« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

“Inevitable” Romney Has the Best Chance of Winning the White House, Delivering the Senate, Keeping the House and Securing a Conservative Supreme Court.

If you are a member of the “Anyone but Romney” crowd and say, “If Romney is the nominee I will stay home,” then keep reading, this post is for you. Because on November 6, 2012, there is now a 67.9% chance you will have to follow through on that threat.

Intrade, the respected prediction market, now wages that Romney has a 67.9% chance of being the 2012 Republican presidential nominee. Perry, by contrast, lags behind at 12.4% and Cain is at 9%. (All these numbers are subject to change rather quickly.)

Romney’s chances at 67.9% is a seismic shift from the ancient political times of mid-August, 2011, when I wrote a Tatler piece about Intrade giving Perry a 31.8% chance of topping the GOP ticket, besting Romney at 30%. This “win” for Perry combined with his warp speed trajectory was especially noteworthy along with my final line — Keep your eyes on Intrade for the “market knows.”

So, consider that Intrade “knows” Romney has a 67.9% chance of winning the nomination but, according to the latest Real Clear Politics poll averages, only 23.9% of GOP primary voters support him. And now since Romney is virtually tied with Herman Cain at 23.4% that means the former Massachusetts governor has a huge political problem.

And here is how Romney can position himself to help solve that problem.

If one considers Real Clear Politics poll averages to be a credible source, then in a general election match-up Romney trails Obama 45.1% to 45.8%, meaning they are virtually tied together in a death struggle.

But what this really means is that with a Romney vs. Obama contest the GOP has the best chance of winning back the White House, taking the Senate, securing even stronger margins in the House and best of all, the future opportunity to keep a conservative balance in the Supreme Court with a new appointee or two.

With this big picture thinking, those disgruntled Republicans who insist on staying home or those who say they will hold their nose and vote for Romney but will not work for him, are all very short-sighted.

Instead, all eyes should be on the prize of Romney’s potential as the winner takes all branches, that now in polling reality, only a Romney nomination truly offers. The Romney campaign should strongly position itself to appeal to conservatives on this level. Especially if you buy the argument that 2012 is the last chance to right our ship of state, after 8 full years of Obama.

But for those voters who will not listen to reason and still insist on staying home if Romney tops the ticket, it would be wise to consult Real Clear Politics poll averages. For here, everyone except Romney loses big in a general election match-up against Obama.

(RCP Average 9/22-10/15)

Romney 45.1% vs. Obama 45.8%   Obama by 0.7%

Perry 41.7% vs. Obama 49.1%

Cain 40.3% vs. Obama 47.0%

Gingrich 36.5% vs. Obama 49.5%

Paul 41.4% vs. Obama 47.6%

Bachmann 37.6% vs. Obama 51.8%

Huntsman 38% vs. Obama 47%

Santorum 34% vs. Obama 45%

NOTE: Rasmussen today released a poll showing Cain beating Obama by two points. That poll is figured into Cain’s numbers shown above.

After looking at these percentages, any Republican who thinks Obama is going to be easy to defeat has their head in the sand. However, Intrade now gives Obama a 46% chance of winning re-election (down from 50% in August), but watch this number closely because it could easily climb back to 50% or higher because he is the president and incumbency has its advantages.

Example A: Obama just raised $70 million in the last quarter compared to $14 million for Romney and $17 million for Perry.

And why is money so important for President Obama right now?

Example B: In the battle-ground state of Virginia, a must-win-back state for the GOP in 2012, a Republican political operative involved in what will be Virginia’s highly contested, high-profile US Senate race, told me that Obama for America already has 29 paid staffers on the ground working that state, and the election is still a year away.

One can only imagine how many jobs Obama will create with his Obama for America campaign job expansion program in 2012.  And with a campaign fund stimulus projected at close to $1 billion, Obama for America employees might actually lower the unemployment rate in several battle-ground states.

Which points to the political reality that the faster the GOP can unite around one candidate, who various polls show can defeat Obama, the faster Republicans can “community organize” themselves against Obama for America.

So if you are one of the “I will stay home if Romney is nominated” crowd, please consider the grand prize of all branches of government that Republicans united under Romney could potentially win or be able to appoint judges to, if he heads the 2012 ticket.

Romney’s nomination is inevitable precisely because “Romney for America” is recognized as having the best chance to defeat the Campaigner in Chief in betting games and in general election polls.

Then our one term president can feel free to create his new organization aptly named “Obama in Retirement.”

COMMENTS

  • wacowboy

    but perceived electability is not the first qualification for POTUS. and that’s all that Mitt has going for him .

    that said, if he is the nominee, I will vote for him, much the same way as I voted for McCain. But there’s 2-3 others on the Primary field who I’d rather see win the nomination on merit rather than perceived electability.

    • redmymind

      Things are still highly fluid and there’s still LOTS of time. This whole business of Romney “inevitability” is merely a function of the establishment wanting to seal the deal, as it were. If it’s that inevitable, then why make a big deal out of it with trumpet blast? The nomination will not be won by pundits, thank God!

      • wacowboy

        I’m getting tired of the main argument for Romney being “but he can win!” I’d rather know why he deserves the nomination over the others since I think that Perry, Gingrich and Cain all have just as good a shot against B.O. in a general election

        and doesn’t current gallup polling show a nameless, faceless republican leading BO? so why don’t we seek out the guy with the best credentials rather than because someone said this person can win.

    • jackdaniels11

      I don’t believe that Herman Cain is ready for his media close-up. He has no experience and that will make a difference for millions of swing voters in swing states that are must-win.

      Rick Perry is a deeply flawed candidate. His position on immigration is killing him with the base. Also, he would embarrass his party in a debate with Obama.

      I’ve voted Republican every election since 1992. I voted by absentee when I was in Iraq in 2006. I have no problem with Mitt Romney. He will get the economy out of neutral.

  • dapala

    Romney is stuck at 25-30% and he will never get above that. He reminds me of a surfer with a monster North Shore wave behind him. If his track record ever catches up to him he will get swamped. Not one vote has yet been cast.

    He appointed some very liberal judges in Mass., his views on global warming are frightening, He wants to do basically nothing to reform the tax code . Romney’s silver spoon upbringing makes George Bush look like he was a poor Texas cowboy.
    His health care bill is a ridiculous idea and he will not abandon it. I just don’t believe he will repeal Obamacare when he was one of its chief architects.

    ABR Anyone but Romney.

  • johnconradarens

    Cain – 47%
    Obama – 45%

    Romney – 43%
    Obama – 45%

    I think Governor Romney is a wonderful man. I am glad he’s a member of the team. But, I am of the opposite view: He is the LEAST electable against Obama, for the simple reason that he will both take the most potent weapon issue-wise off the table (that is, Obamacare, in that Mr. Romney will have to thread the needle between Federalism and nanny-state-ism, a difficult task), and conservatives will definitely support him– but without the enthusiasm they would have for a Cain or a Gingrich.

    There is no pack-leader at this moment. Romney has never broken the 1/3 barrier in the polls, despite having been on the campaign for four years now. This is very telling. The rest is just name recognition boiling around.

  • cajungirl2012

    is using the Huff Post to smear Perry with his dishonest Mormon BS. Accusing Perry campaign of promoting anti-Mormon message.

    Not enough to plant stories about racist rocks.

    Why isn’t he attacking Cain? Is Perry the real threat to the RINO/Cain ticket?

    My conscience won’t let me near the voting booth if Romney is the nominee. He will lose anyway b/c he has no moral compass.

  • jackdaniels11

    My point has always been that Cain’s one-note campaign will soon sound hollow as people realize that he doesn’t have anything coherent to say about foreign policy, military spending, social security, values issues, etc.

    All he wants to talk about is 9-9-9. Is anyone else tired of hearing a Republican brag about a plan that will create the nation’s first national sales tax?

  • jackdaniels11

    “dishonest Mormon BS”?

    That doesn’t make you sound at all biased. I think that Mitt is trying to finish off Perry because Perry is his only opponent that has enough money to do TV ads in must-win states like Florida, California, and New York. Mitt clearly does not feel threatened by Cain. Plus, it is bad form to attack a candidate who is attacking your main competition.

    Notice how Giuliani and McCain said nothing negative about each other in 2007 and 2008. Gentleman’s agreement?

  • cajungirl2012

    and use your religion to attack another Republican’s character? Reagan’s commandment about how to treat fellow Repubs is lost on Mitt. What a shock.

    What won’t Romney do to get the nomination? Good question.

    Sorry. He will never get my vote.

  • sunshinek67

    numbers in October 2007? Polls had Giuliani & Thompson at the top with John McCain, who’s campaign was broke and in debt, trailing at a distant third.

  • mtbrimstone

    If you are curious about how Romney fared among the other Republican nominees on Intrade during the 2008 Presidential Election, visit:

    http://www.intrade.com/Market_Moves/20080109/newsletter.html

    Apparently, Romney did well from September-December 2007 (just as he is now), but his Intrade numbers dropped sharply going into January 2008, after the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary took place. Intraders lost confidence in Romney due to the fact that “Mike Huckabee

  • Right Reason

    Let me help you here. Your diary would have been a much shorter read if you had gotten to the point:

    Romney can win so we should vote for him so he can win.