« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Blame It All On George W Bush

Originally Published At The Minority Report

 

The inflamed passions of the Iranian people — rising up in rebellious protests against the repressive Mullahcracy that has ruled their country with an iron boot — can be laid at the feet of just one man.

Former President George W Bush.

Eight short years ago Afghanistan stood as a lawless frontier on Iran’s eastern border — a failed state of anarchy in which criminal bands of Taliban preyed upon the people while they plotted world terrorism.

Iraq, a nation with which Iran had waged a long and costly war, stood upon its western border — the madman Saddam Hussein training terrorists from a wide number of nations, while pursuing ever more destructive weapons with which to wage terror on his neighbors.

Meanwhile, the Iranian people, among the most Westernized and educated in the entire Muslim world, found themselves ground beneath the heavy tread of a Theocracy of extreme hatred and repression.

What a difference eight years make — all because of the perseverance and resolve of one man, President George W Bush, to do what he perceived as right.

Despite repeated criticism from the left that Afghanistan was a quagmire that had blunted the ambitions of the greatest armies of their day — the British Army of the 19th Century and the Russian Army of the 20th — President Bush made critical alliances with rebel forces within the country, routed the Taliban and sent Osama bin Laden into desperate hiding in a cave somewhere in the mountains of Pakistan.

While the victory over oppression is not yet complete, a fledgling democracy — a democracy unlike anything we have ever seen in this nation, but a democracy just the same — has taken root in Kabul. Rights for women, unheard of under the Taliban, have come to the troubled nation, and freedom — while still a tenuous flower — is blossoming like a field of poppies in the sparse land.

To the west, again despite cries in this country of quagmire — bumperstickers proclaiming an end to “Endless War” and “Bush Lied and People Died” — another democracy — again unlike anything this nation has observed — has begun to flourish in the nation of Iraq.

The wise pundits who proclaimed that Iraqi Shia, Sunni and Kurds could never reconcile into a real government, have been proven wrong by Iraqi Shia, Sunni and Kurds. Proclamations of defeat — some from within weeks after the initial invasion — have been proven, in the words of Mark Twain, “Greatly exaggerated.”

While a lessor man might have been dissuaded — might have faltered upon the alter of his own doubt — President Bush held the course, and we have seen, in recent months, the emergence of an Iraqi nation divided no more.

These lessons have not been lost on the Iranian people. They have witnessed tyrants deposed and democracies spring up — the first such institutions in the region [with the exception of Israel -- of which they will always make an exception].

They have also seen the Bush Administration allocate government resources and money to aid — albeit poorly — the pro-democracy movement in their nation. They have seen an increase in funding for Persian language broadcasting services at Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. [Those allocations have been cut, by the way, from the 2010 Obama Administration budget]

The Iranian people can see that contrary to the experts, democracy can flourish in the Mideast, and they would like to be a part of it. For all of their naivete — allow us to blame former President Bush.

Without his insistence on the pursuit of freedom in Afghanistan and Iraq, the people of Iran would still be surrounded by tyrants every bit as deranged and evil as the leadership of their own nation. Without President Bush, the Iranian people would have no reason to believe that freedom is not only attainable, but within arms reach. Without President Bush, the Iranian people would have nothing other than thugocracies with which to compare their own government and their own lives.

And so, if at the end of this season of discontent, we find democracy emerging — either through peaceful means or violent revolution — we know who to blame.

Blame it on Bush!

COMMENTS

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    as he is known in Iraq today, will be a giant in history.

    Hitchens also thinks that a second election in Gaza would produce a much different result….

    more later

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      …he will be remembered for changing the face of the Mideast…

    • Karina

      He did more for them than the dems with all their posturing.

      Obama is extremely popular in the Mideast because he’s percieved as being Muslim. The bow only encouraged this but it was prevalent even before the election. I’ve talked to a number of people who are looking for the US to help the rebels in Iran right now. They don’t understand that he is not the leader that Bush was or that he sides with Ahmadinejad.

      Note: I have a huge pet peeve over the way the MSM mispronounces Iranian names. Can they learn how they’re pronounced or not say them at all? I know they’re sometimes long but can they try to be professional and get it right? Just saying.

      • Mike gamecock DeVine
      • mom2oneson

        but I know how people butcher thier names. Farsi is easy to sound out but people don’t know how to read sound out words. There is no reasy why they can’t learn to at least pronounce each syllable and put the accent on the right place. Anything longer than two syllables people don’t even try.
        OTOH, even if they sounded them out though the gain & kh sounds are almost impossible for a non-native speaker to learn pronounce correctly in a short time so the word or name would be understood by a native speaker without context. Or without the native speaker being used to how that person or people pronounce those words lol :) (Like they know Americans say “I ran” or “bag dad.” )

        • Karina

          who should have known better as he was voicing opinions like a supposed expert. It just made me discount what he was saying. He was spouting wrong stuff anyway but it sent me over the edge. It’s like Bush and his internets. Urgh! Not important in the long run but like an irritating fly.

  • izoneguy

    because I knew what he was doing was right. Our warriors have not died in vein. They are looking down from heaven at the Iranian people and saying – “Yes”
    I will remind you of what the statists thought….

  • DONTREADONME

    If Iran does show signs within the Government of opening up and loosening of its current infringement on the rights we take for granted, I believe the wake moving out from Iraq and Afghanistan will have been proven; however, I hope this move towards a democratic-republic can occur without bloodshed, that is my desire for the Iranian people.

    Lastly, here is the difference between Bush and Zero, if this does occur do not expect Bush to take credit, he is not that type of man, if will be the Iranians peoples iniative to change the Mullahs.

    Obama is that type of man and he will take credit for actions of his predecessor however that would be a deviation from his current M.O. Damn embarrassment.

    • penguin2

      Though I think he will have a difficult time making the argument, considering it is really an oxymoron for him. After all, America is so bad, so how could she be the example for the birth of freedom in some of the most repressed areas of the world?

      Deep inside the arrogant soul of our current president, I believe rests a sympathetic agreement with dictator/authoritarian rulers. He is the ONE and he WON, and he has indicated that the weight of the presidency has come quite easily to him, no problem…

      I look for the day when the self acclaimed “mighty have fallen.”

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      that Iran was always the target — President Bush knew that Iran was the one he needed to topple, but he first had to remove the threats from Afghanistan [where al Qaeda was openly operating] and from Iraq [where Saddam Hussein had openly been attacking US warplanes for years and violating the treaty that ended Gulf War I]

      With armies in Afghanistan and Iraq and bases In Uzbekistan and a Navy fleet patrolling the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf — we were in a perfect position to topple Iran.

      Had matters gone more smoothly in Iraq, I suspect that President Bush might have been more harsh on Iran.

      • Mike gamecock DeVine

        was good start! The example of Iraqis exercising freedom has affected Arabs and Persians more than the leftist news reports about abu ghraib…

  • nessa

    in the heart of AQ’s planned Califate! Osama’s plans to establish an Islamic Califate stretching across the Pacific, Asia and Africa are hindered by the spread of Liberty, even as his plans to destroy America are hindered by our military forces in these two countries.

    This is one of the hoped for effects of the strategic plan for the Global War on Terror, even if we aren’t supposed to call it that anymore. Could we have been more successful? Sure. But it doesn’t take a billion watt spotlight to form a “Shining City on a Hill” when your neighbors are lucky to have a candle.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      it doesn?t take a billion watt spotlight to form a ?Shining City on a Hill? when your neighbors are lucky to have a candle.

      sometimes all it takes is a tiny spark to set an entire forest on fire…

  • vedette1

    Oh I get it. You guys have gone to your happy place where the truth doesn’t matter, and every day is opposite day.

    Under George W. Bush, the war in Afghanistan was a muddled mess and the Taliban were making a resurgence. Obama has figured out that we need to take out the poppy fields that fund the Taliban war effort. It also has the added benefit of forcing the Taliban to come out of their caves to defend the poppy fields where we can get to them. He also switched commanders to one who hopefully will be more careful not to kill civilians.

    Afghanistan resembles a democracy only in Republican la-la land. It remains a tribal country ruled by warlords. The government doesn’t have any authority outside the capital.

    To tie the events in Iran with Bush’s bumbling attempt to establish a democracy in Iraq is yet another example of Republicans smoking their unique brand of crack. The Iranian Revolution 2.0 is hardly the result of anything happening in Iraq, but is instead the product of 30 years of theocratic oppression, and a young demographic that wants to join the rest of the world.

    Bush set back American foreign policy by decades with his middle-school swagger and boasting.

    • Vegas_Rick
      • janis

        Whoever gacked you did us all a favor. As to your hateful little screed, let’s see who history will remember most when it comes to spreading freedom around the world–Obama or George W. Bush. I guarantee that President Bush is more highly respected in the Middle East at this point than your guy Obama. Dubya said what he meant and did what he said. Obama does the opposite of what he says and means nothing with his empty rhetoric.

        Have a nice Sunday, sparky. It will be all the sweeter for us since you can’t come back and tell any more of your fables and fairy tales.

        • Mike gamecock DeVine

          I still stand on the principle (don’t ask which one – too tired) even if the regime blames the crack down on me…..

        • Mike gamecock DeVine

          I need you

          • mom2oneson
    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      Go take one.

      Moe Lane

      PS: Not In Your Name, vedette1.
      Not then.
      Not now.
      Not ever.

      • IJB
    • Mike gamecock DeVine

      who will, I’m sure weigh in soon. The difference is that they get the facts right, mostly and just disagree on others’ conclusions based on the same facts and even I would say that in the areas where he wasn’t great, its because he was too timid or too liberal.

      • izoneguy

        Just look at the loooooong list of democratic liars….

        Pelosi
        Reid
        Schumer
        Frank
        Waters
        Leahy
        Kerry
        Dodd
        Gore
        Kennedy
        Clinton
        Obama
        Biden

        Need I say more???

        http://www.stopahmadinejad.com/

        • Mike gamecock DeVine
    • mbecker908

      I will note that GWB will likely never be considered a “great” President. But not for any of the reasons you cite. Rather, because he yielded to your side on his foreign policy and didn’t act like Lincoln and arrest about half the damned Congress for treason.

      My quibble with Dave is largely on the edges, I don’t disagree with the substance other than to note that GWB didn’t go far enough.

      Bush did set back US foreign policy decades. He set it back to a time when the government cared more about the interests of the American people than being liked by spineless nabobs who believe in nothing. With any luck at all, our next President will turn the clock back again and take whatever steps are necessary to make sure it doesn’t every come back to “this” present.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Go back to having Ice Cream. Adults are talking.

      EDIT: Ah, Moe already got you. Good.

      • janis

        After all, it’s the same theory that applies when you drive a stake through a vampire’s heart after making sure he’s exposed to the sun. It pays to be redundant sometimes.

    • nessa

      I guess you were in different parts of the country(s) than I have been, vendette1. Oh, sorry, I should have realized by your trumpeting of your party’s line that you gathered your incontrovertible evidence from Harry “surrender monkey” Reid and the Drive-by Media.

      “Under George W. Bush, the war in Afghanistan was a muddled mess and the Taliban were making a resurgence. Obama has figured out that we need to take out the poppy fields that fund the Taliban war effort… ?He also switched commanders to one who hopefully will be more careful not to kill civilians.”

      What makes an Afghan want to become a Taliban? I believe the reasons are much the same as those that make an American want to become a Statist Politician, the desire for power. If we are going to redistribute America?s wealth it is better to be one of those doing the distributing than one who is having his wealth confiscated and redistributed. In Afghanistan, if the country is going to be ruled from gunpoint, it is better to be aiming the weapon than having it aimed at you.

      Obama figured out the poppy thing, huh? Yea, no one there noticed the problem, tried to change political policy or assist the Afghan Government in executing their own eradication effort. Which Commander was ?not? careful when it came to killing civilians? How familiar are you with GEN Petraeus? COIN tactics? Or the tactics of the terrorists? Would it be worth the price of losing months of trust and effort with the populace to risk collateral damage in an attempt to kill Osama bin Laden? Or Siraj Haqqani, Baitullah Mesuud, or Mullah Omar? How good is the intel, can you trust it? You and Nancy have the luxury of judging the quality of intel with hindsight (Bush Lied, blah, blah, blah). Try judging it on the spot, with American Troops in the line of fire, an interpreter telling you what is being said by the enemy as you listen to their radio transmissions, a pair of F15s telling you they can only remain on station for another 10 minutes and then your men are on their own? Don?t forget the terrorists? penchant for launching attacks from populated areas, using human shields or, (gasp!) lying about who was killed in an attack.

      “Afghanistan resembles a democracy only in Republican la-la land. It remains a tribal country ruled by warlords. The government doesn?t have any authority outside the capital.”

      Is the government in Afghanistan great? Hardly, is ours? Are their politicians corrupt? The majority damn sure are. Don’t forget, we are the ones teaching them how to build a democracy; their government is but a reflection of our own. A pale reflection at that, they don’t have Dingy Harry, Pelosi, Dodd, Kennedy, Kerry, Rangel… What we call a politician, by any other name (Warlord?) would smell as sweet.

      I attended a jirga (think townhall meeting) in Khost Province in 2007, nearly a thousand men and their families had travelled miles that could take days to traverse, to sit in a stifling hot tent with Arsala Jamal, the Governor of Khost, and other local politicians, and voice their opinions. Every jirga in every part of the country was greeted the same way, thousands of people risked traveling the IED strewn roads to gather in what makes a tempting target for the Taliban, so that they can take part in forming and advancing democracy and capitalism in their nation. How many Americans would ride a donkey down off a mountain and walk across hell?s half acre to attend a townhall meeting? Of those few, how many would suffer the trip only to beg for a handout or a job, or better benefits and pay from their unskilled, minimum wage job so they can make a career out of it without the investment of time and (God Forbid!) effort to improve their own circumstances?

      I witnessed citizens of Afghanistan driving AK-47 and RPG armed Taliban out of their villages with sticks and rocks because they were unwilling to surrender their new found liberty. Is every village willing to risk life and limb in such a fashion? Of course not, but a great many Americans today can?t find the intestinal fortitude to fight back while our Constitution is ignored and defiled, while our tax dollars and our children?s and grandchildren?s future earnings are stolen by the majority party and redistributed in the form of entitlements to their chosen supporters, aka victims?

      “The Iranian Revolution 2.0 is hardly the result of anything happening in Iraq, but is instead the product of 30 years of theocratic oppression, and a young demographic that wants to join the rest of the world.”

      While you allow your BDS to utterly deny the effect of two burgeoning democracies on Iran?s borders, I am not so narrow minded as to discount the effect of 30 years of tyranny, or the effects of technology, the internet, twitter, you-tube, etc. These undoubtedly play a huge part in the current situation in Iran. Look at the effect 5 months of increasing tyranny have had on American conservatives. You possess clarity I do not, your immeasurable font of experience springs forth from MSNBC, CBS, the NY Times? My clarity is muddied by memories of an old woman?s tear filled eyes and broken English as she thanked me for freeing her family from Saddam?s regime, the strong hand shakes of dozens of men able to provide for their families thanks to the jobs they had in the concrete plant that USAID money built, the smile on a child?s face as they put on the shoes and coat that we helped deliver after generous Americans donated them.

      “Bush set back American foreign policy by decades with his middle-school swagger and boasting.”

      History will weigh foreign policy as can we?

      “The Polish nation, speaking through Solidarity, has provided one of the brightest, bravest moments of modern history. The people of Poland are giving us an imperishable example of courage and devotion to the values of freedom in the face of relentless opposition. Left to themselves, the Polish people would enjoy a new birth of freedom. But there are those who oppose the idea of freedom, who are intolerant of national independence, and hostile to the European values of democracy and the rule of law.
      Two Decembers ago, freedom was lost in Afghanistan; this Christmas, it?s at stake in Poland. But the torch of liberty is hot. It warms those who hold it high. It burns those who try to extinguish it.? Reagan

      ?vs?

      ?It?s not productive given the history of U.S.-Iranian relations to be seen as meddling.? Obama

      Or?

      ?General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!? Reagan

      ?and?

      ??I think it?s important that, moving forward, whatever investigations take place are done in a way that is not resulting in bloodshed and is not resulting in people being stifled in expressing their views,? Obama

      Or?

      “…(O)ne thing that the world can count on is that we will not allow Israel to be crushed.” GW Bush

      ?and?

      ??I think that the democratic process, free speech, the ability of people to peacefully dissent ? all of those are universal values and need to be respected, and whenever I see violence perpetrated on people who are peacefully dissenting, and whenever the American people see that, I think they are rightfully troubled.? Obama

      Which way does your scale tip?

      • eburke

        and thank you for your selfless service to our nation.

      • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

        I would certainly love to read more of your experiences with the people of Afghanistan as they struggle to build a country out of centuries of rubble.

      • Achance

        recommended list. Turn it into a diary!

        My youngest spent awhile carrying a SAW in Afghanistan; his experience mirrors yours. He didn’t much like Afghanistan – what 20 year old American male would, but he like the Afghans he met and served with. Although, I’ll admit that when you here a 20 year-old American soldier who carries a machine gun say that he finds the Afghan Army scary, that’s a little scary.

      • mom2oneson
      • TNJim

        Diary stuff for sure. Great contrasts between what Obama says and the words of Reagan and Bush.

      • DONTREADONME

        I again post a comment pointing out that what Nessa wrote is good and deserves a diary entry. His story and Achances son’s are not uncommon from the troops returning back from Afghanistan.

      • George Claghorn

        This belongs at the top of the rec list where everyone can read it!

      • http://briansimpson.wordpress.com Brian Simpson
      • Mike gamecock DeVine
      • JDidSaint

        I would love to recommend this…

        I will keep an eye out for it in the diaries. Well stated.

      • http://www.evanweeks.com EvanWeeks

        No, that’s not the sound of a sniper rifle, though your comment (ought to be a damn diary!) is deadly accurate… it’s the sound of you hitting this one out of the friggin’ park.

        5!

    • 6eorge Jetson

      I just can’t see why that seems to be so difficult for you guys.

      • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

        getting “vetted” involves sex and a gear shift knob…

        • eburke
  • http://www.RedState.com/ETCartman Kenny Solomon

    Last time I looked, GWB wasn’t part of Teh Juice.

    Oh well, I guess we’re not really “the choesn ones” then, eh? ;)

    • mbecker908

      Only 10 “o”‘s in Jooooooooooos. All true believers know there are E.L.E.V.E.N. “o”‘s. You’re a big fat fraud Soloman.

      • http://www.RedState.com/ETCartman Kenny Solomon

        Plus my new glasses needed re-cutting on the right side lenses, so I’m using the old non-bifocals.

        So that definitely makes me one of those fake Jooooooooooos.

        See, ours go to eleven. ;)

        For my being bad, no NASCAR for me today.
        Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiight.

        God, I love this place. :)

        Cheers !

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
    • eburke

      What took ya so long?

      This is undoubtably the result of you attending your local synagogue rather than being enlightened along with Barry at the inclusive, tolerant and loving church of the most Reverend Jerry Wright.

  • JadedByPolitics

    I have said it since 2003 Iraq was a chess move in the War on Terror or if you like Islamic Fundamentalism. It was a GREAT move in the history of Warfare to surround Iran from Iraq and Afghanistan and President Bush’s hope that Democracy in the form it can be in the Middle East would take hold however he was beaten and abused by the idiot left in this country and who made it LONGER and BLOODIER….Reid, Pelosi and all those liberals who GAVE the President the RIGHT to go to WAR and told us in more STARK terms that WE NEEDED TO GO to then pulled the carpet out from under our President and our TROOPS which led to a LONGER AND BLOODIER WAR!

    The NY Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS and the idiots now in charge of our security were TRAITORS during the final 4 years of President Bush’s term and their complicity in only wanting to win back Congress and the WH while KILLING our soldiers forever CONDEMNS them to the annals of history of ONCE AGAIN being on the WRONG SIDE of it!

    In the future when a President sends our troops to War lets let them go in and CRUSH the opponent and stand behind THEM!

    • izoneguy

      I agree…. until America can CRUSH liberalism that won’t happen.

      • Mike gamecock DeVine

        Doctrine

        And even if we had had more troops thru Pakistan and more later, I think given our betrayal of Iraq in 1991 it was going to take

        TIME

        of staying the course to win over the people to get the intel to make a surge possible.

        Bush did that and we are winning in Iraq and throughout the region, his way. And given the low casualties, its hard to quibble with Bush’s way.

        • 6eorge Jetson

          Engage when you clearly have the numbers. Vote present otherwise.

          Works for a lone superpower General. And a rising politician unquestioned and adored by the MSM.

          Unfortunately, Presidents are subjected to real tests.

          • Mike gamecock DeVine

            be defeated quickly with numbers

      • Karina

        for me was the whole compassionate conservative thing. It just led to appeasment of the dems. He would not stand up and defend himself or his policies. We didn’t see enough of him but know we have waaay to much Obama and his portaprompter.

  • Max Venom

    I find it absurd listening to liberal pundits who are already proclaiming the uprise in Iran is a result of Obama’s Cairo speech, and that the administration is somehow being being slighted for non-recognition.

    Say what ??? (I know… sadly, it’s true)

    The truth is, Iranians have witnessed the POLITICAL changes in Iraq, changes that have ushered in a new wave of FREEDOM. And now, they want it. This is perhaps the most ignored news story of today. And I am insulted that the BHO-News Network would bypass it entirely, and instead attempt to credit Obamas Cairo speech.

    Iranians aren’t that stupid.

    Excellent article.

    • Mike gamecock DeVine
  • 6eorge Jetson

    No one took a stance, until freedom caught my eye
    Standin’ all alone lookin’ sad and shy
    We began to dance, swaying’ to and fro
    And soon I knew I’d never let freedom go

    Blame it on the Bush-a-nova with his magic spell
    Blame it on the Bush-a-nova that he did so well
    Oh, it all began with just one little stance
    But then it ended up a big romance
    Blame it on the Bush-a-nova
    The dance of freedom

    (Now was it the moon?)
    No, no, the Bush-a-nova
    (Or the stars above?)
    No, no, the Bush-a-nova
    (Now was it the tune?)
    Yeah, yeah, the Bush-a-nova
    (The dance of love)

    [Instrumental organ]

    Now I’m glad to say, Iraq is free
    And here gonna, raise a family
    And when our kids ask how it came about
    I’m gonna say to them without a doubt

    Blame it on the Bush-a-nova with his magic spell
    Blame it on the Bush-a-nova that he did so well
    Oh, it all began with just one little stance
    But then it ended up a big romance
    Blame it on the Bush-a-nova
    The dance of freedom

    (Now was it the moon?)
    No, no, the Bush-a-nova
    (Or the stars above?)
    No, no, the Bush-a-nova
    (Now was it the tune? )
    Yeah, yeah, the Bush-a-nova
    (The dance of freedom)

    [Fade]

    • DONTREADONME

      Nah, I am just kidding, individualaty is great huh. :)

      • 6eorge Jetson

        Deal w/ it ;)

        • DONTREADONME
  • http://BrentTeichman.wordpress.com Brent Teichman

    Finally, I can concur in the “blame Bush” mentality. Well said.

  • Joe_Cor

    Even so, his passivity in response to viscious mischaracterizations of his policies have gravely endangered the very progress you site in this diary. It takes more than making good decisions, it takes selling those decisions, and re-selling them–and re-selling them again, if needed– to the American people. To have just idly sat by and let his credibility be destroyed by the media and the Dems was inexcusable. And because he did this, we now have a dangerous radical in charge of our government, and a weak, timid Republican opposition, eviscerated by 8 years of “new tone,” to stand against him. Iraq’s ultimate success is in the hands of Barak Obama, of all people, because GWB didn’t want to offend the Democrats by defending his own positions. We have a man who is indifferent to the opportunities that exist in Iran at the moment because GBW made “new tone,” rather than the success of his own initiatives, as his top priority.

    I do blame all of that on GBW.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

      for all the good he did — he did great damage by not defending his policies. He was no Reagan — he could never articulate in a way that the people could really understand, all that his policies stood for.

      In following through unswervingly on what he believed was right, we was a good president. On allowing others to brand him for what he was not, he will be reviled.

    • ZootSuit

      I would add that I think that Bush went into Iraq too soon and when he did he did not go in with enough force — yes, I do see merits of Powell’s doctrine of “Overwhelming Force” and think it is a superior grand strategic and tactical modis and framework than Rumsfeld’s “Shock and Awe” doctrine — but I think you hit the nail on the head, Joe_Cor.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        will be on Mt Rushmore.

        • Joe_Cor

          With extreme good luck. Barak has to be competent enough, and engaged enough, to see Iraq and Afghanistan to happy conclusions. His indifference to the events in Iran has to not be damaging enough to prevent democracy from breaking out there.

          Even then, Bush has to hope that Obama completely drops the ball domestically and fails to radicalize American society. Otherwise, Bush won’t be up on Mt. Rushmore; the new face there will be of a man tilting his head thoughtfully to one side as he paternally gazes down on all of us. That will be the legacy Bush will have left the nation.

          So Bush’s legacy depends on a man who is competent enough to continue what he started in the Middle East, and who is incompetent enough to blow the opportunity he has to radically transform America domestically. Rather an eclectic combination of competencies and incompetencies, but maybe we’ll all luck out and that will come to pass.

          All this nail biting could have been averted if Bush had just had the common sense, or desire, or attentiveness, or maybe all three of those things, to articulate and defend his own policy against viscious and at times absurd attacks. Since he refused to do this, his legacy is very much in doubt. And “history” may not be as forgiving of him as so many of his supporters are for his refusing to do such an essential part of his job.

    • Martin Knight
  • gonzo55

    I think Reagan deserves a lot of the blame for Iran, too. He was just a confused old man, you know, who won the cold war and championed freedom across the globe.