« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Does the “Republican Establishment” exist, and do you want to become a member of part of it?

Cross-posted at UnifiedPatriots.com

Many words have been typed lately about whether the “Republican Establishment” (“RE”) has been cramming a particular candidate down the throats of the “conservative base” of “the Republican Party.” Some have made the obvious, good point that the RE cannot cast the votes that result in, for example, Mitt Romney winning the Republican primaries and caucuses. Rather, obviously, the voters who bother to show up and vote cast those votes. (More later about how part of the RE can, and does, impact those contests.) Keep in mind that, so far, with the exception of South Carolina (if memory serves me, and I may be wrong about this), turnout in every primary or caucus has been lower than in 2008. What does that say about the (mythical?) “conservative base” of “the Republican Party” we all keep reading about?

Now, regarding “the Republican Party,” let’s define some terms. Because it relates to one part of the RE. Some have written that “the Republican Party” is composed of millions of different people. Not exactly. Yes, millions of people have registered with their county elections department that they would like to be identified as a Republican, but that does not make them a member of the Party itself.

Voters who self-identify as Republicans when registering to vote might think of themselves as “members” of the Republican Party, but without more they really aren’t. Some of them might send enough money to the Republican National Committee, for example, to get in return a nice plastic card embossed with their name telling them they are a “Sustaining Member” of the RNC, but that doesn’t make them a member of the Party. They may even do many good things on behalf of the Republican Party itself (for example, they might give money to the Party at the local, state, or national levels; they might volunteer at their county committee headquarters, they might volunteer to help with campaigns of Republican candidates in the general or primary elections, etc.).

All of those efforts are laudable, but none of them make those registered Republican voters part of “the Republican Party.”

To become part of the RE inside the Party itself, to be in a position to affect some of the things part of the RE, that part inside the Party at the Republican National Committee, does, one has to become a “voting member” of the Party.

So let’s examine some of the things one part of the RE, the Republican National Committee and its Chairman, and the state Republican Party chairmen and the state committees can, and have, done to affect the primary process.

The state Republican Party committees can affect whether their Republican primary is “closed” to only registered Republican voters or open. Who comprise these state Party committees? Every state has a different system, but, basically, those Republican voters who take the necessary steps to become “voting members” of the Party where they live (called precinct committeeman in most states) get to elect, directly or indirectly, the members of the state committees. (I’ve compiled what I’ve been able to find about “how it works” in each state at my little blog linked below.) The state committees can also affect when on the calendar their state’s primary falls, and this can affect, per the Rules of the Republican Party of the RNC, whether the state awards delegates on a winner-take-all or proportionate basis.

The RNC members write the Rules of the Republican Party, as already mentioned, and those Rules can affect which of the state primary and caucus contests come first. This order, some say, could favor the candidate the RE favors.

The RNC members also have determined the scheduling and formats of most of the primary “debates.” Have you been happy with the format? Have you been happy with the networks carrying them? Been happy with the “moderators?” Did you have a vote in determining who became the RNC members? Some of us did. Here in Arizona, in January of 2011, those of us who expended the effort to become precinct committeemen, and then were fortunate to be elected state committeeman, then elected our state chairman (the precinct committeemen in each legislative district, per the state committee bylaws, may elect one state committeeman for every three elected PCs in the distict). Because we had a majority of conservative PCs across the state, a majority of the state committeemen whom the PCs elected turned out to be conservatives and they, in turn, elected a conservative to the state chairman post. Our conservative state chairman is a member of the RNC. At our upcoming state convention the state committeemen will elect our two other RNC delegates. We conservative state committeemen hope to elect two conservatives.

So, if you want to affect that part of the RE inside the Party itself, you have to become a voting member of the Party. There are plenty of vacancies (about half of the Republican Party PC slots are vacant in every state and about one-third of the precincts across the country have no Republican precinct committeemen at all), and the time for becoming a voting member of your state Party for the upcoming election cycle may not have yet expired. The deadline has expired already in a few states. Do you know the deadlines for your state? Do you know how to become a precinct committeeman in your state? Do you think becoming a voting member of the Party matters and is worth your time and effort? Take a look at what is happening right now in Ohio. None of this would be happening within the Ohio Republican Party state committee if more conservatives had become elected precinct committeemen in Ohio. In Ohio, one needs only FIVE signatures to get on the ballot to run for the office of Republican Party precinct committeeman. Five.

So, if you want to become a part of that part of the RE that is “the Republican Party,” one way is to become a precinct committeeman in your “political neighborhood” — your precinct.

Second, if you are planning on not voting for the Republican nominee if it turns out “your guy” does not win the nomination, are you willing to take the risk that a President Barack Hussein Obama, in his second term, will select more Supreme Court justices and federal district court judges and appeals court justices? Will you be okay with Supreme Court Justices Eric Holder and Debbie Wasserman Schultz?

For Liberty,

ColdWarrior
——————–

In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?

Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and Unified Patriots.

COMMENTS

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    “Justice Debbie Wasserman-Shultz”… Hide the sharp objects…

    I am brewing up a diary entry about this fabled Establishment, and how their only power is, in reality, the fecklessness of far too many individual conservative-type Republicans to buckle in the face of criticism (or simply cold-shoulders) from their neighbors and co-workers, and nothing more…

    If we simply overcame our fears, and strongly backed the strongest, most thoroughgoing conservatives available, and did so with vigor both inside AND outside the party, to quote Sam Cook:

    What a Wonderful World This Would Be!

    • Juggernaut

      nobodies, he does have Pence, Connie Mack and John Thune but most of the rest of congressmen aren’t well known or have been labeled rinos. The establishment itself is a myth when it comes to support for Romney.

      Now we do have leaders like Jim DeMint and Marco Rubio who have not endorsed but have called out candidates when they go to far but the real heavy weight RE’s are on the sidelines because they’re as disappointed as the rest of us.

      If the RE had any real influence the Bush years would not have been a trillion dollar spending spree to glad hand dems and right wing special interests. We the people can push them around and remind them we’re keeping score and on election day someone’s going to be rehired and others shall see a primary challenger.

  • westcoastpatriette

    now that we are, once again, dejected over the sorry state of affairs we now face in this election. If more of us followed your advice, certainly we would have made more progress than we have thus far.

  • egl2000

    The “establishment” is our star chamber. Those individuals who see the election of certain contestants through the eyes of K street.
    We talk principles – they talk mostly monetary success. Have they ever come to the rescue of Santorum before? No. Have the supported “principled opposition” before? Perhaps a few. Wealth does not promote principles – wealth promotes more wealth. (and I support that.)

    Why the distinction? Because they have the means to make a major difference – >massive dollar contributions<. Not $10,000 – but $5-10 Million – our own 'Sorros class' donor (he wrote $12 million to Moven On' on a whim, after his 'initial' meeting with the slobs). This class of donor did not come by that kind of donation amount because they won the lottery nor due to their own "principles".

    Seriously – if you considered spending "8 figures" on something like an election, don't you think every Top Cog in the party would be on bended knee in front of you? Would you enjoy that? Would not you mingle with other like minded nobility? That is tremendous power. They are "the Establishment" because not only will they give 5 million this year – they will give IT every cycle and that IS Establishment. You see it on Obama's side almost every day.
    I just hope we use it correctly.

  • dcgator

    I completely agree with you that more Republicans need to get involved at the county, state, and even national level. However, you give WAY too much power to the “Establishment” than what truly exists.

    The Republican Establishment does not set whether primaries are ‘open’ or ‘closed’…thats the state legislature. There isn’t an ability for the state parties to arbitrarily say “New Hampshire is open, Florida is closed, South Dakota is only people who don’t have children” etc etc. That is the state legislatures’ decision. If you want to change it, again, echoing your point, get involved in the local party, lobby your legislature, heck, run for the state house yourself.

    Second, the ‘RE’ has not done ‘that’ much to set the rules for which states go at what point. Yes, New Hampshire and Iowa’s place in the cycle have been preserved (which I disagree with) but for the rest of the nation, there are rules to when primaries can be held and how delegates are allocated. States like FL, in order to increase their importance, have defied the rules (by order of the state legislature, again) and have been punished with delegates. I think a better system would be to rotate every four years around the nation.

    Third, the RNC has done zero to force candidates in debates. RNC Reince Preibus has actually called for there to be less debates. The RNC would probably prefer to have greater control in their debate (which would probably result in a greater quality of moderators and questions) but many times, this is the state parties/news networks issue. The media wants to have a debate, finds one or two top-notch candidates who want to use the free media, and the rest of the field has to oblige. It would probably be better for conservatives if the RNC had a greater say and operated more like the Presidential Debate Commission.

    Despite the faults, you make a good point that is not reiterated enough on RedState that conservatives can make the most change by actually getting involved and working their way up to make legitimate change.

  • naraht

    There are *no* requirements in the US Consitution for a Supreme Court Judge other than the approval of the Senate.George W. Bush could have try to appoint his mother, Obama could try to appoint his daughter, whatever. However unlike in the early years of the Republic, *today* a Law Degree is really used as part of the “giggle test” for appointees. The last Supreme Court member appointed without a degree was back in the 1940s.

    Debbie Wasserman Schultz has no law degree, she got a BA at University of Florida and almost immediately became an aide to a member of the Florida House and got an MA from Florida 2 years later. When that member ran for the Florida Senate, she got elected in his place (he suggested it) and she has remained in office (FL House, FL Senate & US house) since. She wouldn’t even pass the giggle test among the Dems. Now if you’d said Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), *she* might get approved during a second Obama term…

  • mikefrey

    It seems my iPhone can leave comments without leaving them twice, but can’t recommend diaries.

    Whereas my PC can recommend diaries just fine, but is fairly likely to post comments twice instead of once.

    The only thing worse than IT is no IT.

  • sociologyphdjd

    Absolutely, I am to the point where I would prefer that the GOP moderate RINOs not have four more years. Better just to go to heck in the handbasket and get it over with than drag it out with liberal GOPers running the show. These folks are every bit as greedy as the Democrats. George W. Bush, for instance, played a big role in getting us to where we are today. Socialist drug bill, remember? Mittens loves his mandate. No, I think I will stay home. Seeing how the GOP still spits in our eyes (e.g., new highway bill), it is the only logical thing.

    These people who talk the talk and then take the money and run.

    • jakeofalltrades

      trolling on here to support your Chicago Messiah.

  • egl2000

    The Establishment is still beholden to the voters If they see the Tea Party taking over the GOP and as long as victories in the general election will follow then . . .

    If you want to make a difference.

    If you want to see how the engine of Liberty works for real. Real votes, real politicians, real debates.

    If you want to feel as if you ‘really tried.’ Tried to give it your all.

    If you want to argue with like minded thoughtful principled folks.

    If you care.

    Join your county GOP party – or at least go visit a once a month meeting. Not a lot of meeting per year mind you so don’t miss them.

    See vote totals, see and hear the real pressure that your politician is under. Principled as they may be – they can lose elections.

    Consider running for a spot on your city council. Join a board or committee somewhere. The GOP needs candidates with a political and public resume – we need a deep bench’ of experienced candidates in every county in America.

    Example = Palin, started in the PTA! (bake sale anyone) – moved up to State Gov – then jumps to VP candidate and a national representative of GOP. She was “establishment.”

    Candidates are the very first step in how conservatives/the Tea Party will begin to remove Rhinos within the GOP.

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      I hope the Reply To This button worked this time. Sometimes it doesn’t.

      Thank you.

      CW

  • barleycorn

    The Republican Establishment is made up of four groups:

    1. Multimillionaires
    2. High profile office holders.
    3. Former high profile office holders.
    4. Right of center media.

    I’ve listed them in their order of importance. It takes BIG money to win elections and the Big Money guys have final say. The other three groups derive most of their power through their ability to shape the perceptions and thus the actions of the Big Money guys.

    Becoming a precinct captain is a laudable activity but it will mainly help to elect the Republican nominee, not help choose the Republican nominee.

  • barleycorn

    The Republican Establishment is made up of four groups:

    1. Multimillionaires
    2. High profile office holders.
    3. Former high profile office holders.
    4. Right of center media.

    I’ve listed them in their order of importance. It takes BIG money to win elections and the Big Money guys have final say. The other three groups derive most of their power through their ability to shape the perceptions and thus the actions of the Big Money guys.

    Becoming a precinct captain is a laudable activity but it will mainly help to elect the Republican nominee, not help choose the Republican nominee.

    • mikefrey

      precisely to help choose candidates. In my first meeting, I had a say in an endorsement vote for a Republican Candidate. So, no, I won’t have the power to choose the Republican nominee this year, but yes, thousands of us, involved across the country will become more and more powerful and influential in the choosing of our standard bearers, at higher and higher levels.

      Just because we are suffering the consequences of collective neglect of our civic and American duty does not excuse continued lapses. Join and fight!

      Mike

    • mikefrey

      precisely to help choose candidates. In my first meeting, I had a say in an endorsement vote for a Republican Candidate. So, no, I won’t have the power to choose the Republican nominee this year, but yes, thousands of us, involved across the country will become more and more powerful and influential in the choosing of our standard bearers, at higher and higher levels.

      Just because we are suffering the consequences of collective neglect of our civic and American duty does not excuse continued lapses. Join and fight!

      Mike

  • YnotNOW

    at our local Colorado Republican Caucus. And it was actually competitive – 6 candidates ran for the two slots. I specifically ran on a platform of

    “the Republican Party has strayed, and apathy has allowed it. The only solution is for principled people to get involved and bring them back on course. I hope to be part of the solution, instead of part of the problem.”

    I had the highest vote total of all candidates, so many must agree!

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      I hope you will write a Diary about your experience, the “strength” of your local Republican committee, etc.

      Thank you for all you are doing!

      CW