« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

As Rates Increase, Colorado Accounted For Nearly Half Of Xcel’s Record 2012 Profits

Coloradans serviced by Xcel Energy were responsible for nearly half of the company’s profits in 2012 due to rate hikes implemented last May. According to Xcel’s 2012 Year End Earnings Report released last week, Coloradans who purchased energy from Xcel paid higher rates and helped boost the company’s profit to a record $905 million dollars.

Though Xcel is based in Minneapolis and serves seven states other than Colorado, the company’s operations in the Rocky Mountain state managed to rack up nearly the same profit as in Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas and Wisconsin combined. Xcel, through its local Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) division, provides 1.4 million Coloradans with electricity and 1.3 million with natural gas.

The earnings report cites increased rates and a warmer summer as the explanation for Colorado’s large profits for the company: “The [full year] increase [in Colorado] is primarily due to an electric rate increase, effective May 2012, and the impact of warmer summer weather.” The earnings statement went on to note that, “The increase was partially offset by decreased wholesale revenue due to the expiration of a long-term power sales agreement with Black Hills Corp., higher depreciation expense and operating and maintenance (O&M) expenses.”

Overall, Xcel closed 2012 with $64 million more in profits than in 2011, when the company managed $841 million in earnings. “We had an excellent year financially and operationally in 2012,” said Ben Fowke, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company.

A week before the 2012 Earnings Report was released however, Fowke held a press conference in Minneapolis to announce that ratepayers across the country should expect to see larger increases in their energy bills than they have seen in decades. Fowke pointed to an aging energy infrastructure and slower revenue growth as reasons for the future projections on January 22 , mere days before Xcel posted its record revenues.

Most recently, Xcel has advocated for projects that would make a more diverse renewable energy portfolio one of the company’s top priorities. Several alternative energy programs launched in Colorado toward the end of the 2012 calendar year, including the Solar Reward community standard offer as well as exploration into greater spending and investment in wind power.

Xcel Energy Colorado has been suggested by the Sierra Club as a potential buyer for the Martin Drake Power Plant in Colorado Springs, which currently faces potential decommissioning pending an investigation by the city council. “Xcel Energy Colorado will retire coal fired boilers at its Arapahoe, Valmont and Cherokee plants,” the Sierra Club opinion piece notes, inferring that Xcel would do the same with the Drake power plant under its control as the company seeks to spend additional money on alternative sources of energy that have yet to prove successful in the state.

Xcel Energy has been a significant political player in local Colorado politics as well. The company contributed to 108 different political causes and candidates in the 2012 election cycle alone. While Xcel contributes to both sides of the aisle and is fairly even with their disbursements, last cycle’s donations titled slightly in the favor of liberal causes and candidates. A total of $65,600 was invested in both Republicans and Democrats last year, and some recipients were in direct competition with each other.

For example, the Xcel Energy Western Political Action Committee of Colorado gave $5,000 to the Colorado Accountable Government Alliance (CAGA), a Tim Gill backed political non-profit that specialized in negative hit pieces against local Republican candidates. Xcel also maxed out the legal candidate contribution limit on Republican Cindy Acree. Acree was one of the primary enemies and a key target of of CAGA’s 527 and IE committee. In similar fashion, Xcel also contributed to both the Colorado Democrat and Republican leadership funds.

Xcel has invested nearly $1.1 million in Colorado state-level legislative races and politics in the last decade.

David Eves, President and CEO of Xcel’s Colorado division, also showed the same patterns in his personal political giving. Eves has given $6,000 in 35 different contributions to opposing political sides since 2010. Key contributions went to Democratic Governor John Hickenlooper and former Republican Speaker of the House Frank McNulty.

COMMENTS

  • davidlgilmer

    I guess I’ll have to revise my long-standing assessment of PSCo as being in the lowest quartile of utility IQs. They are at least making a lot of money! Seriously, I left Colorado over seven years ago partly because the California refugees and the CU-Boulder grads living in the major urban areas had screwed up politics in the state, so I don’t really care how much they pay in their electric bills for their political correctness.

  • sliverlining

    I have received Xcel materials in the mail. Smarmy, vague promises didn’t sell the operation to me at all. This article seems to be a great indication why that is. Sierra Club endorsements really don’t help the sale with me. The opposite is true. Lots of profits from duped customers and alternatives that can’t stand on their own (the very antithesis of self-sustaining) leave me cold. Pun intended.

    The industry for energy alternatives must crawl first, then walk. Run? Probably not, but even while understanding this, and I do, the crawl is taking waaaay too long. It better start showing signs of being the self-sustaining panacea it proclaims to be. The lefties continue to look like idiots without accountability, just big mouths (that need to be fed . . . a lot)

    Is there even one “alternative energy” that has reached ANYTHING that was promised by the pseudo-religious zealots that trumpet the cause?

  • riverwood

    I’m not sure why Xcel Energy deserves criticism on this. First, the fact that they post approx half their profits from the Colorado ratepayers is to be expected. Xcel has 3.4M electric ratepayers and 1.9M gas ratepayers, and Colorado accounts for 1.4M electric and 1.3M gas ratepayers respectively. So, in reality 51% of Xcel’s customer base is in CO..it would naturally follow that around 50% of the revenue/profit would come from CO ratepayers.

    Xcel does invest some dollars in alternate energy sources, but one of the reasons they do so, is that the state of MN requires a certain percentage of energy to be from alternate sources. I personally think the wind turbine farms popping up are ugly, but Xcel doesn’t have much of a choice

    Regulated utilities are a great investment..not alot of growth, but they provide good stability and regular dividends

  • duncer

    $5,000 to a an attack ad group and the “maximum” to the target of those ads is even handed? The maximum to individuals is only $2,000, 2.5 to 1 is even handed? Deceitful much?