« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Tom Coburn, Ron Johnson, and Pat Toomey Should be Ashamed

Tom Coburn cares about the size and scope of the federal government. So do Ron Johnson and Pat Toomey. But they just voted for a tax increase with legislation that was not even publicly available. In other words, they voted for a law that was not even written for them to review.

And what was in the law?

Nothing to rein in the size of Washington. A tax increase on income. And a payroll tax increase on all Americans.

In fact, the Senate deal brings in less revenue than John Boehner’s Plan B, not that it was ever going to become law.

The only intent of the legislation, we now know from the White House, was to break the Republicans. The White House wanted to get the GOP to break their no tax pledge.

Tom Coburn, Ron Johnson, and Pat Toomey were complicit in this.

Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Mike Lee, Richard Shelby, Chuck Grassley (who wanted a farm bill) voted no.

Coburn, Johnson, and Toomey might console themselves into thinking they’ll now have leverage with the debt ceiling. But their colleagues have already proven themselves unserious on spending cuts. We are that this point because in the last debt ceiling debate Congress agreed to a series of cuts and has now used this vote to weasel out of those cuts.

Any member of congress thinking they’ll get him now with the next debt ceiling increase is fooling themselves to avoid having to realize what a fool they are.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • MiamiDave

    This “deal” tragic and disgusting capitulation. It’s not even worth trying to put lipstick on this pig.

  • northfloridawriter

    Never judge a man by what he says but by what he does. Coburn, Toomey, and Ron Johnson, just showed us what they are really made of. It makes me sick to my stomach. We keep electing people who promise a lot and then all they do is cave. So much for principles. I hope you guys are happy with yourselves. You are now Obama’s whipping boys. You’ve been had.

  • robertfee

    FIRE THEM ALL.

  • drfredc

    Why does the GOP LOSERship needs conservative votes to pass this turd?

    Applaud the LOSERship for their hand holding photo-op with the Ocrats. Focus conservative energy on collectively articulate at least one common sense conservative spending reduction budgeting idea — like eliminating base line budgeting…

    You know, something other than “just no” — go on the offense.

    Also, more conservatives whining about needing a smaller government is not offense — it’s offending to the common sense… Modern society needs creative individually driven social marketplace solutions, not more big government social marketplaces solutions…. Effectively designed and implemented Individually driven social markets will result in smaller government, not wishing for small government all by itself. If this doesn’t make sense to you, then you’re part of the problem, not part of the solution…

  • http://www.deanticks.com digitaldean

    My senator, Ron Johnson, embarrassed conservatives with his capitulation this morning. I have already e- mailed my disgust. I have no time for a RINO-esque type of politician. We have several hundred of them already. At least Rubio and Paul stood their ground.

  • commonsenseobserver

    I think that’s what it was meant to do.

  • http://www.fuckobama.org/ revprez

    No, they shouldn’t. The folks calling for them to throw away the Bush tax cuts in their entirety should certainly be ashamed. I can understand a protest vote here and there, but to adopt a course of action that gives the Democrats $5 trillion in new revenue and a very credible case that Republicans are responsible for it is the very definition of “boneheaded.”

    Erick, you really need to straighten up on this issue. There’s no excuse for turning down an opportunity to permanently avoid raising ordinary and investment rates to Clinton era levels, especially when we still retain the only weapons needed to actually fight back on spending.

  • http://www.fuckobama.org/ revprez

    Senator Paul wouldn’t know how to get from A to B if you held his hand and walked him there. And Marco Rubio has shown he can pull an Obama too and lodge a protest vote when there’s no risk of actually screwing the pooch.

    But please, explain to me how handing the Democrats $5 trillion in taxpayer money over ten years amounts to a conservative position?

  • http://www.fuckobama.org/ revprez

    And we avoid that fate by chucking the Bush tax cuts in their entirety? Please explain.

  • http://www.deanticks.com digitaldean

    Well the entire GOP could’ve voted against it and would’ve had the same result. Disagree on Rand Paul and Rubio. There is such a thing as principle. So-called conservatives bent over and grabbed thei ankles in Senate

  • http://www.fuckobama.org/ revprez

    I ask again. What principle requires conservatives to accept a $5 trillion tax hike? If it’s the principle of not voting for anything that secures a majority of Democratic votes, then I’d submit that’s as dumb a principle as not breathing because liberals do and that we abandon it immediately.

  • commonsenseobserver

    It makes them look like they are trying to have it both ways. Much more hazardous than simply voting yes, as they did, or no, as I would prefer.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Because Coburn has actually spoken up for, fought for, and put forth specific ideas, and brings people together to try and push them through, earning respect even if the final product is not perfect. Which is why he can get the benefit of doubt.

  • commonsenseobserver

    His characterization of Sen. Paul is definitely untrue, but there’s not much evidence either way on Rubio.

    It could be principle, but, as Revprez said, it’s probably the politics of painless protest.

  • viperscale

    Is this the first time Marco Rubio voted against establishment?

  • viperscale

    Sorry but I don’t think we’re that naive. We see him on all the other votes too, not just the one where the public might actually be paying attention

  • DavidS1787

    Next Time Coburn, Toomey, and Ron Johnson are on TV being interviewed I hope these guys are asked ” Since you say you are fiscal conservatives why would you vote for a bill that doesn’t do anything to reduce the debt and raise taxes on everyone?”