« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Just How Badly John Boehner Played His Hand

I talked to two congressmen who were not involved in the purge or victims of it. They both said that seeing House leaders back “squishes” during the primaries including against some incumbents and then seeing them throw conservatives off committees was all they needed to strengthen their spines against the Speaker.

They said they’re happy to be team players, but they think conservatives in the conference are now treated as kids who are to be seen and not heard. They decided they needed to be heard. They like John Boehner. But they are angry with Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy, and Boehner.

They think John Boehner was a terrible negotiator and should never have gone public. They said that leaderships’ bravado to the press yesterday that they had the votes was ridiculous given how poorly the whip operation has worked the last two years. They thought it would be close. They thought they would lose. But they didn’t think leadership really had the votes, just that people would fold in the end.

Few did.

“The Speaker really messed this up by trying to make it a public spectacle,” concluded one. “Some of us were happy to oblige.”

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://scipio62.livejournal.com/ scipio62

    Boehner gave away the game after the election was over. Instead of taking stock that he was still going to be Speaker with a GOP majority in the House, an extremely powerful force, Boehner went weak. Boehner (and many others, even here) were more worried about looking bad to the Democrat media when he and the others should have already figured it as a given that he and the GOP were already going to get the blame. Worse, Boehner did all this on Obama’s turf while Obama was acting like the gutter bully he is. Even worse still, Boehner himself tried to publicly cajole conservatives into passing a bad bill.

    You figure a guy who has been in the House for over 20 years should know the game, know that the rules are fixed against him, and figure out how to change the rules to his, his party’s, and America’s advantage. Yet after nearly two years as Speaker, Boehner still doesn’t. Neither does the GOP leadership.

  • Marcus_Traianus

    “treated as kids who are to be seen and not heard. They decided they needed to be heard”

    Then threw a tantrum, reinforcing their need to be treated as children.

    Where are their alternate ideas? I don’t mean one-minute snippets on talk shows, legislative hi-jinx or leaks/discussions with writers. The plan that this caucus of conservatives is standing behind, replete with press conferences and written articulation?

    You want to know why we are fallaciously being portrayed as the party of no? Look in the mirror. This is not a party of “ideas”. It’s a mob with factions who occasionally band together to yell at the sun for shining too brightly.

  • bdirks

    I see four articles on the front page of RedState proudly hoisting the scalp of John Boehner on this one. Congratulations.

    What is your solution though? What would you all do now if you were Speaker?

  • loganyung

    I just watched Boehner deliver the most moronic news conference. The bottom line that he said was “we’re dealing with the perception of some members that they would be accused of voting for a tax hike”, clearly focusing the blame on House Conservatives. He even brought up the lifeguard analogy.

    What didn’t he say?

    1. All Democrats in the House were planning to vote against Plan B, and the Senate promised to let the bill die. The President even promised to veto the bill. What was the purpose in voting for a bill that was guaranteed to go nowhere? So, the Democrats and the President have now vowed to increase taxes on virtually all Americans, and all Americans will feel it in their first paycheck of the new year.

    2. The President once talked about the scenario of 10 dollars in spending cuts for every dollar in tax increases, and now he’s offering a fake 85 cents for every dollar in tax increases. The president’s plan bankrupts America. He refuses to take his Presidency serious.

    3. Boehner was asked about allowing a vote on the President’s plan. He should have said that the President’s budget was brought up to a vote this past summer, and it got zero votes. The President is so out of touch that he can’t even get votes from his own party.

    4. The President wants everyone to pay more taxes, because that’s what’s needed for him to further his reckless spending. What the President doesn’t seem to realize is that by raising taxes on everyone (he thinks that everyone is rich), there will be less money coming into the government in taxes.

  • http://scipio62.livejournal.com/ scipio62

    I’ve already mentioned what I would do in other threads.

  • JKnight

    I’m not so optimistic that this will all come back to haunt Democrats by 2014. While the electoral turf favors Republicans in 2014, it will all depend on how things progress over the next two years. Democrats believe (and polling suggests) that the public supports them on taxes. I don’t personally think many Democrats feel spending is a problem. There will come a day when that is proven otherwise, but 2014 may not be that time.

    Course, let’s not forget that the healthcare law will be really getting into gear by the time 2014′s election comes around.

  • WY_Cowboy

    The fact of the matter is this is the bed that John Boehner and Eric Cantor made. Now they have to sleep in it. The three top GOP leaders were mistaked when they thought the best way to lead the GOP conference was to use the same threats, tactics, and rewards that Nancy Pelosi uses.
    They engender no loyalty from their backbenchers. They threaten positions on A committees while ignoring seniority, cause PACs to withhold contributions, and treat members as if they were children and they are the parent. They are not leaders. They are autocrats who have lost their ability to punish the serfs.
    Time for the serfs to rise up and elect a new Speaker!

  • earlgrey

    he lost. He won’t be in the house next year.

  • earlgrey

    He isn’t a Kos Kid. He’s been her a long while.

  • Bill S

    No, actually, that’s not true. He wants to raise the top bracket (not “all of the tax rates”) back to the Clinton levels…and we don’t. And we want big cuts to the government…and they don’t. The two don’t mesh. Neither side is going to win 100% of what they want, so [gasp], someone’s going to have to compromise … preferably BOTH someones.

    You are right about one thing – Boehner doesn’t know how to play the game. We have to mix politics and policy.

  • Bill S

    :cue the “THE SPEAKER DOESN’T HAVE TO BE IN THE HOUSE!!!11!” argument:

  • earlgrey

    If conservatives wanted Plan B to fail, where is their plan for success? Why weren’t they present at the caucus meeting where they opted not to put the plan up for a vote.

    Boehner messed up with the purge and general treatment of conservatives, but now that conservatives have what they want, where is their plan?

    Or is embarrassing Boehner all they were after?

  • Jack_Savage

    Walk away and let expenditures hit the debt ceiling, then ask Obama and Reid what they plan to do.

  • Jack_Savage

    I think they are pining for a trip off the fiscal cliff. They have passed budget after budget, and plan after plan with no result. They are also going to be voting “no” on raising the debt ceiling. They took too much heat for voting “yes” the last time.

  • tnguy

    x 100.
    Will never get this notion of “compromise” that the foolish throw around here. There is no compromise with the left. Their plan – and Boehner’s “plan” – was to raise taxes and not cut spending. That Boehner’s plan included slightly less of a tax increase is inconsequential.

  • NightTwister

    There were a lot of bad hands played yesterday. Boehner’s wasn’t the only one. The only one left sitting with aces is Obama. Republican factions are just left arguing over whether their pair of black jacks or red jacks is the higher hand.

  • checkmate2012

    I agree with you and for those that missed the so-called Republican Joe Scarborough on MSNBC this morning talking with Rep. Tim Heulskamp, it demonstates just how insincere the call to raise taxes is to solve our country’s debt problem.

    In the clip, Joe admits that he knows the tax increase on the top 2% will only pay for 8-9 days of gov’t spending but Reps. should agree to raise the taxs as means to compromise, knowing it won’t solve the problem. See minutes 5-10…..stunning.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/ns/msnbc_tv-morning_joe/

  • WhiteOut

    Great passion / wrong analysis:

    ‘Pubs will get blamed for whatever happens by Obum and the willing media. If Plan B passed, then the Dems get to hang ‘raising taxes’ on the Pubs forever.

    It is my belief that at some point you have to quit trying to elicit a response that you really cannot control, and simply stand on principle (which you can).

  • becky5

    1. Obama gets massive defense cuts
    2. Obama gets huge tax/revenue increases

    And which master Republican negotiator orchestrated that deal last year?

  • lonelyinthemiddle

    True, but at least if plan B passed the house republicans could argue that they made a good faith effort to avert what is about to happen.

    Now they can’t even do that. Obama gets everything. He’s on the precipice of getting the full rollback of the Bush-era tax cuts coupled with deep defense cuts. And after all that, he gets to blame conservatives using a media that is all too happy to deliver that message.

    Lack of political savvy on the right has provided a scenario that even liberals in their wildest dreams never thought possible.

  • rabun1016

    If we are going that direction, I would rather go with Dennis Miller.

  • rabun1016

    Glad I watched that, and thanks for posting, but I did not think Huelskamp did much of a job on either the tax issue or the gun issue.

  • ehscott

    There was no way in the world Plan B would accomplish your very well intentioned goals. Regardless of what they did Obama and Harry Reid have every intention of going over the so-called cliff because it is in their political interests to do so. And the mainstream media (or the government media as I call them) would dutifully report it so. Just look at the White House website and the out and out lies they are telling about the content of Plan B for your answer.

    When you combine low information voters with a wildly slanted media you have no hope of getting the message across that you want regardless of the facts. That is the wisdom that Boehner and the rest of the leadership do not have and why they went down this rat hole.

  • MF

    Sharkey, no disrespect intended, but you are wrong on so many levels. First, the American people are NOT smarter than the politicians give them credit for. The average voter is disconnected, relying only on what they hear from MSM (LSM), which is always going to be heavily slanted in the liberals’ favor. Pass Plan B, and the story is that raising taxes was always the right thing to do in the first place, and it’s just that the Repubs won’t raise them enough and that’s why this economy still stinks. WhiteOut has it right.

  • Melody Warbington

    Pass 2 separate bills. One permanently extending the tax cuts for everyone making under $250 K, and the other permanently extending the tax cuts for everyone making over $250 K. At that point, we haven’t raised taxes on anyone, and the Dems have a choice. If they pass bill #1, everybody gets credit for saving the middle class and the majority of Americans from a tax hike. If not, the Dems own it. If they pass bill #2, they own the tax hike and the consequences that follow. If not, they own tax cuts for the rich. Oh, my.

    Laffer’s idea, but it’s really not that hard, except for Congress apparently.

  • Finrod

    Now is not the time for blame.

    I was convinced from the beginning that we were well and truly buggered no matter how this came out. Either we were going to concede everything to the Democrats, or we were going to come up with some half-assed compromise that involved raising taxes now for the promise of mythical spending cuts later (like every previous one of these types of compromises have ended up), or we’d chug over the fiscal cliff.

    There ain’t a good option amongst those.

    Marcus, if you can’t see all the ideas that Republicans and conservatives have put on the table the last few years, then where in bloody blue blazes have you been? We have plenty of ideas, just none good enough or persuasive enough to get enough of the caucus behind. But at least we have ideas, instead of being stuck in permanent 20th century “tax and spend” mode like the Democrats.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Dear Marcus Fallacious Stupidious. It is you RINOs who have no ideas.”

    I’m sorry but the name-calling is NOT helpful … even if its pretty funny.

    Seriously, our problem is like of common ground, unity of purpose etc. Not served by ad hominems on either side. I guess its venting.

    … this … “Boehner is a great American traitor” … is garbage.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “I was convinced from the beginning that we were well and truly buggered
    no matter how this came out. Either we were going to concede everything
    to the Democrats, or we were going to come up with some half-assed
    compromise that involved raising taxes now for the promise of mythical
    spending cuts later”

    CORRECT!

    So bashing some group or another group on OUR SIDE for how buggered we are is wrong and futile.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “Walk away and let expenditures hit the debt ceiling, then ask Obama and Reid what they plan to do.”

    we know that answer: They want to Tax More, Spend More, Blame the GOP.

    So they tell you that …. Then what?

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    If we shut down that Govt, then conservatives have leverage since govt isnt working.
    When its about $400b/year tax hike, much different story. GOP base hardest hit! going off the fiscal cliff is a leftists’ wet dream. They get more revenues.
    Most of them are FINE with taxing all Americans more.

    I dont get this shortsighted conservative belief that going off the cliff is somehow a good thing. In the end, its a win for Big Govt either way.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “There was no way in the world Plan B would accomplish your very well
    intentioned goals. Regardless of what they did Obama and Harry Reid
    have every intention of going over the so-called cliff because it is in
    their political interests to do so”

    If we have a reasonable alternative passed by the House and ‘on the table’ to be simply passed, then it would be blatantly obvious that going over the cliff is on Reid and Obama.

    It’s a cop out to say voters would be uninformed anyway. we have to use what we can to make our case. This obviously didnt go well for Team GOP. I compare it to Abe Lincoln’s lesser Union Generals.
    RINOs are the McLellans, unable to use the leverage they have to win; the Tea Partiers are the genl Hookers, too rash and not strategic, making rookie mistakes … what we need is a Grant, able to unite that Army and move forward persistently and not throw in the towel when under fire, doggedly pursuing our goals.

    Someday our Grant will arrive.

  • Jack_Savage

    I say go for it. We’ll see if that is good economic policy. If so, we deserve to lose. If not, then we have an issue.

  • runner12

    Boehner is the worst with messaging and the media. He has allowed this debate to be all about taxes instead of cutting spending. He should have been on every tnews program explaining why just raising taxes will not help our fiscal mess. The guy really needs to go.

  • http://llphsecondrevolution.wordpress.com/ spoasteph97

    Spread this around: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/12/21/House-Republican-members-circulate-plan-to-oust-Speaker?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BigGovernment+%28Big+Government%29

    House Conservative Members are making plans now! Contact your GOP member and ask him/her to get on board!

  • junglecogs

    Newt did the same thing to former Congressman (WI) Mark Neumann back in the ’90s for refusing to vote for GOP pork bills. That backfired on Newt too.

  • joshinca

    The three top GOP leaders were mistaked when they thought the best way to lead the GOP conference was to use the same threats, tactics, and rewards that Nancy Pelosi uses.

    Are those the same tactics Pelosi uses? I don’t ever remember hearing of democrats punishing members for being to far left, which is the equivalent of Boehner and Cantor’s war on conservatives.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    That’s what’s being bandied about. And it makes sense. Lost seats, got embarrassed, we need a new strategy. Time for a new coach.

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/21/laura-ingraham-well-placed-conservative-voice-says-paul-ryan-in-line-to-replace-boehner/

    I dont know if Paul Ryan is the right man for the job, but Boehner’s tried his bag of tricks and they aint working.

  • sliverlining

    The Party of Lincoln . . . Is that supposed to be a compliment or a label that stuck?
    In my debunking quest, I read that the words Boothe spoke so famously were quite germane at the time. Lincoln not that popular as much as feared. Whether or not that latest book was debunking a myth or bunk itself still gives me pause for thought. The politics we see right now has a divided country with a leader who seeks to divide at every turn. The GOP is falling all over itself all the while the Party of Asses play their part to the hilt.

    I’m left thinking they ALL just want re-election. Everyone knows the “Fiscal Cliff” threshold has passed. We could now wait months for any “real” work to come from Congress. It sure as hell isn’t coming from the Executive Branch in any shape or form.
    All the plans and next moves we discuss here are basically moot. Are you going to vote the incumbent in again? Of course you will because the other guy will and why throw away your vote?

    I’ll be here 4 years from now and re-post this.

    Sliverlining

  • Marcus_Traianus

    I can see it brother. And to your point it is indeed not the time for blame. That was my initial point.

    We all need to look in the mirror- together

    I have no doubt whatsoever there are many good ideas in the GOP. The main problem is that folks have forgotten how to negotiate amongst themselves. Good negotiation by definition requires compromise. Compromise is not, nor should it be equated with or be in a material sense- surrender.

    We mostly have a leadership issue. The people we have entrusted to guide us are blinded by experience and jaded by parochial desires. They fail us in many ways, not the least of which is their poor representation of the many bills, ideas and proposals we, as a party, have worked on. That failure has left the citizenry with false impressions and divided our party members.

    Until that is fixed, we shall not move forward.