« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A veteran, conservatism, and MN Senate

Most non-Minnesotans have a certain view of our political situation.  When Minnesota and politics come together in a conversation, the following names and phrases come to mind – Jesse Ventura, Al Franken, Mark Dayton, Paul Wellstone, and voted Democrat in presidential elections since 1972.  People forget that we also have had Rod Grams as Senator, numerous Republican governors, and currently have Michele Bachmann and Phil Kline for US Reps and a GOP dominated State House and Senate.  Although Minnesota trends left in many ways, it is not a slam dunk for the Democrats.

Amy Klobuchar(D, MN) is a first term Senator up for reelection in 2012.  No one knows much of anything about her and that is exactly the way she prefers it.  Her reputation is that of a super nice and friendly moderate Senator.  She maintains that reputation by avoiding the press and any comments on controversial issues.  The truth is that she is anything but a moderate.  She has voted consistently with the most liberal members of her party.  She has a lifetime rating of 7.2% from the ACU and a 2011 rating of 0%.  Her approval rating is around 60% in Minnesota, but when people are informed of her support for Obamacare, Cap and Trade, and other issues, it drops below 50%.  She may look unbeatable, but when the light is shone on her record, her vulnerabilities manifest.

The key to beating Amy Klobuchar is having the right candidate.  The media will not talk about her record, continuing to do puff pieces about the super nice Senator from Minnesota.  The right candidate needs to have a sizable warchest, charisma, and be someone the media cannot ignore.

There are three main candidates on the GOP side:

Kurt Bills is a favorite of the Ron Paul supporters.  He is a good speaker and has some interesting things to bring to the table, being a public school teacher and a union member who opposes the DFL.   Unfortunately he is a Ron Paul acolyte, and listening to his speeches, it seems he is part of the crowd that believes abolishing the Fed and moving to a gold standard will magically fix all that is wrong.  He is too much of a libertarian to bring the strongly social conservative MN GOP to his banner and can easily be painted as an extremist.

Dan “Doc” Severson is a good man.  A former legislator and MN SoS candidate, he is well known among the party.  Policy-wise he is solid, but he lacks the charisma and appeal to get the buzz generated.

Speaking from my experience as an Army Reserve Noncommissioned Officer, Pete Hegseth is the kind of Officer I would have been proud to have lead me and my troops into battle.

Pete Hegseth is the third candidate, and he is the best chance for picking up this seat.  He is a GWOT veteran and infantry officer, having served tours in Afghanistan, Iraq, and at Guantanamo Bay.  He is also a national figure.  As Executive Director of Vets for Freedom, he took an organization that was in the red and had few members to powerhouse status.  Throughout the 2007-2010 time-frame, VFF and Pete Hegseth dominated the airwaves as the alternative to Code Pink and the media bias against the GWOT.  Pete has done hundreds of interviews on CNN, MSNBC, and FOX.  He testified to congress opposing the nomination of Elena Kagan to the US Supreme Court.  His organization was instrumental in the election of 6 veterans to Congress in 2010, including conservative favorite Allen West.

Pete has the charisma to counteract Klobuchar’s likeability.  He has the courage to go after her about her record.  He has the debating skills to dice her arguments.  He is a solid three-legged stool conservative, who has committed  to staying on message about jobs and the economy throughout the election.  Most of all, he can make the media pay attention to the race and he can raise the money to be competitive.  Watch his new campaign commercial: Tough.  I think the part from about 1:00 to 1:10 says a lot.

Most importantly, and I cannot offer a higher endorsement: He is a Soldier, and I know he is a good one, even if I can’t put how I know that into words.  Speaking from my experience as an Army Reserve Noncommissioned Officer, he is the kind of Officer I would have been proud to have lead me and my troops into battle – and politics is really a different facet of the same battle for freedom that he and I both fought in the god-forsaken desert.  The weapons are different, but the stakes are just as high.

At this point in the contest, Pete’s biggest hurdle is name-recognition with the delegates to the state convention.  Many have heard of him but know little about him.  Look him up at peteforsenate.com .  If you like what you see, tell others about him, throw a little money his way, and if you are a delegate to the MN state convention I hope you can give him your support there.

If Pete Hegseth wins the nomination, Minnesota Senate goes from “not competitive” to “possible pick up” for the GOP.  Even better, Pete will be the kind of Senator to fill the ranks of Senators like Rubio and Demint.  We will never have to worry about him crossing the aisle to get a good op-ed written about him or to gain favor with the DC cocktail crowd.

Cross-posted at UnifiedPatriots.com

COMMENTS

  • conservativerock5

    Opposing the Federal Reserve and favoring the gold standard is not crazy. Monetary policy used to be one of the primary issues until the media shut down the conversation nearly a century ago. But one must understand that those reforms do not happen overnight.

    Libertarianism is good. I consider myself one. That doesn’t mean I go around smoking, or go to anti-war rallies, or entertain any conspiracy I happen to hear. My foreign policy views are not in line with many libertarians, however not all libertarians agree on that issue. For example the Randians are very hawkish in nature, in contrast to Paul’s strand. But I am a Constitutionalist first and libertarian second, and Bills is as well.

    I doubt Bills can be painted as extreme. He looks sharp and has the resume of a citizen legislator who still holds his day job as a teacher.

    With that said, your candidate Hegseth looks very good as well. I like how he talks about the enumerated powers on his issues page, as many people in both parties do not seem to recognize that the Constitution limits the government from restraining the people, NOT the other way around.

    Good diary.

    • Hooah_Mac

      I never said the Fed and gold standard stuff was crazy, but it is treated as a silver bullet by too many people. I had a long conversation with Bills, and I do not believe your assertion that he is a Constitutionalist first and a libertarian second. That said, he isn’t a bad guy, and I have a lot more in common with libertarians than Democrats. I just don’t believe he has or can build the broad appeal within the party he will need before considering picking up the independents and disaffected DFLers.

  • http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php kralizec

    I was fortunate to hear brief speeches by all the declared candidates for US Senate at my Republican district convention last month, all impressed me for different reasons.

    Bills has a passionate desire to get our fiscal and monetary houses in order.
    Severson is a solid candidate with experience and I think he could beat Klobuchar.

    Hegseth spoke very well and what impressed me the most about him was that despite his relative youth in comparison to the other candidates, he seemed perfectly at ease before crowds and one never got the impression he was remotely out of his depth. And it seemed more than just military-bred command presence, he genuinely appears to be more than comfortable in his own skin, is confident, can speak authoritatively and sincerely about the issues confronting our nation and in my opinion would be an excellent campaigner and give Klobuchar more than she can handle.

    This old squid salutes all the candidates and will gladly support any of them, but my support at this time is going to Pete Hegseth. Bottom line we must defeat Klobuchar, she is eminently vulnerable and capturing control of the U.S. Senate has never been more needed.