« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ted Cruz: The Paradigm Shift We Need

If a man is judged by the quality of his enemies, Ted Cruz should be a national hero.  Over the past few days, The New York Times and Politico have run stories describing Cruz’s first 6 weeks in office as combative and McCarthy-like by his enemies.  Let us use this as an opportunity to take a victory lap for helping to elect this great patriot.

Here are some quotes from the Times:

Without naming names, Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, offered a biting label for the Texan’s accusatory crusade: McCarthyism.

“It was really reminiscent of a different time and place, when you said, ‘I have here in my pocket a speech you made on such and such a date,’ and, of course, nothing was in the pocket,” she said, a reference to Senator Joseph R. McCarthy’s pursuit of Communists in the 1950s. “It was reminiscent of some bad times.”

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said that some of the demands Mr. Cruz made of Mr. Hagel were “out of bounds, quite frankly.” Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, issued a public rebuke after Mr. Cruz suggested, with no evidence, that Mr. Hagel had accepted honorariums from North Korea.

“All I can say is that the appropriate way to treat Senator Hagel is to be as tough as you want to be, but don’t be disrespectful or malign his character,” Mr. McCain said in an interview.

It’s funny how we all thought a strong national defense was one ideal still universally regarded in the Republican Party, especially by noted “hawks” like Lindsey Graham and John McCain.  Yet, in just a matter of a few weeks, Senator Cruz has done more to fight the blame-America-first crowd than the brokeback partnership has done during their respective careers.  From his stand against Hagel and Kerry and his strong and articulate defense of the Second Amendment to his leadership against the amnesty circus, Cruz has met and exceeded all our expectations.

Now, for the Politico article:

Behind closed doors, some Republican senators report that Cruz, in his stone-cold serious prosecutorial style, speaks at length when it’s far more common for freshman to wait before asserting themselves, particularly ones who were just sworn in. […]

Quick to annoy one of the most powerful Senate Democrats, Chuck Schumer, after he engaged in a combative line of questioning with the New Yorker on a recent Sunday talk show, even though senators from opposing parties are typically far more collegial in those settings.

Much to the dismay of the media, we are no longer bringing a Lamar Alexander to a Chuck Schumer fight.  We are bringing a Ted Cruz.  And no, we will not wait dutifully for 5 years until our voice will be heard through Senator Cruz.  It’s no coincidence that while McCain was beclowning himself with Schumer during the State of the Union Address, Cruz was sitting by his side with the bewildered expression of a man who can no longer distinguish friend from foe.

It is precisely this bipartisan collegial demeanor that has saddled us with incorrigible debt, distorted our free market economy, limited our liberties, attenuated our esteem throughout the world, and weakened our sovereignty.  If we ever hope to restore the strength and character of this Republic, we need to seek out more people like Ted Cruz – patriots who will not wait a single day to begin delivering on their campaign promises.

One man with conviction can do a lot more than a majority of John McCains and Lindsey Grahams.  Graham is up for reelection this cycle; McCain is up in 2016.  The people of South Carolina and Arizona have not elected Chuck Schumer to represent them.  They never would.  They need a choice, not a faint and pathetic echo.

We salute you, Senator Cruz, and we’re calling for backup.

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • Tbone

    John McCain is a worthless piece meat that should be retired and composted. He is worst than Schumer

  • http://llphsecondrevolution.wordpress.com/ spoasteph97

    I AM SO HAPPY! Senator Ted Cruz is awesome! He, Senator Paul, Senator Lee, and Senator Scott are my top 4 favorite senators who have never voted against my beliefs so far during the 113th Congress.

    And with other second-tier senators, conservatives are taking over the GOP. We need to play smart in 2014, and pick our races carefully. Then, we need to fight hard for our candidates.

    But I take a victory lap and say THANK YOU SENATOR TED CRUZ (makes me feel good to call him senator)!

  • http://llphsecondrevolution.wordpress.com/ spoasteph97

    By the way, we need to work together to primary RINO Graham in 2014.

  • ehopejr

    Thanks Daniel. A natural byproduct of conviction is no fear…and this leads to effectiveness in communication. There are signs of light; Dr. Ben Carson is urging all to SPEAK UP, and many are starting. It is time. The old guard will fall due their emptiness; and may we always conduct ourselves w/ virtue as our guide.

  • ehopejr

    I know Tbone…it’s truly getting pretty sad.

  • gunnyg2002

    McLame is just another Soros minion. Him, Grahamnesty, and the rest of the GOP quislings should be tarred and feathered and the worst of them banished to Gitmo.

    GO TED GO!

  • gunnyg2002

    Dr Ben Carson is THE MAN! He ripped into Obama’s policies with Obama ten feet away!

  • lastgopinillinois

    Politico: “senators from opposing parties are typically far more collegial in those settings.”
    Collegial? I think they really meant “SILENT” instead of collegial. They wish he had been silent. Heaven forbid there should be any opposition to the liberal agenda broadcast on a Sunday morning talk show!

  • MiamiDave

    Liberals and their media allies love the Senate because, historically, it has been the body in which “conservatives” bend the knee to the Statist agenda. Those same liberals and liberal-aligned media voices loath Senator Cruz because he refuses to bow. Keep at it, Senator! You are a hero to all of us who want to see our Senators fighting the good fight. And amidst the media maelstrom, remember– if the the Left is hurling rocks at you, it only means that you are doing something right.

  • Hafeed

    Cruz doesn’t represent opposition for opposition’s sake. What he offers is a well articulated rebuttal to all the nonsense Democrats get away with. For instance, one of the flaws that Republicans are only just starting to fix is that they never explained how the community reinvestment act contributed to the financial crisis. Because political blame has been falsely associated with phantom deregulation, Democrats have been able to “wave the bloody shirt” for something big government policies were responsible for. This should never have been allowed to stand, and I have the confidence that Cruz will push back on similarly misguided narratives in the future. If Conservative policies are indeed better, the long term political advantage will manifest itself.

  • votemout2012

    God bless senator Cruz a defender of liberty. USA

  • ss396

    Go for it, Senator Cruz. You WILL be reelected.
    By the way, do you have a brother who could primary Senator Cornyn?

  • MiamiDave

    How so? What is possibly “bad” about members of our caucus standing up for true conservative values and refusing to play the game that the Left wants them to play? What is “good” about Senators using decorum as an excuse to betray their principles? It seems to me that Senator Cruz is the model to which each and every GOP Senator should aspire.

  • Jim_Riggs

    The other day on these pages I defended Senator Coburn and said I’d trade my MD senator for him anytime. If it came down to what I’ve got and Ted Cruz I’d stick to what I’ve got.

  • rennyangel4

    Why not malign Hagel’s character, Mac? Isn’t that what Kennedy did so effectively to Bork, which is why we have a verb for him? Bork’em.
    Bork Hagel, and if you don’t and sit back and play “gentleman,” you will soon see Hagel dismantling the entire military of the US.

  • rennyangel4

    Exactly. The Dems. depend on Reps. cannibalizing themselves and their positions and playing the “honorable opposition” with no teeth and no bite and NO win!

  • reggie1

    Is there any higher praise than to be labeled another “McCarthy” by the left? They’ve learned to back off of the over used “Hitler” label which reflects poorly on them for belittling the actual Holocaust by comparison. No, McCarthy is their bogeyman. And better yet, Michelle Malkin has done scholarly work to prove him a hero. We can only hope that Cruz is recognized as such DURING his term, and not until generations later.

  • edintexas

    And you deserve Mikulski and Cardin. The NY Times, WaPo and Politico love both. Enjoy your Left wing Senatorial representation.

  • gawken

    I am going to indulge in a wee bit of hopeful speculation ( though I had seriously considered giving up the practice for Lent):

    Watching Cruz’ artful dissection of Hagel at the committee hearing, I was struck by the sense that I was watching a really good poker player. He’d read Hagel’s tells; he knew that Hagel was bluffing. Specifically, I think that Cruz already possesses some of the information that he wants Hagel to divulge: videotapes of some speeches, AND the financial data on some of the organizations that have funded Hagel.

    Now Cruz could have disclosed all this at the hearing, but our Ted is also a consummate politician, and recognizes that the GOP must play hardball with the Dems and the MSM; seize the media spotlight. He repeatedly made cogent requests to have the vote delayed until the information was forthcoming, only to have Chairman Levin lecture him about “fairness.” And then, our Ted had to endure a further admonition by Bill Nelson.

    Cruz’ disdain for these pathetic displays of self-righteousness was apparent. Now consider how well, “sweet” it would be if, during the debate on the Senate floor, Cruz releases all the bad news on Hagel. This would end the nomination, thoroughly embarass Obama, but even more important, make Levin, Nelson, and other Sen Dems, like Schumer, look like the idiots they in fact are.

    One can dream…..

  • jaykali

    There is some hope yet…

  • SoFiMil

    Old fashioned 5! to Dan and Senator Cruz.

  • Jim_Riggs

    What choice do I have? I like living here. I don’t criticize people in other states for electing whoever they want. It’s what makes this country great.

  • bgintn

    Sent,

    Senator Cruz Sir,

    Thank you!
    The war is won, one battle after another, time after time, it will never stop until the LORD takes control.
    In this Country you have moved to the edge of the SWORD, stay sharp, both sides will try to dull you.

  • OhioHistorian

    So you just dissed Ted Cruz, and then say that you don’t criticize people in other states? You don’t believe you implicitly did that by indicating that “I’d stick with what I’ve got”? I do. If you like Cardin and Mikulski, you LOVE SanFranNan, who is a former MDer. But the CHOICE you had a couple years ago was Michael Steele for Cardin. Not perfect, but a heck of a lot better than Cardin. Those are the choices that you MDers reject.

    I have a proposition. If we cut the Federal government by a substantial amount of employees, then maybe MD will face the same economic impact of the rest of the nation and will make some better decisions. http://www.bls.gov/ro3/mdlaus.htm

  • bgintn

    It is not too early to name names, who to get behind?

  • Jim_Riggs

    By that logic I also dissed Mikulski and Cardin by saying I’d prefer Coburn. Texans elected Cruz, I’m fine with that. It doesn’t mean that I would want him as my senator.

  • mikwcas

    how could someone possibly give this a down vote? very well stated Hafeed.

  • gmat

    I’m interested to see if any of these guys, Cruz included, has any interest in addressing the #1 problem facing the US, which is flat GDP and high un/under-employment. Meantime, macho posturing in front of a guy with 2 Purple Hearts occurs for me as uninspiring behavior.

  • neolib

    Why not malign Hagel’s character? Umm, because we’re supposed to be better.

    Insinuating Hagel got paid by foreign enemies, without any evidence, was a dick move, whether republican or democrat.

  • bobmark

    Didn’t seem to hurt Dingy Harry any.

  • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

    What the heck does this mean? “Without naming names, Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, offered a biting label for the Texan’s accusatory crusade: McCarthyism.”

    I see a name there.

    Cruz is exactly what the other squishes like (without naming names) my own Senator and the senior Senator from South Carolina should be emulating.

    If only Flimsy Graham had asked Secretary Clinton, “Where were you on 9/11/2012, and what did you do when and if you found out about the attack on Benghazi. Did you hear about it that night? Why or why not? Answer in short, direct sentences. And why are you withholding the names of the survivors, four months after the fact?”

    If Cruz was on that committee, did he ask those questions?

  • http://llphsecondrevolution.wordpress.com/ spoasteph97

    I heard that State Sen. Lee Bright is considering a run against Graham:

    http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/graham-bright-considering-run/2013/02/04/id/488863

    He’s very conservative and would be a great addition! :)

  • Kyle-MI

    So 2 Purple Hearts gets you a free pass? Why even hold hearings? And can you point to anything that suggests Cruz isn’t concerned about the economy?

  • PowerToThePeople

    Amen to that. Purple hearts, other medals, and past or present service to your country gains you respect in life and for the bravery/service, but it does not grant you respect in politics, or as you stated, a free pass, that must be earned separate from the military service.

  • stewco

    Leaders, like Reagan, present vision vast majority support. So far Senator Cruz seems less driven by vision and more by the same just say no vitriol that cost us the White House and Senate. I’m a pragmatist and want to win. I see zero vision from Senator Cruz, though I don’t doubt his inflaming people’s passion. I’d prefer less passion, more vision and big wins to allow policy change.

  • stewco

    It is sad to me we lost wisdom as a strategy. I think our education system has failed us and am very sad this continued immature approach to leadership will continue to ensure dept of education stays in federal hands. The whole thing makes me sad but I will continue to pray.

  • stewco

    Blind teeth and over-bite cost us the White House and Senate. We must take responsibility for why we lost and not just double down on a failed strategy, in my opinion.

  • Martin Knight

    That’s all well and good.

    Considering that you say that you are a Republican, would you care to explain why and how Senators Mikulski and Cardin would earn your vote over Senator Cruz?

  • Martin Knight

    Let’s see – Cruz has been a Senator for something less than a month – and you are expecting for him to present you with “Vision”?

  • PowerToThePeople

    You will pray the few strong leaders we have rubber stamp Obama and his choices. Who do you pray to? The only loss of wisdom, well really backbone, seems to be coming from you.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HUKL5H546VEAWM6PXPTCPVFQMA Martin

    I don’t get where this silly idea that we’re supposed to be “better” than them (i.e. eschew tactics that work and that the other side use with no hesitation and absolute impunity) comes from.

    This sort of sanctimonious hand-wringing is one of many reasons the GOP gets rightly called the Stupid Party. Whenever a Democrat brings a Howitzer to a knife fight, there’s always this passel of hand-wringing sanctimonious “better than them” spewers wailing and moaning because the letter of apology the Republican brought to the knife fight just might be too “harshly” worded.

    Just who the #%@! are we trying to impress?

    This is not some little girls’ tea party, or soiree with the Ladies who lunch. This is a fight. The man fights – it’s ridiculous that you’re sitting and wailing that this spit polish on his shoe is smudged.

  • bgintn

    The Senate fight in GA. has begun.

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/17/Conservatives-Attack-Rep-Price-R-GA-for-Not-Rebuking-Rove-Super-PAC

  • oribasius

    Is it too early to call for a Cruz/Daniels ticket in 2016?

  • Martin Knight

    Yes … so what if you dissed Mikulski and Cardin?

  • colonelflagg

    Karl! Karl Rove! Is that you?

  • stewco

    Personal attacks of this nature are another reflection of what is wrong with us. Disagreeing with my position is fine, personally attacking me is what weakens us.

    I am as deeply convicted in my Christian faith as anyone. Perhaps the greater question rests around IQ.

  • PowerToThePeople

    I had no question as to the small number of your IQ, hence why I did not ask.

    The question I did ask is quite pertinent, was wondering which deity you pray to when requesting our reps be cowards, that they not do the job they are elected to, and that they just sit back and rubber stamp awful people into powerful positions.

    By the way, if you are going to make ignorant comments that show us all your level of stupidity, do not cry when you are called ignorant.

  • runner12

    Quite frankly, D.C. is so corrupt and messed up the time for vision speeches and fluffy rainbows is past. The elections were held and Cruz is a Senator. He is not and should not be in campaign mode, he should be doing his job. From what I can seem he is a breath of fresh air in that wretched place.

  • runner12

    Senator Cruz is the Washington DC establishment’s worst nightmare. He is brilliant
    ( graduated from Princeton and Harvard Law), honest, unafraid, and a minority. I wanted to laugh out loud when I read the criticisms of his “colleagues”. Basically they were mad because he did not sit down, shutup, and play the same absurd DC politics that have been the ruin of this country. When you twist off both sides of the aisle, you are doing something right. Texas is quite fortunate in their new Senator. Keep it up, Senator Cruz. All good reformers faced opposition, you are in good company.

  • Martin Knight

    And yes, the issue of the day is that Obama put forth an unqualified dunce to be in charge of the nation’s men and women in uniform and a linchpin in the formulation of nation’s defense policy for the next four years that could have ramifications for the next forty years.

    By his actions, Senator Cruz has just presented you with a vision, that Secretaries of Defense (and other Departments of the Federal Government) should be competent people of good judgment. That is something that I believe is supported by the majority of the American people.

    Try again.

  • Martin Knight

    Nope. It was the failure of our candidates and campaign operatives to recognize the terrain they were fighting in, and adjust their approaches accordingly.

  • stewco

    Disagreeing without being disagreeable is what separates leaders from amateurs. I stand by my position that Senator Cruz needs to mature as his lack of respect for the opposition, even though I may agree with his position, will ultimately cost us yet again.

    There isn’t any reason we can’t state our truth simply and directly without the hullabaloo and apparent need for more camera face time. Eric is a great model to look to who seems to approach politics in the healthy manner.