« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

What Did Congress Do About Hurricane Sandy? Rape it for What It’s Worth!

John Boehner Deserves Praise for Not Passing the Sandy Relief Pork

The Caring Members of Congress React To Hurricane Sandy

When Michael Crichton wrote the novel Eaters of The Dead I doubt he had the current US Senate in mind. He could have, and it wouldn’t have required him to alter the title. The sickening opportunism these elected public servants displayed when presented with the opportunity to pass an emergency relief bill for Hurricane Sandy was an exercise in calculated and cynical ghoulishness. Jon Fleischman of FlashReport.com lays out some odious examples of the pork contained in the US Senate Hurricane Sandy relief bill.


$8 million to buy cars and equipment for the Homeland Security and Justice departments.
• $150 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to dole out to fisheries in Alaska
• $2 million for the Smithsonian Institution to repair museum roofs in DC.
• $207 million for the VA Manhattan Medical Center
• $3.3 million for the Plum Island Animal Disease Center
• $1.1 million to repair national cemeteries
• $58.8 million for forest restoration on private land.
• $10.78 billion for public transportation, most of which is allocated to future construction and improvements, not disaster relief.
• $17 billion for wasteful Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), a program that has become notorious for its use as a backdoor earmark program.
• $197 million “to… protect coastal ecosystems and habitat impacted by Hurricane Sandy.”
• $41 million to fix up eight military bases, including Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
• $4 million for repairs at Kennedy Space Center in Florida (because Florida is so close to New Jersey, right?)

So the frequently-abused “Weeper of The House” John Boehner recoiled from this measure with condign disgust and delayed a vote until the House can bring up a less porcine version that directs it’s moneys towards people in the Northeast who happened to have actually gotten rained on last fall when the storm hit. What did Speaker Boehner get in return for standing up against the detestable perversion of loading the Hurricane Sandy Relief Bill with political pork? Show him what he wins, Dom Pardo.

…Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who complained that the GOP stuck a “knife in the back of New Yorkers and New Jerseyites.”

Luckily, not every Republican jumped on the opportunity to punish John Boehner for showing courage and professionalism in the face of a Senate attempt to blatantly steal about $30Bn in pork for their pet projects thousands of miles away from Hurricane Sandy victims. Darrel Issa responded to the strum und drang as follows.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Ca.) observed:“They had the opportunity to have a $27-to $30-billion legit relief package, packed it with pork, then dared us not to vote on it.”

Yet here’s the problem: there is no reward for sticking up for what is right on these issues. People scream atop their lungs that Boehner just folds on spending. Boehner stands up like he should against the Hurricane Sandy waste-a-thon. John Boehner gets accused by other Republicans of having knifed New York and New Jersey in the back.

It just sort of leaves me scratching my head and wondering how we got this big, nasty budget deficit. Part of that answer is easy. Whenever disaster strikes, we now have Congress that stands ready. It stands ready with a bag full of sleazy appropriations to rape a tragic situation for every dollar that it is worth.

COMMENTS

  • rightlane1111

    Wouldn’t it be nice if we had bills that dealt with the subject of the bill? Obamacare…3.8% for resale of property…nothing to do with healthcare. Student loans…Sallie Mae…nothing to do with healthcare. So…why do we as a public allow this? Time to start thinking Constitutional Convention.

  • Kyle-MI

    Why did the Senate send the House such a bill? Because they knew they could get away with it. What absolutely disgusts me is the reporting from the MSM. They interview weeping hurricane victims asking why the House GOP is so mean, but fail to mention anything about the pork. It is as if we don’t have record deficits and debt. There was not even any courtesy “House GOP leaders said …”. The propaganda on TV is unbelievably infuriating.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Exactly. That aspect of it is disgusting as well.

  • westcoastpatriette

    You forgot to mention specifically the disgusting rant by Chris Christie over Boehner’s rejection of the pork-laden bill, Repair Man Jack. In fact, in case you missed it, here is a pretty outrageous diary by a New Jersey native furious about it: http://www.redstate.com/davenj1/2013/01/06/another-christie-rant-more-criticism/

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Yep. Aware of both…Which was why I took some Republicans to task for beating up on Boehner for acting the way Conservatives expect Republicans to act and turning away porkfest bills like this one.

  • timmcg

    You can’t have a bill for every item of government spending.

    They have to be grouped together somehow.

    And earmarks are really more of an corruption issue than a fiscal issue if they are used to buy votes or pay off donors.

    They only add up to less than 1% of the budget but make many people feel like their money is being wasted.

  • PowerToThePeople

    Yes you can and yes they should. Budgets are made for a reason, want discretionary spending, add it to the budget. Once it is gone, pork projects cease. Now when scumbag senator want to add 30 million to a bill to pay for windmills in the desert, he or she has to offer up a bill explaining why more funds should be added and exactly what it is for. Now the populace see what the money is really being spent on, cronies. Then when something like Sandy happens the Congress is only sent a bill containing funds that will be used directly in victims, not the extra 70% that goes everywhere else. No reason at all that every penny spent is not held to a high level of accountability other than the fact the bums do not want to be watched or held accountable.

    Earmarks are a fiscal issue as well as a corruption issue. It is our money being spent on BS causes, hence it is fiscal.

    Who gives a damn what the percent is, it is a problem that needs addressed. The recent sandy bill is prime example of the problem. Very little of the bill actually goes to the problem and the added amount is well above 1%.

    There is also the problem of asshattery. Defense asks for “X” amount of dollars. Budget/bill is proposed. Public is told about it being meant to buy our warriors bullet proof vests. That is all they know. So when they see republicans mass to vote against it, all they see is our party being anti military. But the real reason it is voted against is that “X” amount is now 3 times as high and contains earmarks to pay for abortion clinics in some state because they offer “other services,” money for the art show in that state that contains Pissed on Jesus and other atrocious so called art, etc. But no one hears about that or the massive amount of money added on. This is why it is a fiscal issue and the percent being added is irrelevant.

  • checkmate2012

    The hypocrisy is unbelievable especially when we normally assign it to Lefties and now it’s coming from within our own party nonetheless! Just once could we not close ranks and place the blame on the D’s where it belongs? Apparantly not when Grimm, King, Christie, etc, could have easily said we would have had the relief we needed sooner had O not waited over a month to request disaster aid which included most of the pork btw, and then the Senate under Reid taking another 3 weeks to pass it with the pork at the last minute, forcing R’s to look heartless. Would it take that many brain cells from these men to place blame where it belongs instead of causing fissures within our own Party??!! They’re all losers in my book!
    RMJ, thank you for sticking up for Boehner when he gets it and tries to do the right thing- cut wasteful spending!

  • checkmate2012

    Now that Boehner learned his mistakes and will only act with normal legislation, there shouln’t be any talks of seq. or debt ceiling until the Senate passes a budget (i.e. mark up the House budget and send it back). That should keep the celing in place for quite a while :)

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Sounds great to me, chief!

  • checkmate2012

    Hi rickbull! And I’m hardly a chief..maybe a mischief maker! You can be chief and I’ll be mc. Good to see you :)

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    I’ve been here reading daily, but haven’t been inspired to comment much of late. I’m getting back in the groove, though. How was your Christmas?