communications mechanisms adequately to educate and persuade voters of the merits of conservative viewpoints, and then organize them to do the things necessary to win the election.

Now, we are engaged in a discussion surrounding the fiscal cliff where the emphasis in negotiations seems to be very much on raising revenues, and less so on spending cuts.

There is little scrutiny of already too-high and wasteful spending, the impact that various deficit-reduction plans already in existence would have (how many times a day do we hear “Simpson-Bowles” with hardly anyone knowing what that plan’s effect would be), and the minimal impact that soaking individual industries or economic groups with tax increases would actually have on reducing the deficit.

It is an opportunity that too few conservatives are seizing on, though if you tune into cable news, you’ll certainly see plenty of conservatives arguing against tax increases on camera. I have my own opinions on how we address the fiscal cliff, but today my focus is still on educating & messaging.

Some advocacy groups are attempting to focus attention on these same tactics, and doing it in a way that takes advantage digital tools in order to engage and educate Americans, and frankly, involve us in the process to a greater degree. One truth of this election is that we both underestimated and overestimated the electorate. By that I mean, we failed to educate because we either didn’t believe people would get it (underestimate) or assumed they already knew (overestimate).

It seems obvious to me that we would use the tools and media that are capturing the public to a greater and greater degree, but somehow that escaped our Republican overlords who still live in a world where 30 second spots using deep voiced scary people warning of the apocalypse is the best way to educate.

Obviously we have to do better if we want to avoid a do-over of an election where we saw a phenomenal technology and digital gap. Those in the right-of-center universe have got to get to grips with integrating technology into everything we do in a manner that at least helps set, and then drive higher, minimum standards of digital savviness.

It is in this vein that I want to highlight three tools, launched by three different groups, all of which have an obvious tie-in with the substance of the debate surrounding spending, debt and taxes in the context of the fiscal cliff discussion, and all of which I think RedState readers should have a look at, share with friends, play around with and provide feedback on. These are educational tools, but it’s not just the broader public that could learn something from them.

First up is the “Soak the Rich” tool from our friends at Media Trackers.

This allows you to literally soak a given industry with tax hikes with the click of a button and see the effect on the deficit. A popular misconception is that tax increases could take care of the deficit with great ease. Play around with the tool and you’ll see that is simply not true. Now, if only we could get every player in this debate to play around with it, too, and get more campaigns producing things like this routinely, grabbing useful data while promoting them, and getting more people to share them (education, organization, communication). As has been pointed out numerous times by yelling at walls, increased taxes is a drop of water in the ocean of spending and as always, is based on the assumption that tax increases will result in higher revenues (which we know it won’t).

Second is the Bankrupting America iPhone app released by the fiscal conservative group Public Notice, which provides a constant stream of locally-relevant news about spending and debt to users.

It has added functionality that lets users share examples of wasteful spending with the group by uploading photos or videos, which Public Notice intends to then feature on its website. So, there’s a two-way flow of information that again facilitates education, communication and organization. GOP, take note.

Finally, we have the Federal Deficit Reduction Plan Comparison Tool (whew!) from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

This allows users to compare different deficit-reduction plans side-by-side and by category (defense spending, Social Security, tax expenditures, etc). Again, this is a powerful tool for educating, communicating and organizing. And again, Republican candidates and organizations could benefit from constantly thinking about tools like this to roll out that drive a message, are actually useful to people looking for more information, and can potentially be tied in with data-grabbing mechanisms that help with actually organizing people and getting them to do things you want them to do (vote, donate, sign a petition, or make a phone call).

Given the importance of the issues at stake in the fiscal cliff debate, and the need to improve our policies on taxes, spending, the deficit and the debt, it’s helpful that these tools have been launched.

It’s also helpful because with people using them, the idea of integrating technology and digital tools into every single fight going will become more entrenched, and even if people critique particular aspects of them, as conservatives, we’ll be engaging in a process of ongoing self-improvement where digital strategy is concerned that can only be helpful at this point.

Check out these tools, road test them, and use them to educate yourself and communicate important facts and details your friends and family. We win by getting more people to agree with us.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • davo

    Educating the electorate is extremely important. But more important than the “what” (i.e., educating the electorate), is the “how.” Conservatives tend to make their case using facts and logic, while progressives go visceral. We need to develop a better way of educating the low information and the no information voter – because together they make up the vast majority of people who go to the polls. Facts and logic are too cumbersome, and don’t resonate with these voters. But that’s how Conservatives tend to argue Conservatism. Many progressive policies provide real-time benefits, but have devastating long term effects. For example, the massive increase in government employment (~75% of all new jobs in the past 6 months) delivers a paycheck to those workers, but does so at the taxpayers’ expense. So how do you convice people that such a policy is bad? There are many other examples but this highlights the problem that Conservatives need to address.

    One thing the President and his progressive allies do well is pick a target, freeze it and isolate it. They’ve learned their lessons well from Alinsky. In the end, it’s effective for the low and no information voters. Conservatives should take a lesson from this. We need to learn from our opponents and deploy their tactics against them. Identify specific targets, e.g., progressive policies, freeze them (by having Republicans in Congress all promoting the same talking points), and isolate them by making them the focal point of discussion. It’s not hard. It just takes discipline.

    Educating the elected may be more important. When the Speaker of the House co-opts the progressive verrnacular and starts talking about taxing the “rich” we have a problem. And where are the Republican “leaders” in Congress making spending cuts the issue? They’re all too willing to accept the terms of the debate set by the President – that it’s all about taxes. It’s a typical Republican response to have the argument the other side wants, rather than try to re-frame the argument. We should be discussing spending, not taxes. We have a spending problem, not a tax reciept problem.
    It’s time for Conservatives to get smart, and start playing for keeps. Republican “leadership” in Congress seems unwilling or unable to get the job done. We’d better start doing lots of things differently (maybe starting with a new Speaker), or 2014 and 2016 may be deja vu all over again.

  • kycon

    It’s also important for our side to improve their messaging. History supports our view of the economy, but Obama goes on the stump and says “We tried their way, and it didn’t work,” and people accept it as fact. This isn’t a hard argument to refute, but for whatever reason, our side can’t seem to pull it off.

    We’re letting our opponents define the language of these debates, and that’s why the average low-information voter votes their way. Right now, they’re calling out Republicans for standing in the way of ‘tax cuts.’ Never mind that there aren’t any, that’s the message, and the average Joe is buying in.

    Until we improve our messaging (of which the tech mentioned here is a large part), we’re in trouble.

  • commonsenseobserver

    That’s one plausible approach.

  • tnguy

    That’s all well and good, but we’ve ceded so much to the democrats over the last quarter century, it may be too late to make the case in a way that anyone will listen. How can we argue against gov’t spending when republicans have been almost as guilty in democrats in ballooning federal spending???

    Plus, there is a huge % of the population that is already lost. You think Obamaphone woman understands or cares about any of this? IMO, her ilk doesn’t even really care about the country beyond what it’s going to give to them. If it all comes crashing down, she won’t have the wherewithal, or the integrity, to point the finger of blame at herself. You can’t make any sort of case to people like that.
    I believe only the direct intervention of God himself can save America, though I see very few people inclined to ask Him to do so.

  • tomcatdriver

    And where are the Republican “leaders” in Congress making spending cuts the issue?”

    perhaps an approach to this is that “Republican leaders” could come up with a set of programs/agencies that they would delete which would make some realistic dent in the debt/deficit. Romney got up and said he would cut off PBS and Planned Parenthood …and it was easy for the other side to point out how little money that would actually save…

    you know come up with a quick 200 billion or so.

  • cheesycon

    i dont see how throwing technology at a problem or a bunch of apps can really persuade anyone, and anyway most of that will only be seen by people who already agree. to persuade folk you need to engage them local and talk one on one. in my community the pro-recall people made the same mistake and tried to “persuade” people about our Governor but in reality they were not really making a conversation at the local level either just trying to throw out buzz words and 30-sec clips but Walker’s people were actually on the ground. He’s the only one with experience – even more than Christie – in persuading the moderate and independents to see things the conservative way (and a lot of people voted for Obama who voted for Walker too)

    Walker 2016! :) :)

  • timcooper62

    One of the root causes of this issue is the way government “budgets”. A bold move would be to do a way with base line budgets. Stop calling a decrease in the rate of growth a spending cut. Freezing spending at 2008 levels would end the budget deficit.

  • tomcatdriver

    But that is simply a “cut across the board” and to some extent sequestration DOES that…it doesnt change the reality that as long as the GOP says “spending is the problem” and they will only name Planned parenthood and PBS as something that they would absolutely do away with the claim lacks credibility.

    It is not of course easy. If one says “the energy department” is gone then how much does that really save? For instance are we going to get rid of the NNSA which is in the process of removing nuclear material from countries around the world that want to get rid of them?

    At NASA it is mostly GOP lawmakers that are holding on to the SLS and Orion space projects. They wont do anything with people on them until 2021, already they have spent 20 billion dollars and will need to spend 30 billion more…

    and so it goes almost across the federal budget. we are right now spending 25 billion a MONTH in Afland…and people are complaining about 1 billion total in F-16′s to Egypt…

    You have to come up with real numbers.

  • timcooper62

    The gorilla in the room is entitlement spending. These other programs are peanuts to the budget. http://www.usdebtclock.org/

  • unclemikey

    I don’t know if I watched too much “Schoolhouse Rock” as a kid growing up, but I seem to remember that the only way that the federal government spends a dime is if the House and the Senate agree to appropriate it and the President signs the appropriations bill.

    How about just simply not appropriating the money for NPR, Ed, Energy, you know the list? Why doesn’t this happen?

  • timcooper62

    The house leadership has no stones

  • Finrod

    Forty percent of the country voted for Walter Mondale in 1984 when Reagan won 49 states. Some people are just unreachable, but we don’t need to reach everyone.

  • Hafeed

    The Comparison Tool accepts at face-value some ridiculous estimates for revenues from the liberal proposals.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Perhaps they do.

    They should eat their peas anyway, and accept spending cuts, outside defense as well. Tax hikes do nothing to solve the problem, but if the people want it, they should get them. Doesn’t remove the need for real reform of entitlements and liberal sacred cows.

    Not to mention, people want lots of things, but we must get our priorities in order.

  • Jack_Savage

    Right…I forgot that one.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Crazy troll.

    If we are to create decent jobs with decent wages, well, first things to go are Obamaphones.

    The entitlement state has grown far beyond its original purpose as a social safety net- indeed, it is threatening the social safety net itself.

    And rich corporate executives are always reliable scapegoats, but ever wondered why they can goose profits by offshoring jobs? Businesses have NO obligation to provide jobs in a country that does not welcome that, for people who blame them for everything, so put that in your pipe and smoke on it. Economic patriotism means absolutely nothing in a country that has no grasp of either economics or patriotism.

    If we are to get the public finances in order, demonization of job creators will do nothing to help. It is only by getting the public finances in order, being open to business, and backing free enterprise that ordinary people will have the opportunity and security they need, out of the cruel and vicious culture of government dependency, and assuredly not by trying to tax and regulate people everywhere and erecting an invisible Berlin Wall.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Never mind the statistics that show they mostly do, why do they have to pay for themselves for them to be a worthy accomplishment?

  • commonsenseobserver

    Yes, or are you telling me that DailyKos doesn’t do the same?

    The echo chamber is probably better than being stuck in a chamber full of slimy creatures like you.

  • WmCraig

    Why do you think it is inadvertent that they harm the social fabric?

  • adair

    My complaint about F-16′s to Egypt is sending F-16′s to Egypt. What could possibly go wrong?