« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Drive a Mile, Be Taxed Twice More

I am not great at writing blogs, so here goes nothing….

America is a big country, so it’s a real must for most people to have a decent car.  We love to drive.  I should know, because I love to drive.  I live in Silver Spring, Maryland and I’m no stranger to riding on Metro buses and subway rails, but I’ll take driving over riding public transportation anytime and anyday.  I just like to have my personal space.  I don’t want to get up and sit on a public bus, only to smell smoking and somebody whose stench clearly indicates he hasn’t showered in days.  But I guess that’s about to change.

How?  You know how it is always with liberals quipping that we have to raise gasoline taxes in order to force us to buy or drive a more fuel-efficient car.  We need to raise gasoline taxes, because oil resources are dwindling and more conserving is needed.  Maybe you hear an occasional statement that gasoline taxes should be raised so that more money can be put into researching alternate energy sources or repairing roads.  We’re supposed to love taxes, because it’s the only thing that’s keeping our civilization alive and thriving, or so say liberals.

But tell me, what happens when everybody is driving a fuel-efficient car?  What happens to gasoline taxes?  Wouldn’t that mean revenues in gasoline taxes might decline significantly as you get more miles out of gas?  Yes, it may mean that.  You see, some Democrats and liberals are starting to worry about that, and they don’t like it when taxes don’t work out so well.  Thus, they must find a way to put more taxes on us, whom they have castigated as a bunch of nothing more than Joe the Plumbers.

Oregon (and other states) is experimenting with mileage taxes. It means you get to be taxed a mile as you drive your car. I have no idea how one can mathematically calculate how one pays in gasoline taxes on the same mileage as one is paying on mileage taxes. But I imagine an average American drives 12,000 miles a year. If this average American only pumps gas once a week, and gasoline tax is maybe 50 cents per gallon. If his car’s tank holds 10 gallons, that means he pays $5 in gasoline taxes per week. Since a year consists of 52 weeks, so you take $5 and multiply 52, and you come up with $250 in gasoline taxes yearly.

On the other hand, say if you’re going to pay in mileage taxes, it’s more likely you’ll be taxed a few pennies on every mile you drive. Leaving aside all legal technicalities like what happens when you drive out of state, let’s say you pay 5 cents per mile. And you drive 12,000 miles per year. How much do you pay in mileage taxes? $600. You multiply 5 cents by 12,000 miles, and that’s how much you come up with — six hundred dollars. That’s four hundred more than regular gasoline taxes. And who is to say that mileage taxes won’t be raised more every year?

And ironically, some liberals are now afraid that we won’t buy better fuel-efficient cars simply because we don’t like paying more taxes in any form or shape. So, if one wants to force us to pay more in gasoline taxes if that means weaning us off oil and less fuel-efficient cars, I get it. I don’t like it, but I get it, okay? But I don’t get it when somebody comes up with an idea of finding a way to tax us more if we drive a better fuel-efficient car! If one is driven away from regular cars to more exotic cars with better fuel-efficiency rates, then what happens one is driven away from BOTH types of cars?

You know how it is we often say that in politics, America truly gets what she deserves when she elects leaders like Democrats and President-elect Obama? It’s true. We get leaders we rightfully deserve, good or bad. Heaven forbid we find ways to reduce tax burdens on ordinary Joe the Plumbers, because that would mean the end of world for many social elites and Democratic leaders.

Maybe it’s time for us to buy a bike and do it old-fashioned way….using raw human power to travel to another place. But I wouldn’t put it past those idiots to find a way to tax our human legs or bikes…

COMMENTS

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    The idea of environmentalists (gas tax) and porkers (mileage tax) fighting it out is a delicious commentary on the left’s loss of rationality and a stripping off of high flown rhetoric about the good the planet in place of sheer banditry. Personally, a mileage tax makes it clear to everyone that it’s all about the money.

    What is scary from what I’ve been reading is that the proposals are to use GPS technology, which manufacturers will be compelled to install in cars, to determine the mileage – which despite all disclaimers means that the government will have records of where you travel with your car, especially if they charge you at each gas refilling stop.

    Not to mention the likelihood of federalization when you start dealing with crossing state borders. This just brings big brother technology even closer.

    It’s one thing to voluntarily choose to have toll tags record your bridge crossings in retrun for the promised convenience and faster access; it’s another to be compelled to disclose your driving patterns to the government. Especially as we approach a one-part government.

    • Achance

      that a maker cannot do business without them, so they can dictate pretty much anything they want. That’s even more true now that the three domestic makers are wholly dependent on the good will of a Democrat Congress and the transplants are in danger of being unionized by that same Congress. No more legacy cost issues if the transplants are under the UAW pattern agreement and are paying the same retiree H&W costs as the others.

      I think I’m going to be nice to my aging cars so I don’t have to buy a new one that will be reporting my whereabouts. ‘Course, the way they get you is by stuff like changing fuel formulations and such like. It is almost impossible to use an older car that was made for leaded gas as a daily driver without extensive and expensive engine modifications or mixing your own fuel. If they outlaw the lead replacement additives, you can’t do that. There are lawsuits all over the Country going now over the damage done to boats by ethanol fuel, some even over stuff as dramatic as the ethanol fuel dissolving the fuel tanks. Even without that, it damages rubber hoses and gaskets and absorbs water so that you go through large numbers of fuel filters.

  • Pingback: Errol Christensen

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: randki w rzeszowie

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: more info

  • Pingback: rubinetti

  • Pingback: weddings in italy

  • Pingback: Network

  • Pingback: Try This Out

  • Pingback: Navigate To These Guys

  • Pingback: breast active program

  • Pingback: karos registraciya

  • Pingback: madamelux

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Julie Leiendecker

  • Pingback: Kirk Thakur

  • Pingback: Union Flooring Installations

  • Pingback: Luanne Courtney

  • Pingback: curriculum vitae

  • Pingback: Frederick Pelletier

  • Pingback: Augusta Nabers

  • Pingback: Rosamaria Froebe

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: service PLC mitsubishi

  • Pingback: Work at home jobs

  • Pingback: 411 reverse

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: home distilling

  • Pingback: air compressors

  • Pingback: koi

  • Pingback: Mining Technology

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • From ME to You

    In the People’s Republic of Maine when you register your vehicle you must report your current odometer reading. Just subtract last years reading form this years and you have your annual mileage. The state would then compute your tax and have you pay it.

    I can think of other ways:
    You could have a “Mileage Tax” (from UYA 1) form to fill out just like you do income.

    You could deduct mileage from out of state driving by reporting to the state employee at the border crossing having him/her verify your mileage as you leave the state .
    When you return, report to a state employee to verify your mileage again at which time they would give you an official receipt which would be reported with your annual Mileage Tax Form.

    WOW!!!! I see a job for life opportunity there!!!

  • haydus

    the free market way? Those that use the road more, pay more. The gas tax federally and in most states isn’t raising enough revenue to cover the maintenance and roadway expansion on tap. The gas tax hasn’t been raised since ’93, so it hasn’t kept up with inflation or the huge increases in the cost of raw materials. So if the people refuse to pay a higher gas tax, and refuse to pay more tolls, then the only other way to go will be to cut back on highway expansion, which means that congested road you sit on won’t get an extra lane.

  • exitsfunnel

    I wish that someone could explain to me the advantage of this scheme over just raising the gas tax. What makes this whole thing even more strange is that I would guess that the governor of Oregon (who is the chief proponent here) fancies himself an environmentalist and the effect of a mileage tax in lieu of a higher gas tax is to disincentivize more fuel efficient vehicles.

    -exits

  • From ME to You

    Driving more fuel efficient vehicles would not decrease the number of miles driven/taxed. The number of miles driven would stay relatively stable whereas the amount of gasoline consumed would decline!

    From a confiscatory tax point of view eliminating the gas tax and replacing it with a mileage tax makes a lot of sense!

    With a mileage tax, even if you drive an electric vehicle and buy no gasoline you STILL have to pay taxes!!!!

  • Steve W

    From a confiscatory tax point of view eliminating the gas tax and replacing it with a mileage tax makes a lot of sense!

    Yes, it might make sense from a tax point of view – but here are several plausible consequences IMHO . . .

    • Who’s to say that “they” will eliminate the gas tax and replace it with a mileage tax? I’d bet that they keep the one, and add the other.
    • Federalizing the system would make sense based on interstate travel – but, then who’s to say that a mile in Nebraska is worth the same as a mile in New Jersey in regards to construction or maintenance?
    • Since most highway construction is a cooperative effort between State and Federal taxation – how would this change that partnership? I’m sure that the states won’t like the Federals cutting them out of a major revenue source.
  • zsmvf6

    m y car’s odometer broke down last June, and I have to guessimate how far I drive on Excel Spreadsheets.