« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Mitch McConnell Declares Surrender on Obamacare

Joining Eric Cantor, John Boehner, Kevin McCarthy, and Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell is declaring surrender on Obamacare.

He will no longer fight it.

You’d never know that if you paid attention to his preferred words about Obamacare at CPAC. McConnell told the crowd that “Obamacare should be repealed root and branch.” He also told the crowd that those who think he’s given up the fight are wrong. He pledged to continue to fight.

I call bull.

The part of his speech that McConnell hopes you ignore is him saying, “When it came to Obamacare, we gave it everything we have, everything we have, and we just lost.” He’s also signaling that the Senate Republicans will neither filibuster the continuing resolution nor shut down the government.

The continuing resolution is the best vehicle to use as a fight to defund Obamacare. Republicans will not, despite their rhetoric right now, fight on the debt ceiling to undermine Obamacare. This is the fight.

McConnell has a history of throwing red meat to the crowd then turning his back on them. Last February, Jim DeMint offered an amendment to defund Obamacare. McConnell refused to offer it up as a Republican amendment in the Senate because he did not want to anger Harry Reid. The backlash caused McConnell to promise a month long PR campaign about Obamacare the following month.

It never happened.

John Boehner’s back to claiming we have no debt crisis and that he wants to cut spending, so defunding Obamacare can’t happen. Yes, rationalize that.

Mitch McConnell is claiming he’ll fight to kill Obamacare, but won’t actually fight to kill Obamacare.

Both of these men have been in Washington since 1985. They have no understanding of the real world burdens of Obamacare so they have no incentive to actually do what it will take to defund Obamacare. They are experts in throwing red meat to rally the base, but then never deliver. They blame others and insist we keep them in power fight.

But they have no deliverables, just rhetoric and $16 trillion in national debt.

They and their respective conferences are chickens. Game over until we can replace either McConnell or Boehner and use their defeat as an example.

COMMENTS

  • jpmhofct

    The leadership of Congress from both parties is not going to disturb the status quo.. McConnel and Boehner are as guilty as Obama when looking at the sorry state of our Government’s debt and deficit spending, They have been around too long and will not lead a serious effort to constrain the growth of the federal government.
    They have little if any more respect for the Consritution than the Obama Democrats.
    The most telling facts of all when judging them come from what they do not do,
    What is obvious is that serious opposition leads to “caveing in” and rhetoric about how we did all we could when in fact they abandon opposition efforts to defeat the “Radical Agenda” and expose the many lies and misrepresentations of this President and his many appointed administration officials formal and worse informal beyond congressional approval. Nothing will change untill we “the people” elect more “CONSERVATIVE” Representatives and Senators that will change the leadership and commitment of Congress to the “Oath of Office” to ” Protect and Defend the Constitution”.
    A Congress doing so would have initiated “IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS” ALREADY!!.
    2014 ELECTIONS CAN’T COME SOON ENOUGH AND HOPEFULLY WE DO NOT SEE THINGS GET TOO MUCH WORSE BY THEN.

  • cynbel

    So glad I didn’t waste my time to watch McConnell lie again. Wish I could have made a different decision on Ryan’s speech. He fooled me again.

  • spinoneone

    What is the most scary word for most politicians? CHANGE. Why? Because they know how to deal with the status quo to keep themselves in power, and that is the real bottom line for most of them. They love their jobs and status more than they love their country or constituents. What we need to turn around this great nation is change, deep and long lasting change. That is not likely to happen on our terms with both Boehner and McConnell offering “leadership” in the Congress.

  • danandsis

    A welcome sign for all genuine conservatives.The weak, worthless current leaders of the Republican Party with their cave in mentality have unwittingly started a revolution in the Republican Party. The recent CPAC convention was the first shot across their “brow”.

  • politicalqrm

    Of course McConnell is no longer going to fight it; he nor anyone in Congress will be affected by Obamacare. They’re exempt. And, heaven forbid, he wouldn’t want to insult Harry Reid.
    So why should he break a sweat doing anything for the American people or to save America as a country? I’ve had it with these so-called ‘public servants’ who go to Congress to serve no one but themselves.

  • ringgo1

    Quite right.

  • sudomakeme

    Maybe it’s time we request our senators (Ted Cruz? Rand Paul?) to submit a bill stating that Congress can not submit nor approve any bill they exempt themselves from.

  • raginpatriot

    I am a registered Republican. But I “will no longer fight” the urge to insist that a third party will only splinter voters and lead to defeat. I will vote for a third party conservative running against an establishment Republican — if this means that the establishment Republican loses to the Democrat, so be it. Politicians that provide a gradualist bent to the leftward pull of Progressivism do us no favors — if we’re doomed to collectivism then let’s just get on with it rather than pretending that we’re opposing it by electing establishment / moderate Republicans — better to go down in a principled manner with the occasional third party vote than enabling the enablers.

  • politicalqrm

    Perhaps an amendment to the Constitution so they can’t wiggle out of the law.. I know, it’s drastic, but something has to be done. I’m tired of people getting elected to Congress and then forgetting who put them there.

  • kodachrome

    Step 1 to doing that- don’t shut the government down or default on the debt, ie. “surrender.” McConnell knows what he’s doing.

  • becky5

    Boehner, Cantor, McCarthy, McConnell & Graham must be primaried in 2014. There is no hope until these 5 are replaced.

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    “We gave it everything we had…”

    Bullcrap. They gave it NOTHING they had. What the heck is this milquetoast of a man doing speaking at CPAC for God’s sake? Whose next? Lowell Weicker?

    The government just kept right on lumbering along, getting fatter and fatter, more bloated, more out of control. The senate sat there for five years, slathering layer upon layer on top of the 2008 budget, never once coming to a parliamentary halt when the minority could have used it’s power to tie things in knots. Mitch McConnell is a liar. Worse yet, he’s a political loser. We sent them Scott Brown to do precisely that, and they went down without a whimper.

    Can you imagine such behavior from Chuck Schumer? Or Harry Reid? No, you can’t. However despicable, and loathsome, and vile these men are, they FIGHT like they believe in something. Mitch McConnell doesn’t have a political core. He’s a technocrat, nothing more.

    We sent these bastards to Washington to rip Obamacare out by the root, and they manicure it, water it, pet it. Don’t they get it? Americans DESPISE Obamacare! They have since it was first proposed, and they hate it even more now that their insurance rates are going through the roof, doctors are turning away Medicare patients, and the IRS is filing it’s fangs in preparation for for implementation.

    Fight this thing, dammit! Shut the government down! Filibuster! Tie it up in knots! Get some cajones! Our Lions of the Senate are a bunch of, well, pussies. And Mitch McConnell is the Mother Tabby.

    But, I ought to remember: The Senate is the last place Republicans EVER send fighters. Even in the days of Reagan landslides, they still sat there like little Timid Timmies, scared of their own shadows. These are the best 51 men and women we can send to Washington to save the country?

    Yeah, right.

  • plumely

    I second that. How do we get their attention on that? I think they need to sbmit this bill over and over again and make it public that it was laughed at by the Democrats and establishment Repubs.

  • OldmanRick

    For the sake of sanity, primary both crybaby rino Boinker and two faced rino McCon-all at the earliest opportunity.

  • fredflintlock

    A flanking maneuver may be our best strategy here. While we could give the next President a legislature that is willing to kill Obamacare, even after the 2014 roll-out, this party is unlikely to allow the nomination of a President who will finish the job. The system is set up specifically to shepherd status quo candidates through the primaries and on to the general. And the status quo is, and always has been, “don’t rock the boat – much”. The Republican platform on Obamacare has shifted from eliminate to manage and reap.

    To get the job done I believe we may need to go outside the party apparatus in the presidential primaries to nominate a reliably committed fiscal conservative. This is not a call to go third party (I think just heard somebody power up the blam stick). It is a call to work within the party to take Congress and outside the party to take the White House.

    I’m short on time here and can’t develop this idea in comments anyway. And this may be the last comment I get to make today.

    I’m well aware of the tower of power that is the two party system, but if the will of the people in 2016 is that Obamacare has to go, then we need to find somebody who can beat that system and campaign on genuine promises to eliminate PPACA root and branch (and don’t doubt that “repeal and replace” will be the big campaign cliche of 2016). I believe such a candidate can win the general, but the party will fight to prevent that candidate from emerging.

    This will require from the Republican base something we revile and abhor. It will require activism. And some serious grass roots organizing. And some measure of disloyalty taken in earnest to save the party from itself. Oh, and a candidate willing to risk being cast out forever by the powers that be. That’s all.

    And why does spell check keep telling me I’m misspelling Obamacare? What’s up with that?

    Blam

    <a href="

  • joshinca

    The reason is that the entitlements offer concentrated benefits with diffuse costs and give the beneficiaries the illusion (or reality) of getting a free lunch.

    But what benefit is Obamacare actually going to provide? As far as I can see it is going to be the opposite of traditional entitlement with widespread and concentrated costs and benefits diffused to the point of non existence.

    It can only going to get ever more unpopular as it’s implemented .

  • joshinca

    While we could give the next president a legislature that is willing to kill Obamacare, even after the 2014 roll-out, this party is unlikely to allow the nomination of a President who will finish the job.

    They’re already pushing Jeb Bush – hard.

  • plh

    They. All. Must. Go.

  • mikelindell2

    It shouldn’t even be news anymore when Republicans show themselves to be on the opposite side of conservatives.
    The sad part is how Fox/Drudge/NatReview etc. will manipulate some conservatives into nominating another moderate (moderate is being kind) in 2016 as they did in 2008 and 2012.

    When Rand Paul or Marco Rubio or Scott Walker rise up to take the lead in the primaries in 2016, Fox and Co. will come at them with the same force they did against Gingrich in ’12 to prevent him from being the nominee and ensuring that Romney would be the nominee.
    Looking at how effective the fake conservative news outlets were in their messaging to destroy one Republican nominee and build up another in 2012, it makes you wonder why they cannot be equally effective in successfully pushing a conservative message to the whole country. Are they are only eloquent, dedicated and disciplined in message, and convincing when trying to tear down one of their own?

  • bobmark

    I see a couple of parallels in this situation. First is that the establishment Reps are doing the same thing Rush has started talking about wrt Obama, never governing, always posturing that “Gee, I’ve been working sooooo hard for my constituents, but those Dems are just too tough. Please donate to my campaign and we’ll get’em next time!” pfffttt!
    Second is that the RINO’s are taking the same approach to O’care that the progs are taking to statism. “Sure it’s failed in tha past, but that’s because WE weren’t the ones running it!, We’re much smarter/nicer/_____ than those other guys and we’ll get it right this time.”
    I think Romney was selected expressly because he did have experience with the healthcare law. The establishment wanted him to manage it. A conspiracy theorist might think that’s why Roberts did what he did, to keep it around for the RINO’s to campaign against, and then run, since it’s “the law of the land”. But of course that’s just crazy talk.

  • sarah417

    Every President since Eisenhower has been chosen by the NWO Globalists. We The People have never been given our own choice. Papa Bush was a founding member of the Trilateral Comm. Just about every person in every Presidential Administration belonged to the Trilatera/COFR/Bilderberg. Right now in Obama’s Admin there are 9 Bildebergs, 10 Council of Foreign Relations and 5 Trilaterals. Doesn’t look good does it? They will give us our next choice in 2016: Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton both NWO Globalists. Allen West said it like it is ‘There are 80 communists in our government now. Some choice, Huh?

  • sudomakeme

    Maybe you can make a diary entry and we can brainstorm.

  • votemout2012

    I was listening to Dana Loesch at CPAC on her radio show interviewing Rep Ann Wagner. Dana asked her what grade she gave Boehner for the job he is doing as speaker. Her answer was an A. It will be interesting to see her rating from Heritage Action because so far it sucks.

  • votemout2012

    Me Too!

  • jaydickb

    Interesting point and the seed of a potentially viable political strategy, namely, let the liberals screw things up so badly that the whole system collapses. Then come in and reinstitute a constitutional capitalistic system.

    Not my favorite approach, but maybe the only one available.

  • reddog76

    Amen politicalqrm !!! The fastest way to fix any problem plaguing the masses is to require the few (electorate) to take part in the problem, not self-vote a gold and platinum separate system that actually works and works well for “the elite” on our tax dollars.
    Sweden Norway have National Healthcare, their elected officials are proud to use same healthcare as the masses and there is NO gold nor platinum gilded option for “special” people. The faster we can find a way to require elected people to be on same retirement and healthcare, by whatever means, just same as the rest of us, the faster things will greatly improve for all. Right now, they feel nor share any pain with the rest of us. “Elitist pigs at the taxpayer trough”. Fat and happy moves no change.

  • thompsoj

    All this shows is the real need for term limits. Either they get too tired to fight or being re-elected is more important than doing the right thing for the country. Governing is not easy and many times not popular but hard decisions need to be made and it appears our senior leaders are reluctant to take on the hard issues. I firmly believe that’s why DeMint left the Senate, he was disgusted with what was happening. Its pretty obvious to me that Obama Care is dragging down the economy and will continue to increase in cost while limiting medical care. Should be a no brainer to repeal it. All our government run programs are in the red due to mis-management and poor organization. (eg Postal Dept, SSN, Medicare, Food stamps, etc) We need to wake up and demand action of these leaders and replace them as soon as possible.

  • whitetop

    We are truly a one party country.

  • loganyung

    I don’t think that Erick taking a “Keith Olbermann” approach here
    is the most productive. Announcing a new Republican “Worst Person in the World” every week is missing the point, and just injecting unnecessary turmoil into the discussion.

    Fundamentally, I believe that Mitch McConnell, as well as Boehner, Cantor, and McCarthy, loves America as it was founded. It’s pretty clear that the other side doesn’t, and they are winning the battle to drag America into the pit of despair. You can make the argument that, when these Republican leaders had majorities, they showed a proclivity to advance Statism (they did many things wrong), but, you also have to put this in the context of them trying to support Bush (a good man, but who also did many things wrong). At this point, I think they need help in battling the Democrats, not constant scorn.

    I believe that the Republican leaders are afraid to make aggressive moves based on past history. Erick favors a government shutdown, and, it’s possible that that might work in today’s context given the successes of the sequester. But, there is no guarantee that Obama won’t gain more power like Clinton did in 1995/1996 and use that to flip the House in 2014. This is, indeed, something to fear.

    So, instead of creating more Republican casualties, how about we make productive proposals that attempt to achieve the same thing. I think the only realistic way to kill Obamacare, at this point, is death by a thousand cuts. Every bill generated by the Republicans should contain a razor blade that can be held up to public scrutiny, and can be used for political advantage. There are plenty of examples where Obamacare is inflicting pain on the large numbers of people, and Republicans can be seen as solving these problems for people, while the real intention is to systematically dismantle the bill. Let’s start by adding exemptions for small medical practices on digital record keeping, getting rid of the “Death Panel” (along with it’s allotted money), and removing the tax on medical devices.

    In the end, if Obama gets to keep “Obamacare” as a legacy success, but, in reality, it no longer exists, is that the worst thing that could happen? I think that the worst thing that could happen is that Obama succeeds in fundamentally changing America. In order to stop that from happening, we need an intact opposition party, and we need to keep adding very smart and principled Ted Cruz like people to strengthen the bench, and, over time, we can change the leadership.

  • sgtken

    Boy what leaders (?) we have. NOT

  • Finrod

    Sadly, it only applied to the programs that had already passed Congress at the time.

  • theccur

    Being an enabler is NO excuse. These RINO’s and CINO’s NEVER believed in the Federal Government as envisioned by the framers.

  • theccur

    The media NEVER lets Democrat, liberal, progressive, communist screw -ups see the light of day.

  • Samsara

    jaydickb, the GOP hasn’t got the votes to repeal anything, and
    they won’t have the votes until they get control of their message. They have stopped talking about repealing ObamaCare because it is politically ineffective.

    For example take Quinn and Rose, the Tea Party “Conservative” morning show in Pittsburgh. They defended Medicare Part D as an effective program. Most mornings he is talking about conspiracies and how evil Muslims are. The GOP knows this message mess is killing them. http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/rnc-report-growth-and-opportunity-88987.html

    The question is what changes need to be made?

  • agooglyminotaur

    Can someone explain how Ryan has thrown in the towel? I thought that his latest budget proposals still assumed repeal of the law.

  • citizenkn

    But how would doctors and patients negotiate fees? When you’re having a heart attack, are you going to start calling different hospitals, looking for the best deal on an EKG and a cardiac specialist? No one would ever do that, and that’s why we have to have an insurance system that we can trust to do that for us. But I don’t trust my insurance company to have my best interest at heart, and while Medicare may be successful at negotiating lower fees for services (due to it’s massive size), in it’s current form it’s an unsustainable economy killer. I don’t have a good solution, but trying to say that direct patient/doctor pricing negotiation is the way out isn’t being realistic about how we as individuals make our healthcare decisions, especially when it comes to the most expensive treatments we have to face.

  • agooglyminotaur

    It’s not that they’re exempt, but that they’re already provided public insurance through the government. They’re de facto unaffected by the law because they’re already covered; there’s not a provision in the law that says they can ignore it.

  • theccur

    A VIABLE third party better step up to the plate because I (an MANY like me) will NEVER AGAIN cast a vote for ANY RINO or CINO candidate.

  • agooglyminotaur

    Did you see the “Autopsy” report issued by the RNC this morning? A GOP candidate for the 2016 election might look completely unrecognizable to the current platform.

  • joshinca

    I’m not saying that we have to wait for the system to collapse.

    I’m saying that there is not some narrow window to eliminate Obamcare because it will not be popular in ’14 or ’16 or ’18 etc.

    I do disagree with people that think we should return to the status quo ante after Obamacare. The employer provided insurance model was socialist lite and ultimately unsustainable. We need to be moving to a free market in healthcare with health insurance reverting to a financial product covering the costs of rare predictable events, instead of being the primary providing mechanism.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Third parties are for tantrum throwers who don’t accomplish anything.