« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Tom Ridge: Unindicted Co-conspirator

In Philadelphia we are being treated to the logical outcome of unprincipled pseudo-conservatism. An abortionist by the name of Kermit Gosnell is on trial for murder because some of the infants he was supposed to kill were inconveniently born alive. Gosnell’s defense is that the babies of poor and minority women deserve to be killed and to prosecute him is racism. That’s right. Racism. But Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge is at least as responsible as Gosnell. In honor of that trial, I’m reposting this story from two years ago.

A lot of coverage, outside the mainstream media, has been devoted to the story of Dr. Kermit Gosnell and the abattoir he ran in Philadelphia. As we observe the anniversary of a blight on our national honor and a travesty of the judicial process we need to focus more attention on the enablers of this systematic slaughter of innocents.

Gosnell did not happen in a vacuum. A horrible as the situation was (read the Grand Jury report if you can stomach it) it was not an accident or aberration.

Contrary to the bleating of many feminists who are abortion fans this was not the result of restrictions on abortion. Rather, it was the forseeable consequence of the pro-abortion policy of then Governor Tom Ridge.

According to the Grand Jury report:

Under Governor Robert Casey, she said, the department inspected abortion facilities annually. Yet, when Governor Tom Ridge came in, the attorneys interpreted the same regulations that had permitted annual inspections for years to no longer authorize those inspections. Then, only complaint driven inspections supposedly were authorized. Staloski said that DOH’s policy during Governor Ridge’s administration was motivated by a desire not to be “putting a barrier up to women” seeking abortions.

Not only did Ridge stop inspections of abortion “clinics” he tacitly allowed late term abortions to be performed in violation of Pennsylvania’s Abortion Control Act. In the case of Gosnell, Ridge’s administration was presented with more than ample opportunity to shut him down and refused to do so. Again from the grand jury report:

Indeed, in many ways State had more damning information than anyone else. Almost a decade ago, a former employee of Gosnell presented the Board of Medicine with a complaint that laid out the whole scope of his operation: the unclean, unsterile conditions; the unlicensed workers; the unsupervised sedation; the underage abortion patients; even the over-prescribing of pain pills with high resale value on the street. The department assigned an investigator, whose investigation consisted primarily of an offsite interview with Gosnell. The investigator never inspected the facility, questioned other employees, or reviewed any records. Department attorneys chose to accept this incomplete investigation, and dismissed the complaint as unconfirmed.

Unfortunately, allowing clinics like Gosnell’s to operate were not an anomaly. Abortionists Stephen Chase Brigham and Harvey Walter Brookman also thrived in Pennsylvania under the Ridge administration. Not satisfied with merely allowing illegal abortions, Ridge permitted business to be drummed up for the abortion industry. In 1997 a Planned Parenthood brochure was sent under the postal frank of the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare to all women receiving medical assistance from that department.

In short, neither Gosnell nor Brigham nor Brookman killed women and children in secret, rather they did it with the knowledge and approval of the State of Pennsylvania. When Gosnell finally has his day in court one can only hope that Tom Ridge and some of his key cabinet officials are seated at his side.

COMMENTS

  • Tbone

    It is a good thing he wasn’t clubbing baby seals or every leftwing loon in America would have been ready to lynch him..

  • WmCraig

    This helps us win more political influence in 2014 how? As you pointed out it is two years old and it did not put Pennsylvania in the Red State column for Romney.

    What has changed that this is news worthy today, and will for this 2 year election cycle do anything that it didn’t do in the last? Do you believe that this will convince independents in the big blue cities to vote for a pro-life candidate and overcome the ground work the Democrats are doing to intimidate, isolate and eliminate conservatives from the big blue cities.

  • etbass

    The trial is going on now and some things are so horrific that the politics do not matter. The brutal murder of infants is one of these.

  • lineholder

    Well, by all means, if it won’t gain us more political influence in 2014, we should totally ignore any moral responsibility that we have to try to address the gross negligence and criminal activity that occurred all throughout Dr. Gosnell’s years of business operations. /sarc

    The case is pertinent in more ways than one. The left has been claiming that the things they do are in support of “women’s health”. The Gosnell case leaves the door wide open to prove the lie in that.

    Also, see how the state has acted with total disregard towards maintaining high standards in enforcing the laws for the protection of the citizens living under those laws? Think this doesn’t provide an example of what we’re likely to start seeing when IPAB kicks into gear?

    This case, allong with several cases, are helping to lay the groundwork for new regulatory measures governing the abortion industry. It won’t stop the industry, per se, but it is generating some motivation for abortionists to clean up their act and operate within the scope of the law.

  • joshinca

    This helps us win more political influence in 2014 how? As you pointed out it is two years old and it did not put Pennsylvania in the Red State column for Romney.

    I’m not from PA so this is an honest question:
    Did Romney or any other republican publicize the disgusting details of this case in ’12? I’m guessing that no they did not, and that is part of the reason for their loss.

  • midwestconservative

    why does this have to be for political gain, by the way Bob Casey was a Democrat, and Tom Ridge is a Republican; this isn’t about Politics but moral responsibility

  • ss396

    “Then, only complaint driven inspections supposedly were authorized…motivated by a desire not to be “putting a barrier up to women” seeking abortions.”

    A commenter over at AoSHQ had it that inspections of abortion mills create barriers for abortions to the same extent that meat inspectors create barriers to my ability to buy a steak.

    I read the Grand Jury report when it came out, and I puked. If I say any more than that, I’ll get banned here.

  • danandsis

    No one including Ridge can be a catholic in good standing and be pro abortion, pro choice or whatever sanitized description they can come up with to justify killing of the God’s miracles. They are enablers to this abomination and a disgrace to their faith.

  • http://scipio62.livejournal.com/ scipio62

    I am so glad you brought out the Grand Jury report showing how monstrous this all is.

    I will say that Gosnell did not just kill babies after they were born; what he did was worse. He induced labor because it was easier for him to murder those babies outside of the womb than while they were still inside the womb.

  • streiff

    I believe it demonstrates the utter stupidity of nominating “moderates.”

  • streiff

    Bingo

  • streiff

    IANAL, I don’t even play one on the internet. I’m afraid there is little in the way of earthly justice awaiting these people.