« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Are Santorum and Paul fighting to be Romney’s VP?

I’ve thought about this for a while and until tonight was only thinking of Santorum. Santorum is not really a viable presidential candidate. He is a big government conservative which is not a major problem for electability (see GWB), and he is also too conservative socially to frighten many of the centrist voters away. I think he would lose to Obama in a landslide. But that’s all theory since he is running far behind Romney and Gingrich. However Santorum’s performance in the debates, and his ad campaigns against Newt Gingrich have made me believe that though outwardly it seems like he is fighting Newt for the same conservative voters and 2nd place, in reality he is trying to keep Newt from catching up to Romney. Sure, he also throws in powerful attacks on Romney, especially the debate attack on Romneycare, but in his mind that could be the reason why people would think him a good complement to Romney – someone who would keep Romney from going left if elected.

Is there an upside to Romney’s picking Santorum for VP? I think there are definitely better candidates. But Santorum does shore up the social and anti-Romneycare conservatives. Or so he might be hoping.

Moving on to Paul. Paul has defended Romney in very personal terms recently – did you see his defense of Romney’s not caring about the very poor?

“”I don’t believe for a minute that if Mitt Romney was sitting here, that if he released everything in his heart, he (would say): ‘You know what, the truth is, I really don’t care about poor people.’ That isn’t–I just don’t believe that,” Paul said in an interview on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight.”"

Ron Paul has also often been very lenient on Mitt Romney, and backing Mitt up in debates by attacking Newt Gingrich. That’s been fairly obvious and somewhat of a mystery, considering there isn’t that much difference in Mitt’s and Newt’s professed stances on various issues where they differ from Ron Paul. I know it is not that much to go on, but let’s see what Ron Paul can add to the Romney’s ticket. Well, Ron Paul is very popular with a significant segment on the independents, and even some democrats. Ron Paul is seen as a different kind of politician. He speaks his mind, he backs his views with his voting record, and he has very devoted followers. If he can bring a decent chunk of those voters with him, it will bump up Romney’s electability.

Now, I am a Romney supporter and I am also ethnically Jewish. Paul’s anti-Israel views and general foreign policy views offend me. Additionally, I think there is genuine concern over charges of racism in his past. That is why I never considered Paul as a Presidential candidate. However I could partly overlook those views if he was Romney’s VP, because let’s face it, VP slot is not really instrumental in setting policy, and there is no way Paul could ever influence Romney on Foreign Policy enough to significantly matter. Also of course Paul is older than the quite robust and healthy Mitt Romney, and there is not that much danger of him becoming president.

I think many republicans who could never consider voting for Ron Paul to be President, would not be turned away by him being on the ticket. Plus we would potentially gain a host of RINOs, independents and democrats in November. I think those things are on Paul’s and Mitt’s minds and makes the scenario at least a possibility in my mind.

So both Paul and Santorum are continuing in this race and trying to block any possibility of Newt gaining a majority, could be their plan to win Romney over to the possibility of them being on the ticket.

Your thoughts?

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • pacajka

    Rick Santorum definitely has a place in a possible Romney campaign and administration. He needs to be the Vice President, because he can reach the middle class conservative Republicans and rally the TEA Party behind the GOP ticket.
    If Ron Paul doesn’t retire from age alone, he should be part of the budget process at a high level. His strength is budgetary, because his foreign policy ideas are worrisome.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      Where does this myth come from?

      In 14 years in the House, he has NEVER submitted an alternative budget. He has done nothing substantive.
      He throws out trillion numbers, but does nothing to actually implement them.

      As for Santorum, he is runnig for President. Not VP.

  • mikeymike143

    no person with sanity is considering paul for anything but a trip to the nuthouse

    • Ender

      You like to kneejerk a lot I bet.

  • jimmyneutron

    as politics and power do corrupt.

    Sanatorum could certainly do a deal – he seems to hold similar progressive beliefs to Romney’s. We will see once this is over.

    As for Paul, I do not believe he would do that or that Romney would have him. I think Paul’s comments about Romney were truthful. He wasn’t trying to be overly nice. I had thought the same thing. No one in their right minds really believes that Romney doesn’t care about the poor. People in the real world know what Romney meant.

    Also, can we stop with the insults and personal attacks here? How about debating ideas instead of stooping to name calling and slander? No more Paulbots and Romenybots, etc?

    I disagree with Ron Paul on foreign policy but I also understand that there is no way a Republican president can get us into another war (unless we are clearly attacked) without being completely eaten alive by the Democrats. They showed what they would do with Bush. They let him walk into that war and then when it did not end right away they used it as a club to beat him and all Republicans for years. Right or wrong, this country is simply too divided right now. We need to fix ourselves before we worry about anyone else.

    Of course, if the next president or two do not work to perform the fundamental changes required to repair our system and economy it won’t matter what we think. Forget D-Day or even Iraq. Our foreign military adventures will be limited to the odd brigade here or there because we won’t be able to afford anything else.