« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

974

If you live in the real world, you will notice that the federal government has destroyed our free markets, limited our freedoms, and denigrated our right to religious liberty – all before Obamacare has fully taken effect.  The federal agencies continue to promulgate rules and regulations that drive up the cost of the most vital goods and services to the point that most of us will require government subsidies just to afford our most basic necessities, most notably, health insurance.

Yet, for many Capitol Hill conservatives who live in an exclusive world of budget-speak, we are on the cusp of restoring our Constitutional Republic.  You see, the upcoming CR (H.R. 933) will fund discretionary spending for the remaining 6 months of Fiscal Year 2013 at the level of $974 billion [well, it's actually $982 billion, but it's close enough to the original RSC number for members to become all sentimental over it].  Isn’t that awesome?  Forget about focusing our message on things that actually penetrate the tin ear of the average voter, such as losing their healthcare under Obamacare.  We’re talking about our victory over “974.”

Did you ever think that Republicans would rally around a cry of “974?”  What does the number 974 mean to you?  Not much.  No wonder why Republicans have a terrible approval rating with the American public.

For quite some time, I’ve been trying to convey the message that limiting the harmful effects of big government and cutting spending in the abstract are not necessarily the same thing.  There’s no doubt we should cut spending wherever we have the opportunity to do so, and in the case of the sequester, we should obviously pocket the change.  In fact, that is the entire point.  We already won on the issue; it’s time to move on and fight Obamacare in the sequester – something that really matters to the average person – instead of continuing to fight a battle we’ve already won.

Let’s remember that the sequester will not eliminate a single major program nor will it shut down a single federal agency.  Will it cut non-baseline spending for one or two years (before reverting to baseline cuts in the out years)?  Yes – primarily with regards to defense spending.  But will we actually eliminate any of the harmful programs or agencies that directly cost people their jobs and raise the cost of living?  Absolutely not.

An EPA with an operating budget of $8.1 billion instead of $8.4 billion will still have the ability to promulgate every last regulation that kills jobs, destroys hundreds of billions in private wealth, and raises the cost of major goods and services.

Whether the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) spends $290 million or $280 million will not affect its ability to destroy private sector jobs.

And yes, whether the HHS budget is $78 billion or $75 billion, it will still be able to promulgate the healthcare takeover laws (they just released 700 pages of rules), implement the exchanges, and expand Medicaid….unless we specifically prohibit funding those programs in the CR.  Ditto for the IRS with regards to the enforcement of the individual mandate.

For many conservatives who work in politics, it’s just another day at work.  If Obamacare ultimately goes through, they will still have their jobs and will still be able to put out press releases with hollow threats about the next bad piece of legislation.  They want to move on.  But for those of us who actually believe in what we say; for those of us who believe that Obamacare, when fully implemented, will destroy the country as we know it, this is not just another day at the office.  If Obamacare is not disrupted now, while it is still unpopular and largely in the planning phase, there is nothing worth fighting for in the future.  Every other policy issue, certainly as it relates to balanced budgets and entitlement reform, will become moot.

If the objective of some of the 105 members who signed a defund Obamacare letter last year is to pocket their “974” victory and fight Obamacare at a later date, they would be wise to explain why there will be a more opportune moment at a later date.  What is their roadmap?  If they are among those who believe Obamacare is here to stay, then there is nothing to fight for.  The 974 number based on some random discretionary cuts, half of which comes from defense, will not atone for a vote to fund Obamacare.  Nor will it provide conservatives with a chance to connect with voters.

COMMENTS

  • Tbone

    I, personally, had plenty of Federal government in 2007. In that inflation has been near zero since then, it would seem fair to return the Federal Government to near 2007 size.

  • becky5

    I have felt the same way for some time now, that it’s beyond hope. We need a strategy (if there is one) to fight what’s happening considering we are no longer represented at the state or federal level.

  • http://www.apoliticalpundit.wordpress.com A Poiticalpundit

    I feel the same, I am 66 now, so most of the Obummer junk re healthcare will affect me immediately.. I actually don’t much care. I believe that I have lived through the best days of The United States of America, and I don’t think there is a way to go backwards – the younger generations were raised with a babysitting government and get a blank stare like “humor the old folks” when you try to explain the consequences of the current actions being taken by our government. But I believe these things are like a pendulum while it swings in one direction, it is gaining momentum to swing back the other way! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!.

  • Viet71

    I hear the complaints here. I have my own gripes.

    Yet I’ve walked through D.C. the last three days and have found utter freedom. Even though I had to go through security three times.

  • mhorner

    In today’s news Obama just appointed new leaders for the EPA and the Department of Energy, both agencies that should be abolished. Just like Newt did in 1996, shut this government down at the end of this month until some real spending cuts are achieved!

  • carolb

    Professor: An all-powerful Government, guided by social scientists, will care for all from cradle to the grave, including “funeral and burial services and cremation.” That has been described as “cooperative democracy.”

    Member: This plan provides freedom fromm worry from birth to death, as everybody cooperates in babying and burying everybody else!

    Then the conversations goes on to talk about how competition will be destroyed. This conversation is from the book ” Social Planning by the Frontier Thinkers”, written in 1944.

    The Frontier Thinkers were headed by John Dewey. Yeah, the father of US education.

    They say in the book, the power to do things for you is also the power to do things to you. Instead of leaving the money/funding at the state level where we the people have control, they seize it at the Federal level and then set conditions in order for us to get it back. Has anyone figured out how asinine this is in the first place? All of this was planned out a long, long time ago and as long as they have control of our school systems, good little communist will continue to be pumped out daily. Please listen to this interview Eric to see what they have in store for the future of education. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aaw03zSPy0

  • rluci1

    I keep telling my congressman, pass a budget based on revenues and go home till the senate passes one. If they do not just shut the gov’t down. Also pass a bill to do away with base line budgeting

  • bclare

    I like option B, rights! And consider this. The GOP sets forth that no CR or budget in the future can spend more money then the real dollars that has been spent in 2012. FREEZE IT. Now inflation with accelerate the competition among programs becasue the cost servicing our debt will go up. As programs lose their grip, regulations will have less of an impact thus unchaining our economy. Revenues to the governement will rise and accelerate the closing of the deficit gap. Just freeze the spending John!

    If Boehner and company have the “internal testitude” to do this!

  • grayzel

    There is another option. Starve the beast. Either go Galt or take an extra two weeks vacation every year. Barter or trade for things, withdraw from the taxable economy.

  • grayzel

    Do you really think food and fuel are important? (sarc off)

  • falsereality13

    THE PROBLEM Anti social liberal leadership practiced in oppositional contravention of the rule of law and a willingness to attack anyone who opposes them.

    WHAT AMERICA IS DOING ABOUT IT Nothing. Talking it over. Turning the other cheek. Absolutely nothing.

  • texashistorian

    I know, how dare I suggest such a thing! ;)