« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Colorado Democrat: Women Don’t Need Guns If They ‘Feel Like They’re Going To Be Raped’ *UPDATED

Chill, women, says Colorado Democrat Rep. Joe Salazar. While arguing for the disarmament of college students, Salazar says that even if women feel like they’re going to be raped, they may not, so who needs a firearm for protection? From Revealing Politics:

Said Salazar:

“It’s why we have call boxes, it’s why we have safe zones, it’s why we have the whistles. Because you just don’t know who you’re gonna be shooting at. And you don’t know if you feel like you’re gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around or if you feel like you’re in trouble when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop … pop around at somebody.”

This is the real “war on women” I’ve talked about: the progressive insistence that women disarm. Women, according to Rep. Salazar, are hysterical things which shoot indiscriminately at any and everything.

Some statistics, My emphasis:

In the vast majority of those self-defense cases, the citizen will only brandish the gun or fire a warning shot.
In less than 8% of those self-defense cases will the citizen will even wound his attacker.
Over 1.9 million of those self-defense cases involve handguns.
As many as 500,000 of those self-defense cases occur away from home.
Almost 10% of those self-defense cases are women defending themselves against sexual assault or abuse.

This “feel like you’re going to be raped” nonsense is as poorly-worded as the “shut that whole thing down” drama from last fall. If Democrats don’t swiftly condemn this, I see this used as a tactic to showcase the vast lack of respect Democrats have for a woman’s right to self defense.

*UPDATE:

Here is Rep. Salazar’s legislative contact info, with which you can give him your feedback with more courtesy than he’s demonstrated for women above.

State Representative – District 31
Phone: 303-866-2918
joseph.salazar.house@state.co.us
Facebook

*UPDATE #2: via Erickson and Jesse Byrnes, this is advice the University of Colorado gives to women to repel attackers. If an attacker isn’t grossed out enough over the prospect of raping/beating/murdering a woman, it’s doubtful that any of this will do the trick:

  1. Be realistic about your ability to protect yourself.
  2. Your instinct may be to scream, go ahead!  It may startle your attacker and give you an opportunity to run away.
  3. Kick off your shoes if you have time and can’t run in them.
  4. Don’t take time to look back; just get away.
  5. If your life is in danger, passive resistance may be your best defense.
  6. Tell your attacker that you have a disease or are menstruating.
  7. Vomiting or urinating may also convince the attacker to leave you alone.
  8. Yelling, hitting or biting may give you a chance to escape, do it!
  9. Understand that some actions on your part might lead to more harm.
  10. Remember, every emergency situation is different.  Only you can decide which action is most appropriate.

*UPDATE #3: KDVR reports that Salazar has apologized:

“I’m sorry if I offended anyone. That was absolutely not my intention,” Salazar said. “We were having a public policy debate on whether or not guns makes people safer on campus. I don’t believe they do. That was the point I was trying to make. If anyone thinks I’m not sensitive to the dangers women face, they’re wrong.

“I am a husband and father of two beautiful girls, and I’ve spent the last decade defending women’s rights as a civil rights attorney. Again, I’m deeply sorry if I offended anyone with my comments.”

If Salazar was truly sensitive to the dangers we face then he would understand how statistics do not work in our favor — unless we level the playing field by exercising our Second Amendment right. Salazar also doesn’t explain his insinuation that women basically ditzes who are incapable of proper reasoning and capable of handling firearms, in fact, he backhandedly defends it by saying it was a justifiable example for his prejudice against women’s defense.

Salazar claims to have a record of defending women’s rights but his actions to disenfranchise them of their Second Amendment rights are completely contradictory to that claim. One in four collegiate women report rape and one in five are raped. Salazar wants to deprive women of their right to defense with these odds? Just blow your rape whistles and pray that an attacker represents the “safe zone” boundaries? The best apology is a reversal of his war on women.

COMMENTS

  • Jack_Savage

    All a call box or a safe zone is good for is to let the police know *where* to begin looking for the woman’s body, with a whistle only good for letting them know *when*.

  • Jack_Savage

    PERFECT.
    I am using that one. With attribution, of course.

  • kipling

    Are we talking “rape or rape rape”? The mental giants at The View want to know. Or, as Bill Clinton said to one of his victims, “You may want to put a little ice on that.”

  • flyovermark

    The Court told them “no” to abridging the freedom of speech in “Citizen’s United”. It told them “no” to an individual mandate under the commerce clause. It had to tell Obama “no” to circumventing the advice and consent of the Senate in filling vacancies. The HHS is trying to abridge free exercise of religion with a contraception mandate. You say the Ds see no use for the Second amendment?

    You need to wake up.

  • Finrod

    My first thought reading this was ‘well, of course he doesn’t care, he’s not the one getting raped.’

  • adair

    That was 8 shots. Aren’t we limited to 7 in a magazine?

  • sisyphusx

    Creepy. Salazar has no idea how many gun sales he’s motivating with this garbage, or how this dehumanization of a “victim class” looks to a free and sovereign people.

  • davesinsanantonio

    Salazar didn’t really apologize for his statements. What he said was that it was everyone else’s fault for not understanding him. He was NOT sorry he made the statement, he was sorry that some people were offended by it, but it was their error in taking offense.

  • davesinsanantonio

    Doesn’t every woman carry a call box in their purse? snark

    Just how many call boxes does the average university have? How far apart are they? And, how long is the average police response time? Do they even respond? Or, do they just figure that it is immature college kids pulling a prank and not worry about it?
    Which is more likely to scare a would-be rapist off—a woman pulling out a whistle or pulling the handle on a call box or pulling out a pistol and aiming it at his crotch? And, if she has already been grabbed or hit, putting a couple of slugs into him will make him easier for the police to identify and capture than ringing ears!

  • davesinsanantonio

    For the Libs it is always a case of “it’s okay for me but not for thee!”!!! The hypocrites are just so sure they are more important than you are that they can legislate you into a little box but exempt themselves from the same rules. Why do people keep voting for them?

  • davesinsanantonio

    Actually, the attacker won’t be out of mind because the lib pols and the lefty press will make him out to be the victim, if not a hero (ala Christian Dorner), and keep talking about how evil we conservatives are for not celebrating, or even worshipping, him, and how we took away HIS rights to express himself, or how he was misunderstood because he was shot with his pants around his ankles.

  • The_Gadfly

    I was sort of mugged once on campus. I say ‘sort of’, because unlike a potential rape situation I never felt in fear for my safety, only that I wasn’t going to be able to complete my job which was to deliver the pizza I was attempting to deliver. I was however in a dorm that was fairly close to the police station. And several students passed by as the incident was occurring. One of them did call the campus police. The police were less than a quarter mile away and were on site quite quickly. But even with that, the hooligans escaped immediate capture. They were only caught because one of them bragged he lived on the second floor of the dorm to which I was delivering the pizza and telling me what his name was.

    As a male, I wouldn’t want a woman who was even potentially facing rape to have a similar police response time and capture result as her best hope for a resolution to the situation.

  • The_Gadfly

    I with you on disarming their guards until all citizens have the same right to carry arms as the guards currently do.

  • davesinsanantonio

    Your statement is not true. The Dims think that none of us need a gun, but they often carry, and their bodyguards carry, because regardless of their rhetoric, they KNOW the bad guys carry—hence their own and their bodyguards’ weapons!

  • The_Gadfly

    They don’t uphold the main document, why would they care about a silly amendment?

  • sliverlining

    You are each saying the same thing in a little different way. I am in agreement as well. I can learn certain things about how to throw a football from a brochure and if I had never even held a football that brochure would help. It only brings me from 0% knowledge to a very low percent of knowledge.
    Ultimately I would have to pick up and throw the ball, get to know my limitations, practice, know the rules of the game . . . all that stuff. Otherwise I would not be effective with a football for my team or against the opposition.
    This can be said about most education. The seeds are planted in class but the real growing is out in the dirt.

  • romeg

    Salazar’s lame ‘apology’ highlights the problem with the way liberals ‘think or, rather, FAIL to think through their arguments, proposals and the consequences thereof. In this instance, his original idiotic assertion implies that by being armed, that a woman would endanger herself and everyone else EXCEPT her attacker. What line of ‘reasoning’ fails to take into account is the deterrent effect that NOT KNOWING whether or not a potential target/victim is armed would create in the mind of that potential attacker.

    We rarely hear of these cases but occasionally these miscreant animals find that they’ve sprung a serious, irreparable, and, ultimately fatal leak, of that fluid that keeps them alive because of their failure to take that possibility into account.

  • RedStateVet

    “it’s why we have safe zones”

    Co-ed- “You can’t rape me, I’m in the safe zone!”
    Rapist- “Curses- I hate those safe zones.”

    Is this idiot for real? Safe zones, gun free zones, call boxes, whistles…. none of those mean spit. Criminals don’t obey the law, genius.

    When seconds count, the Police are only minutes away. Protect yourself.

  • hayekwasright

    5555

  • sliverlining

    That is astute critical thinking.

    It IS kind of like the old joke: After calling someone an A-hole then apologizing by saying, “I’m sorry you’re an A-hole”.

    Good call.

  • DefendUSA

    Sorry, but as a person who was actually victimized, er, what’s that word…oh-raped, well, had I a weapon with which to defend, it wouldn’t have had to “feel” so raped.

    Honest to God…these are the people who think they get it? It’s just astounding to me what these people espouse. UFB!! And that rape whistle doesn’t work when you are trapped in a car on a country road with someone stronger than you are…but a gun would have served me nicely, very nicely.

  • DefendUSA

    Indeed it is just that way, Dave. For me, not for thee. Every. Time.

  • 2warabnvet

    He can be thankful that he is a Democrat. If he had been a Republican, and made this stupid statement, the torches and pitchforks would be in the streets.

  • jimmaloney

    “I’m sorry if I offended anyone….” is NOT an apology for the remarks and the sooner we start reminding people of that fact the sooner some of them might rethink before opening their mouths…

  • CrustyOldGeezer

    Just another reason to require intelligence tests and indepth background checks for politicians and bureaucrats.

    This jackass should have never made it onto the ballot.

    I’m betting he will never get another female vote.

  • joshinca

    But the safest course for him, in that case, would be to not touch gun control with a ten foot pole. It’s consistently proven to be a carreer killer for pols. And yet the dems still feel compelled to go there at every opportunity.