« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Republicans Have Failed the Nation

“Obsequious praise for small government does the Republicans no good when they too are in favor of big government in their actions.”

Over the next couple of years, Barack Obama wants to raise the national debt to $18.9 trillion or so.

John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, and the congressional Republicans want to raise the national debt to $18.4 trillion or so.

The present leadership of the Republican Party has gone from making the case that government is the problem and the American people are the solution to making the case that Democratic controlled government is the problem and Republican controlled government is the solution.

By giving up on making the case that government is the problem and pivoting to “Democrats are the problem,” the Republican Party has failed the American people. Historically, when parties lost, their leadership went and hid for an appropriate amount of time under a rock after an acceptance of blame and a resignation.

The present Republican leaders in Washington, instead of hiding under a rock, have taken to standing on the rock and demanding conservatives self flagellate. Neither John Boehner nor Mitch McConnell are visionaries. They are survivors. They survive by recognizing the biggest threat to them and trying to befriend it or neutralize it.

Right now, both see conservatives as their biggest threat, not Barack Obama. Why? Because while Barack Obama maintains the White House, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell maintain their positions of power. They exist for power, not for vision. The visions they articulate are routinely backpedaled. Remember the pledge to nowhere the House Republicans concocted in 2010 as a second coming of the Contract With America? Within two months of returning to the majority they’d already ditched their pledge faster than a frat boy fleeing a one night stand. Only conservatives wish to hold them accountable for their breach of trust, thus conservatives are the threat.

The very same Republican leadership who paved the way for the rise of the Democrats in 2006 through moral opaqueness on the role of government in the lives of Americans now seek to shut up and shut out the conservatives who continue to loudly point out that the size and scope of the federal leviathan has grown too unwieldy. More troubling, with the removal of the several of the critics within the party from key committees and a clear message that loud voices of conservatism will not get plumb committee assignments, the incoming freshman class and even the current conservative leaders in the House of Representatives have rolled over.

Let us not kid ourselves. The Republicans intend to strike a last minute deal to cave. They will. They are going blind in the bathroom over the idea of bifurcating tax cuts so Barack Obama can veto the tax cut for high income earners and let the rest slide through. It is, as usual, a too clever by half compromise from the GOP, which has spent more time out negotiating itself to the left than negotiating with the Democrats.

The compromise is no longer the issue. It will happen.

The issue is that the Republican leaders who will be in charge in January are the Republican leaders who were directly complicit in the construction of the fiscal cliff and were directly complicit in getting us already to $16 trillion in national debt. Democrats are not to blame; both parties in Washington are.

Obsequious praise for small government does the Republicans no good when they too are in favor of big government in their actions. And having two leaders as the face of the party who have both been in Washington since 1986 does no good restoring credibility when these multi-decade residents of the swamp wink and smile that they really do think Washington is the problem.

Is it any wonder the American people have come to the conclusion that government isn’t so bad when the party of small government keeps expanding it too? The leaders of the party are the message, not the words. And the message does not resonate because they do not practice what they preach.

Until the Republicans change their message, they will keep losing. Changing the message means changing the men. Will 16 Republicans in the House be brave enough to stand up and say the party needs a new Speaker of the House?

This is not about the compromise. This is not about the fiscal cliff. This is not even about removing Amash, Huelskamp, Schweikert, and Jones. This is about beginning again anew — a process that cannot happen when the faces of the Republican leadership have been in Washington since 1986 expanding government while preaching the need for limiting it.

COMMENTS

  • becky5

    If they couldn’t cut government with all the wind at their backs after the 2010 landslide win, there’s no way they’ll do it now. They are unprincipled cowards who exist mainly to protect their positions of power (and the perks that go along with it). We have been lied to for years, that’s why they are politicians — they are good liars.

    We are two years out from the next election, the only chance to make any kind of serious change is by shaking up leadership while the opportunity exists.

    The fact that we even have to wonder if there are 16 members of Congress willing to stand on principle for the good of the country is sobering.

  • ohiohistorian

    If you get enough conservatives to not vote, Nancy Pelosi is the next Speaker. The speaker is elected by a majority of the votes cast. http://www.redstate.com/nedryun/2012/12/10/if-not-boehner-then-who-we-have-options/ Yes, we have options, but if you get to cute, you may get to say “Speaker Pelosi”. again.

  • banjojack1956

    I have e mailed and called my Congressman (Phil Gingrey) on numerous occasions about this matter. He and my new Rep, (Graves), appear to be in agreement with you, Eric. Gingrey has even introduced term limit legislation (need I point out how wildly popular with his colleagues THAT was)? I still feel that apathetic voters are far more of a problem than unprincipled politicians, since the one can only exist at the suffrance of the other. We are in dire need of a new Speaker, unless the current one manages to grow a pair, and a spine to hang them on. RINOS care only for staying in, or as close to the drivers’ seat as possible. (By the way, I can’t afford to donate $10, will $5 do)?

  • becky5

    I see your point, but do you realize that by the end of the month we’ll have Republicans agreeing to tax hikes without a single dime of spending cuts, the FED announcing it will print $1 Trillion next year, the debt ceiling will be lifted without any concessions for cuts, and then next up is amnesty early next year (they’ve already formed a ‘gang of 8′ with 4 Democrats & 4 Republicans to work on this). At some point you have to make a stand and do what you can to make a change. This fear of Democrats (and it is certainly justified don’t get me wrong) has held us hostage to supporting the most abhorrent Republican big-government policies.

  • davesinsanantonio

    “Where there is no vision, the people perish”. Proverbs 29:18
    The so-called leaders have not vision, and the people are perishing.

    The so-called leadership clearly show the difference between statesmen and politicians. In fact, the current so-called leaders are giving politicians a bad name. Even if Boner wins the speakership again, he must be primaried. And, if he does not win the speakership he also must be primaried. If he views conservatives as the enemy, and he does, then we must understand that HE is OUR enemy.

    Also, we must find those men and women with a true vision of constitutional conservatism, for both state and federal offices, and encourage them to run, back them when they do, forgive them if they make a missstep or two, or a misstatement or two, and keep after them to follow the basic principles of true conservatives, and fire them if they stray too far or too often. They will be fallible human beings, so we cannot throw them under the bus for just one mistake, either verbal or voting, but we must hold them accountable and get them back on track or dismiss them if they refuse to repent.

    We the People are still in charge of making it work. And, we are also in charge of having our own vision and articulating it to our representatives, and demanding they adhere to it.

  • AndrewHyman

    I don’t want to get rid of Speaker Boehner or Minority Leader McConnell. Screaming and fratricide are not for me. They are working with what they’ve got, and I don’t think Redstate has helped to get them the power that they could have used at a time like this.

    Standing on principle is fine, until it starts dooming most of the things you claim to support. Redstate stood on principle against Ted Stevens, and the direct unambiguous result was Obamacare. But pragmatism has still not developed here. When Mitt Romney urged Todd Akin to withdraw, Erick led a chorus of refusal, thus making Romney look weak and the GOP look like a bunch of anti-woman idiots. See here:

    http://www.redstate.com/2012/10/31/if-you-want-to-repeal-obamacare-support-akin-mourdock/
    We need to be clever. We need to be wise. We need to stop shooting ourselves in the feet with a frigging bazooka.

  • CharleyK

    Whether you raise tax rates or cut tax loopholes, tax increases hurt the economy.

    Repeat after me: Tax increases hurt the economy. Tax increases hurt the economy. Tax increases hurt the economy.

    Until elected Republican repeat that simple message often, and loudly, Obama and the press will appear to be correct about Republican motives: Republicans oppose tax increases because of politics. Or because they’re afraid of Grover. Or because they’re protecting their rich friends. Or whatever.

    Motives matter. And Republicans haven’t been clear about their motives. So again…

    Tax increases hurt the economy. Tax increases hurt the economy. Tax increases hurt the economy.

    Pass it on.

  • AndrewHyman

    Oh I almost forgot to mention how much better off we are without Mike Castle in the Senate:

    http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/09/08/a-few-more-thoughts-on-delaware/

    We need to win what we can, where we can. Not throw every potential winner under the bus and then complain and start a circular firing squad because team GOP lacks power to change the world.

  • becky5

    Andrew, who’s ‘screaming’? And the only fratricide I see here is being done by Boehner, by purging conservatives of committee positions.

  • timcooper62

    It doesn’t seem to matter who the speaker of the house is. The same stuff will happen.

  • donr

    The question to be answered is “HOW DO WE GET RID OF THE ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICATIONS”?
    Right now I would settle for Boehner and McConnell losing there leadership positions in January 2013.
    Erick, how can we accomplish their downfall.

  • http://redmerrimack.blogspot.com/ charliebravoNH

    We need to let our Republican Senators and Congressmen know that Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are liabilities for them back home in their own districts.

  • funwithknives

    Attention Erick and/or Any Moderators:
    I note the contribution request this date and want to oblige, as this is not an unacceptable request, IMHO.
    MeGots no Credit Card [all cancelled] and want to use Snail Mail and an Old Fashioned Check-Thingie. Not seeing a mailing address in the site’s info .
    So what is a Poor Boy to do in this case ?
    I would have put this request on an Open Thread, but ‘no joy’ there, either.

  • cheesycon

    +5

  • conservativepatriot

    It is true that Republicans are not the conservatives they should be, and I am appalled at the sellout by the “leadership” in the House. However, this must be taken care of in house, meaning we must elect other Republicans to replace these statists. In the meantime however, to turn the leadership over to the democrats, who are nevertheless infinitely worse, would be to not just shoot ourselves in the foot, but in the head.

  • Ausonius

    “Who Speaks for the Republican Party?” Daniel Henninger asks this question in this morning’s Wall Street Journal (Dec. 13th), and we have been asking it as well here at RedState.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323297104578175173766036976.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

    The lack of clearly Conservative and dynamic leaders is dismaying. Vacuums will be filled: the quisling RINO’s in Congress are filling it with whining and the crashing sounds of collapse.

    If our supposed new group of Conservative youngsters (Rubio, Jindal, Haley, etc.) want to consider the White House, (and I hate to be writing this a month after the election) it would seem that they need to jump in NOW and establish a CONSERVATIVE brand of Republicanism in the minds of the American people, who apparently will need 4 years of propagandizing to overturn the lies established by the current MAObama regime.

    Haley Barbour said in an interview recently that Republicans tacitly admitted the Democrats’ charges in the campaign when they failed to counter them with the Truth.

    A charge not refuted is a charge admitted.

  • reddog53

    If our Republican Leaders have failed the nation, then we have failed as well.

    The axiom that you ‘get the government you desrve’ applies equally well to the positions of leadership in the party and the resulting leadership in the House and Senate.

    Each of us has a share in this and a role to play in its correction. Cold Warrior has been relentless and true in his focus on Precinct Chairmen. All RedState folks who have volunteered for campaigns and committees are part of the solution, but more obviously needs to be done. I know that I could and should be doing more. I strongly believe that direct personal involvement is th best solution, in whatever form it can take: phoning Speaker Boehner, your own Representative or even returning the avalanche of fund raising mail unopened to the RNC, RSCC or other organizations to register your opinion.

    Every one of our Representatives should know that we think the issue is out of control spending and horrible legislation that is so complex no one can fully understand it– and if they persist I doing theses things, we will replace them as elected officials and party officials.

  • ehspicer

    I’m going to be looking at the Libertarians, as I think many are. At least they seem to be principled. Boehner and McConnell are without imagination or intellect. Neither can imagine America as it was meant to be. They can only imagine more of the same and use their limited tools to fight the trends of the last 60 years. They don’t fight the devolution all that hard, because intellectually they are not equipped to do so. Very sad to watch.

  • shr3dr

    Amen, brother. Well said. Until we remove Republican shapeshifters from positions of power, we will continue to be disappointed. You know, you can go back and find video of Paul Ryan on the House floor extolling the historical success of Keynesian stimulus. He’s been in Washington all his life. I believe in redemption and rebirth. But I also believe that most politicians shift like wind socks. DC is corrosive. The system is corrosive. And anyone who’s been swimming in that sewer is going to stink after awhile. Time for a fresh start.

  • shr3dr

    “We are two years out from the next election, the only chance to make any kind of serious change is by shaking up leadership while the opportunity exists.” –becky5

    Dead on. Time is short. And instead of riding a crest of excitement and patriotism, as we did in 2010, this leadership is going to have the base dispirited and disillusioned.

    Shake off 2012. A bad year is behind us. Suit up for battle. And the crooked shall be made straight.

  • runner12

    Amen. I pray that there will be enough courageous House members to step forward and oust Boehner. He must go.

  • quill67

    “The Republicans have Failed the Nation”

    Does that mean that we can finally start talking about a new party? Or is the ban on such talk still in place at RedState?

    We are now spending a trillion $ on welfare of various forms (housing subsides, unemployment, food stamps, welfare) at the federal level–and this doesn’t count the hundreds of billions in health subsidies that are coming under ObamaCare.

    We spend more on welfare than on national defense. Yes, medicare is creating our long-term financial crisis, but welfare is a HUGE part of it and welfare is destroying the moral foundation of our nation.

  • sjccoach

    The Republican party is in its death throes because of RINOs like Boehner and McConnell. The leadership of the party is too enthralled by their power to see that they are killing the party. I for one say good riddance to the party. I have cast my last vote for Republicans. I will either vote third party or stay home.

  • jaykali

    I fully agree. I am tired of playing this baseline budgeting game where politicians have to be dragged KICKING AND SCREAMING to make any sort of minor cuts. The US govt is going to spend like 40 trillion dollars the next 10 years. Even if you “cut” (according to baseline budgeting) 1 trillion that would like like a 2.5% cut. And of course that is a cut from inflated spending anyways.

    We need real solutions, a big reason why Republicans are losing is that they don’t really stand for anything other than not raising taxes.

    I want real reforms such as:
    1. Real tax reform
    2. Killing base line budgeting
    3. Balanced budget amendment
    4. Term limits
    5. Actually ending programs??!?

    Things that can actually get to the heart of the matter. I feel like our real hope is in the states. Washington is a disaster. We have a 4 trillion dollar a year government and the president doesn’t want to cut any of it. Those are his voters. This is such an unserious regime. When I hear Nancy Pelosi drone on I just want to kill myself.

  • bgintn

    Got it, thank you sir.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Maam…lineholder’s a maam.

  • whitetop

    Obama leaves Sunday on a $4millon taxpayer paid vacation to Hawaii so Boehner has 3 days of posturing until he capitulates to the Chosen One.

  • rosenstern

    I think this post gets the current situation exactly right. One other related consequence. The congressional leaders in charge of legislative negotiations are also the public face and voice of our party and their communications strategy is driven by legislative negotiating tactics. Their language is all about bids, counter-bids, concessions, what will members accept, timelines, cliffs, etc. What is missing is a clear articulation of conservative principles and rationale (beyond some superficial boilerplate) and in the current leadership vacuum I believe is doing great damage to our brand.

  • tnguy

    Conservative in the primary, republican in the general…….

    Conservatives who’ve practiced that principle helped make the current situation. When anyone suggested otherwise, they were shouted down, or here at red state, threatened with a ban.

    Your way doesn’t work. We see the results of that now, in spades. You helped buy the current situation, Erick, so own it.

    Wake up. Conservative or else. We can’t gripe about what Boehner and McConnell do if we keep enablng them.

  • Brookhaven

    This would just be a temporary fix. Like the 2009 tea party rallys, it would be a shot across the bow that might scare them for a moment, but it wouldn’t cause them to change course.

    We need to be thinking of a more systemic, long therm approach.

  • major

    Tera it down to rebuild!
    WE MUST REMOVE THEM!

  • http://www.evanweeks.com EvanWeeks

    …The People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions — everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circuses.

  • lcdrscottcoleman

    I’m right there with you. If our leadership has failed us, and those we elect don’t have the courage to replace them.. then it doesn’t leave us with many options.

  • Brookhaven

    Look at this site http://www.theconservativehand.com before you jump head first into the 3rd party pond.

    3rd parties have a dismal record. As much as I’m disgusted with the GOP, it still is the most likely framework for achieving our political goals.

    There are several strategys floating around for taking back the GOP (the one above and the precinct project–google it) that actually have a realistic chance of working. Those are the ones we should be focusing on.

  • timcooper62

    How will it be worse with Pelosi? Boehner will give Obama what he wants just like Pelosi. Boehner is the epitome of the “squishy” republican. Wait and see, we will get immigration “reform”. The president will get his unlimited debt ceiling, and there will be no meaningful spending cuts or entitlement reform even with Boehner as speaker.

  • Brookhaven

    Voting for a non-productive Republican (one that does not advance conservative goals) is the same as voting for a Democrat.

    We need to understand the difference between productive and non-productive Republicans.

    http://www.theconservativehand.com

  • earlgrey

    In fairness it is easy to be principled when you have no real power. I do share your disgust, and I have conflicted feelings about voting GOP too.

    Remember though to continue to support good local GOP candidates–they may move on to higher office and believe it or not local races matter. We ousted an R state rep in a primary that was a pet of our state’s governor. He has just refused to set-up health exchanges after showing signs of wanting to set them up and asking for federal money for them. We were fairly certain he’d set up the exchanges.

    Local races matter so try to thinkg about that even if you can’t support the smelly rotten carcass of the GOP on national level.

  • littlehouse18

    A lot of Repubs still think that if you answer charges you give them more attentionand credence. Sitcks and stones … ignore them they say. Not so! I learned in grade school and in life that if you ignore a bully or a lie, you just get more of the same. Directly and forcefully confronting the attack is what works.

  • littlehouse18

    Exactly – case in point Obamacare.

  • edintexas

    Arlen Specter, Charlie Crist, Carolyn McCarthy (elected on the Democrat ticket, but remained NY State registered as a Republican for 3 or 4 years after serving as a Democrat), Don Riegle (Rep, MI), etc. Going with who might win doesn’t always work out…

  • shr3dr

    A) I don’t think the leadership would go to the democrats. B) If it did, I actually think letting the democrats own all of this wouldn’t be such a bad thing, given the choices we face. I’d rather have no Republican fingerprints on this fiscal policy than have Republicans be unprincipled, complicit and share the blame.

  • Brookhaven

    Maybe nobody should speak for the Republican party. Certainly, nobody should speak for conservatives.

    Maybe we focus on model that works without central leadership or control. The free market works that way, why can’t political parties?

    http://www.theconservativehand.com

  • Tbone

    Nothing more than traitors dealing in the treason of selling out our country’s future for their current positions of comfort..

  • Jack_Savage

    Erick, you’re wrong. The nation has failed the nation. Everything we are getting, we voted for. So I say let us have it, and good.

  • cbfisher64

    I don’t have to go too deeply on this but … c’mon … you’re just now realizing this? This should be considered “common knowledge” and not requiring a diary entry as foundation. To be frank, it’s well beneath what I feel the mission of this site is.

    “They exist for power, not for vision.” DUH. They have for a long, LONG time. They don’t care about main street or whoever lives there. Not unless and until someone sticks a microphone or a camera in their face and then the soundbites and cliches start flowing. We’re not a representative government in anything but name. Once they get elected they horse-trade and wheel-n-deal. If they ARE looking out for our “interests” it’s only for ends which they believe will provide fodder FOR their re-election — completely self-serving in every sense.

    As you’ve noted, the hostility of leadership (to anything which threatens them and their hold on power, majority or minority), is something which typically happens behind closed doors. Heck, they’ve made movies and spoofs of it all. You’ve simply chosen to call them on it. Yet, Boehner’s only response is to acknowledge the retaliation and vindictiveness which has occurred and count himself has a key culprit.

    They love to say to the incoming freshmen “This is how things are (or get) done in Washington.” Well we can all see that their definition is (more accurately), “This is how we do things to stay in power and keep ourselves in the lap of luxury.”

    In summary, this is lamenting on an issue which is well-known by those who care to know, and even by many who don’t know (but suspect). But the baffling part of all this is that, with Congressional approval ratings SO low, how does one explain the massive “mandate” given by the re-election of so many of them for continued service? The process IS broken, and has been for a LONG time, and is stacked against a fix. By this I mean (and which has no doubt been echoed in several places and by numerous voices (here and/or elsewhere)) that incumbents have heavy advantages, that the “average” Joe faces a huge uphill battle (with funding) and many obstacles to even GET to the forefront. Once they’re there (by fate or God’s grace), they face a hostile leadership (to the status quo). So even if they “go along” for awhile, to establish themselves and some kind of power base, they become too “indoctrinated” and flush with perks/bennies/cash, that they “forget” what the original mission is and THEY themselves become part of the problem. Ad nauseum, ad infinitum …

    The ONLY way we fix this is by throwing them ALL out and starting anew. And the ONLY way that happens is with severe measures (use your imagination).

    For where we stand now, the Democrats’ way gets us to calamity (without any doubt). The GOP (aka “Democrat-lite”) simply gets us there slower. It is for this reason, the foregoing, and for so many other (reasons), that this last election cycle simply was the final straw and/or nail in the coffin, and why myself, and a LOT of my like-minded colleagues, have thrown in the towel. It’s like peeing into a fan. It feels good for a second, but you wind up with stink all over you. I’m tired of ramping myself up, of getting energized, and all the hyperbole, only to see bigger wigs sabotage it all for their own selfish ends.

    So, welcome to the U.S.S.A.!! I don’t know what that will look like on a hockey sweater, but it won’t be C.C.C.P. (Союз Советских Социалистических Республик)

  • rabun1016

    “They exist for power, not for vision.” I could not agree more. Either Boehner or McConnell would make a better Teamster leader than Congressional leader. They both come across as people who can’t frame the big picture in a simple, fair manner, or offer constructive wisdom, in a plausible manner, as to the first steps of a solution.

  • denverkitty

    Boehner and McConnell must both GO!! Career politicians are no good on either side. These people we elected are too used to their perks…it’s time for a dose of reality. And time to clean house.

  • denverkitty

    shr3dr, I’m with you!! It’s time we kicked our own freeloading RINOs to the curb!!

  • denverkitty

    “optimal”?? really? I think you might want to check who said “optimal” and what they were referring to; i.e., the Butcher of Benghazi & the deaths of 4 Americans.

  • denverkitty

    Follow the money. Boehner and McConnell are getting it, and they want to keep getting it.

  • denverkitty

    Absolutely!! I’ve been saying “term limits” for a long time, but it seemed no one wanted to hear.

  • plh

    Simple majority or absolute majority? I’ve heard both, but have been unable to find an internet source that specifies which it is (including the Constitution or the House Rules of the 112th Congress). If it’s an absolute majority, it may be better to leave the House Speakerless, as our side seems committed to giving away the store – which isn’t much better than the other side stealing it.

  • cbartlett

    Can we please stop calling these “tax loopholes”? The items under discussion are lawful, legitimate tax DEDUCTIONS – some that have been around for decades. “Tax loopholes” implies something sinister and illegal – especially to low information voters. If these legal deductions somehow distort the taxing process by favoring one group over another unfairly, then let’s campaign to lawfully eliminate the deduction. (And/or possibly consider a flat tax?) This kind of narrative only feeds into the class-envy theme the Dems seem to be so good at perpetuating in the MSM. And yes – “tax increases hurt the economy”. Pass it on.

  • fpete13527

    You’re probably right. I’m extremely frustrated with Boehner’s non action and what it will mean

  • aeaeren

    I disagree, right now Obama will get what he wants and the Republican’s will get the blame for it period. Let’s be real Boehner isn’t going to fight and in fact appears to agree with the Ds so at this stage I say let Pelosi be the leader. I know she will drive the agenda but at this point we have so many drones that parrot the Dems Talking points we need a complete collapse before we have a chance to teach the drones why BIG Gov’t and Progressives are BAD for them. Meanwhile we can clean house and tossing Boehner out would at least make them consider from now on they NEED us and better start thinking about that.

  • aeaeren

    LOL you forget they redefine things on the fly so what was what yesterday is not what today. And well History is sooo old and looky here if you don’t like it then file form 89878786a revision c and we will get around to looking at it in 2 years when we have these elections again. Now move along troll we have important business in destroying the productive in the United States and THAT is exactly how they feel towards Conservatives. We are fighting the Little Big Horn and in case anyone has any questions on which side we are well here comes our Leader Custer now.

  • n2sooners

    Maybe it’s time for conservatives to do what I have long been suggesting blacks should do to get the attention of the parties and vote the other way. I know it doesn’t make as much sense since conservatives are voting based on issues and not race, but the conservative vote is being treated the same way by the republican party that the black vote has been treated for years by the democrat party, as a sure thing.

    I think it’s time for conservatives to not only challenge squishy republicans in the primaries, but if that fails we should vote for the democrat in the general. If enough do it, we could replace some of the RINOs in the house with a democrat and then replace that democrat two years later, hopefully with someone better. This won’t really work for president and is much riskier in the senate with their six year terms, but even if we only took out a few (like Boehner) and made a few more uncomfortable, maybe we could change their attitudes towards us just a bit.

    One way or another we need to let them know that we can take their power away. Otherwise conservatives are just republican party slaves.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    That is exactly where to start – locally. We conservatives have the numbers to take over the Republican Party from the precinct level on up. It all starts at our respective local Party committee meetings. That’s the place to best organize and unite because you end up hitting several birds with the same stone. First, once you become an elected or appointed “voting member” of your local committee, you have the right to vote for who becomes the officers/”leaders.” And depending upon how it works in your state, you probably also have a right to vote directly, or indirectly, for your county and state officers/” leaders.” About 10 days ago I voted for the conservative candidates running for the officer positions of my legislative district committee, the “lowest-level” committee in the Arizona Republican Party. I also got to cast votes for the state committeemen who would represent our legislative district committee at the state organizational meeting on January 26, who will in turn elect our state chairman and other officers. Our state chairman is also a member of the Republican national committee. I was fortunate enough to be elected as a state committeemen and, therefore, I’ll be able to vote for the best conservative in the race for the chairman’s slot and the other officer positions. Earlier this year, the precinct committeeman of my legislative district committee elected the delegates representing us at the state presidential nominating convention. I was fortunate enough to be elected to be a delegate. At the convention I was able to vote directly for the state’s national committeemen and national committeewoman.

    Recently, our county committee, of which I am a member, passed a unanimous resolution in support of Rep. David Schweikert requesting that he be reinstated to his committee post. Imagine if every committee, local and county and state, passed resolutions criticizing Speaker Boehner. It could be so, if conservatives would fill up all the vacant precinct committeeman slots across the country. It doesn’t take a lot of time and it doesn’t cost a lot, if anything (every state has a unique system), and it is the best place to organize and unite conservatives for real political action.

    Unite and organize politically locally. Win nationally.

    Thank you.
    CW
    http://precinctproject.us
    http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

  • brojohn2

    Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. We need to have a conservative speaker, Boehner and Pelosi can go exchange kisses in the corner instead of in public. If there is to be a speaker, it must be a Republican as having Pelosi in again gives her a large presence in the Media and gives her a power base again. Let us not open that can of worms!!!!!

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    wcp,
    Give ‘em conservative hell! ;-)

    Thank you for all you are doing. Will be looking forward to your report..

    Thank you.
    CW

  • AndrewHyman

    Specter may have royally screwed up in the Bork hearings, but he got us confirmation of Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and John Roberts. That’s light years better than if Specter had not been there.

    I would have preferred a Pat Toomey with all the seniority that Specter had, but that was IMPOSSIBLE at the time. The smartest thing Rick Santorum ever did was support Specter.

    We’ve got to be clever. It’s not enough to be right.

  • plh

    Boehner = Custer? Ouch.

  • sliverlining

    Even a stinking drunk eventually hits bottom and admits that an inanimate object has him beat. “How can that be?”, he asks, “that a liquid sitting on a table with no ambulatory powers somehow finds its way into my gaping maw?”

    The answer, so simple, finally dawns on even his damaged consciousness:
    It’s my own damn fault.

    My conclusion: Republicans are one step behind that poor, sick bastard in figuring out their main problem. Themselves.

    You want scary? They aren’t as bad as the democrats!

  • plh

    Outstanding quote. I, too, believe that this is the ultimate solution. I am heartened by the recent actions of Republican governors (right to work in MI, refusing to set up state Obamacare exchanges in NJ and now PA), and pray that it will continue to the point of actually seizing back their states’ rightful powers. Maybe the President had to be reelected for things to get worse enough for this step to finally occur.

  • red_oakster

    Erick has misread this one completely. Boehner and McConnell are willing to go over the cliff. If they caved, McConnell would get a tough primary and Boehner would be ousted by his caucus. If they want to keep their jobs, they’ll do the opposite of what Erick says-and that’s what they are doing.

  • red_oakster

    One more thing. Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, and Camp are acting as a team. Those three are not going to cave (despite the demonology). They understand the importance of lowering marginal rates. Finally, the debt limit comes into play afterJan 1st and that gives the Republicans leverage.

  • joshinca
  • Finrod

    I realize this is a serious subject, and I’m as annoyed about the miserable failure that our GOP leadership is as much as anyone.

    But, I have to say I was quite amused at the phrasing ‘going blind in the bathroom’. Well-played, Erick.

  • jillibrown

    This is glorious. Welcome to reality – and the 21st century. I must say, you’re a slow learner Mr. Erickson. Many have seen through the republicans con game years ago – it’s nothing but a racket. The claims of small government are nothing but a ruse. The mantra of fiscal conservatism is complete myth. Better late than never.

  • jillibrown

    Too bad the gop has chosen a total incompetent as it’s speaker of the house, eh?

  • jillibrown

    At least the democrats pay for their legislation. The same can’t be said for the republicans. The two unfunded wars, the unfunded bush tax cuts, the bush recession/economic collapse, and the republicans unfunded medicare drug plan are the main drivers of our debt and deficit. If you honestly believe in republicans being fiscally conservative, you’re a fool – and the gop is playing you for a rube. their priorities are themselves, their jobs, and their corporate/wall street benefactors – country falls way down the list. Wise up.

  • jillibrown

    Swi, were you concerned when freedoms were truly lost with the signing of the “Patriot” act? I’d be willing to wager you were wearing your flag pin and thumping your chest with pride over that. Freedoms were truly lost…and the right cheered them on.

  • jillibrown

    Grow up skippy. Adulthood requires negotiation and compromise on a daily basis. Only children insist on their way all day.

  • jillibrown

    Charley when you babble “tax increases hurt the economy” do you have any grasp of reality? You mean hurt the economy like the increases did during the clinton admin? When 22 million jobs were created and we were on the road to record surpluses? That kind of hurt?

    What exactly did we gain from the lowest tax rates in over 50 years? How many jobs were created as a result of the double-dip tax cuts to the “job creators?” Reality shows that during the bush admin – and the reign of the bush tax cuts – the nation saw the lowest job creation rates since WWII. We also increased our debt and deficits at a record pace. That’s a pretty crappy return on our investment – and you don’t have to be a Rhodes scholar to see that. You’ve fallen for the tripe – the complete hooey that the gop has been peddling for years. Putting that lipstick on failed economic policy…and the intellectually weak eat it up.

  • jillibrown

    Take a little trip down memory lane skippy…back to the 90′s and the clinton admin…your analogy is baseless in light of reality.

  • jillibrown

    There aren’t enough old white people for the gop to win national elections. Time for a little serious soul searching. Alienating the fastest growing demographics may still allow wins on local levels, but they’ll never produce wins nationally.

  • jillibrown

    why do you people continue to vote for republicans?

  • westcoastpatriette

    Clean up on aisle six. Another lunatic lib is here spewing Obama hate and idiocy around the place.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Why don’t you shut up?

  • checkmate2012

    Bravo! You are great at regurgitating the Obama lies and talking points. Congratulations for showing your ingnorance at RS.

  • Jack_Savage

    Not on principle, pal. Never on principle.

  • Jack_Savage

    The reason the economy thrived during the Clinton years is that the country threw off the yoke of Democrat rule in Congress in 1994 and was free to prosper without the communist thieves stealing everything they earned.

    Sadly, the Republicans were not in charge of foreign policy, which Clinton ignored and led directly to terrorist attacks, culminating in 9/11. George Bush had to rebuild a neglected military and tend to everything the coward Clinton had let go while he was on his serial sexual predator spree.

    Sorry homey. Facts are facts.

  • Jack_Savage

    So Clinton was completely responsible for a thriving economy, but Obama is not responsible at all for a weak economy?
    Got it, jackass.

  • Jack_Savage

    We don’t think stealing money those fast-growing demographics earn is a real good policy, but we are glad that is your strategy.

    When will you guys realize that communism fails wherever it is tried? I mean, seriously.

  • Jack_Savage

    Because our other choice is mindless Obama worshipers like you.

  • Jack_Savage

    Thank goodness the lightweight moron Obama makes him look like Lincoln.

  • Jack_Savage

    Aha…HAHA…..HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    The only thing Democrats pay for is Obamaphones with my money.

  • Jack_Savage

    We had a little trouble with the terrorists that your suck buddy Clinton ignored, in case you don’t remember.
    How DO you guys wash the blood off your hands, anyway?

  • Jack_Savage

    Wrong. Supporting Specter cost Santorum his Senate seat.

  • commonsenseobserver

    The Clinton administration inherited a recovering economy from the Bush administration after the Bush tax hikes had worn off, promptly went on to slow growth down, and then was forced into a worldwide boom with a capital gains tax cut and spending restraint.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Loopholes can’t be illegal.

  • commonsenseobserver

    He wouldn’t have made much of a difference anyway, but the thing is, even if McCain had not asked for it, without 60 votes, the bill could not have passed, except through reconciliation, and reconciliation required the sunset.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Nah. It only made the margin bigger.

  • CharleyK

    Jilli,

    Tax increases can have only three possible effects on an economy; they can help the economy, hurt the economy, or have no effect.

    You apparently believe that tax increases HELP the economy, that businesses can grow faster and hire more people, and that consumers can buy more goods and services…when they have LESS cash in the bank.

    So the best way to REALLY help the economy is for the government to tax it all. Every single dime. That way, we would all be rich!

    Fascinating. That’s a NEW IDEA that you really must explain for the benefit of all mankind.

  • Dave_A

    1) Taking control of 1 house of government is not ‘the wind at our back’

    2) Bohemer isn’t the problem… Everyone keeps saying he’ll cave – and he might – but he seems to be holding position for now….

    The desire to have a ‘firebrand’ speaker is NOT in-line with the ability to get anything out of this, while only holding one house of government.

    P.S.: Newt eventually caved in 95….

  • Dave_A

    The FED is doing their job.

    In a savings-free economy, low interest rates are mandatory, and inflation is a fact of life.

    Due to the consumer-choices of Americans, we have a savings-free economy.

  • Dave_A

    The democrats haven’t paid for anything.

    The national debt went up 2x as much in 4 years of Obama, as in 8 years of Bush.

    And the ‘unfunded wars’? First off, EVERY SINGLE war in US history has been ‘unfunded’.

    Second, the wars (which we did not start, in case you forgot) cost less than $300bn/yr.

  • CharleyK

    Not at all. Did you ever run outside when the wind is blowing? You can still run against the wind. But the stronger the wind, the worse your performance.

    Raising taxes hurts the economy in the same way that a stronger wind in your face slows your running. These days, we want companies to run FASTER, not slower. So the last thing we should do is to increase their headwind.

    Tax increases hurt the economy. Pass it on.

  • becky5

    Oh for crying out loud jillibrown, which do you think is most responsible for the jobs created during the time Clinton was president:

    1.) The biggest technology boom in all of human history, coupled with a 500% spike in the Nasdaq, or…

    2.) The Democrats raising tax rates

  • commonsenseobserver

    Not to mention that we actually had an operating surplus in the last budget under Bush and a Republican Congress, and the entire deficit fell every year from 2004 to 2007, while the debt ratio was restrained during that time, remaining near Clinton levels.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Yes, but I’m not sure even a fireband Boehner is the best face of the party.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Really, are we banned from saying words like “fine” or “build” too now?

  • celador2

    The landslide of 2010 was tea party outrage grounded deep in debt reduction and limited government and was independent of DC leadership. The GOP led by Boehner and McConnell had been banished to the wilderness but not for fiscal responsibility. They rubber stamped Bush expansions of spending.

    When Obama took office Jan 2009 McConnell had 39 and could stop no filibuster. But, Boehner was in minority and Pelosi Speaker of a Majoritarian House. Obama had a super majority but blew his victory goodwill in 2009 and 10. The upbeat special election win in MA by Scott Brown on a campaign against Obamacare gave the GOP Senate caucus its magic 40 to have a fillibuster January 2010. November 2010 saw the landslide of discontent.

    When there was public outrage on spending and government takeovers and Republicans regained House 2010 those seats were mostly tea party or about 87 of them were. But, Boehner was not the driving force on taking back the House. And McConnell did not drive the Senate gains that gave us Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Pat Toomney and Ron Johnson. .

    Boehner became speaker anyway and his caucus leadership reflected seniority not tone or mood of the electorate 2010.

    Boehner is not as responsible for 2010 as tea party was national and grassroots. but is more responsible for losses in 2006 and 08.

    About 83 freshmen of class 2010 ran again and all but 11 won. Why the silence from the tea party and conservatives at this time?

    Where is Michele Bachman, chair tea party caucus?

    Have we been had, folks?

  • celador2

    Yeah, its a shame the tea party who won so many seats they gave Minority leader Bioehner the Spekership for 2011 do not join together and pick someone else in line wth tea party promises and campaign events.
    .

  • rosenstern

    At my age it is great to be told to grow up, not to mention being called Skippy – makes me feel young again. I believe that that voters are hungry for politicians that have the courage of their convictions and take principled stands.

  • Bill S

    See ya…Skippy.

  • jaykali

    Ya we are still playing by big government rules.

  • celador2

    Ah, We can forgive him his big shotism in hindsight, I’d take Newt back in a minute as Speaker, wouldn’t you?

  • celador2

    You can’t put lipstick on a pig.

  • celador2

    Thumbs up!

  • celador2

    Thumbs up 2!
    And new diary at RS implies liberal WA state may not do exchanges now GOP have more control in state Senate.

  • celador2

    Its seniority system top down and based on getting a slot in caucus. hierarchy pecking order. House members never break that set up’s lock.

  • celador2

    No, jill high taxes do not alone render econmic growth in all cases if any.

    The spending rates were very much lower in Era of Bill and Newtie, were they not?

    Was there not a balanced budget deal negotiated by Rep John Kasich chr House budget committee?
    And what was national debt under Clinton?
    Your post reminds me of Maddow an apologist on high taxes and economic prosperity using cooked book numbers.

  • celador2

    Does that mean back to Clinton era spending?

  • celador2

    Voting GOP beats voting DNC every time.

  • celador2

    oh, the 787bn stimulus was paid for 2009 along with more bank and auto bailouts. Are not tax payers stiffed still on GM?

  • checkmate2012

    Thank you for not making us live through this drone again! And what a spot to post that drool.