« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The public option, the player is also the referee

I was listening to of all things (MSNBC’s The Ed Show), and I could only listen to it for a total of 3.5 seconds when this idiot started talking about a public option that does not have a policy say would be more palateable. Which got me thinking about my football days.

I played football for a Division 1-AA football team (AKA the Football Championship Subdivision, the one not many people don’t pay attention to), and if I could have been in the position where I could have refereed, and been a player, my penalty yards would have been greatly reduced, (I was an offensive lineman, and we always hold, it’s just a matter of getting caught), and I could have pretty much been an All-American.  But alas, in the game of football the referee, for the most part is neutral and calls the game both ways and here I am a lowly computer tech doing the working man thing.

This is analogous to the “public option”.  From what I can see this “option” is going to “compete” with private insurance companies. How is that going to work effectively, when the “public option” will have an unlimited capital pool from which to draw from then any other insurance company, so it would be fine for them to take about 5 years of solid losses, covering everything that the referee (federal govt, the owner of the public option), makes every other insurance company cover, so right there the insurance company, plays against a stacked deck, until they fold, then the “public option” becomes the only player in the game then we are in a “single payer”system.  Then somebody is going to find out that the first 5 years is not sustainable, and then we get the rationing and “economic decisions” of who gets treated or not.

Another thing about this deal is what happens if the private company’s (I know probably a long shot but hear me out), still have the ability to out perform the “public option” by maybe advertising that they can deliver services better than the “public option”, and then doing so.  Is the referee, still going to call the game down the middle, and let the “”public option” die.  No, they are going to change the rules so that the private insurance companies cannot market against the public option, therefore tilting the deck once again in their favor.

This whole healthcare thing as the Democrats are pushing is a raw deal for America as a whole, but for a country that thrived on competition and innovation, these proposals are going to kill it, and we will be under a “single payer” system, and personally, I don’t like my survival chances in that environment.

COMMENTS

  • Joe Rivers

    We all know the term, we’ve all seen it at some level. Anybody who thinks this system will work to the benefit of the consumer is an idiot.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    App State, Furman and now Samford as my brother lives in B-ham. Also like Colonial with William & Mary and Richmond. Jerry Richardson, owner of the Carolina Panthers and former WR with Unitas and the Colts, was a little-all american at Wofford when they finished #2 in the nation in NAIA.

    great column too btw

  • Achance

    You’ve drank so much of Comrade Obama’s KoolAid that you must be typing from the bathroom.

  • SteveLA

    stephhunter

    So that there non profit health care management thingie, you want the US Post Office to run that or what? The folks that run the DMV out here in CA could be hired as consultants.

  • Leopard1996

    Myself, if my insurance company decides to deny something, I call Mr. or Ms. lawyer, and sue their ass off, as well as Media, if I report to the media that insurance company X are scumbags for x or y then that company gets enough black eyes and no one does business with them. Under the great public option your boy is talking about I have no option if after a few years and I have my job, that my job deems my insurance too expensive, therefore putting me on the govenment plan, and then the government plan turns around and deems me too expensive to keep my treatments up to manage my condition. I have zero recourse.

    You don’t understand, that this is not about insuring people, this is about controlling people. If you control the health care, you can link any other policy to it.

  • Xasteius

    BTW, stephhunter, how’s Holder doing?

  • Achance

    but it didn’t make me an idiot. Made me think I was a fool for doing it sometimes though.

  • stephhunter

    Who’s watching the game now? Now there are no referees as the private insurance companies are doing whatever they want and abusing the American people they are supposed to be serving. Sure the public option isn’t the magic pill or anything, but it will bring some real competition. If it’s run on a structure of a non-profit then it could run in the black and be a real benefit to the country.
    One non-profit health management company is already doing this while serving nearly one million people. This could be expanded nationally! htt://cli.gs/z3AtaY/

  • Xasteius
  • Leopard1996

    Hence my screen name. Won two rings while I was there, one that I was actually a part of.

  • Leopard1996

    The government should be throwing the flags, but not be a participant in the game. The gov should have the ability to make rules within reason (stopping the state insurance commissions from running their own fiefdoms, and allow interstate competition so that if you are nice and healthy, you can get a bare minimum plan without coverages for things you don’t need, instead of the insurance commission stating every insurance policy in the state needs to cover things such as pregnacy if you are a single 25 year old male.).

    And I am sure that these state insurance commissions are just the model of government
    honesty and there are no kickbacks going on between the commission and the insurance companies that are in a given state. /Sarc