« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama longs for days of “entire population…hearing one source of news”"

In a recent interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer Obama was asked about the lack of hope and change in DC and continued partisanship, he gives a couple reasons why.   One reason, congressional districting was a theory he has seen proposed.  The second reason, freakin chilling, was his own idea of the diversification “splintering” of the media.   He longed for the days where “…the entire population just watching Walter Cronkite hearing one source of news.”

I am surprised I haven’t seen any coverage on this.    Obama, off prompter, adding his own belief that the problem is splintered media.

Here is the transcript from CNN for context:

BLITZER:  Yes.

A quick question.  You know, Washington, I’ve been there a long time –

OBAMA:  Right.

BLITZER:  – a lot longer than you’ve been there.

OBAMA:  Right.

BLITZER:  When we spoke here, end of 2008, hope and change.

OBAMA:  Right.

BLITZER:  You know what I see in Washington still to this day?

OBAMA:  More of the same.

BLITZER:  The same old, same old.

OBAMA:  Yes.

BLITZER:  Lot of bickering, backstabbing –

OBAMA:  Maybe a little worse.

BLITZER:  – name – why?

OBAMA:  Well, you know, I think what’s happened, you know, there are a lot of theories about this, part of it is you have theses congressional districts that are now so Democratic or so Republican that people don’t feel like they need to move to the center and try to find some common ground.  They dig in their heels.  They’re more worried about a primary fight coming up from their own party, and I think that contributes to it.

Some, frankly, Wolf, is I think the media’s changed.   You know, it’s much more splintered.  You don’t have the entire population just watching Walter Cronkite hearing one source of news.  Now everybody’s kind of going off into their respective corners.

http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/16/pres-obama-ultimately-the-buck-stops-with-me-im-going-to-be-accountable/

What might be even be more revealing is that Blitzer had no follow up on that.   His hair did not stand on end as a member of the supposed ‘check and balance’ media when a sitting President in this day and time longs for the day of one source of news for the ENTIRE population.  It is an admission that Blitzer knows he is a part of that one media carrying on the propaganda for the left.   Why wouldn’t he reply with, “Mr. President, are you saying you would rather have one source of news media?, Please clarify your remarks.”

I tried finding a video clip of this part, if someone locates it, please post.

Obama blames the bickering and backstabbing(read not everyone agreeing with him on every step) on the lack of ONE news source for the ENTIRE population.

Truly chilling and very revealing.

 

 

COMMENTS

  • gregorysstewart

    It can be real difficult to serve up some Orwellian pablum if you get called out on it by a media that is not in your pocket. You have to feel sorry for the prevaricators who in times past could manufacture fake national guard records, trumpet them as true and have the fake evidence go unchallenged.

    How do you put up with the challenge of the people that get to hear you talk about bitter clingers, when in the old days that would never have seen the light of day?

    What do you do when your pet projects like ACORN are presumably helping a pimp and a prostitute get government bailouts, and help with the under-aged prostitutes and you want it all swept under the rug? Sure you can count on the New York Times, CBS, NBC and ABC to mold the news to your liking, but guys like Andrew Breitbart just haven’t learned how to hide the facts behind the myth.

    What really bothers Obama is that Big Brother never had to deal with these “little people.”

    • Common_Cents

      Obama can be very revealing when he is off ‘prompter. His real thinking just flows easily like this and the “cop acted stupidly” moments. Too bad the lame stream media is too busy lickin his boots.