« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

What is Marriage?

Download Podcast | iTunes | Podcast Feed

On today’s edition of Coffee and Markets, Brad Jackson and Allysen Efferson are joined by Ryan Anderson to discuss his new book, “What is Marriage?: Man and Woman: A Defense,” how the President’s evolved opinion of marriage is impacting the debate, and why the role of the state is a critical component in the definition of marriage.

We’re brought to you by Stephen Clouse and Associates and The Heritage Foundation’s Morning Bell. If you’d like to email us, you can do so at bjackson[at]coffeeandmarkets.com. We hope you enjoy the show.

Related Links:
Buy What Is Marriage?: Man and Woman: A Defense on Amazon
Not Dead Yet
Marriage Matters
Can the President Have a Marriage Agenda Without Talking About What Marriage Is?
What is Marriage?

Follow Brad on Twitter
Follow Allysen on Twitter
Follow Ryan on Twitter

The hosts and guests of Coffee and Markets speak only for ourselves, not any clients or employers.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • westcoastpatriette

    The poignancy of the fact that next year the Supreme Court is poised to make profound decisions regarding the future of marriage in America cannot be understated.

    Given the recent ruling whereby they upheld the legitimacy of Obamacare, I would have to say my trust in their judgment as a sound judicial body is at an all-time low.

    And, given the fact that a mere forty years ago, the same court — although comprised of different actors — foisted the “right” to kill babies in the womb upon all states, thus thrusting America into further moral decline than we have ever known — I will not be surprised if they issue another ruling re: the “right” to homosexual marriage thus inflicting more moral turmoil on the nation.

    Not sure what the significance of forty years is in this case. Many times, it represented a period of judgment in the Bible. Maybe this court will reflect on the consequences of issuing a ruling devoid of moral instruction such as was done in Roe v. Wade and change courses. However, nothing in the recent history of the court gives me that hope.