« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Tea Party 2.0: Focus On The Four R’s & Fight Back

Rebrand. Retool. Recruit. Re-engage.

Tea Party 2
Last Monday evening, I had the privilege and disappointment of speaking with yet another Tea Party group that had come to hear a message on How to Become a Force Multiplier.

I say it was a privilege to speak to this group (and others like it) because, as always, I found the group comprised of Americans concerned about the future direction of America and highly desirous to hear a message on how to save and restore it.

Yet, it was also a disappointment because, after nearly four years of this upstart movement—this “beautiful chaos” called the Tea Party Movement—after all the demonization by the institutional Left and its media apparatchik; the backstabbing by the Republican establishment; after millions of dollars of donations from large and small donors alike, last Monday’s group (like so many others) were largely unaware of the size of the behemoth we face and, worse, have never been given the basic tools necessary to lead a movement.

As a former mobilization coordinator for the other side, I was disappointed to meet yet another Tea Party group that, after nearly four years, had not even formed a committee to recruit more people into their ranks—something that is absolutely essential to building a movement. [Worse is the fact that, given the age of many Tea Party activists, attrition in the movement is a very real problem.]

While their naivete is not their fault, I was left wondering: Where has all the money gone from all the donations given to the legacy groups? Though it is, in many cases, too late now, why didn’t anyone teach these amateur leaders of a movement how to lead a movement?

It is for all of the above reasons, we (collectively) need to re-evaluate the direction of this hybrid movement called the Tea Party.

Each and every individual that remains associated with the Tea Party movement, needs to look closer at what has gone well and, more importantly, what hasn’t gone well with the Tea Party.

Below are recommendations, for your consideration, to help rebuild a movement that has been attacked (unjustly) by its enemies as well as its alleged “allies.”

Before you can begin to focus on How to Become A Force Multiplier, as I observed (again) last Monday, there must be a re-examination of the Tea Party and where it is going.

Let’s start with some basic needs:

Rebrand the Tea Party: Keep the mission, dump the name.

The Tea Party brand has been effectively destroyed. After three years of demonizing the Tea Party as ‘racist,’ ‘extremist,’ and ‘radical,’ the brand has become a cancer.

It is now a drag on the candidates it supports, with the Left (and GOP establishment types like Karl Rove) gleefully labeling conservative candidates as “outside the mainstream.”

In the meantime, while the Tea Party had once enjoyed 24% popularity, according to a recent Rasmussen poll, only 8% of Americans now identify themselves as members of the Tea Party.

While that is the lowest it has been in the three years, there is some positive news in that poll: Thirty percent of the poll’s participants do hold favorable views of the Tea Party. That is something to build on.

However, insofar as it has been branded and is now associated with negativism, the brand itself must change in order to build and grow again.

Note: Rebranding does not mean disbanding the movement. Instead, rebrand it—into a hundred (or a thousand) different brands.

Think ACORN.

After Andrew Breitbart, James O’Keefe, and Hannah Giles successfully exposed the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and its misdeeds, many thought ACORN disbanded and disappeared.

It did disband. However, it did not disappear.

Instead, like a hydra, ACORN has evolved into numerous other “community organizing” groups.

There has been a target on the big tent called the Tea Party, and the assaults have come from all sides–nearly destroying the tent and turning people away from the essential ideas that originally spawned the Tea Party: Fiscal Responsibility and limited government.

As a result, activists need to think differently.

One such way would be to break off into smaller, more mobile groups that are less identifiable, yet just as effective as the original army of activists once was.

Keep the mission, dump the name, go forth and multiply.

Retool the Movement

One of the major disadvantages of the Tea Party movement has been the unwillingness of certain legacy groups (as well as grassroots groups) to work together, to share technology, information, as well as on-the-ground efforts for GOTV.

In addition to the arrogance of the Republican establishment, everyone claims to have a better mousetrap, a better gadget and each poured money into their gadgets. A few worked, others famously didn’t.

One thing is certain: The Right has a technology deficit.

Leave the egos at the door and share a cup of coffee.

Before the 2014 mid-term elections become another lost cause—another lesson in just how far the Right’s GOTV  (that means Get Out The Vote) pales in comparison to the Left’s—there needs to be one of those ‘super-secret’ meetings among the legacy groups where technology can be demonstrated and chosen as the standard.

Frankly, donors (large and small) should withhold their monies until the legacy leaders, along with grassroots leaders have a kumbaya session to kiss and make up and come to an agreement to work together.  

If the Left could do it (again), so can the Right. [Note: There is a standing offer from an unnamed ex-union guy to bring the baseball bats if that helps move things along.]

Recruit to Build The Movement: Get over the ‘outrage’ and fight for a goal.

Even as you read this, there is a race against time that is occurring.

The Left is pushing for amnesty in order to have 8 million new Progressive voters.

Meanwhile, as noted above, many of the Tea Party groups (some independent and unaffiliated, others not) have never even formed a committee among its members to recruit more people into the movement.

To make matters worse, the Tea Party movement has an attrition problem called age.

All-too-often, Tea Party meeting attendees are grandparents fighting to save America’s future for their grandchildren. Yet, the grandchildren are nowhere to be found. Why?

If you’re fighting for your kids’ future, get your kids involved—and have them bring some friends.

More importantly, develop a formal plan and start recruiting.

Instead of sitting at your computer and passing along the latest ‘outrage of the day’ written by the chattering class (including yours truly), develop a simple set of goals to fight for, develop an action plan, and then execute it.

Move beyond the “Obama did it again…” emails and establish a mission and vision that your group stands for—one that can be articulated in messaging, that others will find appealing.

Then, develop a simple way to communicate your message to people of like mind. It’s called recruitment and really isn’t that difficult.

As I told the group last Monday, if 50 people recruited five people each, then you’d have 250 people. If each of them recruited five more, then you’d have 1250 and so on.

It’s called the Power of Five and it works for both building a movement and getting out the vote.

Re-Engage in the Fight

Obama won the election and the Left is diligently working (along with some on the Right) to reshape American politicsforever. Get over it.

Many people wrongly thought that common sense would permeate American electoral politics and Obama would be defeated. It didn’t happen.

The Left’s machine was bigger, better equipped and more finely tuned than many on the Right estimated. Mistakes were made, systems crash, people stayed home and Obama won.

Now, if people don’t get over their doldrums and re-engage soon, the 2014 mid-terms will come and go and the Democrats will have the House, the Senate, as well as the White House.

Right now, America has a $16.5 trillion debt and $122 trillion in unfunded liabilities.

While stocking up non-perishables is one way to deal with a bleak future, we must also not give up.

Getting off the couch and into our communities is necessary.

The other side has been doing a better job of it, but not all is lost.

Unlike the Left, there are no union treasuries to fund our activities, nor can we fight full time. However, with minimal dollars, and more focused collaboration, America can be restored.

If the Tea Party gets back to basics by rebranding, retooling, recruiting and re-engaging, it can and will Become a Force Multiplier.

Related:

_______________________
“Truth isn’t mean. It’s truth.”
Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)

Get LUR Updates on Twitter.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • plumely

    I like your point about mission specificity. I think you are right that the name also sadly needs to be changed and a cool new acronym would do. We are also missing a person like Abdrew Breitbart who had the will and the means to expose the corruption on the left. So, I think another group needs to be formed to do that. Then another group needs to be formed to target government waste and spending, The Tea party under a new name can still target confiscatory taxes and be for limited government.

  • gs425

    Some planks of the conservative platform:
    -Economic freedom.
    -Balanced budgets.
    -Rule of law (nation of laws)
    -Religious freedom.
    -Strong national defense.
    -Limited government.
    -Individual liberty.
    -Private property rights.
    -Equal opportunity.

    What exactly needs ‘re-branding”

  • flyovermark

    I think my point is that the TEA party doesn’t need to “dump the name”. What adds to the TEA party’s aura of political power is precisely that it isn’t the values of an organized “movement” that are projected onto a coalition of interest groups, but is instead a projection of the values commonly held among individual Americans. Part of the left’s inability to attack the TEA party was that it couldn’t identify us, and that foiled their use of Alinsky’s RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” . The TEA party doesn’t have a command structure, or a “chairman”, on which to focus their attacks in order to besmirch all of us.

    After admitting he is a “former mobilization coordinator for the other side”, I distrust his motives. I fear that LUR would have us transform, via his “four Rs”, into becoming the very kind of “astroturf” grass roots organization that Pelosi falsely accused us of being, or worse, into becoming a better target.

  • aliswell

    I don’t know about dumping the name, it’s just so appropos. The mission is on target, as well. But you make some GREAT points about the utter lack of organizing, recruiting, and technology.

    I went to one ~ and only one ~ Tea Party event in my region a few years ago. The protest consisted of about 150 people. To my surprise, I was neither welcomed nor was anyone interested in recruting me. In fact, information about the group, future events, meetings, goals and the like were sparse. Little to no printed material, no printed contacts, nothing. There was no leadership at all. Nobody wanted to bother contacting me, but rather, the burden was placed on me to go here and call there to gather information about the group’s plans. An attitude of “Not really interested. You’ll have to chase after us if you want to join us” not only doesn’t inspire, it’s bizarre. The dichotomy of feelings between arrival and departure was deeply disappointing.

    I still check the local Tea Party websites for information about upcoming events, new goals, and the like, but little to nothing is ever displayed. However, there are PLENTY of phone calls, emails, and snail mail all requesting donations. As the local Tea Party groups don’t seem to be doing anything, I too have wondered what is being done with any monies they receive. I will say, though, until some major improvements occur not one dime will they get from me again.

  • http://www.myfreeblogs.us grclark

    Uh, sorry, but that would be AATT.

  • http://www.myfreeblogs.us grclark

    Well said, Mark. The new Tea Party Community gives us a chance to share our common voice and ideas in sometimes inspiring ways while NOT getting so “organized” that we begin to smell like a Political Convention. www.teapartycommunity.com Our grassroots should not be given over to the appearance of brick and mortar establishment.

  • lineholder

    So, in other words, you’re saying that becoming organized to the point of genuinely being a force to be reckoned with just isn’t your “cup of tea”?

    If so, then why even have a TEA Party? Why not just have social clubs at a local level?

  • lineholder

    Yet the left did succeed in marginalizing the TEA Party, Mark. If they hadn’t, then the polling results included in LURs article would be much more positive than they are, wouldn’t they?

    You want to play patriots, fine. Like I told your friend below, it’s better to know now so other options can be considered.

  • raginpatriot

    LUR, I like your thinking. Hadn’t thought about dumping the “Tea Party” moniker, but you may be right. The name, coupled with the (well-meaning) folks dressing up in colonial era attire has made it too easy to denigrate the effort.

    That said, no matter what we do, or call ourselves (whether in an umbrella sense or ACORN-like “diversity), the Left and media will still denigrate and try to portray us as being out of the (their) “mainstream.”

    So perhaps we try to neutralize that in advance by tying ourselves into something that will be harder for them to frame / control the narrative. Something along the lines of “The Greatest Generation II — inspired by their example, rekindling their principles, answering our country’s call.” (I’m not saying that THIS is what we should use, just throwing an idea / concept out there as an illustration).

    Building off of that, tie into their patriotism for our country as founded, and rising to its defense on behalf of not just the present, but generations to come. In turn, springboard off of this for discussions regarding fiscal sanity (and I would submit as well the deleterious impact of post 1960′s cultural revolution / cultural Marxism).

    Similarly, as another illustration, the “The Main Street (or Mainstream) Coalition — Not Washington. Not Wall Street. Everyday America.”

  • lineholder

    Thanks for the honesty. You might want to do some research on LUR before completely shutting him down, flyover.

  • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

    Flyover, I did recognize your sarc, and raised you a sarc, ‘comrade.’

  • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

    flyovermark, your comment about the marginalization by the Left *and* the Right is absolutely correct…Unfortunately.

    You are missing, however, one component that am raising. By rebranding the TP movement, I am not talking about into *one* brand, I am talking about into many brands.

    The basis of the strategy is fairly simple: One target (tent) is easy to destroy (via the referenced Alinsky #12) when enough missles are coming in from all sides. However, in guerilla warfare, becoming a more nimble force, with multiple tents, makes it harder to destroy the force and causes the enemy to waste missiles.

    Note again (from above), I am not saying disband. Further, if you look at the slides in How to Become a Force Multiplier (linked in the above post), there is specific reference to reaching out and coordinating with like-minded groups. This can and should be a must.

    Merely changing a name into five different entities does not mean they cease to collaborate as like-minded groups–only that it is harder for the other side to identify the strikes and where they are coming from.

    You (we) can continue down the same path–but it isn’t working. As long as the TP remains as it is, it will continue to see further marginalization until it is utterly destroyed.

    I hope this helps.

    [BTW: I don't claim to have all the answers, but the Left is something I was part of decades ago and have been studying and fighting for the last 20 years. These are ideas--not set in stone. However, I don't see many ideas coming from *anywhere* that are going to change the trajectory...]

  • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

    Aliswell; Some are run better than others. However, most are run by people who have very little experience in leading a movement like this. Moreover, most are doing it with very little money and on their own time (sacrificing time spent doing other things in life). That was my point about: Why, after nearly four years, are groups still so naïve in how to do this? Where did the resources go?

  • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

    earlgray, here is what I told the group last week when one of the leaders did not want to change the name: Fine. Keep the name, but form four other groups within to conduct specific tasks goals.

  • earlgrey

    I’ll suggest that. I brought a copy of you article here to one of our meetings and had our leader read it.

  • 1stRichard

    You are correct on some points but have the wrong strategy. The Tea Party is a distributed network under one banner, this is the big tent but most all are on this side of the fence. In my local network, I have found my self standing with Paulbots to Objectivist, from Christian Evangelists to Classic Liberals and much more. This is the core group of boots on the ground, the leaders and warriors but more importantly, these are the groups that form the foundation of the Tea Party. As you can imagine the only thing these groups can agree on amongst their selves most of the time is to disagree on priorities and the only subject all agree on is remaining on this side of the fence.

    Thus, it is all about the fence and what side of the fence you stand on. There are exceptions but you can only hold your nose for a limited amount of time. This effect is also seen in the media propaganda wherein any misstep of a conservative candidate is amplified. This is also Alinsky rule number four, live up to your book of rules or be killed. In the special election for the U.S. Senate seat formerly held by Secretary of State John Kerry, news of Republican state Rep. Daniel Winslow forming an exploratory committee, all had the same reaction amongst the many groups in the Tea Party, here we go again, a RINO.

    We do have the basic tools, a bit of funding, the technology, the skills and much more but it is locked up in the sub groups that are divided because of the established candidates. We have enough ammunition on the right to totally destroy the left, we don’t need any Force Multiplier now, however we need a uniter first that is on this side of the fence now. If all the groups on this side of the fence open fire at the same time there will be nothing standing on the other side of the fence. The problem here is that we have too many established Republicans that are on the fence and on the wrong side of the fence. It is common sense that the circular firing squad that all too often forms on the right is not a good idea yet we see it all the time. This is the first paradox to resolve before any other steps can be taken.

  • flyovermark

    Thank you for taking the time to further explain your position to me, LUR. I just wish I had confidence in the purposes for your position, and what your priorities are for the results of your plan.

    You assert that “we (collectively) need to re-evaluate the direction of this hybrid movement called the Tea Party”, and then recommend an ambitious plan to build the organizational infrastructure that’s necessary for sustaining a “movement”.

    Here I was, thinking all along that the TEA party was us (collectively) re-evaluating the direction of our nation’s government, and then engaging in an ambitious plan to make a course correction by actively participating in the primary elections of whichever political party we belong to.

    Maybe I’m wrong, and we just weren’t focused on the right thing.

  • flyovermark

    Well, look at that! After nine hours, the post I thought must be lost forever shows up within minutes of posting a replacement for it that I had to recreate from memory. I wonder how that happened? Did the moderator have a change of heart, and decide to let them both go through?

    They’re pretty close don’t you think? Anyway, not bad for an old guy. I like the latest version a little bit more, but they both allude to the same point.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Here’s the why and how of what to do:

    http://www.teapartynation.com/profiles/blogs/what-we-need-to-do-as-soon-as

    The last graphic is the key.

    The Republican Party is there for the taking by conservatives. It starts in our respective locales. No cavalry is coming to save each of us. We have to do it together where we live.

    Immediately. We’ve already wasted four years.

    Thank you.

    CW
    http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

  • Melody Warbington

    And my experience has been totally different. We have an active tea party. We direct our own path, i.e., we decide our agenda, not any national group. Very friendly folks, welcoming atmosphere and the call for donations is minimal. Occasionally a reminder that we operate on a shoestring budget, and everybody is a volunteer. If you want to work, you show up and get busy. We don’t consider it a burden to call and find out what’s going on, considering most of us work for a living, including those who try to keep things like the website up and running.

    For the most part, we have moved beyond flag waving and rallies to activism. Leading up to the election, we sent volunteers to several states, mostly Florida, by working with American Majority. We made phone calls, individually and at calling parties. We mailed thousands of handwritten postcards. Among other things.

    Our strategy at this point is to focus on pushing specific legislation that we think will affect our local area and state for the better. We are starting an initiative for our members to adopt a legislator in order to stay informed and keep the pressure on them to stick to conservative principles. If they do, we’ll have their back. We have built solid relationships with other tea parties and local GOP’s, several legislators, and local talk radio hosts and bloggers. We set up debates and forums for potential candidates.

    Don’t judge all tea party groups by your bad experience. If you really want to get involved, there are plenty of opportunities out there.

  • aliswell

    Wow, Melody, what a difference between your site and the ones local to me! Like night and day. And your activities….”calling” parties, “adopt a legislator,” these are terrific!
    You have given me some ideas. Thank you.

  • aliswell

    Agreed, LUR. I will say, however, you can’t ask that question with regards to the Rainy Day Patriots in Alabama. Would that ALL Tea Party groups were like this one.
    The Tea Party movement needs better organization overall, and TRAINING on HOW to become better organized.

  • Melody Warbington

    Do you mind sharing where you are? I can check around and see if I know anyone in your area.

  • 1stRichard

    I agree cold, we are making progress on that front but it is going to take time and from the looks of it too much time. We have a good number of operatives that have made this their top priority and a good number working in supportive functions at a lower priority. As of now, the lines seem stagnant on this front in this State, wherein the establishment has the high ground being the establishment and with this, they protect their control forcefully. With a stalemate on this front there needs to be another force to break the lines but this seems unlikely. Our State is mostly considered a lost cause and the national GOP seems to have a policy of non-involvement in local matters. All this has given rise to the sentiment that the GOP is dead, a worthless cause as prescribed in the lead news story of one of our news pamphlets here…

    http://thepeoplespen912.webs.com/ppenIssue8.pdf

    I suspect other States are stuck with the same paradox as we are with others getting past this establishment stalemate. This is a complex issue involving funding, time and much more with no quick fix. The many groups are fighting battles on so many fronts locally, from agenda 21 to education and each have an important part in shaping the political landscape. Fighting the Party that is supposed to be on our side of the fence and fighting the leviathan on the left is a problem, a paradox that needs to be resolved before we focus on The Four R’s & Fight Back.