« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The opportunity of a country’s lifetime – missed by Barack Obama

The final round of the British Open was held on Sunday. Played at the Old Course in St. Andrews, Scotland, the tournament was won by a man from South Africa named Louis Oosthuizen. His given name is Lodewicus Theodorus Oosthuizen, but “Louis” will be on the Claret Jug, much to the relief of the engraver, I would imagine.

As he walked up the 18th fairway, with his drive on the green and an insurmountable lead, he smiled and put his arm around his friend and caddie, Zack Rasego. Rasego happens to be black. Oosthuizen mentioned in his interview after the tournament that he was thinking about Nelson Mandela as he walked toward victory – it also happened to be Mandela’s 92nd birthday – and I would guess that Zack was probably thinking the same thing. Imagine that – a white South African golfer, with a black caddie, mentioning Nelson Mandela in his victory speech in the championship of the former colonial power, the United Kingdom.

The scene made me wonder what made it possible – how could this happen, given South Africa’s well documented race issues? The answer, I believe, lies with the man who celebrated a birthday today. Held in prison for decades, brutalized but never bowed, Nelson Mandela went on to become the leader of the country which had at one time despised and imprisoned him. With every reason to be vindictive and petty, Mandela instead chose to be magnanimous. Instead of unleashing violence against whites, or turning a blind eye to it, he did his best to create an environment that could produce a scene like the one we saw today. There are legitimate criticisms of Mandela’s tendency toward Communism, the violence that plagues South Africa to this day and the continued imperfection of race relations there. I doubt, however, that Mandela can legitimately be criticized for fanning the flames of racial hatred or intentionally being divisive.

“I detest racialism, because I regard it as a barbaric thing, whether it comes from a black man or a white man.”

“If there are dreams about a beautiful South Africa, there are also roads that lead to their goal. Two of these roads could be named Goodness and Forgiveness.”

Nelson Mandela

Another country comes to mind when the issue of race relations is mentioned, and that is the United States. The first black leader of this country is Barack Obama, elected in a near-landslide, with support not only from blacks but also from whites. A man who enjoyed over 60% approval when inaugurated and a leader who promised change and a new direction for this country. A man who could, once and for all, turn the tide of race relations in this country forever.

What an opportunity. What an opportunity missed.

Instead of using this chance to be President of all people, Barack Obama has instead not missed an opportunity to be petty and divisive. He could have challenged us all to be better than we would have been before – to put away centuries old grievances and attitudes and work together for the good of a country which is still the beacon of freedom to the world. Instead, attempting to put himself as above the fray, he has allowed reasonable people who disagree with his policies to be called racists-and worse- by those closest to him. Instead of taking charge and asking for support, he has spent the majority of his time blaming his predecessors and whining about what he inherited. Instead of facing our racial issues head-on, he has taken the “coward’s” way out (h/t Eric Holder), and refused to take the African American community to task about the rampant crime, addiction and broken families that are so prevalent there. And worst of all, he has allowed a situation in Philadelphia that strikes at the very core of our representative republic to be swept under the rug, apparently because the perpetrators are black.

He is the only President who could have made a difference in the ways that we so badly need a difference to be made. He has chosen not to.

He has used the power of the federal government to reward blue states and penalize red states. He has declared war on business – the insurance industry, the oil industry, Wall Street, banks and anyone who dares make a profit – with more that could be named, and more surely to come. He is taking a state to court – fellow Americans – for daring to write a law which exactly mirrors a federal law, then refuses to enforce the federal law to further inflame the situation. He uses crisis when it occurs, and creates crisis where none exist.

In short, he is not the leader of a country. He has chosen another path. He is the leader of a group of narrow special interests, bound together only by selfishness and a desire to extort as much as possible from groups which they deem undesirable, oppressive or historically advantaged.

He desires to split this nation apart, like a jeweler would split a large, beautiful diamond into little chips for trinkets. He divides us, with his words, with his policies and by proxy.

What an opportunity missed. Forever.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog/loren_heal Socrates

    Given who he is, there is no other path for him.

    You watch. When the Republicans take the House, and have a filibustering minoity in the Senate, he will continue to pursue the same policies he is now. If his tactics change, they will do so only slightly, and be even less effective.

    • Jack_Savage

      And I believe he could have been anything he wanted to be. He called himself a “blank slate”, but he chose – and is choosing – to be the aggrieved black man, even though not a drop of slave blood runs through his body. His church, his work with ACORN and other community groups and his well-documented friends on the left were all part of a carefully cultivated persona. He picked it. He needed to be authentic, and went as far as he could go.

      Now that he has become who he is, there is no other choice. You are exactly right – after the elections this November there will be no compromise or realpolitik, only more bitterness and aggression and division. Instead of improving race relations, his election will set things back decades.

      • penguin2

        First let me apologize, my Reco disappeared. Apparently doing this in the middle of the night, I double clicked or something. I am sorry.
        About Obama:
        Unless he has an epiphany and turns his inner being inside out, he cannot but help be himself. A man who has nothing in common with the American people, nothing in common with the issues of their daily lives, the man who can party and waste like no average American would consider in the face of the dire economic situation in this country, a man who is intent with his Leftist cohorts, to bring down America as we know it.

        Everything we see, is his character and core personality, and he couldn’t have done anything differently. IOW, he was and is not capable of taking advantage of the opportunity. I think that is what is so difficult for the majority of Americans to understand. He is nothing more than an angry, “I’m entitled, I’ve been anointed, I’m king of the world.” personality. He sees himself as a ruler, with aspirations for dictator; it remains for us to keep that from happening. His wife, as First Lady, fits the same mold, the idea of entitlement and wanting to be royalty.

        As far as race, I think Obama doesn’t identify with the average African-American in this country. They will vote for him because they do not see his disdain or contempt, but it is there. To him, black & white, we are nothing more than peons to be controlled, used and discarded, when no longer useful.

        As your post brings out, therein lies the true tragedy for the nation.

        • Jack_Savage

          It is both outrageous and sad to have a President who simply doesn’t have anything in common with anyone – he is a mile wide and an inch deep. He’s angry because he’s been told from the beginning he’s supposed to be angry, without having any experiences that would justify anger. Ironically, the truth is that he has been pampered all his life and been allowed to enter institutions and been promoted to positions that are far, far above his head because of his race, not in spite of it.

          To those of us who have seen firsthand an affirmative action employee, the way things are playing out with this President is depressingly familiar. A minority who talks a good game is hired, when their incompetence quickly becomes evident the employer attempts to take corrective measures, the race card is played and the situation stays the same until the employee leaves or dies.

          Thank goodness we have recourse for the poor choice this country made in 2008. I hope it is not too late.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
          • Jack_Savage

            ; )

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • renny

    If the 2008 election was a reaction to eight years of Bush and mostly Republicans, it was not the overwhelming embrace of the Democratic/progressive agenda the MSM and the political party have promoted.

    o got 52% if the vote; Bush in 2004 got 51%, and no media maven thought that latter was a national endorsement.

    McCain took 85% of the counties in the US, but he didn’t carry a city, leaving ACORN, Rock the Vote, People’s Workers Party, and other lefty corruptions free reign where few Reps. tread.

    The Dems. did win the House with supermajority numbera, but the Senate would be much closer had Arlen Specter not changed his stripes (again) and Franken not won (prob. illegally) in MN.

    And despite, all this Dem. power wherever anyone looks in DC, neither the party nor the president has had an easy time proposing or passing much of anything. Almost every bill is a cliff hanger with the Dems. trying desperately to pick off a stray Rep. one way or the other in order to impose their “mandated” election.

    Had o and cronies chosen a more moderate approach to nearly everything, more bills would have sailed through the capital’s legistures and maybe been more warmly embraced by the electorate. As it is, Obamanationcare, the finance act, the coming energy abomination, and possible card check have been bitterly opposed and hated. A good rousing point for conservaties, but not necessarily good for the nation as a whole, as repealing or rescinding signed laws is a hard row to how.

    • Jack_Savage

      …he would have been defeated.

      Everyone who voted for Obama thought he had the opportunity and desire to be a transformational figure in US history. His rhetoric and campaign themes as much as guaranteed this. Instead, he has proven himself to be a bitter ideologue, ramming every liberal dream down our throats as quickly as he can before his power slips away.

      • izoneguy

        Wow, I can see the TV spots now…..

        Obama Accuses GOP of “Lack of Faith in the American People”

        http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20010906-503544.html

        Heh…..

        IG report says Obama GM, Chrysler moves needlessly accelerated job losses

        Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/IG-report-says-Obama-GM-Chrysler-moves-needlessly-accelerated-job-losses-98709459.html#ixzz0u9JGRzeL

        TARP audit claims Obama admin destroyed ?tens of thousands? of jobs in dealer closures.

        http://www.sigtarp.gov/reports/audit/2010/Factors%20Affecting%20the%20Decisions%20of%20General%20Motors%20and%20Chrysler%20to%20Reduce%20Their%20Dealership%20Networks%207_19_2010.pdf