« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Fiscal Deal: Tax Hikes, Green Pork, Stimulus, Oh My

Surprise surprise, they have a deal to avoid the politicians’ cliff.  Who didn’t see that coming?

Here’s an enigmatic riddle for you: what happens when Republicans publicly obsess about the degree of tax increases they are willing to accept without a commensurate demand for spending cuts?  You get tax hikes and no spending cuts!  In fact, we will spend even more as a result of this deal.  Haven’t we seen this rodeo a gazzilion times?

As if on cue, negotiators have agreed to raise the top income tax rate from 35% to 39.6% on individuals earning more than $400,000 and married filers earning above $450,000.  They will also see their dividends and CapGains tax rates go up to 20%.  In addition, the Death Tax, which should be completely abolished, will increase from 35% to 40% on all assets above $5.12 million.  There will be a permanent AMT patch as well, as if there already wasn’t one anyway.

What about the spending side?  Here are the spending increases:

  • A $30 billion one-year extension of Medicare doc fix
  • A $30 billion one-year extension of 73 week unemployment insurance. Over the past four years, the federal government has collected roughly $192 billion in federal unemployment payroll taxes, while paying out $510 billion in benefits.  Evidently, that’s not good enough.
  • Stimulus Refundable Tax Credits:  Somehow, a 5-year extension of Obama’s stimulus refundable tax credits got inserted into the deal.  So he calls a tax cut a handout, and a handout a tax cut.  These latter three provisions alone will easily top $100 billion a year, dwarfing the $50-$60 billion in static revenue projections from the tax cuts on the rich.  So much for a balanced approach.
  • Green Energy Pork:  The irony is that while the rich earned every penny of their money, Obama refers to the current system – one in which the top 1% pay 37% of the taxes – as a handout to the rich.  Yet, this deal extends a true handout, the 2.2 cent per kilowatt/hour wind Production Tax Credit.  This is a refundable credit that can be claimed by any wind company that fails to generate a profit, of which there are many.  In addition, all special interest credits passed out of the Senate Finance Committee  – the real loopholes in the tax code – are included in the deal.

Of course, nothing is being done about the 5 major Obamacare tax hikes that are set to take effect this week, including the deleterious 2.3% tax on all medical devices, the millionaires’ surtax, and the 0.9% increase of the Medicare payroll tax.  It’s absolutely stupefying that Republicans couldn’t use this as a leverage point, after 16 Democrat senators, including Al Franken, wrote a letter requesting a delay in the implementation of this tax.

Of course, there is no agreement that Senate Democrats must formulate a budget for the first time in 1342 days.

It’s amusing to watch some Republicans decry Obama’s smug press conference and his mocking threat of raising more taxes during the next fiscal imbroglio over the debt ceiling.  Obama is correct.  Once you agree to the notion that we need to raise taxes on the rich (both through the expiration of the Bush rates and the Obamacare taxes), why shouldn’t every debt deal contain a “balanced approach?”

Not only will Republicans fail to push real spending cuts in exchange for the debt ceiling, they might actually toss an interception and incur more tax increases.  Lindsey Graham already began repeating the insanity from 2011 by demanding spending cuts from Obama in one sentence while emphatically declaring he would never “let us default” in the next sentence.  That sort of rhetoric will really scare Obama into compromising on spending.

Moreover, the preliminary framework of this deal calls for delaying the sequester for two months.  That will coincide perfectly with the debt ceiling fight, providing Obama with another bargaining chip and gratuitously exacerbating the schism between fiscal conservatives and defense hawks.

The Senate is voting tonight on the bill, and it looks like they have the votes to pass this stimulus/tax hike.  House conservatives must demand an open floor process so they can offer an amendment to fully extend all the rates including making the payroll tax cut permanent.  That is a much better alternative middle class tax cut than Obama’s refundable credit handouts.  Let Obama oppose the aspect of the fiscal cliff that will be felt most vividly and immediately.

The amazing thing is that this deal is more appalling than the previous plans floated over the past few months.  If Republicans planed on caving, why didn’t they just agree to this in November?  At least the stock market would have been spared from uncertainty.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • mong001

    I haven’t seen any commentary regarding the individual income threshold being nearly as high as the family income threshold. This clearly places an extra burden on married families who overall are a solid GOP voting block. Why would our GOP senators agree to this nonsense? I know, I know, I don’t really need an explanation for STUPID. Give them a chance and I’m sure the GOP will give Obama his way on capping deductions for charitable giving too. Our party is too ignorant to realize Obama’s going after this deduction because it will hit conservatives harder than liberals since liberals are real tightwads when it comes to actually helping others rather than talking about their “compassion.”

  • confab

    “If Republicans planed on caving, why didn’t they just agree to this in November?”

    An excellent point.. Why run out the clock, take all the arrows and scare people out of their minds when you’re just going to cave anyway?

    If you don’t have actual principles to defend, why do any of this?

    You get all the heat, Obama looks like he’s won a great victory, and he rubs it in your face.. If that’s a genius strategy, I’d like to see a poor one for purposes of comparison.

    What’s really maddening is that Boehner is the most powerful man in the country right now.. He’s holding the appropriations authority and the keys to the treasury for a country that is flat broke.

    What would have happened if he had simply said “No” and forced a comprehensive deal will be left for us to imagine..Regardless of the outcome, it would have reinforced the idea that the GOP is the party of fiscal responsibility when voters are pondering their options in 2014…

    As it is, can the GOP be solidly relied upon to deliver anything?

    If so, what?

  • confab

    This is really bothering me.. and it has been for some time.

    I can’t RELIABLY depend on the GOP to:

    1) Defend my right to bear arms.
    2) Defend my privacy.
    3) Defend any other part of my Constitution.
    4) Make me more free.
    5) Shrink the federal government.
    6) Be fiscally responsible or support balanced budgets.. Or even the idea of budgets in general.
    7) Defend the borders of our country.. Even as they traipse all over the globe defending borders elsewhere.
    8) Defend my right to equal protection before government and the law..

    And now, after all their endless blather.. I can’t count on them on tax hikes? ORLLY?

    I’m REALLY stating to ask myself: Why am I a Republican again?

    Or even: What IS a Republican and what do they stand for??

    Does anyone know? Because I sure don’t..

  • jaykali

    Lets face it, elections have consequences. We lost, they won. Sometimes things get worst before they get better. Democrats are getting what they want. Good. Obama is super cocky EVEN FOR HIM. Even better. Ya some Republicans are going to get screwed. Fine, lets flush some more of the political class and get in more actual conservatives. Obama has the Republican leadership by the balls. That’s fine with me, we don’t like their leadership anyway. Conservatives are in the wilderness for sure. The country will get worse, our hope is that ppl will wake up and see the these policies don’t work. Watching these politicians on TV just has me believing that this is a big game to them. I am sorry that real ppl are going to suffer. I really am. Some through no fault of their own, but this is who the people elected. I strongly believe that things have to get much worse. Obama and democrats don’t care ab debt bc people don’t care ab it. And maybe they never will. Our best hope is that a large group of people start to wake up.

  • NightTwister

    Hey, a “Plan B” might be worth looking into about now. Oh. Right.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    I hate to break this to you, confab–George W. Bush was the one that gave the Obamaphone lady her phone.

  • confab

    I’m aware of that..

    Actually, the program began under Reagan, I believe.. And it was intended to provide land lines to poor folks, I suppose for safety purposes.. In case there was a fire or a medical emergency or something. Bush just expanded it to cell phones. At least as I understand it.

    But the point is: That woman had something to show for her support.. the democrats are like that.. Their base has ultimate faith in them, because they can reliably be counted on to deliver for them.

    Not overnight.. Not all at once.. But they move the ball. They’re dedicated, and their base knows this.

    I guess I’m just a little jealous that my team doesn’t have these characteristics and that I can’t rely upon them?

    It must be nice to know that your leadership is in your corner, and will fight for you tooth and nail!

    Look at Obamacare? How many dem politicians fell on their swords to win that one?

    They fight for what they believe.. While I don’t even KNOW what my leaders really believe.

  • Tbone

    Just who in this country do the Repubicans represent? Anyone have an idea? Certainly not me. It is time for a new party.

  • gmat

    It just occurred to me that each of the members of Congress may actually be acting in his own self-interest, vs. doing the public business. Is that possible?

  • commonsenseobserver

    Is that intended to make us feel better?

    In any case, yes, Republicans accept that those who cannot work, the old, the young, and the sick, do need a helping hand, by local communities, civil society, and then, after all those, a limited, sustainable and strong social safety net. The problem is, since the Great Society first came, the social safety net has been bloated far beyond its original goal of protecting people from extreme economic hardship and helping people get back up on their feet. The safety net now threatens to devour its only source of support- the American taxpayer. And not just the heroic entrepreneur, but also the striving family, the exhausted retiree, the working poor, and, ultimately, those who depend on the safety net themselves. The tide of red ink and stagnation cannot be thwarted by envy and division, and it will ultimately swallow public services and the safety net while pulling the free market down with them.

    The goal of Conservative welfare reform is not to demonize the poor, but to focus help on those who need it most, to help people off welfare into work, where they can be better off, and to truly restore social justice by not just tackling the symptoms of poverty, but its causes- worklessnes and social breakdown above all others.

  • votemout2012

    Republicans just handed democrats control of the congress in 2014. There is no difference between the 2 parties in my mind. No reason to vote in 2014 when republican leadership is a mirror image of democrat leadership.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Not intended to make anyone feel better or worse, just to point out that even when Republicans do something to benefit the needy, the dims still get credit for it.

    Your comment can easily be summed up with an expression I am sure you have heard before: It’s a safety net, not a hammock.

  • republitarian

    You’re a Republican because you know you’re not a Democrat.
    That’s what the party has become: not-Democrats.
    Romney and McCain were the not-Democrat nominees.
    The elephant in the big tent stinks and I’m tired of holding my nose election after election.

    Experience has shown that men are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of backroom deals and compromises continue advancing statist policies of Big Government designed to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government and to provide new Guards for their future security.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Yes, it would be nice to get something other than a kick in the shins from the ol’ GOP.

    The contradiction is that, as much as it may look to the dem constituency that their party is moving the ball for them, they are intentionally keeping a vast swath of their constituency in abject poverty, with little chance of ever escaping it. They’ve turned the public schools into babysitting/indoctrination centers, where very little useful education is provided, and they rain down just enough manna from heaven to keep the masses happy and at home watching the boob tube, making boobs out of all of them.

  • socialistpig

    Never again will I vote for a GOP candidate, not contribute a red dime to the GOP coffers.

  • DerKrieger

    Don’t they always?

  • dsmurf

    how odd that Howard Dean on CNBC sounds like Erickson here about taking the cliff option. So I still have popcorn and await tomorrows festivities at Boehner’s Congress. You got to hand it to McConnell for leading someplace, which we can’t get from the majority. If nothing else, taking the cliff allows for the marriage penalty, (will gay marriages still want the tax benefits or lack thereof?) and for 47 % of the country to not get redistributed wealth. Time for all to have skin in the game tax law.

  • avgjo

    Ever notice the dims don’t have to worry about their own Senators screwing them?

    Yeah, must be nice to know that your people reliably represent you.

  • commonsenseobserver

    True. ^^

  • confab

    Everything you say is true of them, but they don’t seem to care?

    Socialists seem to prefer it that way.. ?

    They’d rather have a little bit that’s guaranteed them as opposed to no guarantees, but no upper limits..

    They’re a baffling bunch, to be sure. But their leadership clearly understands them, and they get what they want.

    No issue is ever off the table till they pull down a victory of some sort.. I have to admit, I’m a bit jealous of that. I’d like to see the GOP at least mimic their level of enthusiasm!

  • commonsenseobserver

    Even people like Justin Amash?
    You have to realize, of course, that rank-and-file Republicans were very isolated from the talks, and I’m not even sure Paul Ryan was involved….

  • avgjo

    Problem is, Republicans seem to be, daily, going from ‘not-Democrats’, to ‘quasi-Democrats’. From there, the mutation will be shortly complete.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    No argument from these quarters. It takes ambition and hard work to achieve something significant in this life. The 47% have been stripped of ambition by the handouts of their government. They wallow in the pleasures that their leaders dole out to them in teaspoons, and most are just waiting to die. Sad that so few escape the treadmill.

  • plh

    The only reason I remain a registered Republican in FL is so I can vote for the most conservative, limited Government candidate in the primaries. I no longer contribute to the Party, but to individual campaigns only, having explained my reasons to telephone solicitors until the Party stopped calling. For any third party movement to have a realistic chance of success, a substantial percentage of elected Republican Senators, Representatives, and state and local officials would need to announce their switch over to the new party at an organized event.

  • plh

    Except for pulling the Democrat lever, I completely agree.

  • plh

    With regard to the establishment, not what we believe in; that’s become painfully obvious.

  • plh

    Amen.

  • joshinca

    Agree with you, except for the part about voting for irresponsible dems.

  • confab

    No kidding.. They’re like a well oiled fighting machine. Every one of them is up to speed. Every one of them has the same talking point. Every one of them is playing for keeps..

    Then, there’s “our” side.. which frequently resemble a bunch of monkeys poking something they don’t recognize with a long stick.

    It’s very frustrating.

    I’m a bit jealous.

  • socialistpig

    God agreed not to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah if even ten righteous people lived there. I think the GOP congressional delegation would come up a bit short of the threshold.

    The GOP controls the House of Representatives and can stop this fiscal abomination if they want to. If it fails to do so, it must die.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Not really. All it needs is Pelosi’s caucus, plus thirty plus, I believe, rebels.

    You know what people call us- the nasty party. Sodom and Gomorrah, when applied to your own elected officials, doesn’t help.

  • avgjo

    Yeah, so am I. That’s why I’ve decided to study them and mirror their tactics.

  • confab

    And they’re claiming there’s a farm bill extension included in it too..

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57561465/its-official-deal-reached-on-fiscal-cliff/

    pork, pork, pork..

  • jphamlore

    The Republicans waited until now for this bad deal because they wanted the deal to be voted on in the House in 2013 so that the ones who vote yes most in danger of primary challenges can claim technically they did not vote for a tax increase. Yes they are that cynical.

  • confab

    Wow.. I certainly hope that’s not the case.. Because that’s the absolute thinnest rationale I can possibly imagine.

    I don’t doubt you though.. It’s certainly possible they believe it will make some difference to anyone.

  • socialistpig

    All but five GOP senators (Rubio, Shelby, Grassley, Paul, Lee) voted “yes”.

    The GOP must die.

  • elayman

    Honestly, they don’t seem to care about the debt because Republicans haven’t cared enough about it in the past…

  • WmCraig

    Red State is not a place were “new party” advocacy is tolerated. Friendly advice. However, I do agree with you that it is time for new faces, new direction and time that we get involved in a way that focuses on gaining political power and using that power to our advantage. And while that doesn’t mean we need a new Republican Party it does mean that the future of the Republican party doesn’t look like the past.

    The Democrat party is made up of various constituencies that compete with one another for crumbs from the table. At least the Democrats deliver those crumbs. What we want is different, but what we need is the same thing. We need a ground game that can turn out the R votes (or discourage the D votes), can build an echo chamber for free market, federalist ideas. And can hold the people we put into power accountable to deliver the goodies. Now the goodies will be different. But they are goodies all the same. School vouchers, end to federal education intervention, better security, more liberty. And we do this in ways that appeals to Blue state minorities, religious faithful, independents, and the elderly.

    We can do that from within the structure. We just need to change the structure.

  • WmCraig

    It looks to me like they are delivering cover for Obama, and while I guess they might not have understood that in 2011, to continue to do so is either sheer stupidity or collusion. Fool me once shame on you as the saying goes. I am rejecting stupidity and going with collusion.

  • WmCraig

    Actually the dims senators abuse them all the time, they are just distracted by the shiny objects to realize it.

  • Tbone

    You’re full of crap. No one is going to change the Party. The corrupt RINO leadership will see to that.

  • diamondreo

    “Then, there’s “our” side.. which frequently resemble a bunch of monkeys poking something they don’t recognize with a long stick.”

    …confab, you just succinctly summed-up the GOP post-election fiscal-cliff “negotiations”!

    The only thing missing was the part where they all look at each other and nod and scream in agreement…that was last night.

    ..now they get a banana to slide down the chute or something…

    The most compelling evidence for the Evolutionary Theory yet:
    “our” govt.-monkeys have found the most efficient way to get us to totalitarianism without the guns and gulags..yet. Sheeez!

  • avgjo

    Perhaps, although from where I’m standing, you can reliably count on dim Senators to vote FOR a given liberal agenda item, 9 times out of 10.

    Obamacare? Check.
    DADT repeal? Check.

    You don’t see Harry Reid get undermined by dim Senators whenever he comes out and says that any GOP budget is DOA. We, on the other hand, get to worry about the Maine Sisters*, Lindsey Grahamnesty, John ‘Maverick’ McCain and Tom the ‘Gangster’ Coburn ‘reaching out’ to the other side and screwing us; we get to worry about this ALL THE TIME.

    *Thank God we’re rid of Snowe. Good riddance to this rubbish.