« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama Fetishism – The Hollow Evil of Tactical Adoration

Like Scientology For The Poli-Scis..

I’ll bet the people who voted for Obama never realized how utterly cool they had become. They too get to have something in common with Tom Cruise! Like Tom Cruise they’ve been brainwashed, duped out of their money and will ultimately be betrayed by a nut-job cult. No, voting for Barack Obama doesn’t quite automatically enroll you in the Church of Scientology*, but when Time Magazine describes the 2nd Term of any US President as The Second Coming, I tend to think we’ve crossed a dangerous border between admiration and idolatry. Here’s how Newsweek Magazine serves up a dose of blasphemy in honor of our Dominus et Deus, Barack I.

Forgive Them Lord, They Know Not What They Do.

Forgive Them Lord, They Know Not What They Do.

This pathetic media fetish is something I call tactical adoration. This partially cynical strategy of using propaganda to elevate President Obama as an object of worship is studied and barbaric hypocrisy. It uses art, media and popular entertainment to make a secular, political leader take on the trappings of a sacred figure. This is done to deliberately raise barriers of conscience against anyone who would question or speak out against the priorities or beliefs of our President Elect. This, more than any politically active Mega-Church’s campaign donations, violates the important barrier between church and state. It seeks to make the very state an idolatrous church dedicated to the worship of a human leader.

When American Artist, Sheppard Fairey, painted “Obama Hope,” he deliberately and consciously aped the style of Soviet, Nazi and Chinese propaganda artists who deified despotic overlords of the 20th Century. The painting went viral, and became a staple feature of rallies involving some of our president’s creepier true believers.

A major feature of American Exceptionalism used to be our desire to be a nation of laws and not men. This statement implied that all of us, regardless of wealth and station were subordinate to a greater law and a higher social order. In simpler terms, the millionaire and all the peasants who worked for him put their drawers on the exact same way. There was to be no American Nobility, the very idea of calling any American President’s administration Camelot would transgress against the form of decent democratic society.

Yet as our republic has devolved into a group of warring political factions seeking to elect their very own dictator, the tactical adoration of said Dear Leader has replaced responsible journalism and affirmative citizenship. This has been intentionally aided and abetted by members of the artistic and journalistic profession. In keeping with Vladamir Lenin’s Maxim “Art is a weapon,” the images presented to our eyes were carefully arranged to be evocative of adoration towards an elected leader.

Senator Ted Cruz from Texas advises us not to go along for the ride. Senator Cruz had the following commentary regarding Barack Obama’s recent behavior after the Sandy Hook Shootings.

Republican senator Ted Cruz of Texas said Thursday that Barack Obama is “high on his own power” with regard to the president’s announced efforts on gun control. Speaking on Laura Ingraham’s radio talk show, Cruz, who was just elected to the Senate last November, said “this is a president who has drunk the Kool-Aid.”

The entire President Jesus Act grew wearisome to the more observant, even before Barack Obama took office in 2009. Fred Reed wrote the following observations he had from Barack Obama’s First Inaugural Mass four years ago.

I can stand singing commercials for toilet paper. I once watched a half hour of Oprah and recovered, though with psychic scars. But twelve hours of embarrassing imperial pomp, chattered about by boringly dressed dullardesses with the intelligence of catfish? A freaking coronation with everything except inbred hemophiliac nobles?
In a sane world, a president would sign in online. User ID, password, bingo, he’s president, spare me the media circus. Why involve the rest of us? When I get a new job, I don’t need a $150-million parade that blocks the streets everywhere. It’s a sign of a defective character.

My only exception to Fred’s observations are that he acts as if the pomp, ceremony and disruption are due to poor breeding and ignorant taste rather than inimical intent. This is not intended to be just another inauguration. It’s THE SECOND COMING!, and after maybe thirty minutes of modern idolatry and dictator worship unworthy of the world’s foremost democracy, I’ll probably wish that it really was.

Thus Barack Obama’s tactical adoration circus reminds me of Scientology at it’s worst. Like the nut-jobs in Tinseltown it adopts the facade of religious meaning without any viable raod to salvation or redemption. Like L. Ron Hubbard at his most mendacious, it constantly bilks people’s money to “continue the endless struggle.” And most importantly, it is all hollow and tactical at its rotten core. People are knowingly usurping the langauge and trappings of religious adoration to boost the power of a fallible, secular leader. Obama Fetishism truly exemplifies the sin of idolary at its worst.

*-But only because Obama Fetishism lacks the scientific rigor of Scientology.

COMMENTS

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    He’s not the first to do a 2nd Innauguration. Clinton and Bush II’s 2nd Innaugurals were forgettable affairs and Reagan’s had to be moved indoors due to sub-zero temperatures. It will be interesting to see how Obama’s 2nd Innaugural Mass goes over.

  • Chris

    Most political ceremony is forgettable, I agree. That doesn’t mean that there weren’t lots of people there, or that they weren’t expensive also. Anytime the president is involved, it becomes a circus. And you never know, occasionally second inaugurals can be important – Lincoln gave one of his most famous speeches at his.

  • donnybrooke

    RMJ,

    Quite an “AC” moment for Obama. When do we get the golden statue?
    (Come now! I kid our Progressive brethren!) But I do go back and read Lincoln’s Lyceum Address from time to time. Very prescient.

    “At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I
    answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It
    cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must
    ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we
    must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

    “I know the American People are much attached to their
    Government;–I know they would suffer much for its sake;–I
    know they would endure evils long and patiently, before they
    would ever think of exchanging it for another. Yet, notwithstanding
    all this, if the laws be continually despised and disregarded, if
    their rights to be secure in their persons and property, are
    held by no better tenure than the caprice of a mob, the alienation
    of their affections from the Government is the natural
    consequence; and to that, sooner or later, it must come.”

    And he spoke of a leader to come:

    “Distinction will be his paramount object, and although he would
    as willingly, perhaps more so, acquire it by doing good as harm;
    yet, that opportunity being past, and nothing left to be done in
    the way of building up, he would set boldly to the task of
    pulling down.”

    I read Lincoln’s words from 1838 and nod.

  • uselogic

    As long as a conservative…. or even a Republican….is elected I think the Nation will be in celebratory mode that day. Might be worth the ridiculous expense.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Reagan took lots of flack because he insisted on continuing to breathe and opposing liberal policies.

  • Sir Aaron

    Maybe…unless his farewall is accompanied by Pelosi’s inauguration…

  • kipling

    And King Saul so worked out well for everyone.

  • runner12

    Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. There is really nothing more you can say about Newsweek.

  • ss396

    Have no fear. As soon as a Republican takes office, the media will awaken from their trance, and they will remember their duty. Of course they will then pursue their duty with a fervid overreaction as some sort of penance for having neglected their duty for so long.

    (And then when the next Dem comes in, the media will realize that they overreacted, so they will back way off as a kind of compensation for their previous overreaction to the Republican. Funny how that works…)

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    I have made no secret of the fact that my wife is a bleeding heart liberal, but, in her defense, she has never once made the comment to me that the rich need to pay their fair share of taxes. She knows how much they already pay. She also knows that she is paying more in taxes than she would like to. She cares for (and her heart bleeds for) the downtrodden, but not to the point of wanting to confiscate more of other people’s money to give to them. In other words, she’s a liberal, not a communist.

  • checkmate2012

    Very true regarding the lame media. I’ve asked many a time where is the radical left when you need them. Where’s Cindy whats-her-name when O sent planes to Libya and won’t answer questions on Benghazi, where is the ACLU on O’care and drones and F&F, where is Sharpton on Chicago killings, etc. They are silent since they adore King O and hold out hope for their bowl of porridge. More sir, please. And no I’m not advocating for the Left, simply pointing out their hypocrisy.

  • checkmate2012

    Sounds like my loving sister. Would give her last dollar to a stranger rather than feed herself, but doesn’t begrudge those that would hire her. She values riches in ways many can’t imagine and is richer for it IMO. Sounds similar to your great wife.

  • ncfamilyman

    That’s assuming he has one. It’s early yet, and we’re just seeing the Organizing for Action stuff taking off. Not good for America at all.

  • rightlane1111

    Well…went to Church today…40th Anniversary of the passing of Roe v Wade. Funny how Obama wants to protect the Children in Newtown….but when he was a State Senator went to post abortion…and in the US Senate…as was his belief, thought partial birth abortion was just fine. So much for the innocents.

    However, here is something interesting in the bulletin ..”There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to Him: Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and man who stirs up dissension among brothers” (Proverbs 6:16-19)

    SOUND LIKE ANYONE WE KNOW???????????

  • kipling

    Awesome Scripture!

  • jaykali

    I would pull my hair out. I do think that the Democrats are very good at messaging to women and men who possess the bleeding heart type quality that a lot of women have. I wish Republicans could figure this out.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    We have, we’re just not good at communicating it: Pride. This was Ronald Reagan’s strength: he conveyed pride in one’s nation and one’s achievements like no liberal EVER could.

  • Sir Aaron

    Yeah…my point. God warned them not to take a king and the people said thanks for your advice but we know better than the Creator of the universe.