« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Entropy of Freedom

A little DIGG love if you please:

While Entropy has slightly different meanings according to the field of science in which it is used, its general meaning is the degradation of a system toward chaos – the gradual loss of energy leading toward nothingness.

Cosmologists will tell you that at the instant of creation of our universe, at the very moment of the Big Bang – whether that bang was the result of random chance or the creation of an intelligence whose design is well beyond our own puny comprehension – Entropy was even then beginning its dark natural force of counteracting that creation.

As the universe expands, Entropy builds up a momentum of its own, slowing that expansion until hanging for a period of time in a balance, it begins to contract upon itself, leading the universe inexorably into chaos.

And so it also is with freedom.

At the very creation and founding of our nation, the seeds of Entropy were planted along side the seeds of Liberty, to grow by equal measure toward their own end. Even as freedom flourished in this nation – and spread as seed carried by the wind across the seas to other nations – so were the seeds of Entropy growing in government.

But the wisdom and depth of understanding of our founding fathers is breathtaking. Through the discussions and writings between them, and the care and precision of the documents they penned, it is clear that they feared from the moment of creation, the destruction of this country through the appetites of its own government. They recognized those seeds of Entropy and attempted in their crafting, to thwart their growth.

Thomas Jefferson, who would become the third President of the United States said, “When the people fear their government, it is tyranny. When the government fears the people, it is Liberty.” That side-by-side understanding of our founding fathers of the necessity and the tyranny of government is what propelled them to write one of the most remarkable documents in human history – our Constitution.

As Benjamin Franklin once stated, “Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” Our founding fathers, recognizing the necessity the Safety of government, were willing to trade a bit of Liberty in exchange. But in the crafting of the US Constitution, with its curbs on the powers of government, they attempted to cede as little essential Liberty as possible, while securing the least amount of Safety necessary to govern.

But Entropy is a force of nature – as is government a force of man. As Entropy began building from the moment of creation – so does government. As Entropy is the antithesis of creation – government is the antithesis of Freedom.

Taking those lessons of history, they attempted to fashion a government that derived its just powers from the consent of the governed. For the first time in human history – and the only government so installed to this day – the founding fathers recognized that rights are not derived from government but from God.

Ours is not the first Republic with which our founding fathers had to build the framework of their government. They had only to study the failures of the ancient Greeks and the Romans to realize the frailty of Freedom and Liberty in a society build by men. In the Declaration of Independence they wrote:

Quote:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The lessons of history were not lost on those men. They saw that noble Republics in both Greece and Rome – governments for and by the people – had fallen prey to the voracious appetites of government toward tyranny – eventually devolving into prison states of despots.

And so, after trial and error with the Articles of Confederation, and much discussion as to the necessary role of government, the Constitution was created. With that remarkable document, “WE THE PEOPLE” became stewards of our government, not the other way around. The powers not enumerated as having been ceded to the federal government were understood to be held by the states or the people. The Constitution provided a framework from which to work – a framework to thwart the unbridled natural growth of government to tyranny.

But by little bits and pieces, even in the earliest years of our founding, the Entropy of government began to grow. The power of the federal government, at first frail and weak, began to build with each passing year – with the passage of laws that took tiny essential freedoms from the people, and gave those powers to the government.

And gradually, over time, the people became more and more dependent upon that government. Temporary safeties became permanent tyranny – and essential Liberties became but a memory.

As we watch our federal leviathan usurp more and more of our liberties and rights – providing not even a temporary safety – the American people are just now awakening as though from a deep and prolonged sleep. They ask themselves and those about them, “How did we come to this place? How did WE THE PEOPLE ever allow this to happen?”

The answer is Entropy – the gradual degradation of our system of government toward tyranny and chaos.

Many cosmologists will say that once Entropy succeeds in collapsing the universe back into the moment of nothingness in the moment before creation – creation will all begin again. A new Big Bang will once again ignite the universe – once again begin the creation of life.

What the Entropy of the American Republic look like is anyone’s guess. But as we learned the first time, creation is messy, and not for the faint of heart. As Benjamin Franklin once noted, “Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God.”

Happy Memorial Day

Originally published at The Minority Report

COMMENTS

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    later

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      and your recommend

  • ocleverone

    One thing about entrophy, it is changed constantly at a subsystem level. We can be that subsystem level and thus change the outcome.

    I love this diary. Great job!

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      As I said in comments at TMR, I first began thinking about the constant battle of Good v Evil — and that is what lead me down the path of thinking about Entropy as a social force against freedom

      • nessa

        His SciFi/Fantasy novels didn’t focus on good vs. evil, the battle was between Entropy (Chaos) and Law. Good or evil was merely a state dependent on the status of the battle between Chaos and Law. While some law is necessary and good, too much Law quickly becomes evil when carried to the extreme, ie. every behavior controlled, only one penalty-Death for every conceivable transgression. The forces of Law were opposed by the forces of Entropy. It too when applied in moderation was a good thing, too much chaos created a world that was different but equally as evil as that of too much law. The always sought but seldom found or long maintained Balance was the key. I think our balance is tipping too far towards Law right now, where is a Melnibonean when you need one? I never realized Ronald Reagan might be an incarnation of the Eternal Champion!

        Thanks for the diary!

        • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

          and a sadder, more pompous, radical left wing ass it would be hard to find. (except maybe Harlan Ellison)

          Of course his stories were imaginative, and he is a pretty good writer, but there is a whole lot of moral relativism in there.

          I doubt seriously if he would agree on Ronald Reagan being and incarnation of the eternal champion! LOL

          • nessa

            “and a sadder, more pompous, radical left wing ass it would be hard to find. (except maybe Harlan Ellison)”

            You hit the nail on the head! I’m sure he would pitch a fit over my addition to his pantheon. Maybe Ronaldus Magnus should be one of the Gods of Chaos? At least a denizen of Tanelorn.

            Off topic? Maybe but entertaining none the less and this fits right in with the Trekkie posts I see here and there on the site. LOL.

          • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

            I suppose there is some connection with dreaming about fantastic worlds and longing for a conservative America. They both seem at times far fetched.

          • BooBooKitty

            ?Question: Who governs the governors? Answer: Entropy?

          • nessa

            From the same book,

            “If you think of yourselves as helpless and ineffectual, it is certain the you will create a despotic government to be your master. The wise despot, therefore, maintains among his subjects a popular sense that they are helpless and ineffectual.
            –The Dosadi Lesson”

            I’m not trying to hijack this, just enjoying the conversation.

        • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

          but never read any of his stuff. Know nothing about the guy….

          Entropy against Law — interesting… trust a liberal to believe it has to be all one or all the other…

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    The first peoples lived in small clans, families of Hunter Gatherers. In time a few villages which had some sort of superior trait to them began to grow. As more people were added, it became necessary to devise rules on how to live and cooperate.

    Ever since that time there has been a struggle of Personal liberty versus the power of the state. Marx was correct in viewing history as a dialectic struggle between two competing ideas, but it was not a class struggle, He got the players wrong.

    The types of governments, social systems, and economic systems are nearly infinite, but the struggle remains. and it all comes down to human nature.

    Human nature decrees that we try to control the actions of others. We want them to look like us, dress like us, talk like us, think like us, and act like us. Raw human nature is always a bloody tyrant.

    So it is only a matter of time in any sort of republic before the populous gets to impose their will upon others. Few are the people who will respond to the idea that by safeguarding the freedom of others they safeguard their own.

    Yes, they will pay lip service to that Idea, but do they really believe it? Take your average freedom loving middle class homeowner, He or She believes in the constitution and rights of every type, but let them become the head of the Home Owners association, and watch the tin pot dictator come out.

    Or that respectable conservative who laments about our lost freedoms with one sentence, and then condemns those filthy pot smokers, or people who smoke in bars, or people who watch pornography or whatever.

    The truth is, until the people are wiling to let other people live their own lives, then you can have no freedom.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      my original thoughts…this began, in my mind as a dissertation of good v evil — which is also a peek behind the curtain of man’s inner reasoning.

      The constant battle we fight even with ourselves to do what is right, versus what we know to be wrong, or expedient. How many people find a wallet and return it intact? Many…but many do not. Even ‘good’ people sometimes give in to temptation.

      And once you have made that compromise once, is it not easier to make that compromise a second, or third time?

      That, to me, has always been one of the most powerful reasons for fidelity in a marriage, for instance. Cheat, just once….and you have given yourself a reason to do it again. Do I condemn someone who has cheated in their marriage? No, not really, but it is the reason why I would not…which I see is a little off the topic…but maybe not entirely.

      why not just a little tyranny…

    • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com LJ “Beaglescout” Miller

      The first cavemen had little bands. Everything belonged to the clan, communally. That was communism. It was controlled by the chief, whose every whim was the law. Kings came out of the same dynamic. Thousands of years ago someone thought of money as an intermediate measure of value that could be traded for things that would otherwise require barter. That was the first big advance in the science of economics and government. Then someone thought of property rights as an extension of monopolies granted by the king. Then someone thought of property rights as something from God instead of from the king. Then came other rights to Life, Liberty, the commons, etc. Democracy was tried. Republics were tried. Written books of law were tried as a replacement for ruler’s whim. Both the ancient Hebrews under Moses and the Anglo-Saxons under Hengist and Horsa came up with representative government. Those were the models, along with the Roman Republic, that the founders of the US imitated and elaborated upon. They combined the best of the political and governmental discoveries of human history with free market science as described by Adam Smith and the other economists of the day, and the result was the greatest explosion of wealth and happiness ever experienced in the world.

      Now Obama is our new ruler and his whim is the law. He will throw out every scientific advance in government that restrains his power. He is taking us back to caveman times as quickly as he can. He wants power. He doesn’t care about us, the Democrats, or anyone’s general welfare. All he cares about is power.

      He is destroying the science of government and of economics in order to impose his atheist, nihilist, Marxist religion on us all.

      • Mike gamecock DeVine
  • penguin2

    Excellent analogy David. Just thought you would find if interesting to know that from the day we are born, we are in a state of entropy. The medical model seeks to create and maintain a state of ‘negative entropy’.

    So in essence, we should be striving for a state of negative entropy to ensure the survival of Freedom. I think the idea fits.

    You always have some good ideas and analysis. Thanks.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      from theblogprof who teaches the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics to engineering students. In that comment he says:

      The 2nd Law is the only law of nature that I am aware of that is not neutral. It is all bad and because of it we are in bondage to decay. Interestingly, there is evidence in the Bible that the original creation didn’t contain the 2nd Law, and that it was imposed after the fall of man.

      I find that an interesting theological point of view.

      • Mike gamecock DeVine

        Independence Day and Labor Day are the trinity of Bar-be-que season Holy Days, I hope that many of you in KC, Memphis and Texas will get right with God and cook the whole pig!

        • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

          cuz we’re ornery like that, and I’m more ornery than most cuz I’m a Cajun Texan. I can say Yeeeehahhh, and I can say Aayyyyeeeeeii.

          • Mike gamecock DeVine
        • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

          didn’t want to threadjack the other diary.

          Had to literally carry L_V outside to use his bodily functions so I missed the opening of the third period — WHY did the Wings replace Osgood? Just to give him a rest…or did something happen?

          • Mike gamecock DeVine

            for some peter pans playing music

            new bartender that isn’t yet properly schooled on daytime sports and happy hours reserved for non-peter pans that don’t need to re-live their childhoods thru music that makes them feel like heels for not being nicer to first wives…

          • penguin2

            Two answers possible: Some say barbecue and drinking are not good for one’s health-entropy. OTOH, a state of happiness and contentment can lead to enhanced well-being and prevent cancer-negative entropy.

          • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

            barbecue and drinking on Memorial Day Weekend could only be considered health food.

          • Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://bluecollarmuse.com Blue_Collar_Muse

    Perhaps this sort of thoughtfulness appears in places on the Left. I tend to think not. If it does, I would venture that it appears in those who are paid to write and who have already developed national or international audiences.

    The reason I’m honored to participate here at RS and to associate with the folks here and elseblog around the Interwebz is that I find these sorts of thoughts on the nature of Government, the character of men, the events of history and the role of nations in the writings of housewives, students, lawyers, soldiers and other otherwise ordinary and unremarkable everyday Americans – from the Right.

    If one assumes RS plays the role of the anti-Kos, then diaries like this stand in comparison and opposition to ranting, raving, obscenity laden drivel from Americans who, driven by entropy, have fallen much farther down the well. While you stand at the top of the well pulling them and the rest of us back up.

    Kudos … and great work!

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      I consider any praise from the BCM to be of the highest praise.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Dugg it, recommended.

    I haven’t read the comments yet but one thing that your piece made me think of was disenfranchisement and how it hastens the entropy of our nation. Not only are We the People experiencing a level of disenfranchisement but the State Legislatures and Governors are as well.

    I know it is one of those lost causes but it would sure be nice to repeal the 17th Amendment and get the Senate back to being representative of the State’s and the Representatives being of the people.

    This, in addition to strengthening the 10th Amendment or possibly a federalist amendment, could help to reverse the entropy to a measurable degree.

  • eburke

    This diary embodies the reason I am continually drawn to RS no matter how chaotic life becomes. Well written, thoughtful, thought-provoking, insightful.

    Excellent piece, David.