« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Boehner’s Tax Increase to Nowhere

So Boehner plans to introduce a bill on the House floor that increases the top marginal tax rate on those earning more than $1 million per year.  Most likely, Boehner and Obama will ultimately agree on a deal that splits the difference between $400,000 and $500,000.  Many Republicans will shrug their shoulders:  “Who cares about a few rich liberals?”

However, this rationale represents a shortsighted view of our problems with the tax system, the budget, and the role of government.

Obama and the Democrats have engaged in sly marketing to peddle their tax increases.  After spending more than a decade fighting the Bush tax cuts and denying that they lowered the tax burden on everyone, they now co-opted the tax cuts and are demanding that taxes on the rich go up, lest the middle class go over the “fiscal cliff.”  Instead of calling them out for fighting against those very tax cuts for years, Republicans have given into this doomsday notion of avoiding the deceitfully contrived fiscal cliff, and are therefore resigned to raising taxes.

The reality is that the Bush tax cuts primarily benefited the middle class, not the rich.  That’s why Congress will never produce enough revenue from taxing the rich, even without factoring in the damage to the economy from tax increases.  According to the CBO’s monthly budget report, revenues have already increased in just the first two months of FY 2013 as much as they would have yielded the entire year from Boehner’s tax increase.  Yet, the debt actually increased because of new spending, despite the debt ceiling deal.  In that sense, this is a tax hike to nowhere.

Moreover, the broader point that has been overlooked by Boehner and the boys is that it’s not just about the Bush tax rates for the rich.  He has refused to put Obamacare tax hikes on the table – taxes which will ultimately affect everyone.  Beginning next month, there will be a $123 billion tax hike in the form of a 3.8% surtax on investment income for families earning more than 250k, not just over $1 million.  This is on top of a 0.9% increase in the Medicare payroll tax.  Middle class seniors will be hosed with new taxes on Flexible Savings Accounts, the 2.3% excise tax on medical devices, and a cap on deductions for medical expenses.

Ignoring the Obamacare taxes as part of the final deal is outrageous.

Here are some other things to consider:

  • The federal government has incurred a $86.8 trillion long-term liability just for the top three entitlement programs.  An austerity cut to the current system without transformational reform is not real entitlement reform.  The goal of healthcare reform is not to merely cut its costs to the federal budget; it is to alleviate the burden of government-run healthcare on the entire healthcare sector.  Any proposal to tweak the outlays for programs such as Medicare, without fundamentally reforming their anti-free-market structure, will only achieve minor savings, cause pain for those suffering from healthcare inflation, and incur the wrath of the largest voting bloc.
  • After 50 years of the war on poverty, we’ve spent 18 trillion, now up to 1 trillion per year, yet poverty as at an all-time high.  Nothing will change from this deal.
  • There are 2,184 assistance programs.  Which one will be eliminated as a result of this deal?
  • We’ve accrued $5.73 trillion in debt over the past 4 years, as much as from the nation’s founding to 2001.  This deal will consummate that spending binge and increase it, albeit at a slower pace.  We are literally debating a distinction of spending $46.5 trillion over 10 years vs. $45.5 trillion.
  • The tax hikes are immediate; the spending cuts are baseline cuts, tenuous, and not guaranteed in the future.  The guaranteed revenue will not be used for deficit reduction; Obama will spend it on new stimulus.

The sad thing is that this bill represents the right goal post headed into the final week of negotiations.  The final products will be much worse and will probably include a clean debt ceiling increase.

We already know that Republicans will never demand something substantial, such as entitlement reform or Obamacare repeal, something that will fundamentally alter the trajectory.  However, they have always stood firm on taxes.  This vote, which is scheduled for the end of the week, will serve as a jail break vote – one that frees them up to vote for additional tax increases in the future.  Hey, once you vote to increase on those earning more than $1 million, you could knock it down to $500,000 and include caps on deduction for those in the second tax bracket as well.  Sensing this opportunity, Democrats are immediately balking at the proposal, knowing all too well that they can extract even more concessions.

Boehner plans to schedule a vote on two bills; one would raise income, dividends, and capital gains taxes on families earning more than $250,000 and one would raise taxes on those about the $1 million threshold.  We must demand regular order on the floor of the House with the opportunity for members to offer amendments.  Please call your representatives and tell them not to raise taxes for the purpose of feeding the rapacious, unconstitutional growth of government.

COMMENTS

  • http://conservative-wanderer.com/ Conservative Wanderer

    Brent Bozell has already said that he’ll encourage conservatives not to give a single penny to the GOP if they agree to any tax increases.

    I gotta agree… tax increases in this economy aren’t gonna help, and are actively going to hurt.

    http://conservative-wanderer.com/2012/11/29/brent-bozell-pressures-rnc-on-taxes/

  • plh

    Exactly right! End of story!

  • tompusateri

    The real danger is hiding the spending by borrowing more. We’re better off holding firm on the debt ceiling creating a de-facto balanced budget amendment and then let taxes go up to pay for the government we have. Then when people don’t like paying for it, they’ll ask for cuts.

  • ceili_dancer

    Why delay, so we can get all worked up again a year or two down the line? We got into this mess because of a temporary tax increase and other stop-gap measures. To quote Yoda, “Do or do not, there is no try” there needs to be a commitment or no one will follow.

  • markkozikowski

    “However, this rationale represents a shortsighted view of our problems with the tax system, the budget, and the role of government.”

    Boehner, with all due respect, has NO VIEW of any of this.

    He is only interested in his being SOTH this term, next, and on, and on, and on.

    As long as he can keep 50% + 1 of his state constituents happy, he is happy. And apparently, than only means that he promises what they want. There is no need to deliver.

  • OhioHistorian

    I believe that the Speaker can force a “yeas and nays” vote which means that all present must vote in this manner if they vote. So an abstention would be considered a “Present” vote which has gone on forever. However, an abstention is not a vote, so it counts neither way.

  • OhioHistorian

    What do you think that the Bernanke QE is doing? You are getting a tax increase on your WEALTH in the manner that it will buy less because there is more money out there. It is not progressive, is the only problem liberals have.

  • OhioHistorian

    And Schumer’s of 2010.

  • OhioHistorian

    The Senate can force it to the floor if Dems will vote with it on a release petition. The way to handle this is to try to get Dems to help bring it to the floor, like Chucky Schumer who agreed with it two years ago.

  • Bill S

    You are enormously naive if you think Obama would take the blame for any cliff-diving we do. Believe me, the press will nail this to the backs of the GOP, no matter what. So “making Obama own it” is really poor logic to use for “going over the cliff”…won’t happen.

  • votemout2012

    We need a new speaker who can articulate conservative principle. Are we still trying to get republican congressman to Block Boehner confirmation as speaker by abstaining for voting in January?

  • checkmate2012

    revtm, are you referring to plan B or the previous Boehner offer that also had a tax increase for over a million plus set aside the debt limit for a year? O should have taken that deal as it was a gift and hopefully will never be offered again (thank goodness O didn’t take it!)

    I’m starting to like Plan B and I think the Dems and prez are scared it could pass the Senate evidenced by their very swift dismissal of it, not to mention it was a Pelosi idea to begin with. Hmm.

    From www.Speaker.gov:

    “Here’s what the House “Plan B” bill does – and doesn’t – do. According to the House Ways & Means Committee, the House Plan B bill –

    Does not raise taxes. It is a net tax cut that prevents a $4.6 trillion tax hike on January 1;

    Permanently extends income tax rate cuts for Americans making less than $1 million, which protects 99.81 percent of all taxpayers;

    Permanently extends the current estate and gift tax ($5 million at 35 percent and indexed for inflation);

    Permanently extends section 179 expensing for small businesses ($250,000 and indexed for inflation);

    Permanently stops the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) from hitting more middle class families;

    Permanently extends parity for capital gains and dividend taxes, preventing dividend taxes from being taxed at the highest rates; and

    Does not include anything on the debt limit or other non-tax policy items. Remember, Speaker Boehner’s rule on the debt limit still applies: spending cuts must exceed any debt limit increase.

    It’s important to have “a backup plan that makes sure that as few American taxpayers are affected by this increase as possible,” said Speaker Boehner. That’s exactly what “Plan B” will do.”

  • rabun1016

    And a good many in the GOP are afraid of Boehner and McConnell. Hence, no opposition, ever.

  • revtm

    i was referring to the plan b that obama nixed today.
    I understand the hatred folks have for Boehner but i do think he has handled these negotiations well. Hes officially called Obama’s bluff twice now to try and get spending cuts going and it is finally starting to stick that the “tax raise for millionaires” isnt what the democrats really want and the GOP has begun to expose it. Now we need to point that out over and over.

  • checkmate2012

    Very good points. I like what a Republican Rep. said on Greta, that Boehner assumes he’s negotiating will a willing party, but I hope he learns that O isn’t a willing accomplice to avoid the fiscal cliff.
    I agree with you that he’s done his best to negotiate in good faith (not all to my liking) and if O and the Dems don’t pass Plan B, then you’re spot on that it exposes they never wanted a deal in the 1st place and it’s not about millionaires and billionaires. Of course we who didn’t vote for him knew this all along.

  • joshinca

    No doubt that the media will dutifully propagandize for Obama. But I question how much traction that will have with low information voters.

  • joshinca

    I fear that it’s actually worse than that.

    With Boehner already thinking of his next gig as a mulitmillion dollar a year lobbyist that can get things done. In which case, caving, aka making a deal, enhances his career prospects.

  • Jon “Occam” Blue-Collar

    I didn’t know we ever got out of our current recession. Care to confirm?

  • Jon “Occam” Blue-Collar

    The GOP has a message to deliver, that being a conservative platform message? Aside from our pundits, I’ve yet to hear it, the best I’m able to glean from the current GOP is they don’t mind spending us into oblivion, they just want to do it on their terms. Oh, unless you count the contortion of our platforms espoused everyday by the liberal MSM, which is the only one too large of the voting public hears everyday.

  • Bill S

    The fact of the matter is the so-called “low-information voters” will blame the GOP, not Obama. Any ideas we have that “he will own it” are just ridiculous.

    I believe we are basically saying the same thing.

  • revtm

    well Boehner brought the wood today, people should be applauding him. Plan B or nothing…